'Fox News Sunday' to Host Kentucky Senate Debate

"Fox News Sunday" is heading to Louisville, Ky. Jack Conway, Kentucky's attorney general and the Democratic candidate for Senate , and Rand Paul, the Republican nominee and son of Representative Ron Paul, Republican of Texas, have agreed to a live debate on "Fox News Sunday" on Oct.3 at 9 a.m. (Eastern time).

Full Story
Constitution Party

Sun Valley, NV

#82637 Feb 25, 2013
Rick Perry will lose to Bill White in 2014!
dems are retards

Lansing, MI

#82638 Feb 25, 2013
wtf wrote:
<quoted text>Yes....they blow them.
Lmfao
I had no idea you were a Texan, I just thought you lived in a holler surrounded by chickens,
Linktv org

Sayville, NY

#82639 Feb 25, 2013
Trinite wrote:
<quoted text>
WASHINGTON, Dec. 21 /PRNewswire-USNewswire/-- Full Disclosure Network® presents a six minute video news report at the URL: http://www.fulldisclosure.net/Blogs/83.php in the ongoing cable TV series entitled "Judicial Benefits & Court Corruption". On December 16, 2009 a Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals three judge panel issued an "unpublished" decision in the contempt of court case involving jailed Anti-Trust Attorney Richard I. Fine. When Fine learned the opinion was designated as "unpublished" and "not be used as precedent" he described the three Judge panel's opinion (Reinhardt, Trott, Wardlaw) as having "succumbed to the cancer of corruption and the criminals in judicial robes."
http://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/ninth...
Court Insider Exposes Judicial Treachery #630-632
As a former long-time newsman and writer for the Los Angeles Times for 25 years, Allan Parachini served for eight years as the Public Information Officer for the Los Angeles Superior Court. He was there during the incredible persecution of Dr. Richard Fine, who served eighteen months in solitary coercive confinement. In this preview of parts one and two of this three-part interview, he explains why the judges did everything they could to destroy Dr. Fine.
http://www.fulldisclosure.net/2012/11/court-i...
No other future Supreme Court or any court is allowed to use Bush v Gore as precedent. Bush is truly an illegitimate President. http://tinyurl.com/2ps3e3
George W. Bush's January 20, 2001 inauguration was unconstitutional. This isn't because Bush lost the popular vote. Nor is it because he lost Florida and thus the electoral vote. The U.S. Supreme Court's decision to hear the Florida recount lawsuit, Bush v. Gore, violated the U.S. Constitution. It's a states' rights issue. Elections fall under state law; the highest court that may resolve a legal challenge about an election is a state supreme court. The U.S. Supreme Court--a federal body--didn't have jurisdiction in the case.
http://yalelawjournal.org/2006/11/07/flanders...

Has Bush v. Gore Become the Case That Must Not Be Named?
August 15, 2006 / http://tinyurl.com/qbx2s
At a law school Supreme Court conference that I attended last fall, there was a panel on “The Rehnquist Court.” No one mentioned Bush v. Gore, the most historic case of William Rehnquist’s time as chief justice, and during the Q. and A. no one asked about it. When I asked a prominent law professor about this strange omission, he told me he had been invited to participate in another Rehnquist retrospective, and was told in advance that Bush v. Gore would not be discussed.

The ruling that stopped the Florida recount and handed the presidency to George W. Bush is disappearing down the legal world’s version of the memory hole, the slot where, in George Orwell’s “1984,” government workers disposed of politically inconvenient records. The Supreme Court has not cited it once since it was decided, and when Justice Antonin Scalia, who loves to hold forth on court precedents, was asked about it at a forum earlier this year, he snapped,“Come on, get over it.”
There is a legal argument for pushing Bush v. Gore aside. The majority opinion announced that the ruling was “limited to the present circumstances” and could not be cited as precedent. But many legal scholars insisted at the time that this assertion was itself dictum — the part of a legal opinion that is nonbinding — and illegitimate, because under the doctrine of stare decisis, courts cannot make rulings whose reasoning applies only to a single case.
http://www.nytimes.com/2006/08/15/opinion/15t...
Ron Paul 2016

Sun Valley, NV

#82640 Feb 25, 2013
Paultards and Paulbots voting for Rand Paul in 2016 are all sell outs!
dems are retards

Lansing, MI

#82641 Feb 25, 2013
wtf wrote:
<quoted text>Yeah, the Military is going to be cut from 698 Billion to 653 Billion....now that is to the core.
You ignorant retard pos.
Lmfao
45 billion $ in military cuts is not excessive? I guess the 1.4 billion $ that the oblamers spend to subsidize their social life isn't much either, heres the funny thing about it libotard, you can't even count that high, baaaaaaaaaaa
dems are retards

Lansing, MI

#82642 Feb 25, 2013
Linktv org wrote:
<quoted text>
No other future Supreme Court or any court is allowed to use Bush v Gore as precedent. Bush is truly an illegitimate President. http://tinyurl.com/2ps3e3
George W. Bush's January 20, 2001 inauguration was unconstitutional. This isn't because Bush lost the popular vote. Nor is it because he lost Florida and thus the electoral vote. The U.S. Supreme Court's decision to hear the Florida recount lawsuit, Bush v. Gore, violated the U.S. Constitution. It's a states' rights issue. Elections fall under state law; the highest court that may resolve a legal challenge about an election is a state supreme court. The U.S. Supreme Court--a federal body--didn't have jurisdiction in the case.
http://yalelawjournal.org/2006/11/07/flanders...
Has Bush v. Gore Become the Case That Must Not Be Named?
August 15, 2006 / http://tinyurl.com/qbx2s
At a law school Supreme Court conference that I attended last fall, there was a panel on “The Rehnquist Court.” No one mentioned Bush v. Gore, the most historic case of William Rehnquist’s time as chief justice, and during the Q. and A. no one asked about it. When I asked a prominent law professor about this strange omission, he told me he had been invited to participate in another Rehnquist retrospective, and was told in advance that Bush v. Gore would not be discussed.
The ruling that stopped the Florida recount and handed the presidency to George W. Bush is disappearing down the legal world’s version of the memory hole, the slot where, in George Orwell’s “1984,” government workers disposed of politically inconvenient records. The Supreme Court has not cited it once since it was decided, and when Justice Antonin Scalia, who loves to hold forth on court precedents, was asked about it at a forum earlier this year, he snapped,“Come on, get over it.”
There is a legal argument for pushing Bush v. Gore aside. The majority opinion announced that the ruling was “limited to the present circumstances” and could not be cited as precedent. But many legal scholars insisted at the time that this assertion was itself dictum — the part of a legal opinion that is nonbinding — and illegitimate, because under the doctrine of stare decisis, courts cannot make rulings whose reasoning applies only to a single case.
http://www.nytimes.com/2006/08/15/opinion/15t...
Unconstitutional? LOLOL, it was the supreme court that ruled it constitutional libotard, baaaaaaaaaaa
dems are retards

Lansing, MI

#82643 Feb 25, 2013
wow, is this priceless or what, libotards want marijuana legalized, then they destroy the business by taxing the dealers with insane taxes, ROTFL, LOLOL,

they have really outdone themsevles this time, we already knew they destroy everything they touch, now they now destroy the very things that destory everything else, is this liberal implosion or what? how much more can libotards take of their own progressive thinking, BAAAAAAAAAAAA

Marijuana dealers get slammed by taxes

http://money.cnn.com/2013/02/25/smallbusiness...
jtf

Cynthiana, KY

#82644 Feb 25, 2013
so you democrat supporters,still think dems support the constitution.coal? my ass. the democratic party is just a step above the communist party.
whitehair

Eminence, KY

#82645 Feb 25, 2013
Don`t worry about it,they just increase prices til the poor can not afford whatever ,anymore.Haven`t you noticed your income is smaller?

Instead of the poor moving up to middle class,here we move the middle class down to the poor.

Obama`s rule.
Reality

Frankfort, KY

#82646 Feb 25, 2013
Worse wrote:
<quoted text>
Abortion? Still legal
What if your mother had aborted you?

You would not be on this earth.
You would not be on this thread.
You could not argue, er I mean debate the lies you believe in.
You could not be a liberal.
you would not be free to spew nonsense.

What if.......
Reality

Frankfort, KY

#82647 Feb 25, 2013
Constitution Party wrote:
<quoted text>
Another Zionist Rand Paul Supporter!
Yea, Rand Paul AS President 2016
Reality

Frankfort, KY

#82648 Feb 25, 2013
Constitution Party wrote:
<quoted text>
Another Zionist Rand Paul Supporter!
Rand Paul, he's our man. Go Rand Paul.
Ron Paul 2016

Sun Valley, NV

#82649 Feb 25, 2013
Go Ron Paul!

F*ck Rand Paul!
Reality

Frankfort, KY

#82650 Feb 25, 2013
Uncle Tab wrote:
Republican Teabaggers here as usual all weekend all night.
You poor lonely people.
If the Internet ever goes down or your headchecks stop.... You poor sad folks will have a mass suicide.
Just think, if the satelite, local or cable TV goes out, what will you do without Andy Griffin to put a "smile" on your face?
Reality

Frankfort, KY

#82651 Feb 25, 2013
dems are retards wrote:
<quoted text>
LOLOL, 28% of the eligible voters in this country elected oblamer, and that makes the rest of us a minority? LOLOL, only with libotard math,
baaaaaaa
.......and the 28% voted twice, so it really is only 14%.

The 14% need to be ship to a socialist country along with most of our elected officials--both parties on the basis of treason.
Reality

Frankfort, KY

#82652 Feb 25, 2013
If Obama were any more Obvious....

Even worshipping Germans turned a BLIND EYE to Hitler's evils too.
Reality

Frankfort, KY

#82653 Feb 25, 2013
"Sequestration"

A fancy word for holding hostage America's military in order to pressure Republicans to agree to yet another tax hike.
dems are retards

Lansing, MI

#82654 Feb 25, 2013
Reality wrote:
<quoted text>
.......and the 28% voted twice, so it really is only 14%.
The 14% need to be ship to a socialist country along with most of our elected officials--both parties on the basis of treason.
they decided it was too far to go to a socialist country so they made one here,
Reality

Frankfort, KY

#82655 Feb 25, 2013
Dang, while I was focused on the attack on the second Amendment, I almost forgot about the crippling unemployment rate, the 16 trillion dollar debt, the Fast and Furrious scandal, the Benghazi cover-up and the Obamacare.
Reality

Frankfort, KY

#82656 Feb 25, 2013
If gun restrictions work..........

Explain Chicago.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Guthrie Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Who do you support for U.S. House in Kentucky (... (Oct '10) 2 hr The RECKONING 499
amish on bicycles 5 hr tractors 4
Dino, who knows this guy? 8 hr lum peabody 3
who the triple h is floyd kay????? 12 hr porkchop 1
Teen jobs Tue Need job 1
Chris Wilson Tue Just wondering 7
Meth Head Mon Tree 3
Guthrie Dating
Find my Match

Guthrie Jobs

Guthrie People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

Guthrie News, Events & Info

Click for news, events and info in Guthrie

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]