US school shooting revives gun debate

[downhill246]

barefoot2626 wrote:

<quoted text>
I am trying to keep up with your BJ's, donglicker... I don't have the energy you have, I guess...
Funny how you skipped over Au Dumbo who has twice as many posts as me, though... when you take in his other aliases....

How did you know I was good at Black Jack? Remember, it isn't the lack of energy making you a lousy Black Jack player ,it is the lack of functioning brain cells. Statistics show that the seven you have are not even sufficient to play Solitaire, flamer.

[barefoot2626]

downhill246 wrote:

<quoted text>
No it doesn't because you can not prove you weren't posting before you registered.

So you say with your 150,000 posts.

You cannot disprove it, Donglicker and whatever else we know about you and your multple aliases: they share their dishonesty.

[barefoot2626]

downhill246 wrote:

<quoted text>
How did you know I was good at Black Jack?

I don't know what color Jack was, I was talking about the going down downhill246 head bob.

Oh, I see the little light over your stall is on again, I'll let you go.

[barefoot2626]

downhill246 wrote:

<quoted text>
Obama Neither Pays nor Treats Women at the White House Equally

Funny how the tea baggers scream bloody murder when Obama puts women up for cabinet positions and when Obama puts someone else up, they scream he should have put up a woman.

[barefoot2626]

downhill246 wrote:

<quoted text>
Obama Neither Pays nor Treats Women at the White House Equally

PS: flagged for off-topic spam.

[sickofit]

downhill246 wrote:

<quoted text>
Why would you find concern over the killing of the unborn, funny? Now, you could make an argument for funny with a guy that wants to marry someone that looks kind of like himself.

I find it funny how you religous nazi fascist scream for government to get out of your life...BUT YOU SURE WANT TO BE IN OTHER PEOPLES LIVES DONT YOU HITLER?????????

[CatholicPatriot]

http://www.topix.com/forum/us/TGQ8CSD0S5SLVSR...

[sickofit]

downhill246 wrote:

<quoted text>
I don't think we want you with a nuke. You get angry too easily.

So you want limits on the second amendment??

[The Troll Doll]

barefoot2626 wrote:

<quoted text>
Funny how the tea baggers scream bloody murder when Obama puts women up for cabinet positions and when Obama puts someone else up, they scream he should have put up a woman.

Ummmm, this is a gun debate. You're off topic too.

[just another guy]

Cathouse Mouse wrote:

<quoted text>
If new laws passed by the Federal Governemnt state you cannot own or possess an AR-15, it means just that.

If a new law is passed by the federal government that says you cannot own or posses an AR15, that means every politician that voted for it has declared themselves an enemy of the people.

[The Troll Doll]

just another guy wrote:

<quoted text>
If a new law is passed by the federal government that says you cannot own or posses an AR15, that means every politician that voted for it has declared themselves an enemy of the people.

Since over 70% of the US supports the second amendment that would mean those politicians would be looking for a new job after the next election.

[SATAN_64]

The Troll Doll wrote:

<quoted text>
Since over 70% of the US supports the second amendment that would mean those politicians would be looking for a new job after the next election.

And dodging bullets, Lol!

[The Troll Doll]

SATAN_64 wrote:

<quoted text>And dodging bullets, Lol!

Something to think about.
Personally I think shooting back is safer than dodging. I wonder how many of these congressmen have weapons themselves but just don't want the rest of us to have them.

[Cathouse Mouse]

The Troll Doll wrote:

<quoted text>
Since over 70% of the US supports the second amendment that would mean those politicians would be looking for a new job after the next election.

70%? That's all? That seems low to me. I'd thought it would be in the upper 80s or lower 90s.

Tell me this,... what % of the US supports bans on assault rifles?

[SATAN_64]

Cathouse Mouse wrote:

<quoted text>
70%? That's all? That seems low to me. I'd thought it would be in the upper 80s or lower 90s.
Tell me this,... what % of the US supports bans on assault rifles?

Only forty eight percent of Democrats would support a ban on imitation assault weapons. The other fifty two percent know which side their bread is buttered on.

Drop it Mouse, they ain`t NEVER gonna be a ban on guns, the day its attempted, we will be in a civil war, and many of the military have stated, they will refuse an order to fire on the people they are suppose to protect.

[The Troll Doll]

Cathouse Mouse wrote:

<quoted text>
70%? That's all? That seems low to me. I'd thought it would be in the upper 80s or lower 90s.
Tell me this,... what % of the US supports bans on assault rifles?

Define assault rifles.........
Most people have no clue what an assault rifle is. Do you?

[Brad]

SATAN_64 wrote:

<quoted text>Only forty eight percent of Democrats would support a ban on imitation assault weapons. The other fifty two percent know which side their bread is buttered on.
Drop it Mouse, they ain`t NEVER gonna be a ban on guns, the day its attempted, we will be in a civil war, and many of the military have stated, they will refuse an order to fire on the people they are suppose to protect.

Thats why Oblamer wants an armed Civilian national security force.
Every dictator should have one.

[Le Jimbo]

conservative crapola wrote:

<quoted text>
People like you who want to interpret and distort the Constitution to suit your fetishes are the attackers.
lejimfraud cry-a-thon: Day 63.

If you could only prove it tinkerbell. You haven't, you won't and you never will. Come see me, we'll play grape.

[Le Jimbo]

Cathouse Mouse wrote:

<quoted text>
70%? That's all? That seems low to me. I'd thought it would be in the upper 80s or lower 90s.
Tell me this,... what % of the US supports bans on assault rifles?

Assult rifles are against the law unless you have a federal firearms license. There just isn't that many tinkerbell. Trying to change definitions is the favorite ploy to control debate for liberals.

[Le Jimbo]

just another guy wrote:

<quoted text>
If a new law is passed by the federal government that says you cannot own or posses an AR15, that means every politician that voted for it has declared themselves an enemy of the people.

Most have already broken their oath of office, they would just make it for us with them exempted as with everything else.