'Fox News Sunday' to Host Kentucky Senate Debate

"Fox News Sunday" is heading to Louisville, Ky. Jack Conway, Kentucky's attorney general and the Democratic candidate for Senate , and Rand Paul, the Republican nominee and son of Representative Ron Paul, Republican of Texas, have agreed to a live debate on "Fox News Sunday" on Oct.3 at 9 a.m. (Eastern time).

Read more
General Robert E Lee

Johnson City, TN

#119678 Aug 28, 2013
RepubliCONS wrote:
<quoted text>
AGAIN FO )8~D> batshit crazy loon
RIP RACIST BIGOTED TEABAGGING GOP
DITCH THE WITCH
&
DITCH MITCH
American Lady was here a long time befor you arrived, and she will be here long after you and crow(thats eating crow) are gone! God bless AL, and to hell with you, you sorry ass bitch!

Since: Jun 12

Location hidden

#119679 Aug 28, 2013
RepubliCONS wrote:
<quoted text>
It is absurd for sure. One of the reasons people shy away from most of them. Getting too poltical. Lost that concept of teaching people to be Christ like and save souls. Hard to find a good one with old fashion Bible teachings and all that Love Thy Neighbor concept. I believe they will be judged harshly by the ONE who is suppose to judge us. Glad it wasn't that way when I was growing up. Too political and judgmental for me. If Jesus came back today I bet HE would shake his head in disgust at those teabagging repukes who forgot his teachings. You know He'd be a DEMOCRAT. lol
RIP GOP
DITCH MITCH
It def wasn't that way when I was growing up. So to me it's just plain ludicrous.. and you're right, there is no way Jesus would be a stingy conservative.

Since: Feb 13

Location hidden

#119687 Aug 28, 2013
General Robert E Lee wrote:
<quoted text>
So… you are bragging about your hero and quoting the stock market? What part does Obozo play in the stock market? And you are bragging about a bunch of very rich people getting richer? Are you bone stupid?
The rise and fall of the stock market has always been looked upon as an indicator of employment and sales. In 2008 when the market lost 60% of it's value in two days it was a sign of things to come. Are you bone stupid?
rwb

Van Wert, OH

#119688 Aug 28, 2013
Injudgement wrote:
<quoted text>The rise and fall of the stock market has always been looked upon as an indicator of employment and sales. In 2008 when the market lost 60% of it's value in two days it was a sign of things to come. Are you bone stupid?
Why is it that the Stock Market normally does better under a Democrat President? http://www.foxbusiness.com/investing/2012/09/...
Acre

Campbellsville, KY

#119691 Aug 28, 2013
rwb wrote:
<quoted text>
Why is it that the Stock Market normally does better under a Democrat President? http://www.foxbusiness.com/investing/2012/09/...
I can tell u why, democrat admins. Always due to tax and spend policy's artificially stimulate the economy and cause investors to do well . Problem is those people who get taxed more and by printing more money doesn't actually help the common man. But then that not the intention of the dems anyway is it?

Since: Dec 11

.

#119692 Aug 28, 2013
ILoveitHere wrote:
<quoted text>
It def wasn't that way when I was growing up. So to me it's just plain ludicrous.. and you're right, there is no way Jesus would be a stingy conservative.
You all have it so ass backwards.
Lets take your chameleon friend AKA Hot C (Calvin_Coolish); He is
1. Atheist
2. Hate filled
3. Vulgar
4. Belligerent
5. Liberal/Progressive/Democrat

Would he fit right in with the "Jesus crowd"?
The "stingy Conservatives" keep people fed with food pantries, Christian Ministries, Catholic charities where people donate clothes food and cash to help pay utility bills, etc!
I don't see any "Atheist Food pantries" can you point one out?
Maybe Toys from Atheist programs?

Since: Dec 11

.

#119694 Aug 28, 2013
rwb wrote:
<quoted text>
Why is it that the Stock Market normally does better under a Democrat President? http://www.foxbusiness.com/investing/2012/09/...
If that were true...wouldn't shoot down the "Republicans are for the RICH" myth that Dimocrats keep using in political debates?

Since: Feb 13

Location hidden

#119695 Aug 28, 2013
Acre wrote:
<quoted text> I can tell u why, democrat admins. Always due to tax and spend policy's artificially stimulate the economy and cause investors to do well . Problem is those people who get taxed more and by printing more money doesn't actually help the common man. But then that not the intention of the dems anyway is it?
Senate Republicans held ranks on Monday and blocked a Democratic effort to overhaul the financial system and crack down on Wall Street.
In a 57-41 vote, Democrats fell short of the 60 votes necessary to proceed to the Wall Street bill.

Read more: http://thehill.com/homenews/senate/94485-gop-...

.
You were saying something? Votes always speak loudest. Repubs are the party that has been shown time and time again to be the ones protecting the Rich.
.
General Robert E Lee

Johnson City, TN

#119696 Aug 28, 2013
Calvin_Coolish wrote:
<quoted text>
U S Grant kicked your ass too, if I remember...right, Bobby?
I don't intend to play games with a child, young man, I mean you no disrespect.

Since: Feb 13

Location hidden

#119697 Aug 28, 2013
Aristocles son of Ariston wrote:
<quoted text>
If that were true...wouldn't shoot down the "Republicans are for the RICH" myth that Dimocrats keep using in political debates?
I'm sorry did you want to get a word in about that "Myth" of Repubs being for the Rich?
.
As I said, votes speak much more than words on the subject.
.
Senate Republicans held ranks on Monday and blocked a Democratic effort to overhaul the financial system and crack down on Wall Street.
In a 57-41 vote, Democrats fell short of the 60 votes necessary to proceed to the Wall Street bill.

Read more: http://thehill.com/homenews/senate/94485-gop -...

.
You were saying something too?

Since: Dec 11

.

#119698 Aug 28, 2013
Injudgement wrote:
<quoted text>Senate Republicans held ranks on Monday and blocked a Democratic effort to overhaul the financial system and crack down on Wall Street.
In a 57-41 vote, Democrats fell short of the 60 votes necessary to proceed to the Wall Street bill.
Read more: http://thehill.com/homenews/senate/94485-gop-...
.
You were saying something? Votes always speak loudest. Repubs are the party that has been shown time and time again to be the ones protecting the Rich.
.
Then why is your Democrat friend saying "Why is it that the Stock Market normally does better under a Democrat President?"
General Robert E Lee

Johnson City, TN

#119699 Aug 28, 2013
Injudgement wrote:
<quoted text>The rise and fall of the stock market has always been looked upon as an indicator of employment and sales. In 2008 when the market lost 60% of it's value in two days it was a sign of things to come. Are you bone stupid?
If that is the case, where are these jobs, you say are indicated? The stock market is a world market, and busts and booms on a regular basis. One fact remains, Obama nor any president influences it! I play the market some, do you?
General Robert E Lee

Johnson City, TN

#119701 Aug 28, 2013
Injudgement wrote:
<quoted text>I'm sorry did you want to get a word in about that "Myth" of Repubs being for the Rich?
.
As I said, votes speak much more than words on the subject.
.
Senate Republicans held ranks on Monday and blocked a Democratic effort to overhaul the financial system and crack down on Wall Street.
In a 57-41 vote, Democrats fell short of the 60 votes necessary to proceed to the Wall Street bill.
Read more: http://thehill.com/homenews/senate/94485-gop -...
.
You were saying something too?
Do you really belive your Democrat Senators are less owned by the power brokers of this world? Votes are staged by both parties, when they know they don't have the votes to pass something, to give the impression they are fighting for the people, and both parties are guilty as hell!
General Robert E Lee

Johnson City, TN

#119702 Aug 28, 2013
General Robert E Lee wrote:
<quoted text>
If that is the case, where are these jobs, you say are indicated? The stock market is a world market, and busts and booms on a regular basis. One fact remains, Obama nor any president influences it! I play the market some, do you?
I dare the stupid sumbitch that judged this to prove it wrong! Step up.

Since: Feb 13

Location hidden

#119703 Aug 28, 2013
Aristocles son of Ariston wrote:
<quoted text>
Then why is your Democrat friend saying "Why is it that the Stock Market normally does better under a Democrat President?"
All anyone need do is research the last 50 years of history to see more jobs have been created under Democratic Presidents thus allowing for more growth in all economic sectors.
,
Republicans

Richard Nixon: Increase of 7.1 million jobs
Gerald Ford: Increase of 1.3 million jobs
Ronald Reagan: Increase of 14.7 million jobs
George H.W. Bush: Increase of 1.5 million jobs
George W. Bush: Decline of 646,000 jobs

Total: Increase of 23.9 million jobs under Republican presidents

Democrats

John F. Kennedy: Increase of 2.7 million jobs
Lyndon B. Johnson: Increase of 9.5 million jobs
Jimmy Carter: Increase of 9.0 million jobs
Bill Clinton: Increase of 20.8 million jobs
Barack Obama: Increase of 332,000 jobs

Total: Increase of 42.3 million jobs.
.
http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/state...
rwb

Van Wert, OH

#119704 Aug 28, 2013
Aristocles son of Ariston wrote:
<quoted text>
You all have it so ass backwards.
Lets take your chameleon friend AKA Hot C (Calvin_Coolish); He is
1. Atheist
2. Hate filled
3. Vulgar
4. Belligerent
5. Liberal/Progressive/Democrat
Would he fit right in with the "Jesus crowd"?
The "stingy Conservatives" keep people fed with food pantries, Christian Ministries, Catholic charities where people donate clothes food and cash to help pay utility bills, etc!
I don't see any "Atheist Food pantries" can you point one out?
Maybe Toys from Atheist programs?
I don't think there are any established Atheist organizations, but there are non-Christian charities that contribute. American Red Cross, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Rotary, ACLU. Here is a good link to use before you donate to see where your donation will go. It is pretty good, I have used it for info before. http://www.guidestar.org/
wtf

Horse Cave, KY

#119705 Aug 28, 2013
Well, well, well! Obama and his ObaMORONS are learning the meaning of "What goes around, comes around".

For years now they have called Bush every vulgar name they could think of and accused him of being a murderer and a war monger. NOW their messiah is doing the same thing. Wonder how they will attempt to spin Obama's latest oopsie? lmao

Obama is receiving the same intel concerning Syria that Bush received about Iraq. Hitlary Clinton and Crazy Joe Biden were all for that war. Saddam and his soldiers exterminated hundreds of thousands of their citizens. Many were women and children. They were raped and tortured and thrown into mass graves as if they were trash.

NOW...Obama has stated once AGAIN that killing women and kids in Syria is crossing his red line. Hmmmmm...Bush was wrong about Iraq but now that Obama is faced with the same situation...Obama is right. Is that the spin? Come on ObaMORONS, y'all can do much better than that, can't you? lol

The only difference is that Obama is announcing to the leadership in Syria what the US is going to do and when they are going to do it! Whut? Yep! He is giving them enough time to vacate the places that Obama is going to bomb and move things around that need moving. I guess that will be another reason for you brain dead ObaMORONS to brag about how much the Middle East respects the US now that Obama is president.

Just democrats shooting from the lip as usual and the Middle East not giving a damn what Obama says or does. That's how skeered they really are! Putin just pulled his shirt off and had a good laugh.
General Robert E Lee

Johnson City, TN

#119706 Aug 28, 2013
Injudgement wrote:
<quoted text>All anyone need do is research the last 50 years of history to see more jobs have been created under Democratic Presidents thus allowing for more growth in all economic sectors.
,
Republicans
Richard Nixon: Increase of 7.1 million jobs
Gerald Ford: Increase of 1.3 million jobs
Ronald Reagan: Increase of 14.7 million jobs
George H.W. Bush: Increase of 1.5 million jobs
George W. Bush: Decline of 646,000 jobs
Total: Increase of 23.9 million jobs under Republican presidents
Democrats
John F. Kennedy: Increase of 2.7 million jobs
Lyndon B. Johnson: Increase of 9.5 million jobs
Jimmy Carter: Increase of 9.0 million jobs
Bill Clinton: Increase of 20.8 million jobs
Barack Obama: Increase of 332,000 jobs
Total: Increase of 42.3 million jobs.
.
http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/state...
I notice the only sorce you cite is a liberal website! I lived the Carter term, I remember the lines at the employment office, that streched 1/2 mile outside the building! I admire the man Jimmy Carter, but he did not create 9 million jobs, and if not for Obama he would have gone down in history as Americas worst President!

Since: Feb 13

Location hidden

#119707 Aug 28, 2013
General Robert E Lee wrote:
<quoted text>
Do you really belive your Democrat Senators are less owned by the power brokers of this world? Votes are staged by both parties, when they know they don't have the votes to pass something, to give the impression they are fighting for the people, and both parties are guilty as hell!
Really? Share with us the jobs plan or tax relief plan put forth by Repubs in the House or Senate for middle class Americans.

Since: Feb 13

Location hidden

#119708 Aug 28, 2013
I'll help you with Repub job plan and tax plan for middle class Americans.
.
Washington (CNN)-- Senate Republicans on Thursday blocked the No.1 item on the president's congressional "to-do-list," refusing to allow a vote on a bill that would give tax breaks for companies that "insource" jobs to the U.S. from overseas while eliminating tax deductions for companies that move jobs abroad.
.
And who can forget the Repubs holding 98% of America hostage if the top 2% got a tax increase?

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Greenville Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
jeff oliver 23 min family friend 4
Steve runyon 3 hr crazy 1
Sneaking at Wendell ford 12 hr Haha 2
logan snyder Fri ooooo oreily 3
Muhlenberg County Social Services Mar 27 Unhappy with The ... 5
Zack roberts Mar 26 u know who this is 10
Chain link fence (Jul '14) Mar 26 Looking for deals 10
Greenville Dating
Find my Match
More from around the web

Greenville People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]