Your argument fails on a number of levels, but most significantly it fails in this way:<quoted text>
Being that these medical doctors get Big Bucks from Big Pharma to push their wares,And Big Media Gets Big Bucks to push their wares,and Big Government gets Big Bucks to push their wares what do y'all think of that Viox recall that Merck knew was lethal but they made billions and paid a few milllion in fines and no jail time? Who wrote those prescriptions a topix troll? How about Bayers aids contaminated drug? Governrment passed and troll prescribed?Yes? FDA even knew that was contaminated didn't they? Yes they did.
How about CDC's Thorsen and his 'Danish study" and his Fraud and Money laundering trick?This was the big study on the Autism connection to vaccines wasn't it? I heard y'all mention Wakefield but no Thorsen Or that other CDC credible that was indited for child molestation and a little animal fun in the bedroom.TRUST? SURE.
Y'all talked about the mumps and the danger so everyone must get the vaccine.Is this that Merck vaccine you'd be speaking of to save the day? The one that is up on fraud charges, the fraud of their Mumps vaccine?
You argue that doctors you don't know are getting money you can't demonstrate they are getting from groups you can't name and that because of this money, you can't trust their opinion despite the fact that the results are verifiable.
However, you give Wakefield a pass despite the fact that we KNOW he invented the autism scare specifically to sell his vaccine. We KNOW he faked his research. We KNOW he did it for money. And we KNOW he doesn't have any results to demonstrate his claim.
You so have 6-7 UNKNOWNS in your argument and no valid reasoning, but you accept it with blind faith.
Meanwhile the argument with NO unknowns is rejected because...