David Hawk is A Shame to Greeneville
Whatever

Abingdon, VA

#42 Dec 22, 2012
funny wrote:
<quoted text>
Read the whole trial transcript....oh yes, and look at the other order in the other case that the paper didnt report. Eye opening. And you are not really correct. Not a friend, just acquaintance. I just hate to see anyone railroaded and I think she will beat it on appeal. I also hate for people to compare the two cases. That's all I'm saying.
I understand what you're saying. One should have nothing to do with the other. The minute it hit the papers about her, David started using that as his defense. I still think he's guilty, but won't go to jail. She may not be guilty on her charge, but it will be hard for her to win an appeal against a federal judge. Seeing all the money her ex has and all the power David has, I think she'll be wasting her money on an attorney if she has one.
funny

United States

#43 Dec 22, 2012
Whatever wrote:
<quoted text>I understand what you're saying. One should have nothing to do with the other. The minute it hit the papers about her, David started using that as his defense. I still think he's guilty, but won't go to jail. She may not be guilty on her charge, but it will be hard for her to win an appeal against a federal judge. Seeing all the money her ex has and all the power David has, I think she'll be wasting her money on an attorney if she has one.
Sad thing is that he knew of the case when he married her. He testified for her. But now that they are not together he is using it against her. I also want to hear what his ex's say. Will be interesting.
Tidal

Tucker, GA

#44 Dec 22, 2012
funny wrote:
<quoted text>Haha! Who's to say that she is or isnt? Again, you don't know the whole story. It will all be revealed in due time. Just wait....patience is a virtue!
Waiting, patiently...
My Opinion

Nashville, TN

#45 Dec 23, 2012
Neither one of them are saints, but Hawk putting his hands on her formed my opinion of him being a low life piece of sh!t! He should serve jail time like everyone else who assaults others.
citizen

United States

#46 Dec 23, 2012
My Opinion wrote:
Neither one of them are saints, but Hawk putting his hands on her formed my opinion of him being a low life piece of sh!t! He should serve jail time like everyone else who assaults others.
I want to know what the grand jury saw to make them indict him on felony charges, instead of misdemeanor? There is a lot we don't know, and its something to make them decide he deserved more than a misdemeanor.
Applause

Lawndale, NC

#47 Dec 23, 2012
citizen wrote:
<quoted text>
I want to know what the grand jury saw to make them indict him on felony charges, instead of misdemeanor? There is a lot we don't know, and its something to make them decide he deserved more than a misdemeanor.
Oddly. Misdemeanors are difficult to dismiss when they involve domestic violence. This is ALL A MISDIRECTION and CORRUPTED scenario to release this monster back out onto the streets and return to Nashville. What you do is this.: you raise it to a felony, then in court, find that it was a misdemeanor. Well, he was in court for a felony, somitngets dismissed, the visiting DA returns home, David Hawk walks free and Greeneville is represented properly by a low life worm. No offense to worm lovers or worms themselves.
Nita Mann

Clover, SC

#48 Dec 24, 2012
He should not be representing "we the people" of Greene County. She should not have a law license after a Federal Judge entered a Judgment against her for the deception relevant to her previous marriage. The Federal Judge heard all the facts & still decided against her.

What should they both be doing? Trying to straighten out their own lives & be a better parent for their child. Nexxxxxxxxxxt........
friend to all

Morrison, TN

#49 Dec 24, 2012
Nita Mann wrote:
He should not be representing "we the people" of Greene County. She should not have a law license after a Federal Judge entered a Judgment against her for the deception relevant to her previous marriage. The Federal Judge heard all the facts & still decided against her.

What should they both be doing? Trying to straighten out their own lives & be a better parent for their child. Nexxxxxxxxxxt........
You are so quick to judge both! Who are you to judge?!?! Just a topix troll....I know them both and hate this happened. I also know that they BOTH fought against her ex. What you font realize is that another order went down against Mr Klumb during all of this. Paper didnt report that and the Hawks dost run to the paper to do so. Let it all play out and see who is left standing. Don't judge when you don't know all of the facts from ALL of the cases!
Nita Mann

Clover, SC

#50 Dec 24, 2012
friend to all wrote:
<quoted text>
You are so quick to judge both! Who are you to judge?!?! Just a topix troll....I know them both and hate this happened. I also know that they BOTH fought against her ex. What you font realize is that another order went down against Mr Klumb during all of this. Paper didnt report that and the Hawks dost run to the paper to do so. Let it all play out and see who is left standing. Don't judge when you don't know all of the facts from ALL of the cases!
You call me a topix troll yet you sure have managed to keep this thread going for quite sometime. Your name "friend to all " reminds me of a one size fits all sweater....in reality...IT DOES NOT FIT ALL. Furthermore, I have read numerous documents in this case using my friend google. I also read the 46 page Federal opinion written by a judge who heard all the facts!!

No matter how you slice it, & you can relabel it to your liking BUT there was a very young dependent child in a house where alcohol & domestic abuse went down. I also know both of them & speak with authority that they need to get their personal lives straight before attempting to "help the public"!

I have yet to meet any perfect people. Everyone has problems at one time or another. These two are not doing themselves or anyone else any service by perpetuating their drama. I reiterate they need to work on their OWN lives before "helping" the rest of us. I wish them well in their endeavors.
Nita Mann

Clover, SC

#51 Dec 24, 2012
"A friend to all is a friend to none" --Aristotle
Hmm

Abingdon, VA

#52 Dec 24, 2012
Nita Mann wrote:
"A friend to all is a friend to none" --Aristotle
I like that.
kopcw

Tucker, GA

#53 Dec 24, 2012
Nita Mann wrote:
"A friend to all is a friend to none" --Aristotle
I agree.
PassiveAgressive

Lawndale, NC

#54 Dec 24, 2012
Nita Mann wrote:
<quoted text>
You call me a topix troll yet you sure have managed to keep this thread going for quite sometime. Your name "friend to all " reminds me of a one size fits all sweater....in reality...IT DOES NOT FIT ALL. Furthermore, I have read numerous documents in this case using my friend google. I also read the 46 page Federal opinion written by a judge who heard all the facts!!
No matter how you slice it, & you can relabel it to your liking BUT there was a very young dependent child in a house where alcohol & domestic abuse went down. I also know both of them & speak with authority that they need to get their personal lives straight before attempting to "help the public"!
I have yet to meet any perfect people. Everyone has problems at one time or another. These two are not doing themselves or anyone else any service by perpetuating their drama. I reiterate they need to work on their OWN lives before "helping" the rest of us. I wish them well in their endeavors.
You didn't do anything or say anything improper . Don't let them tell you they did. You stand up for what's right and punching a woman in the eye isn't right no matter what you're last name is...hawk is a punk, nothing more....and I'd gladly tell him to his face
friend to all

United States

#55 Dec 25, 2012
Nita Mann wrote:
"A friend to all is a friend to none" --Aristotle
Funny, you read one order...not the 4,000 page trial transcript. You also didn't read the other order that went down against Klumb, did you? In a separate case. Do some digging! I admire her for not airing her laundry, but I feel bad that someone should defend her. What about Another jusge the same month, finding Klumb to be not credible? The sun didnt run that. Crystal and David were together, fighting it together. So before you base you opinion on something, find out the whole story. Go to the Greene County courthouse and the federal courthouse and retrieve all the documents under the name Klumb/hawk/Goan. Then let me know when you have read it all, because you havnt.

And on furthernote, I havnt kept this thread going. I just hate that everyone read on order and is read to place blame. The hawk case is exclusive from the Klumb case,....no comparison. And the Klumb has has multiple cases, and unless you read all 3 or 4, then you have no right to assert an opinion about something u know so little.

But it seems you do not like to be called to the carpet and challenged. Just because I suggest you doing more research, doesn't mean I am attacking you personally. I just hate when people are being blindly led down a primrose path. Oh yeah, I will sale you ocean front property in Arizona as well!
back to top

Antioch, TN

#56 Dec 25, 2012
friend to all wrote:
<quoted text>
Funny, you read one order...not the 4,000 page trial transcript. You also didn't read the other order that went down against Klumb, did you? In a separate case. Do some digging! I admire her for not airing her laundry, but I feel bad that someone should defend her. What about Another jusge the same month, finding Klumb to be not credible? The sun didnt run that. Crystal and David were together, fighting it together. So before you base you opinion on something, find out the whole story. Go to the Greene County courthouse and the federal courthouse and retrieve all the documents under the name Klumb/hawk/Goan. Then let me know when you have read it all, because you havnt.
And on furthernote, I havnt kept this thread going. I just hate that everyone read on order and is read to place blame. The hawk case is exclusive from the Klumb case,....no comparison. And the Klumb has has multiple cases, and unless you read all 3 or 4, then you have no right to assert an opinion about something u know so little.
But it seems you do not like to be called to the carpet and challenged. Just because I suggest you doing more research, doesn't mean I am attacking you personally. I just hate when people are being blindly led down a primrose path. Oh yeah, I will sale you ocean front property in Arizona as well!
Lori, don't you have family you can enjoy on this Holiday? Or is it that the warm feeling you have down deep inside for David is really a 'crush' or maybe sexual anxiety?

Since: Sep 12

Lexington, SC

#57 Dec 25, 2012
Nita Mann wrote:
"A friend to all is a friend to none" --Aristotle
Nita when are you gonna register that sexy handle and go blue like the rest of us regulars?

Since: Dec 12

Monroe, NC

#58 Dec 25, 2012
GreeneNative wrote:
<quoted text> Nita when are you gonna register that sexy handle and go blue like the rest of us regulars?
I thought I had! Lol! Something strange happened with my phone today & most of my pre-sets are gone. I posted in blue yesterday. My first duty is to respond to Friend to None....I mean Friend to All. Having to mull over a 4,000 page transcript leaves me hanging with a 25 word response. BAHAHAHA

Merry Christmas!:)
Dont Care Bill

Jonesborough, TN

#59 Dec 25, 2012
Bill Tollen wrote:
<quoted text>
Yes, that's true and it's honorable. But my point is that in his case they re-elected him without the facts. That means they don't care about the facts. That means they don't care if he hits women. That means they suck.
But yes, he is innocent until proven guilty.
This will NEVER go before a jury of 12. NEVER.
The reason is this: they cannot absolutely control the outcome of 12 jurors. It will NOT reach a jury, therefore justice will never be brought about.
But it's TOTALLY telling about the low class and corruptness of the Tennessee state thugs running this wasteland of a state. When Ron Ramsey is the 2nd highest ranking thug in the state, it's well past time for a revamping of our responsibilities to our children. We got some cleaning to do
They allready had the facts on Eddie! He was a liar and a thief, and you are just mad he got his ass beat! Thats the real truth, you dont care about guilt or corruption, your just a Democrat!
notfromaroundher e1997

Hendersonville, TN

#60 Dec 27, 2012
Bill Tollen wrote:
You allowed a wife beating republican THUG to not only skate your greasy little corrupt court system, but to get re-elected too.all this after your churchitty church people walk around talking about FAMILY VALUES and MIRALS and Holiness... That's absolutely disgusting, immoral, nasty and shameful.
But it is socially redeeming, because it is VERY, VERY telling.
Greeneville is a wasteland of Sodom and Gomorrah and nothing more. YUCK !!!
Let's just say there is plenty of evidence in another court case to allow some of us to think that the 'beaten wife' is a truth-challenged, scheming, evil woman. Mr. Hawk does have a history of picking women who make terrible wives.
Way to Go

Kingsport, TN

#61 Dec 28, 2012
It's just like the Fine Folks of Greeneville to vote him in!!

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Greeneville Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Secret Service Agent Douglas Allen (Aug '12) 21 min Why four years 4
dtr good or bad place to work? (Mar '12) 32 min Meerd 38
The numbers on Trump 41 min Scared 16
who got shot on fish pond rd tonight 55 min Depends 13
fun thing to do ***Keep a Word~Drop a Word*** (Sep '10) 1 hr Midnight Rose 9,729
Favorite cookie.. 4 hr Duh 7
Miranda Finley 5 hr Annoying 9
Flesh eating bacteria 7 hr Dr Wu 11
Mother going crazy! 9 hr We fell for it 22
More from around the web

Personal Finance

Greeneville Mortgages