Bayless

South Pittsburg, TN

#77953 May 2, 2013
SexySassySenior wrote:
<quoted text>
I don't give a crap if she's a Martian from Outer Space! She's an Expert on the Banking Industry and I've been following her of years!
She's fighting for YOU, Doofus, and trying to keep the Big Banks and Credit Card Companies from ripping you off in every way imaginable!
You "don't give a crap" if she's a confirmed LIAR too either. Well I guess being a liberal democrat that is normal.

Big Banks and Credit Card companies don't rip me off either as I don't play their game and don't give them my business. Only a true DOOFUS such as yourself deals with them.
hey fat boy

United States

#77954 May 2, 2013
Amos wrote:
<quoted text>
Dumbass. This is an open forum - anybody can address anybody else and point out their stupidity.
What's the matter old fart? You must be miserable hating on the ladies. If you would get some every once in a while you wouldn't be so stupid yourself turdball!

Since: Feb 13

Location hidden

#77955 May 2, 2013
Scarlett Pimple wrote:
<quoted text>
This was clearly a publicity stunt by our “Hollywood” president. It accomplishes nothing more than make it look like this oaf is for the little people.
And while you’re on the subject of who else was stupid enough to “give back”, where vive president stupid? He wasn’t on board. How about Holder and the rest of Obama’s flunkies? They are ALL rich, but they didn’t get on board.
And your knowledge of congressional salaries is faulty. Members of congress are paid $174K, not $200. The use of flawed facts explains your whacko opinions.
They are not Elected Officials of our Governing Bodies...they are EMPLOYEES!! DUH!
They do not Pass Laws, nor vote on Laws to be Passed or Not Passed, they have no say-so in that, they just make recommendations, if asked, and then, do what they are told to do!
I swear some of you People, obviously, have no more idea of how your Federal Gov't. works than you know how to make a Rocket fly into Outer Space! It's astounding!
hey fat boy

United States

#77956 May 2, 2013
ORIGINAL WILLARD wrote:
<quoted text>
Like everything else you post, your stupid hypothetical is irrelevant! The time to ask would have been while the government was confiscating money out of everyone's check, not "after" they've been stolen from for multiplied decades! What's wrong with you? Nevermind...I don't have time!
Many tried to opt out, myself included but were denied. Don't you realize this is confisticatory policy. I could've have taken 50% of my own stolen withholdings and made an absolute fortune.
So, Your question of principle can be placed where it belongs. The SS system is one of the the most "unprincipled" mechanisms of government takeover ever to exist.
Let me know if I need to re-post this in triplicate or more...I want to get each of you! LMAO!!
You blowhards like to say you don't have time to respond, but yet you do.. Amos, I mean Willard, or whatever your many "moniker" names, you are delusional and yet interesting to read because it's like having our own private Rush your prophet and holy idol right here. Are you a pill popper too? That may explain your delusions of grandeur and you are the only one in this whole world who know the truth! It's actually fun seeing you go to crazy town. Keep up the good work Amos, I mean Willard!
Dunlapian

Dunlap, TN

#77957 May 2, 2013
Overtaxed wrote:
<quoted text> Good morning my friend.
Actually, our parents paid into Social Security and that money was used to pay benefits for their parents and grandparents. Our payments are being used to pay benefits for our parents and grandparents and when we retire, it is our kids who will pay for ours.
"Willard" would like to have us foot the bill for his parents and grandparents as he pockets his contribution to their retirement. Why am I not surprised ?
Good Morning OT, Willard would like us to believe he is the "Infallible Oracle of Truth", see post #77916.
Maybe in his own delusional thinking.
I do understand there is a actual test for this, it's called (PDI),
"The Peters Delusion Inventory"
I mean with all of his issues with the government and his "friends", Mary Ann, Carol, lil Jamie ect. this test just might help Willard.

Since: Feb 13

Location hidden

#77958 May 2, 2013
hey fat boy wrote:
<quoted text>
Hollywood President? Oh, you mean Reagan? Aditionally, Congress may make '174K, but you didn't figure in all the free perks they receive like health care for their whole family. The benefits are endless and would add up to a much higher salary if considered.
You are absolutely correct about the Perks and what they would add up to. I think you're alittle short on the amount of their Salary, if they aren't a Freshman, first Term, Congressman. The Longer they serve the more they make, because they have gotten more raises.
Their Staff is paid for, as well as their Family-coverage Insurance and it's better than any Policy the Ordinary Citizen can even get, at any price, so you know it's high-priced. It's been described as "State of the Art" Medical Coverage. Their travel expenss are all paid and the Perks just go on and on...and we won't even get into the Lobbyists' payments that they receive to influence their votes.

Since: Feb 13

Location hidden

#77959 May 2, 2013
Scarlett Pimple wrote:
<quoted text>
This was clearly a publicity stunt by our “Hollywood” president. It accomplishes nothing more than make it look like this oaf is for the little people.
And while you’re on the subject of who else was stupid enough to “give back”, where vive president stupid? He wasn’t on board. How about Holder and the rest of Obama’s flunkies? They are ALL rich, but they didn’t get on board.
And your knowledge of congressional salaries is faulty. Members of congress are paid $174K, not $200. The use of flawed facts explains your whacko opinions.
I said "around" Idiot...LOOK IT UP! It's not hard for anybody with a thinking brain to find it, so YOU might have some trouble!

I get so tired of "Know-nothing" brsin-dead Pure Idiots that want to argue every little thing!
For your information, some of the Long-timers make more than $200,000 a year!
JUST GOOGLE IT, FOOL, they don't ALL make the same amount!
hey fat boy

United States

#77960 May 2, 2013
ORIGINAL WILLARD wrote:
<quoted text>
I have never "compelled" fools to do anything for me. I don't care what you do with your money, it's the "government" that forces generations of fools to provide a never ending slush-fund for government to rape and pillage, only to leave it full of IOU's!
Corrupt lobbyists and emtionally charged activists quickly smell the corrupt money and come running to corrupt legislators with corrupt causes and corrupt appropriations are thereby made with the extortion funds for every corrupt purpose except what they were supposedly intended for!
I accept the proposition that there are people who actually think this is a good idea, Many do not and would prefer a different model..maybe to include transparency, honesty and integrity?
I'm well acquainted with all the hash over this issue, historical political and theoretical, including the insurance model interpretations, so don't bore me with any of it!
The salient truth of this issue is that people are forced into this ridiculous life-long scheme while our spend-thrift government constantly rapes the pot for every obscene cause imaginable to appease political interests de jour, then threatens old people and tries to politically leverage them after raiding the cookie jar! This is beyond repugnant!
By the way, idiots are always easily surprised!
You know, you old coot, I actually agree with some of this. I don't like it either when government threatens old people and constantly wants to put their hands in the social security pot as if it's their very own piggy bank. F-that, I'm going to be old real soon too and I know it's not going to be there for me, but my granny is on it and by damn they should keep their hands off of what little she gets (I do watch over her and help supplement her monthly check). Damn you Willard, you did make ONE valid point.

Since: Feb 13

Location hidden

#77961 May 2, 2013
"Amid New Security Threats, Some In Congress Look To Update 9/11 Law."

Click here:
http://news.yahoo.com/amid-security-threats-c...

And READ the DAMN THING, you'll learn something!

Since: Mar 13

Location hidden

#77962 May 2, 2013
hey fat boy wrote:
<quoted text>
You blowhards like to say you don't have time to respond, but yet you do.. Amos, I mean Willard, or whatever your many "moniker" names, you are delusional and yet interesting to read because it's like having our own private Rush your prophet and holy idol right here. Are you a pill popper too? That may explain your delusions of grandeur and you are the only one in this whole world who know the truth! It's actually fun seeing you go to crazy town. Keep up the good work Amos, I mean Willard!
You may want to consider gainful employment, it may help your anger issues. I was thinking..maybe an "accordian grinder with a monkey" career? After all, you are clown-like and apparently the job doesn't require much. I think you should be able to find a used accordian and some old french guy anywhere!

Since: Feb 13

Guild

#77963 May 2, 2013
Overtaxed wrote:
<quoted text> Requiring all sellers to do the same background checks gun stores have to, isn't a "registration scheme". That is simply closing a loophole I could drive a truck through.
OK - I sell my Marlin 336C 30/30 to my son.

I served in the Marine Corp., have a file at the FBI as well as the TBI, have not only a HCP in Tennessee - but virtually all other states as well, a FFL Class3, and have never been convicted of a crime.

My son, served in the Marines Corp., has a HCP, and has never been convicted of a crime.

WHERE is there ANY justification that a background check be performed when I sell to my son?

The fact is - and liberals may chatter until the cows come home - there is none. All this federal expanded background check scheme is about is liberals wanting to pass a feel good law that does NOTHING to deter crime.

Since: Feb 13

Guild

#77964 May 2, 2013
I meant Corps...not to be confused with Corpse.

Since: Feb 13

Guild

#77965 May 2, 2013
SexySassySenior wrote:
<quoted text>
You are absolutely correct about the Perks and what they would add up to. I think you're alittle short on the amount of their Salary, if they aren't a Freshman, first Term, Congressman. The Longer they serve the more they make, because they have gotten more raises.
Their Staff is paid for, as well as their Family-coverage Insurance and it's better than any Policy the Ordinary Citizen can even get, at any price, so you know it's high-priced. It's been described as "State of the Art" Medical Coverage. Their travel expenss are all paid and the Perks just go on and on...and we won't even get into the Lobbyists' payments that they receive to influence their votes.
Don't forget that they made it legal to do the whole insider trading thing that if you or I did...we'd be in jail.

And, there's things like this:

Sen. Diane Feinstein’s husband Richard Blum "won" a billion dollar construction contract for California’s high-speed rail project, reports the California Political Review.

That is $35 Million of taxpayer money...per mile

“IMNTBHO”

Since: Dec 10

Smyrna, TN

#77966 May 2, 2013
SexySassySenior wrote:
<quoted text>
OW, your SS is already paid for . It was paid for by the Generation before you...your Mom and Dad paid for yours. What you're paying into the SS Fund during your working years, is for the next Generation after you...your Kids' Retirement or your Nieces and Nephews Retirement, not your own Retirement Fund Benefits.!
That's the way Social Security was set up and that's the way it works!
If that is true, then why is the amount I am allowed to draw based on my past income and payments?
Overtaxed

Thorn Hill, TN

#77967 May 2, 2013
Nuh_ wrote:
<quoted text>
Only law abiding citizens obey law. Criminals, by definition, do not.
Now, as far as background checks go - Buy a gun at a gun store, there is a check. Buy a gun at a gun show - from the sellers that have booths - there is a check. Buy a gun over the internet - if you do not have a FFL, you MUST have the gun shipped to a gun store or individual who does...AND THEN, there is a background check on you PRIOR to your getting the gun.
These are all existing laws - and NONE of them prevented the heinous crime committed in Newtown...and neither did the Massachusetts "assault weapons ban".
Why were ATF officials and Attorneys General on the carpet for not prosecuting "criminals" who tried AND FAILED because of background checks, to purchase guns at gun stores ?
Aren't they criminals by definition ?

This being Topix, I will not post HOW I know, but suffice to say, I could prove that you can buy a gun at a table, inside a gun show without a background check.
I have no experience with buying guns over the internet, so I will take your word fot that pending further investigation.

“IMNTBHO”

Since: Dec 10

Smyrna, TN

#77968 May 2, 2013
SexySassySenior wrote:
<quoted text>
And not a Single Member of the House has given back a penny, to date, and they won't, IMO...they're too greedy.
Three Democratic Senators did and two Republican Senators did, out of a Hundred...but not a Single One of the House Of Representatives did, not one!
So, out of the entire Legislative Branch of the Federal Government...and I believe that 536 Members, including the President, only 6 People followed gave back anything...4 Democrats and 2 Republicans, all totaled!
That ought to tell the American People something about their Legislators and their Party Members and what most of them are all about!
BTW, the average salary of a Member of the House of Representatives is about $200,000 a year in salary, alone. Senators make a few more thousand than that, about $25,000 more...in salary alone, not counting all their Perks, which are many!
How much did you give back?
Overtaxed

Thorn Hill, TN

#77969 May 2, 2013
Dunlapian wrote:
<quoted text>Good Morning OT, Willard would like us to believe he is the "Infallible Oracle of Truth", see post #77916.
Maybe in his own delusional thinking.
I do understand there is a actual test for this, it's called (PDI),
"The Peters Delusion Inventory"
I mean with all of his issues with the government and his "friends", Mary Ann, Carol, lil Jamie ect. this test just might help Willard.
Good morning !! He tickles me ! I just loved his OUTRAGE at the idea that another poster used two screen names, but concocted the most outrageous excuse I have ever read for his own use of multiple "monickers" as he calls them !

“IMNTBHO”

Since: Dec 10

Smyrna, TN

#77970 May 2, 2013
SexySassySenior wrote:
<quoted text>
OW, your SS is already paid for . It was paid for by the Generation before you...your Mom and Dad paid for yours. What you're paying into the SS Fund during your working years, is for the next Generation after you...your Kids' Retirement or your Nieces and Nephews Retirement, not your own Retirement Fund Benefits.!
That's the way Social Security was set up and that's the way it works!
You got it backwards anyway Linda. My parents paid for their parents, just as I paid for my parents and my kids will pay for mine.
Overtaxed

Thorn Hill, TN

#77971 May 2, 2013
ORIGINAL WILLARD wrote:
<quoted text>
I have never "compelled" fools to do anything for me. I don't care what you do with your money, it's the "government" that forces generations of fools to provide a never ending slush-fund for government to rape and pillage, only to leave it full of IOU's!
By the way, idiots are always easily surprised!
Then you should be surprised to find that the Communist Chinese have trillions of their dollars invested in the same financial instruments that the Social Security Trust Fund has it's money invested in !
I guess the joke's on them.
Dunlapian

Dunlap, TN

#77972 May 2, 2013
Nuh_ wrote:
<quoted text>
OK - I sell my Marlin 336C 30/30 to my son.
I served in the Marine Corp., have a file at the FBI as well as the TBI, have not only a HCP in Tennessee - but virtually all other states as well, a FFL Class3, and have never been convicted of a crime.
My son, served in the Marines Corp., has a HCP, and has never been convicted of a crime.
WHERE is there ANY justification that a background check be performed when I sell to my son?
The fact is - and liberals may chatter until the cows come home - there is none. All this federal expanded background check scheme is about is liberals wanting to pass a feel good law that does NOTHING to deter crime.
Nuh_, I find it odd that you would "sell" a gun to your son!
Why not give it to him, I mean he is your son. As a parent myself, I would never sell anything to my own Son/Daughter, if I didn't need something and my offspring needed it, I would just give it to them.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Greeneville Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
when we die 6 min Kohlrabi 55
Atheist/agnostic atrocities 6 min z0neCrew 46
fun thing to do ***Keep a Word~Drop a Word*** (Sep '10) 6 min Independent1 7,673
ty for slandering 24 min fooling nobody 10
patty hartman off of snaps ferry rd (Aug '14) 33 min watauga snow 3
Trailer park on Jones bridge Rd on the curve? 42 min concerned mother 3
Tracey Michelle Cutshall Berryhill Holt 56 min funny 28
Poll What unversaty you atend? 10 hr Mr Christian 31
Ted Cruz for president 21 hr Question 117
Greeneville Dating
Find my Match
More from around the web

Greeneville People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]