Who do you support for Governor in Tennessee in 2010?

Posted in the Greeneville Forum

Comments (Page 3,425)

Showing posts 68,481 - 68,500 of123,971
|
Go to last page| Jump to page:

Since: Mar 10

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#76221
Apr 13, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Overtaxed wrote:
<quoted text>
Well "Pete", if Republicans had been prudent with taxpayer dollars, you would have made some good points...but they haven't and Democrats have long memories ! When Reagan came into office the national debt totaled about a trillion. He cut taxes and spent a bundle on a military buildup. When his administration was asked...they basicially said don't worry we can spend and cut taxes, deficits don't matter and....we are fighting the "evil empire". The debt when Reagan left office, nearly three trillion dollars. George H.W. Bush took over and in 4 years the debt had climbed to 4.5 trillion. George W. takes on a debt load of nearly 6 trillion, cuts taxes and when asked about deficits, basicially says don't worry, we can spend and cut taxes, deficits don't matter, and.... we are fighting the "axis of evil". By the time he leaves office the debt is at 12 trillion.
In that time period the top tax rate in this country went from 70% to 35%.
Forgive me if I missed most of the great economic boon coming from cutting taxes in half. Especially since I read the other day that the average American's wages went up a GRAND TOTAL of 4% adjusted for inflation, between 1971 and 2007. American families survived by sending wives out to work, and then by borrowing themselves into poverty. Now...SOME Republicans want the poor and elderly to pay the piper for the debt, because SUDDENLY debt and deficits DO matter.
Cynical ???? You bet I am !

Excellent point!
Overtaxed

Thorn Hill, TN

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#76222
Apr 13, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Hey wrote:
<quoted text>
What I said here was refering to your thing, how getting all these people to go with it was impossible.
I said it appeared that many went along with the WMDs which were bogus to begin with and look at the wild ride that took off on,killing how many?
And how many were involved in the big money scam of 2008? One or two?
Do you doubt the firefighters on the scene and you believe Cheney?
Does iron melt and flow from an office fire and burning furniture?
Does 50 percent of the twin towers just disappear in a puff of smoke?
Where are the crushed bodies,instead of bitsy pieces and bone fragments?
These aren't my holes in my stories these are first responders questions and a lot more just like these are being asked even by those who were involved in the 9/11 commisson report.
I am saying these look like really good questions that need answers and they want answers.
So sue me.
You apparently believe that our government could coordinate all that happened on 911, and then keep it a secret, but couldn't slip a few WMD into Iraq when the DOD was shipping MASSIVE amounts of munitions there everyday. Are those in charge geniuses or are they inept ?? I do not see how they can be both. Ask all the questions you want "Hey". That is your right and I am happy to fight for you to have that right. I don't think you will be satisfied no matter what answers you get, but ask away.

Since: Mar 10

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#76223
Apr 13, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Amos wrote:
<quoted text>I pay 44 dollars per month for health insurance,dental/vision. Get a better job.
Where do you work? I pay almost double that each week and I've got one of the better plans in town. Does your healthcare cover anything more than leeches? I haven't paid a healthcare premium that low since Clinton was in office.
Hey

Cookeville, TN

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#76224
Apr 13, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Overtaxed wrote:
<quoted text>You apparently believe that our government could coordinate all that happened on 911, and then keep it a secret, but couldn't slip a few WMD into Iraq when the DOD was shipping MASSIVE amounts of munitions there everyday. Are those in charge geniuses or are they inept ?? I do not see how they can be both. Ask all the questions you want "Hey". That is your right and I am happy to fight for you to have that right. I don't think you will be satisfied no matter what answers you get, but ask away.
I asked you some of the seperate questions that first responders,building experts,family members,demolition experts and the 9/11 commission committee are asking.
You are not answering the individual Questions that don't stack up with reality.
How does molten steel run down the building from an office fire? The steel in the building is melting from office furniture that's burning,then it collapses in its own footprint in a few seconds with no resistence? The point is it can't.I'm not saying this, the experts are saying this,and there are a lot of experts involved in wanting answers.
You say you don't think i'll be satisfied no matter what answers I get but you have not answered any questions I've asked,You just come back with how silly to think you could get such involvement but these folks are looking at these individual things that do not add up,and there is many many of these that don't add up.
Fifty percent of a building gone in the dust just does not sit well with the experts who are aware of these kinds of issues.
I think it's important to know these answers for this country as we know it is day by day losing it's place as a free nation,and there are a lot of dead people in this war on terror.
Just answer this 1 question on building 7.I know it's a magical building that stands its ground one half hour after the BBC said in went down,but that's another story another rock to look under.
Pete

Jonesborough, TN

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#76225
Apr 13, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Dunlapian wrote:
<quoted text>Pete, I am no expert in Politics, but what I have seen in the past 10 years or so in the Republican Party is a major takeover by the TeaParty.
Your post is very interesting, and many things to digest and think about.
Now could you explain, just what you meant by the average Government spending per household has exceeded the average household income?
I opened up your first link, and found out the Feds collected a record $2.7 Trillion in taxes, and the Republicans are going to
jump on President Obamas goal of raising taxes, "especially on the wealthy".
Now Pete, this is what I have a problem with, the Republicans(TeaParty) seem to only care about the rich, they could care less making cuts on the backs of those that are less fortunate.
Hi Dunlapian. I am happy to respond and will address this to OT as well because I think he basically stated the same points you did. I will make this short because I have to leave and because most of these points have been argued to death by many others on here. But simply, I posted my beliefs. I realize not everyone agrees, but these are my true beliefs and I do respect your opinion as well as others' opinions as well, even though we differ.

The average income per household information can be found at the U.S. Bureau of Census website. I think somebody alluded to that definition above. There are also tons of articles on this very fact currently on the internet.

Republicans, for the record, are all for helping the poor and needy. Our government wastes so much money, we are now at a point where we have to cut almost across the board, including some beneficial programs for these classes of citizens. We could tax corporations and taxpayers 100% and still not pay off our debt. We are at record high tax levels already. We are also now at record high spending levels. We cannot keep increasing taxes and increasing spending and remain viable. It isn't possible. Yes, you can argue that we could re-appropriate tax dollars from things such as defense, aid to foreign countries, investment in new technologies, etc. and send this money to the poor and needy. This is a valid argument. But simply spending more and more is not. Our government, republican and democrat, wastes so much of our tax money we could easily help the poor and needy and lower taxes. Look what Cal Coolidge did. But given term limits, our politicians are only interested in getting re-elected, so the focus is on that rather than where the real needs are.

Also, there are only 50 something Tea Party members in a house made up of 435 members. You and others may be polar opposites of how the Tea Party thinks, but they are not a very influential factor any longer. The Tea Party is far from making up most of the Republican party. The Tea Party get gets a lot of the attention because they are who you disagree with the most. Just like Nancy Pelosi and others get a lot of ink. If the Tea Party was that influential, we wouldn't have had the recent tax hike on the wealthy and we wouldn't have Obamacare.

Republicans want America to go back to a philosophy where a good work ethic, sound principles and personal accountability were the norm. Again, myself and most other Republicans wish that everyone who is in need would receive help. However, those who don't try to help themselves should not be entitled to that same help. That is going on today and in the past. The rich aren't taking anything away from the poor and needy. If it weren't for the rich, most charities wouldn't exist. Today, the rich would rather give directly to charities than have the government distribute their taxes due to the prevalent government waste. Look how much money simply disappeared with the Katrina relief. This blame can be placed across local, state and the federal government. How much taxes does it take for a Presidential re-election? This would have helped many.

Just my two cents.
Pete

Jonesborough, TN

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#76226
Apr 13, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Overtaxed wrote:
<quoted text>
Well "Pete", if Republicans had been prudent with taxpayer dollars, you would have made some good points...but they haven't and Democrats have long memories ! When Reagan came into office the national debt totaled about a trillion. He cut taxes and spent a bundle on a military buildup. When his administration was asked...they basicially said don't worry we can spend and cut taxes, deficits don't matter and....we are fighting the "evil empire". The debt when Reagan left office, nearly three trillion dollars. George H.W. Bush took over and in 4 years the debt had climbed to 4.5 trillion. George W. takes on a debt load of nearly 6 trillion, cuts taxes and when asked about deficits, basicially says don't worry, we can spend and cut taxes, deficits don't matter, and.... we are fighting the "axis of evil". By the time he leaves office the debt is at 12 trillion.
In that time period the top tax rate in this country went from 70% to 35%.
Forgive me if I missed most of the great economic boon coming from cutting taxes in half. Especially since I read the other day that the average American's wages went up a GRAND TOTAL of 4% adjusted for inflation, between 1971 and 2007. American families survived by sending wives out to work, and then by borrowing themselves into poverty. Now...SOME Republicans want the poor and elderly to pay the piper for the debt, because SUDDENLY debt and deficits DO matter.
OT, republicans and democrats are both at fault. However, now we need to fix the problems. Right now, they are getting worse because we continue to do the same things that got us here. Yes, Bush and company helped get us here. But Obama is now accelerating the ill effects. The country has no money with the highest taxes in history. This is an obvious problem, regardless of how we got to this point. We now need to focus on fixing it.
My point in my post centers around the fact our debt is now more than our GDP. Therefore, we have no means to pay this debt other than to print money. This hurts everyone including the middle class and the poor. I wish for everyone to stop the blame game and simply redirect the focus to actually fixing the problem. Everyone is going to have to participate at fixing this problem.
Again, just my opinion, and if I sound a little bit cynical, it is probably because I am as well. Right now we have come to a rock barrier in a road with a semi truck barrelling towards us from the rear. Our solution to this problem is removing one rock at a time rather than taking a backhoe and removing a lot of rocks at a time. Stupid analogy, but I hope it helps make my point

Since: Mar 10

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#76227
Apr 13, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Pete wrote:
<quoted text>
We are at record high tax levels already.
This is simply not true.
Dunlapian

Dunlap, TN

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#76228
Apr 13, 2013
 
The Original Amused wrote:
<quoted text>
Where do you work? I pay almost double that each week and I've got one of the better plans in town. Does your healthcare cover anything more than leeches? I haven't paid a healthcare premium that low since Clinton was in office.
Well OA, only since you brought it up, I use to pay half of that when I was working,(at one time we didn't pay anything at all) now that I'm retired I now I pay a little more. But don't think the company did it out of the goodness of their heart, it takes a good Union for that to happen.
The only thing I can say is that it is BlueCross BlueShield which is a POS, and it covers Medical,Dental and Vision,
I have a $20 deductible.
They do provide me with other options every year, but my wife does the choosing.
Dunlapian

Dunlap, TN

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#76230
Apr 13, 2013
 
Scarlett Pimple wrote:
<quoted text>
"In fiscal 2010, according to numbers published by the Census Bureau and the Office of Management and Budget (OMB), net spending by all levels of government in the United States was $5,942,988,401,000. That equaled $50,074 for each one of the 118,682,000 households in the country.
In that same year, according to the Census Bureau, the median household income was $49,445."
http://www.sumnerbooks.com/books/view/complet...
"A nation whose government spends per family more than the typical family earns is on the road to ruin. "
O.K., Thanks!
But wait, the Feds just don't get ALL of their revenue from households, now does it?
They also squeeze taxes out of Corporations(people per Romney)and other places. So it's not sound math when you take a number(net spending) and divide it by just "households" and leave off all other forms of income.
But still I do agree with you that we are spending way too much.
Now what I do see coming, or at least what the Republicans want to do is "FIRST" take it off the backs of those that need it the most.
Overtaxed

Thorn Hill, TN

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#76231
Apr 13, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Pete wrote:
<quoted text>
OT, republicans and democrats are both at fault. However, now we need to fix the problems. Right now, they are getting worse because we continue to do the same things that got us here. Yes, Bush and company helped get us here. But Obama is now accelerating the ill effects. The country has no money with the highest taxes in history. This is an obvious problem, regardless of how we got to this point. We now need to focus on fixing it.
My point in my post centers around the fact our debt is now more than our GDP. Therefore, we have no means to pay this debt other than to print money. This hurts everyone including the middle class and the poor. I wish for everyone to stop the blame game and simply redirect the focus to actually fixing the problem. Everyone is going to have to participate at fixing this problem.
Again, just my opinion, and if I sound a little bit cynical, it is probably because I am as well. Right now we have come to a rock barrier in a road with a semi truck barrelling towards us from the rear. Our solution to this problem is removing one rock at a time rather than taking a backhoe and removing a lot of rocks at a time. Stupid analogy, but I hope it helps make my point
"Pete" your assetrion that we have the highest taxes in history is simply....wrong. The top tax bracket under Eisenhower was 91%. The top bracket when Reagan was inaugurated was 70% the top bracket today is under 40%. Capital gains are half that top rate.
In 1976 the top 1% held 19% of the wealth in America. By 2000 they held 40% and today slightly under 50%...so SOME Americans have the ability to pay the debt. What congress and Obama need to do is grow a backbone and tax those who have gotten a free ride as the rest of us have barely stayed afloat, not look to the 99% which COLLECTIVELY have little more than the 1% do, to correct the mistakes made over 30 years. If a jump to 70% on the highest earners isn't enough, there are always tariffs on cheap Chinese junk which we are swimming in thanks in part to Wal-mart and our free trader friends in both parties.... I believe it was Willie Sutton who, when asked why he robbed banks, answered "because that's where the money is". Well we all know where the money is in our country and it isn't in the back pockets of average Americans. If the traesury needs to further constrict the pittance given to retirees, I suggest they divest a few bucks from those who can well afford it FIRST. To take more dollars out of the pockets of retirees and working class Americans just constricts their buying power all the more and exacerbates an already sluggish recovery.
Overtaxed

Thorn Hill, TN

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#76232
Apr 13, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Dunlapian wrote:
<quoted text>O.K., Thanks!
But wait, the Feds just don't get ALL of their revenue from households, now does it?
They also squeeze taxes out of Corporations(people per Romney)and other places. So it's not sound math when you take a number(net spending) and divide it by just "households" and leave off all other forms of income.
But still I do agree with you that we are spending way too much.
Now what I do see coming, or at least what the Republicans want to do is "FIRST" take it off the backs of those that need it the most.
Seems funny to me that the emphasis of this is that the government is spending as much per family as an average family makes...but not at what a pittance a fifty thousand dollar average income for an American family is !
We spent last year hearing what a terrible time folks were going to have if incomes over 250K were subjected to a 3% income tax raise....but NOTHING about the fact that the average American family has to get by on ONE FIFTH of that. Now our elected representatives are busy telling us that 50K is enough to live on and still save to suppliment a retirement, because government must cut the COLA for seniors....Talk about being out of touch with average Americans....they aren't out of touch they are from a different planet.
Scarlett Pimple

Jamestown, TN

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#76233
Apr 13, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

The Original Amused wrote:
<quoted text>
This is simply not true.
Overtaxed wrote:
<quoted text> "Pete" your assetrion that we have the highest taxes in history is simply....wrong.
Pete was not talking about tax rates, he was talking about tax receipts - the amount extracted from those who actually work and pay federal income taxes.

According to the CBO in this document:

http://www.cbo.gov/sites/default/files/cbofil...

the federal Treasury expects to collect a record $2.712 trillion in taxes on Americans and U.S. business this year, shattering the 2007 high of $2.5 trillion in taxes.

And the fine print in President Obama's budget presented Wednesday reveals that the administration expects to take more in taxes than the Congressional Budget Office projects.

The president's 376-page "Historical Tables," projects that tax receipts will soar during the remainder of the president's second term, reaching nearly $4 trillion in 2018.

http://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files...

Something tells me that it won't all come out the hides of the rich.....
Bump

Lebanon, TN

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#76234
Apr 13, 2013
 
John J. Hooker
Overtaxed

Thorn Hill, TN

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#76235
Apr 13, 2013
 
Hey wrote:
<quoted text>
I asked you some of the seperate questions that first responders,building experts,family members,demolition experts and the 9/11 commission committee are asking.
You are not answering the individual Questions that don't stack up with reality.
How does molten steel run down the building from an office fire? The steel in the building is melting from office furniture that's burning,then it collapses in its own footprint in a few seconds with no resistence? The point is it can't.I'm not saying this, the experts are saying this,and there are a lot of experts involved in wanting answers.
You say you don't think i'll be satisfied no matter what answers I get but you have not answered any questions I've asked,You just come back with how silly to think you could get such involvement but these folks are looking at these individual things that do not add up,and there is many many of these that don't add up.
Fifty percent of a building gone in the dust just does not sit well with the experts who are aware of these kinds of issues.
I think it's important to know these answers for this country as we know it is day by day losing it's place as a free nation,and there are a lot of dead people in this war on terror.
Just answer this 1 question on building 7.I know it's a magical building that stands its ground one half hour after the BBC said in went down,but that's another story another rock to look under.
Well, "Hey" I would guess that a jet is powered by jet engines, and that jet engines run on jet fuel, and that jet fuel burns fairly easily and a fire from jet fuel would get pretty hot...but I never claimed to be a structural engineer, and I have no idea how or why the buildings fell.
I am sure there are people with questions, and engineers that have opinions, and those who claim to have heard or seen unusual things....and those who will pay them to express their opinions and those who will exploit those opinions, heck I know a man that believes our country never landed a man on the moon. Another big conspiracy to get money out of the treasury according to him....
I am not going to attempt to answer any of your questions...since I am no expert on how this building went up or how it came down. I did watch a documntary where an engineer was explaining how the towers were built and why it was possible to have them collapse as they did, but truthfully much of his explaination went over my head.
I do not believe any conspiracy happened here. If you do, power to you !
Overtaxed

Thorn Hill, TN

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#76236
Apr 13, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Scarlett Pimple wrote:
<quoted text>
<quoted text>
Pete was not talking about tax rates, he was talking about tax receipts - the amount extracted from those who actually work and pay federal income taxes.
According to the CBO in this document:
http://www.cbo.gov/sites/default/files/cbofil...
the federal Treasury expects to collect a record $2.712 trillion in taxes on Americans and U.S. business this year, shattering the 2007 high of $2.5 trillion in taxes.
And the fine print in President Obama's budget presented Wednesday reveals that the administration expects to take more in taxes than the Congressional Budget Office projects.
The president's 376-page "Historical Tables," projects that tax receipts will soar during the remainder of the president's second term, reaching nearly $4 trillion in 2018.
http://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files...
Something tells me that it won't all come out the hides of the rich.....
If that 4 trillion dollar number isn't too rosy an estimate, maybe congress and the administration will stop trying to milk the last dollar out of those who can least afford it, and folks like me that depend on the spending from those average Americans, to survive in business can FINALLY breath a sigh of relief.
Pete

Nashville, TN

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#76237
Apr 13, 2013
 
Overtaxed wrote:
<quoted text> Seems funny to me that the emphasis of this is that the government is spending as much per family as an average family makes...but not at what a pittance a fifty thousand dollar average income for an American family is !
We spent last year hearing what a terrible time folks were going to have if incomes over 250K were subjected to a 3% income tax raise....but NOTHING about the fact that the average American family has to get by on ONE FIFTH of that. Now our elected representatives are busy telling us that 50K is enough to live on and still save to suppliment a retirement, because government must cut the COLA for seniors....Talk about being out of touch with average Americans....they aren't out of touch they are from a different planet.
OT, I'm not simply making this up. News articles everywhere have been reporting this for months.

http://www.newsmax.com/US/tax-revenue-record-...
Hey

Cookeville, TN

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#76238
Apr 13, 2013
 
Overtaxed wrote:
<quoted text> Well, "Hey" I would guess that a jet is powered by jet engines, and that jet engines run on jet fuel, and that jet fuel burns fairly easily and a fire from jet fuel would get pretty hot...but I never claimed to be a structural engineer, and I have no idea how or why the buildings fell.
I am sure there are people with questions, and engineers that have opinions, and those who claim to have heard or seen unusual things....and those who will pay them to express their opinions and those who will exploit those opinions, heck I know a man that believes our country never landed a man on the moon. Another big conspiracy to get money out of the treasury according to him....
I am not going to attempt to answer any of your questions...since I am no expert on how this building went up or how it came down. I did watch a documntary where an engineer was explaining how the towers were built and why it was possible to have them collapse as they did, but truthfully much of his explaination went over my head.
I do not believe any conspiracy happened here. If you do, power to you !
So from what I take from your remarks is that you don't believe anything is wrong with the official story put forward basically by Bush and Cheney because you think it would be too hard to bring something like that together.
Well I say look how many were involved in the scam of the American Medical Assoc. to get the alternative therapies out of their way.How many agencies conspired to take this competeing method of healing down.
How many picked up on that Quack word to describe natural methods and make them even laughable.Many did,you said it yourself, their method worked didn't it.There were people jailed because they had the damn nerve to cure folks from cancer without using chemo or radiation even when they were sent home to die by the groupies.
How many conspire to keep Monsanto going strong even to threaten other countries if they go against them?Is this not a whole bunch of folks conspiring on Monsanto's behalf?
There are thousands in this group.
Jet fuel does not burn hot enough to melt steel And office furniture certainly does not. Building 7 was not hit by a plane.It simply had office fires and went down in it's own footprint.This does not seem out of place to you?
PairAnnoyed

North Augusta, SC

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#76240
Apr 13, 2013
 
Hey wrote:
<quoted text>
So from what I take from your remarks is that you don't believe anything is wrong with the official story put forward basically by Bush and Cheney because you think it would be too hard to bring something like that together.
Well I say look how many were involved in the scam of the American Medical Assoc. to get the alternative therapies out of their way.How many agencies conspired to take this competeing method of healing down.
How many picked up on that Quack word to describe natural methods and make them even laughable.Many did,you said it yourself, their method worked didn't it.There were people jailed because they had the damn nerve to cure folks from cancer without using chemo or radiation even when they were sent home to die by the groupies.
How many conspire to keep Monsanto going strong even to threaten other countries if they go against them?Is this not a whole bunch of folks conspiring on Monsanto's behalf?
There are thousands in this group.
Jet fuel does not burn hot enough to melt steel And office furniture certainly does not. Building 7 was not hit by a plane.It simply had office fires and went down in it's own footprint.This does not seem out of place to you?
Bush & Cheney had nothing to do with the report. Neither of those two have enough smarts to concoct a bogus report. But, it's obvious to even a non engineer, that the planes caused the buildings to collapse.
Hey

Cookeville, TN

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#76241
Apr 13, 2013
 

Judged:

1

PairAnnoyed wrote:
<quoted text>
Bush & Cheney had nothing to do with the report. Neither of those two have enough smarts to concoct a bogus report. But, it's obvious to even a non engineer, that the planes caused the buildings to collapse.
The 9/11 Comission Report Committee had an appointment with Bush after some effort to get it and they complained they were not getting answers and found that disturbing.
This was the investigative team into 9/11.
The Original _Mobile

Livingston, TN

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#76242
Apr 13, 2013
 

Judged:

1

old Timer wrote:
<quoted text>
Where have you been hiding?
Smoke break.....

Tell me when this thread is updated: (Registration is not required)

Add to my Tracker Send me an email

Showing posts 68,481 - 68,500 of123,971
|
Go to last page| Jump to page:
Type in your comments below
Name
(appears on your post)
Comments
Characters left: 4000
Type the numbers you see in the image on the right:

Please note by clicking on "Post Comment" you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

36 Users are viewing the Greeneville Forum right now

Search the Greeneville Forum:
Topic Updated Last By Comments
Sheriff Burns should resign (Mar '12) 44 min Pot Pie 85
Yet an another murder in Greene County 51 min Interesting 153
preg deli girl at walmart 55 min Sex buddy 3
I love this forum because?????? 1 hr Pot Pie 238
Greene County Clerk Race 1 hr Pot Pie 109
A Great Big Fck You 1 hr Non-Fan 250
FUNERAL HOMES do they remove gold teeth (Oct '12) 1 hr Alyagotado 16
Greene County Mayor's Race 4 hr bozo palace 100
•••
•••
•••
•••

Greeneville Jobs

•••
•••
•••

Greeneville People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

•••

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]
•••