Are you suggesting in any way that "DEBATE" can exist without "insult"? Were you ever taught that "ALL" human thought is philisophically, politically or principally "Reconcilable"? If so, you got ripped for the cost of your education. Moreover, you need to discard the drama and false indignation! You know better than this. I get insulted every time I watch television, listen to radio, read ridiculous editorials or seek critical thinking from stupid people!<quoted text>All in one post;
You say quote,"I disagree with you, and for that, you resort to name calling and insults"
Then you go on to say "Liberals always decry Obama is trying to 'work with' the Pubs-BS!"
There's much in life which is "NOT" reconcilable, not attributive to human intransigence, but simply because conflict manifests itself in things which are found to be incongruent, anomalous, at variance, differing, disagreeing, disconsonant, discordant, discrepant, dissentient, inconsistent, inconsonant,etcetera.
Many things in life are inherently incongruant. As though it were necessary to further illustrate, the example demonstrated by the inability for you and I to agree on matters which are "Value based" is adequately self evidencing.
I see you erroneously claimed an apology from a mere clarification, which "I" think is bull-sh/t! People have a right to their activities, but I'm thinking you may wish to reconsider yours if contemporary vernacularisms are too much for your social sensitivies.