Since: Jul 10

Cumberland City, TN

#68754 Feb 22, 2013
Dunlapian wrote:
<quoted text>So why is it called an Obama phone?
Not sure but thats what many call the free cell and home phone service you can get from welfare. Again , not sure when it started but my guess with the name implyed it started with obamo.
WILLARD

Dunlap, TN

#68755 Feb 22, 2013
TJohn wrote:
<quoted text>The next time you have to re-certify for your food stamps ask your case worker and you can apply for a cell phone and a voucher for a land line for your home. You take the voucher to your local phone company and then you will get service based on the amount of the voucher.
You need to watch this video, it explains the Obama-phone giveaway!

CLICK TO WATCH VIDEO: http://bit.ly/P2EwQO
crazya55whiteboy

Rock Island, TN

#68756 Feb 22, 2013
Its crazy how people turn against each other just cuz one has more money than the other, gives them a sense of feeling more higher up than the rest of people,and how greed can create such chaos when those people start wanting to make even more, (ceos and politicians and corps) while paying workers less, the republican party is trying to kill the middle class especially when single parents are living below poverty line while working full time jobs and wanting to strip social security and food stamps and any other benefit that helps those less fortunate instead of raising taxes on the extremely wealthy. i find that greed the kinda thing that creates most most of our problems here in the United States. we need a new increase in the minimum wage and it does not effect the jobs numbers in doing so it actually helps because people dont want to work all day and only bring home $280 a week and thats not enough to raise kids on and save money back its impossible. i voted democrat Mike Mcwherter and every other democrat that will run because republicans are racist and corrupt inside and out.
Guadalupe

Matawan, NJ

#68757 Feb 22, 2013
Dunlapian wrote:
<quoted text>So why is it called an Obama phone?
How did you get your obama phone?
Cornbread

Scottsville, KY

#68758 Feb 22, 2013
So why is it called an Obama phone?

All because one Black woman was caught on video at a rally, saying something like "I Love my Obama phone."

There is one problem with the Obama Phone: It doesn’t exist. Obama didn't start the program .

Since 2009 there has been an urban myth that Obama created a program to provide free phones to low-income Americans at taxpayer expense.

There is, in fact, a government program that will provide low-income people with a free or low cost cell phone. This policy started with land line phones first, since cell phones weren't around. It began in the 1980's.

The idea of providing low-income individuals with subsidized phone service was originated in the Reagan administration following the break-up of AT&T in 1984.(It was expanded and formalized by the Telecommunications Act of 1996.) The program is paid for by telecommunications companies through an independent non-profit, not through tax revenue.
Truth Detector

Jamestown, TN

#68759 Feb 22, 2013
Teapublican wrote:
<quoted text>How can I get an Obama phone?
http://obamaphone.net/
Unreal

Dandridge, TN

#68760 Feb 22, 2013
The Obama Phone?

Posted on October 29, 2009 , Updated on Nov. 5, 2009



Q: Has the Obama administration started a program to use "taxpayer money" to give free cell phones to welfare recipients?

A: No. Low-income households have been eligible for discounted telephone service for more than a decade. But the program is funded by telecom companies, not by taxes, and the president has nothing to do with it.

FULL QUESTION

Is this e-mail true?


I had a former employee call me earlier today inquiring about a job, and at the end of the conversation he gave me his phone number. I asked the former employee if this was a new cell phone number and he told me yes this was his "Obama phone."

&#11024; Click to expand/collapse the full text &#11023;

FULL ANSWER

Welfare recipients, and others, can receive a free cell phone, but the program is not funded by the government or taxpayer money, as the e-mail alleges. And it’s hardly new.

How It Works

SafeLink Wireless, the program mentioned in the e-mail, does indeed offer a cell phone, about one hour’s worth of calling time per month, and other wireless services like voice mail to eligible low-income households. Applicants have to apply and prove that they are either receiving certain types of government benefits, such as Medicaid, or have household incomes at or below 135 percent of the poverty line. Using 2009 poverty guidelines, that’s $14,620 for an individual and a little under $30,000 for a family of four, with slightly higher amounts for Alaska and Hawaii.

SafeLink is run by a subsidiary of América Móvil, the world’s fourth largest wireless company in terms of subscribers, but it is not paid for directly by the company. Nor is it paid for with "tax payer money," as the e-mail claims. Rather, it is funded through the Universal Service Fund, which is administered by the Universal Service Administrative Company, an independent, not-for-profit corporation set up by the Federal Communications Commission. The USF is sustained by contributions from telecommunications companies such as "long distance companies, local telephone companies, wireless telephone companies, paging companies, and payphone providers." The companies often charge customers to fund their contributions in the form of a universal service fee you might see on your monthly phone bill. The fund is then parceled out to companies, such as América Móvil, that create programs, such as SafeLink, to provide telecommunications service to rural areas and low-income households.

...
The president has no direct impact on the program, and one could hardly call these devices "Obama Phones," as the e-mail author does. This specific program, SafeLink, started under President George Bush, with grants from an independent company created under President Bill Clinton, which was a legacy of an act passed under President Franklin Roosevelt, which was influenced by an agreement reached between telecommunications companies and the administration of President Woodrow Wilson.

Wilson Phones, anyone?

Read more:
http://www.factcheck.org/2009/10/the-obama-ph...
Dunlapian

Dunlap, TN

#68761 Feb 22, 2013
TJohn wrote:
<quoted text>Not sure but thats what many call the free cell and home phone service you can get from welfare. Again , not sure when it started but my guess with the name implyed it started with obamo.
Well allow me to set you straight!

http://www.factcheck.org/2009/10/the-obama-ph...

Since: Feb 13

Location hidden

#68762 Feb 22, 2013
WILLARD wrote:
<quoted text>How are you today?
I'm doing well. And you?

Since: Jul 10

Cumberland City, TN

#68763 Feb 22, 2013
Cornbread wrote:
So why is it called an Obama phone?
All because one Black woman was caught on video at a rally, saying something like "I Love my Obama phone."
There is one problem with the Obama Phone: It doesn’t exist. Obama didn't start the program .
Since 2009 there has been an urban myth that Obama created a program to provide free phones to low-income Americans at taxpayer expense.
There is, in fact, a government program that will provide low-income people with a free or low cost cell phone. This policy started with land line phones first, since cell phones weren't around. It began in the 1980's.
The idea of providing low-income individuals with subsidized phone service was originated in the Reagan administration following the break-up of AT&T in 1984.(It was expanded and formalized by the Telecommunications Act of 1996.) The program is paid for by telecommunications companies through an independent non-profit, not through tax revenue.
If true then you blew two urban myths out of the water. One the " obamo phone " myth and the other the " republicans only wanna help rich people " urban myth.

Just for the record the phones are not " free " because someone down the road has to pay for them. Somehow I believe taxpayers flip the bill for some if not most of the bill. I`m funny that way.
Truth Detector

Jamestown, TN

#68764 Feb 22, 2013
TJohn wrote:
<quoted text>I can see it now. Obamo standing on a street corner with one of those sighs saying " THE END IS NEAR " with a date on it March 1st 2013. I promise you the world isn`t coming to an end in the next week because of these cuts.
Yes it IS! ABC News said so. Right here:

http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/OTUS/57-terrib...

57 Terrible Consequences of the Sequester

“Committee Chairwoman Barbara Mikulski, D-Md., they warned of terrible things: Greater risk of wildfires, fewer OSHA inspections and a risk of more workplace deaths, 125,000 people risking homelessness with cuts to shelters and housing vouchers, neglect for mentally ill and homeless Americans who would lose services, Native Americans getting turned away from hospitals, cuts to schools on reservations and prison lockdowns. There's also a higher risk of terrorism with surveillance limited and the FBI potentially unable to disrupt plots, closed housing projects, and 600,000 women and children thrown off WIC.”

OH The HORROR of it all. Look:

1. Air Travel Disruption
Transportation Secretary Ray LaHood: "A vast majority of the FAA's nearly 47,000 employees will be furloughed for approximately one day per pay period until the end of the fiscal year in September, with a maximum of two days per pay period....

2. Longer Security Lines at Airports
3. Slower Extreme-Weather Forecasts
4. Greater Risk of Wildfires
5. Pest-Infested Crops
6. Nationwide Meat and Poultry Shortage
7. Prison Lockdowns
8. Slower Gun Background Checks
9. Fewer FBI Agents
10. Immigration Backlog
11. Longer Waits for Passports and Foreign Visas
12. Neglect for Mentally Ill, Homeless, and Substance Addicted
13. 125,000 Would Be at Risk of Homelessness
14. 600,000 Women and Children Thrown Off WIC
15. 424,000 Fewer AIDS Tests, 7,400 Fewer Patients Could Get HIV Medications
16. No Rent Assistance for 7,300 AIDS Patients
17. 807,000 Fewer Hospital Visits for Native Americans, Hospital Closures
18. Dilapidated Low-Income Housing, Closed Projects
19. No Child Care for 30,000 Kids, No Head Start for 70,000
20. Longer Waits for Disability Payments
21.$725 Million in Cuts for Low-Income and Special-Needs Students
22. Cuts to Schools on Indian Reservations
23. Native American Tribes Would Lose Almost $130 Million
24. Higher Risk of Terrorism
25. Untranslated Wiretaps
26. Less Surveillance
27. Classified Information Vulnerable to Foreign Spies
28. An Even More Porous Border
29. Untended Nukes
30. U.S. Less Prepared for a 'WMD Incident'
31. FBI Will Eventually Be Using Broken Equipment, Could Have Trouble Tracking Fingerprints
32. 1/3 Cutback in Pacific Naval Presence
33. Reduced Army Readiness
34. No Maintenance for Some Ships and Planes
35. 46,000 Defense Jobs Could Be Lost
36. Some Air Force Planes Can't Fly
37. Less Cybersecurity
38.$1 Billion Cut from Disaster Relief
39. First-Responder Layoffs
40. Coast Guard Operations Cut by 1/4, Drugs Coming In on Boats
41.$500 Million Cut from Foreign Economic and Military Aid
42.$380 Million Cut from Global AIDS Funding
43. Less Security at U.S. Facilities Abroad, Less Protection for Americans Abroad
44. Freed Up Terror Money
45. U.S. Attorneys Will Take 2,600 Fewer Cases
46. Smaller Unemployment Checks
47. 1,200 Fewer OSHA Inspections, Potential for More Workplace Deaths
48. Fewer Mine Inspections
49. No Job Training for Hundreds of Thousands of People, Less Training for Veterans
50. 1,928 Fewer Small Business Loans
51. Slower Reporting on Economic Data, Less Analysis of It
52. Parks? Can't Use 'Em.
53. 128 Refuges Could Close
54. Less Drilling and Exploration, Offshore and Onshore
55. Fewer Air-Quality Forecasts
56. 1,000 Fewer Environmental Compliance Inspections
57. Less Nuclear Cleanup

Whew! If they do all that on $44 Billion, What do they spend the other $3.6 TRILLION on?

I didn’t notice any cuts for fuel for Air Force One.

Since: Feb 13

Location hidden

#68765 Feb 22, 2013
SexySassySenior wrote:
<quoted text>Why do you blame the "Dem/Libs" for this? Where were you when George W. Bush and the Republican-Controlled Congress voted in a change to the "Emminent Domain" Law, so they could take your Property for any Corporation or Company that would pay more Taxes on it, than you do and there's not a thing you can do about it? Where were you then? Where were you in 2011, when Boehner bragged about getting the Sequestration Option from Obama in exchange for agreeing not to send the Country into Default? Where were you then? Where are you now, that the Teapublicans are willing to let the Country go back into a major Economic downfall, again, just to protect the Wealthiest from paying more than a 14% Tax Rate and/or close the Tax Loopholes that enable them to pay zero taxes, instead of paying the 28 to 32% that you pay, or are willing to let THEIR Sequestration that Boehner bragged about getting agreed to, that will surely almost destroy YOU and just about everybody else , as well as this economy? WHERE WERE YOU THEN AND WHERE ARE YOU NOW???
I can PROVE what I'm accusing Boehner/Teapublicans of, can you prove what you're blaming the Dems/Libs of???
You can object but your objection is lost underneath the name calling. I was prepared to read your rebuttal up to the name calling of the other party. So close yet so far sweet lady. Is it just not in your character to object to someone's opinion without attempting to belittle them? There are better ways I promise you. Why don't you make a point today of avoiding any response filled with sarcastic remarks?
Unreal

Dandridge, TN

#68766 Feb 22, 2013
TJohn wrote:
<quoted text>If true then you blew two urban myths out of the water. One the " obamo phone " myth and the other the " republicans only wanna help rich people " urban myth.
Just for the record the phones are not " free " because someone down the road has to pay for them. Somehow I believe taxpayers flip the bill for some if not most of the bill. I`m funny that way.
Yes, it is called the "universal service fee" that is on all our bills for each phone we have.

Since: Jul 10

Cumberland City, TN

#68767 Feb 22, 2013
Dunlapian wrote:
<quoted text>Well allow me to set you straight!
http://www.factcheck.org/2009/10/the-obama-ph...
I got a small chuckle when I read the part about me being " set straight " . " Don`t be offended when I say I really don`t give a flying rip ! I soon realized I messed up when I started down this rabbit trail into the weeds. To be honest the turd who asked the question was really being a smart ass. I admit I have on occasion used the term " obama phone " and now that I know the truth I might not use the term again but then again.
Unreal

Dandridge, TN

#68768 Feb 22, 2013
Really Sassy wrote:
<quoted text>
You can object but your objection is lost underneath the name calling. I was prepared to read your rebuttal up to the name calling of the other party. So close yet so far sweet lady. Is it just not in your character to object to someone's opinion without attempting to belittle them? There are better ways I promise you. Why don't you make a point today of avoiding any response filled with sarcastic remarks?
but, but, but.... I thought you were opposed to telling posters what to post...

I guess that is only when it goes against your posts?
Dunlapian

Dunlap, TN

#68769 Feb 22, 2013
TJohn wrote:
<quoted text>
I got a small chuckle when I read the part about me being " set straight " . " Don`t be offended when I say I really don`t give a flying rip ! I soon realized I messed up when I started down this rabbit trail into the weeds. To be honest the turd who asked the question was really being a smart ass. I admit I have on occasion used the term " obama phone " and now that I know the truth I might not use the term again but then again.
Yeah, watch that rabbit trail!
Honestly

Beechgrove, TN

#68770 Feb 22, 2013
SexySassySenior wrote:
<quoted text>
Why do you blame the "Dem/Libs" for this? Where were you when George W. Bush and the Republican-Controlled Congress voted in a change to the "Emminent Domain" Law, so they could take your Property for any Corporation or Company that would pay more Taxes on it, than you do and there's not a thing you can do about it? Where were you then? Where were you in 2011, when Boehner bragged about getting the Sequestration Option from Obama in exchange for agreeing not to send the Country into Default? Where were you then? Where are you now, that the Teapublicans are willing to let the Country go back into a major Economic downfall, again, just to protect the Wealthiest from paying more than a 14% Tax Rate and/or close the Tax Loopholes that enable them to pay zero taxes, instead of paying the 28 to 32% that you pay, or are willing to let THEIR Sequestration that Boehner bragged about getting agreed to, that will surely almost destroy YOU and just about everybody else , as well as this economy? WHERE WERE YOU THEN AND WHERE ARE YOU NOW???
I can PROVE what I'm accusing Boehner/Teapublicans of, can you prove what you're blaming the Dems/Libs of???
Here you go shooting off without facts:

Congress did not vote in a change to the ""Emminent Domain" Law,"
2005---SUpreme Court Ruled in favor of a developer in NewJersey.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kelo_v._City_of_...

June 23, 2006, G. Bush issued executive order limiting the amount and type of land that could be seized. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eminent_domain

Obama put in the Sequester we are now going through. Do you think that everybody should just let you spend and spend and spend with out them saying anything. Obama is a failure so far.

Lets see, Obama just got that 14% on the Rich and now he wants more. Try to keep up.

Congress has passed two bills, held up by dirty harry, that would make necessary cuts, to get rid of the sequester and close loopholes among other things. Boy, Your brain washed bad.

Oh, the obama's buddies can pay no taxes but if they are a considered a republican business, they have to pay it all back. Lets, see, there General Electric, Apple, and Now, facebook that does not pay any (ZERO taxes)

How many are tea party people are there in congress (15-20??? out of 400+...

I have come to the conclusion that most (not all) the people the write in the thread are either related, have been related, are friends, or live within the same neighbor hood. Why? because all you do is fuss and fight, call each other names, and then tell each other stories about the big bad teapublicans that will take you house away, burn you babies, kill your dogs, put in a dungeon, starve you, take away your welfare, food stamps and ....and........ God help you cause I can't

Sometimes its better to turn away from a lost cause than try and correct it and lose.
Honestly

Beechgrove, TN

#68771 Feb 22, 2013
Dunlapian wrote:
<quoted text>So why is it called an Obama phone?
WHy do you blame everything on BUsh,, turn about is fair play....LOL
Cornbread

Scottsville, KY

#68772 Feb 22, 2013
TJohn wrote:
<quoted text>If true then you blew two urban myths out of the water. One the " obamo phone " myth and the other the " republicans only wanna help rich people " urban myth.
Just for the record the phones are not " free " because someone down the road has to pay for them. Somehow I believe taxpayers flip the bill for some if not most of the bill. I`m funny that way.
It isn't free. The rest of us pay a fee on our phone bills to help cover the cost. But technically... it isn't a tax.
The creation of the Lifeline program -- which has now been dubbed the "Obama phone" -- during the Reagan administration was one of these attempts to ensure that the new fragmented and competitive telecom industry still provided the same public goods that the old monopoly did.
Far from a government cheese handout, Lifeline was funded through a "universal service charge" on phone bills, and then administered by a private non-profit. While the distinction between a surcharge and a tax may seem technical, it was specifically selected to over a proposed welfare program — a straight-up handout referred to as "phone stamps." The Universal Service Fund was created to be a lean, nimble private sector beast.
The guys who came up with the idea for Lifeline were Republican Sen. Bob Packwood and Democratic Rep. John Dingell. The Reagan administration soon got on board, as The New York Times reported on December 27, 1983, in part because of "a growing recognition that the price of telephone service could become a 1984 campaign issue." Then other Republicans got on board -- Sens. John Heinz and John Chafee urged the Federal Communications Commission to "take concrete steps to ensure that local telephone companies offer lifeline programs designed to preserve affordable phone service," according to The Washington Post on September 15, 1985.
http://www.theatlanticwire.com/politics/2012/...
Honestly

Beechgrove, TN

#68773 Feb 22, 2013
TJohn wrote:
<quoted text>
One women recently on the news this week gets approx.$80,000 per year while sitting at home with two kids.
I also saw this report and it stated the woman was studying to be a nurse and one child was in daycare and the other in pre-school with that be the bulk of the assistance but the total wasn`t 80 k but it could be as high as 80 k with other programs available to her. I agree with helping people esp those who are trying to help themselves but the problem is we don`t have the money and 80 k is alot when you consider the amount of people who can get it. I wish I had enough money to help everybody out of poverty but I don`t and if tried I would soon be with em. I see us all in the ditch and my question is who will help America when that time comes and it`s coming.
Other then that the rest of your post is pretty spot on.
thanks for the adjustment

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Greeneville Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Funeral home directors trained for EBOLA burial... 7 min Hope 2
FERGUSON PD ressigned to White House security 11 min Hope 6
fun thing to do ***Keep a Word~Drop a Word*** (Sep '10) 31 min JustMe 4,574
Shanna Carter 35 min My two cents 2
Y are people on here so big on spelling 1 hr Dr Wu 5
Jan Kiker is disgusting 1 hr Hey son 22
Are u a son of the south 1 hr Hmmm 17
get rid of Robert Sayne 3 hr gc resident 36
Greeneville Dating
Find my Match

Greeneville Jobs

Greeneville People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

Greeneville News, Events & Info

Click for news, events and info in Greeneville

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]