“"U.S. Constitution"”

Since: Mar 09

Tea-Party

#67624 Feb 17, 2013
Funny I always hear the liberals saying the same thing......lol

Since: Feb 13

Location hidden

#67625 Feb 17, 2013
Pete wrote:
<quoted text>
She'll never get it. That is why she is destined to poverty. Wonder if she could tell us one thing she did this week to improve her financial situation other than blaming her predicament on the rich and Fox News?
If it's coming from you, Pete, I don't want it! First of all, you'd never let me forget those 2 Pennies that you once gave me and second of all, I'd have to pry those 2 Pennies out of your cold dead hand, to get them! So, NO thank you! The "pay-off" isn't worth the hassle!
I'll bet you squeeze a nickle until the buffalo poops!
really

Jackson, TN

#67626 Feb 17, 2013
SexySassySenior wrote:
<quoted text>
Let me guess...you're a ignorant Tea Bagger, aren't you? You can spot 'em before you ever see 'em...they constantly yell, "Mine, Mine, Mine" or. "Gimmee, Gimmee, Gimmee".
coming from the old ass bitch who's on welfare, a bit funny don't you think? most democraps are welfare recipents.While we republicans work for a living while you cry wanting more free shit!

“"U.S. Constitution"”

Since: Mar 09

Tea-Party

#67627 Feb 17, 2013
According to this, thousands and thousands of Americans who can't get health insurance due to pre-existing conditions are going to be denied coverage from the Pre-Existing Conditions Insurance Plan - which is sort of a collective of high risk pools set up under Obamacare. As you might guess from the name of the program, it was set up specifically to provide coverage to people with pre-existing conditions.

But because Obama is patently unable to make any sound decisions related to the economy, or finances, or money in general, the program has already run out of money, and now has to turn away thousands of people. BRILLIANT!

See, these high risk pools were set up in the summer of 2010 as a "temporary bridge" to last until 2014, when the full effects of Obamacare will be realized, and insurance companies aren't ALLOWED to turn away anyone based on pre-existing conditions. But they underestimated the financial burden, because that is what Democrats do, and so now they can only afford to cover the 100k people who are already enrolled, and no further applications are being accepted.
http://chicksontheright.com/posts/item/23828-...

Since: Feb 13

Location hidden

#67628 Feb 17, 2013
Dee Lay wrote:
According to this, thousands and thousands of Americans who can't get health insurance due to pre-existing conditions are going to be denied coverage from the Pre-Existing Conditions Insurance Plan - which is sort of a collective of high risk pools set up under Obamacare. As you might guess from the name of the program, it was set up specifically to provide coverage to people with pre-existing conditions.
But because Obama is patently unable to make any sound decisions related to the economy, or finances, or money in general, the program has already run out of money, and now has to turn away thousands of people. BRILLIANT!
See, these high risk pools were set up in the summer of 2010 as a "temporary bridge" to last until 2014, when the full effects of Obamacare will be realized, and insurance companies aren't ALLOWED to turn away anyone based on pre-existing conditions. But they underestimated the financial burden, because that is what Democrats do, and so now they can only afford to cover the 100k people who are already enrolled, and no further applications are being accepted.
http://chicksontheright.com/posts/item/23828-...
The Republicans should have gotten out of the way and let Obama set it up as a single-Payer System, like Obama and the Democrats wanted to do, in the first place.
Sure doesn't say much for Mitt Romney's Plan, which is what Obamacare basically is, now does it?
You Teapublicans would screw up a 3-car, single-file Funeral Procession!
Goodbye

Grand Saline, TX

#67629 Feb 17, 2013
Such a doofus! How can one person be so dumb?
SexySassySenior wrote:
<quoted text>
The Republicans should have gotten out of the way and let Obama set it up as a single-Payer System, like Obama and the Democrats wanted to do, in the first place.
Sure doesn't say much for Mitt Romney's Plan, which is what Obamacare basically is, now does it?
You Teapublicans would screw up a 3-car, single-file Funeral Procession!
Pete

Nashville, TN

#67630 Feb 17, 2013
SexySassySenior wrote:
<quoted text>
The Republicans should have gotten out of the way and let Obama set it up as a single-Payer System, like Obama and the Democrats wanted to do, in the first place.
Sure doesn't say much for Mitt Romney's Plan, which is what Obamacare basically is, now does it?
You Teapublicans would screw up a 3-car, single-file Funeral Procession!
You have got to be kidding! Dee Lay clearly points out that patients with pre-existing conditions are still going to get turned away due to over spending by the government and you think the obvious solution is for the government to take over healthcare entirely????? Did you ever think that if the government can't handle this one simple phase of Obamacare, they just might not be able to handle healthcare in its entirety? DO you ever think before you post period?

Then you go and blame the republicans for screwing it all up and they have nothing to do with this plan. Sure, single payer healthcare is the simple solution in your mind. Why, because you feel entitled to free healthcare and you think a single payer system will give it to you for free. You are the one screaming gimme, gimme, gimme.

Again, tell me how much of what I earn do you actually think you are entitled to? Again, what have you done in the past week that merits anyone giving you anything? What have you done in the past month or the past year? You don't pay any Federal taxes, so you obviously want someone to simply write you a check. What would you do with it? Spend it on cigarettes, more alcohol, lottery tickets?? After that, you would be broke again and be in the same predicament. So how does filching more money off the rich going to help you? I would love to here your answer to that.
Unreal

Dandridge, TN

#67633 Feb 17, 2013
Pete wrote:
<quoted text>
She'll never get it. That is why she is destined to poverty. Wonder if she could tell us one thing she did this week to improve her financial situation other than blaming her predicament on the rich and Fox News?
Well Pete, your outrage over "FU" was diminished with your agreement to this VULGAR post just because it is another enemy of your enemy. You are starting to sound like all the other posters with a vendetta/obsession with one poster instead of someone with any real point.
Pete

Nashville, TN

#67634 Feb 17, 2013
Unreal wrote:
<quoted text>
Well Pete, your outrage over "FU" was diminished with your agreement to this VULGAR post just because it is another enemy of your enemy. You are starting to sound like all the other posters with a vendetta/obsession with one poster instead of someone with any real point.
Sorry, I never use vulgarity and don't condone it. Sometimes I do see a funny post with vulgarity in it, but I enjoy this type of humor privately. And you are absolutely correct, I do have particular interest in one poster who continues to misrepresent the facts, blasphemes, insults, abuses and condemns others simply because they don't share her opinion. I also find her pretty obnoxious with wanting other people's money without doing one thing to earn a penny for herself. And you are also correct by stating I am not alone with this observation. She has many foes who share my same view of her. And just in case you think I am simply jumping all over someone for being liberal, I could care less what political affiliation anyone has. If you want to be a liberal, go be the best one you can be. But condemning another for not being one is a bit narrow minded. Anyway, don't blame me or others for condemning the poster you are referring to, she brings it all on herself. If you agree with her opinions, fine. But don't bash me because I call her out on her misrepresentations.
Unreal

Dandridge, TN

#67635 Feb 17, 2013
Pete wrote:
<quoted text>
Sorry, I never use vulgarity and don't condone it. Sometimes I do see a funny post with vulgarity in it, but I enjoy this type of humor privately. And you are absolutely correct, I do have particular interest in one poster who continues to misrepresent the facts, blasphemes, insults, abuses and condemns others simply because they don't share her opinion. I also find her pretty obnoxious with wanting other people's money without doing one thing to earn a penny for herself. And you are also correct by stating I am not alone with this observation. She has many foes who share my same view of her. And just in case you think I am simply jumping all over someone for being liberal, I could care less what political affiliation anyone has. If you want to be a liberal, go be the best one you can be. But condemning another for not being one is a bit narrow minded. Anyway, don't blame me or others for condemning the poster you are referring to, she brings it all on herself. If you agree with her opinions, fine. But don't bash me because I call her out on her misrepresentations.
I wasn't "bashing" you; I was simply stating that you seem to disregard your "stated values" when it comes to an opportunity to "bash" another poster that you dislike. I do agree with some of her opinions, and when I don't, I have no problem telling her that I disagree, but I don't make my every post about her or her opinions. I like to hear a variety of opinions, but I am tired of every post being about the obsession/dislike of one poster. There are several on here that I dislike most of their posts/opinions, but I don't post a comment about every post they make to the point of obsession.
BOO HOO

Martin, TN

#67636 Feb 17, 2013
Unreal wrote:
<quoted text>
Well Pete, your outrage over "FU" was diminished with your agreement to this VULGAR post just because it is another enemy of your enemy. You are starting to sound like all the other posters with a vendetta/obsession with one poster instead of someone with any real point.
U AKA MAID NOO SENNCE DOES U DOT A MIRROW FUFUFUFUFUUFUFUFUUFUUFUFUFFUUF UFFUFUUFUFUFUFFU
Pete

Nashville, TN

#67637 Feb 17, 2013
Unreal wrote:
<quoted text>
I wasn't "bashing" you; I was simply stating that you seem to disregard your "stated values" when it comes to an opportunity to "bash" another poster that you dislike. I do agree with some of her opinions, and when I don't, I have no problem telling her that I disagree, but I don't make my every post about her or her opinions. I like to hear a variety of opinions, but I am tired of every post being about the obsession/dislike of one poster. There are several on here that I dislike most of their posts/opinions, but I don't post a comment about every post they make to the point of obsession.
Ok, understood and honestly, I agree with most all of what you are saying. Let's just say this one poster seems to punch all the right buttons with me. I would very much like to comment on all of her posts because I find all of them obnoxious and very mis-representative of reality. I also take it a little personal when I myself am a republican, but I do work very hard, have good family and community values, give when I can give and encourage when I can encourage, and yet she can bash me for simply being a republican when she has none of these values. Yes, that gets to me sometimes. But I do understand your point. Again, I do not oppose someone for being a liberal or some other affiliation that is different than mine. I have no argument with you UR even though we probably have a totally opposite view of politics. I respect your right to have your own opinion and would stand up for you if anyone would ever condemn you for having this right.

Since: Mar 10

Location hidden

#67639 Feb 17, 2013
Dee Lay wrote:
According to this, thousands and thousands of Americans who can't get health insurance due to pre-existing conditions are going to be denied coverage from the Pre-Existing Conditions Insurance Plan - which is sort of a collective of high risk pools set up under Obamacare. As you might guess from the name of the program, it was set up specifically to provide coverage to people with pre-existing conditions.
But because Obama is patently unable to make any sound decisions related to the economy, or finances, or money in general, the program has already run out of money, and now has to turn away thousands of people. BRILLIANT!
See, these high risk pools were set up in the summer of 2010 as a "temporary bridge" to last until 2014, when the full effects of Obamacare will be realized, and insurance companies aren't ALLOWED to turn away anyone based on pre-existing conditions. But they underestimated the financial burden, because that is what Democrats do, and so now they can only afford to cover the 100k people who are already enrolled, and no further applications are being accepted.
http://chicksontheright.com/posts/item/23828-...
Are you actually complaining about the Republicans apparently being successful in "starving" Obamacare by not funding it -- their stated goal after they couldn't prevent it from being passed?
Hey

Cookeville, TN

#67640 Feb 17, 2013
Obama plays golf with Tiger Woods.How Precious.

Since: Mar 10

Location hidden

#67641 Feb 17, 2013
really wrote:
<quoted text>coming from the old ass bitch who's on welfare, a bit funny don't you think? most democraps are welfare recipents.While we republicans work for a living while you cry wanting more free shit!
I cannot conceive you having gainful employment. Also, since Cumberland County is almost completely Republican, statistically, the majority of welfare recipients in this county are Republican.
BOO HOO

Martin, TN

#67642 Feb 17, 2013
Unreal wrote:
<quoted text>
I wasn't "bashing" you; I was simply stating that you seem to disregard your "stated values" when it comes to an opportunity to "bash" another poster that you dislike. I do agree with some of her opinions, and when I don't, I have no problem telling her that I disagree, but I don't make my every post about her or her opinions. I like to hear a variety of opinions, but I am tired of every post being about the obsession/dislike of one poster. There are several on here that I dislike most of their posts/opinions, but I don't post a comment about every post they make to the point of obsession.
YOUUR QWWEENN STARTEDD THEE FU THANG DUMMIE SOO GETT BACKK ONN THEE TIT AND TALKK TOO HEER //IT
Pete

Nashville, TN

#67643 Feb 17, 2013
The Original Amused wrote:
<quoted text>
Are you actually complaining about the Republicans apparently being successful in "starving" Obamacare by not funding it -- their stated goal after they couldn't prevent it from being passed?
Republicans starving the program???? How about Democrats overspending what they have. That is the more likely scenario.

Since: Mar 10

Location hidden

#67644 Feb 17, 2013
Pete wrote:
<quoted text>
Sorry, I never use vulgarity and don't condone it. Sometimes I do see a funny post with vulgarity in it, but I enjoy this type of humor privately. And you are absolutely correct, I do have particular interest in one poster who continues to misrepresent the facts, blasphemes, insults, abuses and condemns others simply because they don't share her opinion. I also find her pretty obnoxious with wanting other people's money without doing one thing to earn a penny for herself. And you are also correct by stating I am not alone with this observation. She has many foes who share my same view of her. And just in case you think I am simply jumping all over someone for being liberal, I could care less what political affiliation anyone has. If you want to be a liberal, go be the best one you can be. But condemning another for not being one is a bit narrow minded. Anyway, don't blame me or others for condemning the poster you are referring to, she brings it all on herself. If you agree with her opinions, fine. But don't bash me because I call her out on her misrepresentations.
Be that as it may, I have yet to see you focus your self-righteous moral outrage against profanity towards any of the posters who share your political view -- MississippiGurl, Willard, lol, really, 123pictures, etc.

Kinda diminishes your moral standing to, well, nil.

You have company though, Willard does the same; however, his embarrassing little crush on the foulest of posters DOES place you a little higher on the morality scale.

Since: Mar 10

Location hidden

#67645 Feb 17, 2013
Hey wrote:
Obama plays golf with Tiger Woods.How Precious.
Much safer than hunting with Dick Cheney.

Since: Mar 10

Location hidden

#67646 Feb 17, 2013
Pete wrote:
<quoted text>
Republicans starving the program???? How about Democrats overspending what they have. That is the more likely scenario.
Silly me, I thought appropriations began in the house and Obama simply signed them when they got to his desk. Then again, I didn't realize (until conservatives set me straight, ahem) that Obama sets the price of gasoline as well.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Greeneville Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Effects from smoking cigarettes 8 min Dixie iron fist 8
Feeling lonely for the holidays 8 min Trunketeer 131
Why so paranoid? 10 min csmaven 79
Greeneville Snobs 15 min Dixie iron fist 26
Just announced! 500th post wins trip to Hawaii. 16 min Trunketeer 6
Favorite Classic Music? 18 min Dixie iron fist 10
"Greeneville police: 2 infants found dead in ho... 44 min Rope 87
fun thing to do ***Keep a Word~Drop a Word*** (Sep '10) 1 hr Bree_Z 5,587
Principal at Mosheim 13 hr Friend Of 58
Greeneville Dating
Find my Match
More from around the web

Greeneville People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

Greeneville News, Events & Info

Click for news, events and info in Greeneville

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]

NFL Latest News

Updated 4:04 pm PST

Bleacher Report 4:04PM
Highlights, Recap for Pats vs. Jets
Yahoo! Sports 4:08 PM
Browns lose Manziel in 17-13 loss to Panthers
NFL 5:13 PM
Cam: Panthers fans 'classless' to cheer Manziel injury
NBC Sports 5:30 PM
Manziel leaves Browns' loss with hamstring injury - NBC Sports
Bleacher Report 6:22 PM
Can NFC South Winner Steal Playoff Win?