Since: Oct 11

Location hidden

#62689 Jan 17, 2013
Nuh wrote:
If a man says he'll fix it, he WILL. There is no need to go and remind him every dang six months about it
Lol! I get what you just said, but I don't think anybody else did! Are you trying to say that a Man will fix it sometime this Century, so there's no need to keep pressuring him about it every Decade? LMAO!

As Dunlapian keeps reminding me, it's that Man's "Box" mentality, kicking in, again. One thing at a time, is all a Man can think about or deal with, and everything has to wait until he clears than One "Box" out of his mind. Then, he'll go to the next "Box" and start working on clearing it out of his Mind. You gotta love 'em...but they only think about one thing, at a time, and everything else is wiped out of their thinking, while they're doing that.
If I can find that Video, explaining how a Man's Mind and thinking differs from a Woman's, I'll post it. It's hilarious...but accurate! Lol!

Since: Oct 11

Location hidden

#62690 Jan 17, 2013
Nuh wrote:
If a man says he'll fix it, he WILL. There is no need to go and remind him every dang six months about it
Here it is! LMAO!

Since: Jan 13

Terre Haute, IN

#62691 Jan 17, 2013
Bill Haslam
Honestly

Beechgrove, TN

#62693 Jan 17, 2013
Overtaxed wrote:
<quoted text> Of course I have unearned income. My point was and IS that the money made in a savings account, real estate, stocks, bonds, etc. is MONEY. That is all it is. I made it without working, yet the tax code treats it more favorably than the money earned by the guy who made his with his hands and his back. NOTHING is more unfair in my opinion.
I see nothing special about unearned income...in fact I think labor deserves a richer reward than "passive capital investment". Obviously, we will need to agree to disagree, since I have come to my determination over many years and you probably have as well...
I tend to agree however, lets explore this a little more..
From what I understand the tax for unearned money is at 15%. Your Dem Billionaire Warren (somebody) stated that he paid less taxes than his secretary. Yes he did! he did not pay payroll taxes just unearned taxes. Apples and Oranges.

If I have invested $1M in a stock, the company I invested in would be the recipient of that money. Like a savings account allowing the bank to use your money, the company could use this money in which ever way their board sees fit. It could be to expand (purchase more equip. and hire more people)or it could be to pay off previous loans. There are a host of things that can be done with it.

What I out of the deal is the interest (dividends) from that money. Should I pay the same as someone who has labored for their paycheck? You say yes!, I say HOW MUCH? Do we pay taxes on these dividends the same as a earned payroll check. SS#, Medicare, withholding, etc.?
If you answer is yes, Take into account that if that company goes belly-up, I lose my Million dollars. If the bank goes bankrupt, your savings is protected up to a point. Ok, we charge all unearned dividends the same as a payroll paycheck. The stock market will fall through the floor immediately because me and others have removed their money from the companies stock. I am not going to pay someone 35-50% tax on unearned income when I have to take all the risk. Why risk it at all. Just keep the $1M and enjoy it. If I have $1M to put into the stock market, I have other businesses that are making that million and they do payroll taxes!

Now the companies no longer have money to expand, hire more workers, payoff old debts, pay for inventory they need to make their product in order to sell it to the public. You talking about a depression here of a massive scale. With more people out of work you are talking about less purchases, less payroll taxes and at some point in time, the gov. either raises taxes or starts shutting/trimming down entitlement spending (i.e welfare, SSN, Obamacare, food stamps, etc.)

My honest opinion is that Yes, we should tax the unearned money a little more from 15% to 20% but to place a payroll tax on it would result in short order a disaster nation wide we the people might not recover from.

To place that 5% on unearned tax might get us 500 Billion a year. Not enough to cover the $1.6 Trillion Obama Spends per year

“IMNTBHO”

Since: Dec 10

Smyrna, TN

#62692 Jan 17, 2013
Overtaxed wrote:
<quoted text> I support the second amendment. That does not mean that I support everyone's right to own a machine gun. I own several guns and not to boast, I can shoot pretty well and I enjoy it. I have no intenton of turning my guns over to the government and I do not know ONE Democrat around here who is willing to (or advocating for that) either. I suspect the vast majority of Republicans support the same basic things that I do.
Obama,(and every THINKING person) realizes that there is no legislation that is going to completely protect kids from a nut with or without a gun hell bent on killing them.
I do not however think it is unreasonable to limit magazine sizes and outlaw those already in circulation, anymore than it is unreasonable to limit public access to dynamite.
Where I and what I call the gun nuts differ is that I KNOW without a doubt that IF my government sends the U.S. military after me, it will not matter what weapons I have, they will capture me or kill me if they wish to. These idiots think the military that defeated the Nazis and the Japanese, will be cowed by the awesome firepower located in their basement.
If reasonable gun owners would shut those folks up, they would do their cause and the second amendment a big favor.
I do not know what the answer is to preventing another Newtown or Columbine...but I don't subscribe to the notion that the answer is more guns, unless those guns are in the hands of trained professionals.
The first thing they would have to find is enough members of the US Military to move against the people. Many soldiers interviewed have stated that they will defend the US Constitution first. Then they have to convince them to move against their families. I don't think Obama is dumb enough to believe that he could turn the military against the people. The next group they have to worry about is the criminal element who will fight before giving up any guns. And they will gain access to the same types weapons that the military will use against them.

By saying it is not unreasonable to outlaw those already in circulation you set the stage for confiscation that could bring more blood to the streets than there already is. It has been proven time and again that making guns illegal does not stop gun violence. Look at Chicago and their gun ban. Last year more people died from gun violence in Chicago than our forces in Afghanistan.

I would like to see all gun crimes be a federal offense with a minimum 10 year jail sentence, no chance of parole. Crime went down in Florida with their 10/20/30 law. The way I heard it explained was this. Simply having possession of gun while committing a crime, whether you show it or not, is 10 years. Brandishing it in the commission of a crime is 20 years. Firing it is 30 and killing with it is life. All with no parole. That is the kind of gun law we need on a national level. Not restricting what law abiding citizens do or making criminals out of law abiding citizens.
Honestly

Beechgrove, TN

#62694 Jan 17, 2013
Really Sassy wrote:
<quoted text>
Oh Dear Lord, how dumb some of you People are! The "Judicial" Branch...i.e., the Supreme Court...ONLY "checks" Laws when the Case is brought before it. The Justices do NOT run around double-checking everything the President and Congress does.
Members of Congress are supposed to know the Constitution AND the Amendments to it...they are given a POCKET COPY when they are sworn in. Now, whether or not they read it or use it as a reference before they vote on an issue is doubtful. Sen. Robert Byrd of West Virginia, a Democrat, was famous for pulling it out of his Breast Pocket and waving it at the other Legislators, when he wanted to make a point in his speeches on the Senate Floor.
The President, along with being a former Constitutional Professor, himself, has Constitutional Attorneys on Staff to advise him on Constitutional Issues, as well as being able to pick up the phone and consult with any Constitutional Expert in the Nation.
I doubt that ANY of them have ever refused to take a call from the President of the United States...this One or any of the Former Ones! Plus, if he wants to for some reason, the President can summon any or all of them to the White House, should he deem it necessary. I don't know that any President ever has, but if One did, YOU DO NOT REFUSE! The President has the Power to have you brought there if he wants to. But, it's considered an Honor to be summoned to the white House and Nobody has ever refused!
So, now that you know just a small fraction of how many Experts on the Constitution are in the White House, on Congressional Staffs, Congressional Committee Staffs, Supreme Justices' Staffs, and easily accessible Nation-wide to any and all Presidents, Congressmen, and Senators, and...all as close as the nearest telephone or down the Hall, it's alittle ludicrous to even think that if the Constitution is being violated, NOBODY in the other Political Party would notice or know it! and you better bet that if the President should do it and the Teapublicans even thought the President was violating the Constitution, they would have filed charges against him before he even finished his speech!
You may be 62-63 and you have become very daft.

You can bet the Judicial sees every piece of NEW Law legislation?

Take that tot the bank! Yes that is their main. The other job just settles suites from lower courts.
Honestly

Beechgrove, TN

#62695 Jan 17, 2013
Really Sassy wrote:
<quoted text>
I don't care if it's from a Conservative or a "Liberal" Site as long as it's the truth, and I have yet to find a Conservative Site that tells the truth! Ideology has long ago replaced any Conservative Site's truth. there are a few Well-known Conservative Bloggers who don't lie and distort the truth. and even though I don't agree with their opinion, if I find it interesting and truthful about the facts, I post it. I did that just a couple of days ago, by George Wills, I think.
I KNOW what the problem is with you People because it's as plain as the nose of your face, in every Post you make, to us Long-time Political Junkies.
You barely knew that the Federal Gov't. even existed, nor did you care, until the Economy crashed and Barack Obama got elected President! then, all of a sudden you woke up out of the trance you had been in all your Life. But, instead of trying to catch up on what you had no knowledge of, or paid any attention to, for your whole life, even though it was your Patriotic Duty to keep up with what your Gov't. was doing...now you want to pretend that you know all about it and have all the answers, and all you do is make yourself look like the ignorant Fools that we all know you are because your Source of Information and your method of "catching up" is to watch and believe everything Fox Fake News tells you! And even then, you don't understand half of what they are lying to you about! And I'd bet money that you are a Tea Party Member or would be, if you joined any Political Party because it's the typical Tea Party Member that I've just described! Dumb as a box of rocks and still has no clue about the Federal Gov't. or how it works, much less WHY it works that way! So, you compare it to the only things you know, which is the simplest of things! And to make it even worse, you want to argue about it, when somebody tries to explain it to you and tell you why your Posts make absolutely NO SENSE!
I can tell just as well as I know my own Name who has been a Long-time Politics-watcher and Federal Gov't-watcher, on this Forum, and there are very few, but "OT" is obviously one and so is "Dunlapian". There are a handful more, of both Conservatives and Democrats who aren't as knowledgeable, but they are fast-learning and getting there. But, the Tea Party Newbies are the most ignorant that I have ever encountered, ANYWHERE, in my Lifetime! I simply don't think they have the mental capacity to ever learn anything and understand it! That's why you see all the pics, making fun of them, their spelling , and their own words. They have become the "National Joke" and justifiably so!
Your hypocritical TRUTH>

“IMNTBHO”

Since: Dec 10

Smyrna, TN

#62696 Jan 17, 2013
Really Sassy wrote:
<quoted text>
Do you understand that if this passes, or is made Law by Executive Order, you are NOT going to have to surrender your Assault Weapon...you just won't be able to buy another one, in the U.S.


You and Overtaxed need to get your Liberal brains together on this.
Overtaxed wrote:
<quoted text>
I do not however think it is unreasonable to limit magazine sizes and outlaw those already in circulation, anymore than it is unreasonable to limit public access to dynamite.
Honestly

Beechgrove, TN

#62697 Jan 17, 2013
Really Sassy wrote:
<quoted text>
Do you understand that if this passes, or is made Law by Executive Order, you are NOT going to have to surrender your Assault Weapon...you just won't be able to buy another one, in the U.S.
You'll probably be able to order all you want from other Countries, though! THAT wasn't mentioned, or addressed, in any of the Reports that I've seen.
I did read Reports of Assault Weapons being shipped into this Country from other Countries, when the previous Assault Weapons Ban was in force.
With this "Global Economy", I expect the Assault Weapons Manufactuters will just start making them in other Countries and you may have to pay extra shipping, but I doubt that you'll have any trouble ordering all of them that you want. But, I wouldn't advise re-selling them to anybody in this Country, once you receive them. But, for your own Personal use... I doubt there will be much change, at all. That's the same thing that I think about the Large-capacity Mags, too!
DUmb DUmb, it can not be made a law unless it passes through the senate and house of Reps. They are for Execution of present laws only.

“IMNTBHO”

Since: Dec 10

Smyrna, TN

#62698 Jan 17, 2013
Honestly wrote:
<quoted text>
I tend to agree however, lets explore this a little more..
From what I understand the tax for unearned money is at 15%. Your Dem Billionaire Warren (somebody) stated that he paid less taxes than his secretary. Yes he did! he did not pay payroll taxes just unearned taxes. Apples and Oranges.
If I have invested $1M in a stock, the company I invested in would be the recipient of that money. Like a savings account allowing the bank to use your money, the company could use this money in which ever way their board sees fit. It could be to expand (purchase more equip. and hire more people)or it could be to pay off previous loans. There are a host of things that can be done with it.
What I out of the deal is the interest (dividends) from that money. Should I pay the same as someone who has labored for their paycheck? You say yes!, I say HOW MUCH? Do we pay taxes on these dividends the same as a earned payroll check. SS#, Medicare, withholding, etc.?
If you answer is yes, Take into account that if that company goes belly-up, I lose my Million dollars. If the bank goes bankrupt, your savings is protected up to a point. Ok, we charge all unearned dividends the same as a payroll paycheck. The stock market will fall through the floor immediately because me and others have removed their money from the companies stock. I am not going to pay someone 35-50% tax on unearned income when I have to take all the risk. Why risk it at all. Just keep the $1M and enjoy it. If I have $1M to put into the stock market, I have other businesses that are making that million and they do payroll taxes!
Now the companies no longer have money to expand, hire more workers, payoff old debts, pay for inventory they need to make their product in order to sell it to the public. You talking about a depression here of a massive scale. With more people out of work you are talking about less purchases, less payroll taxes and at some point in time, the gov. either raises taxes or starts shutting/trimming down entitlement spending (i.e welfare, SSN, Obamacare, food stamps, etc.)
My honest opinion is that Yes, we should tax the unearned money a little more from 15% to 20% but to place a payroll tax on it would result in short order a disaster nation wide we the people might not recover from.
To place that 5% on unearned tax might get us 500 Billion a year. Not enough to cover the $1.6 Trillion Obama Spends per year
Well said
Honestly

Beechgrove, TN

#62699 Jan 17, 2013
NTMD8OR wrote:
<quoted text>
Your question reminded me of an old joke I heard years ago. I thought I would share it here. LOL
President Clinton was jogging in the park one day when he came across a young boy with a litter of puppies. He stopped to ask the boy about the pups. The boy told him that they were recently born and were all Democrats. This made Clintton very happy as he finished his jog. A few days later, while joggging, he again saw the same boy and stopped to inquire about the pups. The little boy proudly told him that they were doing fine and they were all Republicans. This shocked the President and he said "You told me last week that they were all Democrats, Why do you say they are Republicaqns now?" The boy replied, "Last night their eyes opened."
Also remember these famous words. "The problem with socialism is that you eventually run out of other people's money.
&#8213; Margaret Thatcher
Very GOOOOOOOODDD>>>> >>>>>>> >>>
Honestly

Beechgrove, TN

#62700 Jan 17, 2013
Overtaxed wrote:
<quoted text> I support the second amendment. That does not mean that I support everyone's right to own a machine gun. I own several guns and not to boast, I can shoot pretty well and I enjoy it. I have no intenton of turning my guns over to the government and I do not know ONE Democrat around here who is willing to (or advocating for that) either. I suspect the vast majority of Republicans support the same basic things that I do.
Obama,(and every THINKING person) realizes that there is no legislation that is going to completely protect kids from a nut with or without a gun hell bent on killing them.
I do not however think it is unreasonable to limit magazine sizes and outlaw those already in circulation, anymore than it is unreasonable to limit public access to dynamite.
Where I and what I call the gun nuts differ is that I KNOW without a doubt that IF my government sends the U.S. military after me, it will not matter what weapons I have, they will capture me or kill me if they wish to. These idiots think the military that defeated the Nazis and the Japanese, will be cowed by the awesome firepower located in their basement.
If reasonable gun owners would shut those folks up, they would do their cause and the second amendment a big favor.
I do not know what the answer is to preventing another Newtown or Columbine...but I don't subscribe to the notion that the answer is more guns, unless those guns are in the hands of trained professionals.
check out this site:( http://justifiedends.blogspot.com/ ). The writer spells out pretty good the yes, and nahs of protecting our schools. Unfortunately, it has now been three weeks and the Sparta commissioners, school board and their superintendent have done nothing. Its like they are just waiting until it happens here. Maybe we could sue them for incompetence.

“IMNTBHO”

Since: Dec 10

Smyrna, TN

#62701 Jan 17, 2013
On a slightly different note.

Dear Abby R.I.P.

'Dear Abby' Pauline Phillips Dies at 94
http://www.people.com/people/article/0,,20665...

Since: Oct 11

Location hidden

#62702 Jan 17, 2013
Honestly wrote:
<quoted text>
I tend to agree however, lets explore this a little more..
From what I understand the tax for unearned money is at 15%. Your Dem Billionaire Warren (somebody) stated that he paid less taxes than his secretary. Yes he did! he did not pay payroll taxes just unearned taxes. Apples and Oranges.
If I have invested $1M in a stock, the company I invested in would be the recipient of that money. Like a savings account allowing the bank to use your money, the company could use this money in which ever way their board sees fit. It could be to expand (purchase more equip. and hire more people)or it could be to pay off previous loans. There are a host of things that can be done with it.
What I out of the deal is the interest (dividends) from that money. Should I pay the same as someone who has labored for their paycheck? You say yes!, I say HOW MUCH? Do we pay taxes on these dividends the same as a earned payroll check. SS#, Medicare, withholding, etc.?
If you answer is yes, Take into account that if that company goes belly-up, I lose my Million dollars. If the bank goes bankrupt, your savings is protected up to a point. Ok, we charge all unearned dividends the same as a payroll paycheck. The stock market will fall through the floor immediately because me and others have removed their money from the companies stock. I am not going to pay someone 35-50% tax on unearned income when I have to take all the risk. Why risk it at all. Just keep the $1M and enjoy it. If I have $1M to put into the stock market, I have other businesses that are making that million and they do payroll taxes!
Now the companies no longer have money to expand, hire more workers, payoff old debts, pay for inventory they need to make their product in order to sell it to the public. You talking about a depression here of a massive scale. With more people out of work you are talking about less purchases, less payroll taxes and at some point in time, the gov. either raises taxes or starts shutting/trimming down entitlement spending (i.e welfare, SSN, Obamacare, food stamps, etc.)
My honest opinion is that Yes, we should tax the unearned money a little more from 15% to 20% but to place a payroll tax on it would result in short order a disaster nation wide we the people might not recover from.
To place that 5% on unearned tax might get us 500 Billion a year. Not enough to cover the $1.6 Trillion Obama Spends per year
Your Post is complete Jive-Talk BS from beginning to end, and we both know it!
Honestly

Beechgrove, TN

#62703 Jan 17, 2013
NTMD8OR wrote:
On a slightly different note.
Dear Abby R.I.P.
'Dear Abby' Pauline Phillips Dies at 94
http://www.people.com/people/article/0,,20665...
reckon how many people she help and how many she helped to destroy??

Since: Mar 10

Location hidden

#62704 Jan 17, 2013
I love watching Fox"News" and then going to Topix to hear the verbatim reiterations of the talking points I just watched on TV. Most times they even repeat certain phrases word for word. It's a fun little game.

Since: Oct 11

Location hidden

#62707 Jan 17, 2013
Honestly wrote:
<quoted text>
Very GOOOOOOOODDD>>>> >>>>>>> >>>
No, very Baaaaaaaadddddd>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >
An old stale joke that wasn't funny to begin with and a quote from a Prime Minister during Reagan's Administration that the English People hated and voted out!
Very Baaaaaaddddddd>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>
lol

Jackson, TN

#62706 Jan 17, 2013
Not Willard wrote:
<quoted text>He's not the brightest bulb on the tree......very angry and hate filled with no redeeming value.
and you blow for crack money,bitch lol
Honestly

Beechgrove, TN

#62708 Jan 17, 2013
Really Sassy wrote:
<quoted text>
Your Post is complete Jive-Talk BS from beginning to end, and we both know it!
AGAIN, Your Hypocritical opinion!!!!!!!!!!

Since: Oct 11

Location hidden

#62709 Jan 17, 2013
The Original Amused wrote:
I love watching Fox"News" and then going to Topix to hear the verbatim reiterations of the talking points I just watched on TV. Most times they even repeat certain phrases word for word. It's a fun little game.
They're like Programmed Robots, aren't they? They can barely remember their own Name, but they can recite that BS, word for word! Classic sign of being Totally Brainwashed!

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Greeneville Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
TN Tennessee Hunting Rights Amendment (Oct '10) 2 min TheRealZeke 8,648
Wreck Chuckey Pike/Mitchell Rd 13 min Pretend 2 B Normal 12
What do think about free mansions 16 min Pretend 2 B Normal 7
Balancing the Greene County Budget by 5% per de... 18 min making cuts at home 3
get rid of Robert Sayne 28 min resident 34
Wally World Chicks 46 min that is a fact 3
fun thing to do ***Keep a Word~Drop a Word*** (Sep '10) 49 min Jennifer Renee 4,560
whorin around 1 hr heeler 13

Greeneville Jobs

Greeneville People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

Greeneville News, Events & Info

Click for news, events and info in Greeneville

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]