Comments
56,781 - 56,800 of 141,247 Comments Last updated 24 min ago

“IMNTBHO”

Since: Dec 10

On The Road Again

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#62358
Jan 14, 2013
 

Judged:

2

2

2

Nuh wrote:
<quoted text>
What occurred was, and I realize at your advanced age you are prone to memory loss,(LOL)....
A balanced the budget for the first time in 40 years in 1997, 1998, 1999. And a $230 billion surplus to boot...
It's about time for another government shutdown - don't you think?
You know very well the the "PARTY" does not allow her to "remember" anything that is not in the talking points for the subject.
Overtaxed

Thorn Hill, TN

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#62359
Jan 14, 2013
 

Judged:

2

2

2

mUH wrote:
<quoted text>
The economic implosion of Europe is accelerating. Even while the mainstream media continues to proclaim that the financial crisis in Europe has been “averted”, the economic statistics that are coming out of Europe just continue to get worse. Manufacturing activity in Europe has been contracting month after month, the unemployment rate in the eurozone has hit yet another brand new record high, and the official unemployment rates in both Greece and Spain are now much higher than the peak unemployment rate in the United States during the Great Depression of the 1930s.
The economic situation in Europe is far worse than it was a year ago, and it is going to continue to get worse as austerity continues to take a huge toll on the economies of the eurozone. It would be hard to understate how bad things have gotten – particularly in southern Europe. The truth is that most of southern Europe is experiencing a full-blown economic depression right now.
Sadly, most Americans are paying very little attention to what is going on across the Atlantic. But they should be watching, because this is what happens when nations accumulate too much debt. The United States has the biggest debt burden of all, and eventually what is happening over in Spain, France, Italy, Portugal and Greece is going to happen over here as well.
Obama and Congress just negotiated the "Fiscal Cliff" deal that did NOTHING do address our SPENGING problem.
Something wicked this way comes...and it is accelerating.
This is what happens when severe austerity measures are implimented during a deep recession. Curtailing government spending during recessionary periods always leads to a deeper recession. It is at times like these that the government becomes the only entity that can spur economic activity. The time to institute economic austerity for governments is when their economies are booming, not when they are contracting.
You posted a snapshot in time of what is happening in Europe that is factual. Then you suggest the United States follow Europe down the slope back into recession, and if austerity measures are severe enough....depression. That will really fill government coffers and balance the budget.

This reminds me of another poster who, after reading about a fellow Tennesseean who is in danger of death from the loss of Tenncare insurance, advised this person to support the repeal of Obamacare, a program which when it is fully enacted next January, has the potential to save this person's life.
Unreal

Dandridge, TN

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#62360
Jan 14, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Goodbye wrote:
<quoted text>That is sad. I know how costly that can be.With all the changes coming due obamaCare, I can see this happening to more and more people. I do not know what people who are dependant on medication are going to do. I know some retired people who have gone back to work just to pay for their medicines. You will be in my prayers daily. Please contact your legislators and let them know what is happening and that you want ObamaCare repealed.
Can you explain what thought process led you to equate the posters loss of TNCare and medicine to the passing or repeal of "Obamacare".
Unreal

Dandridge, TN

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#62361
Jan 14, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Overtaxed wrote:
<quoted text> This is what happens when severe austerity measures are implimented during a deep recession. Curtailing government spending during recessionary periods always leads to a deeper recession. It is at times like these that the government becomes the only entity that can spur economic activity. The time to institute economic austerity for governments is when their economies are booming, not when they are contracting.
You posted a snapshot in time of what is happening in Europe that is factual. Then you suggest the United States follow Europe down the slope back into recession, and if austerity measures are severe enough....depression. That will really fill government coffers and balance the budget.
This reminds me of another poster who, after reading about a fellow Tennesseean who is in danger of death from the loss of Tenncare insurance, advised this person to support the repeal of Obamacare, a program which when it is fully enacted next January, has the potential to save this person's life.
You beat me to that last part OT. I guess I spent too much time studying it trying to come up with any rational thought to that post.
;)

Since: Mar 10

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#62363
Jan 14, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

NTMD8OR wrote:
Follow the rules of your "PARTY" like all good communists should. It would not be so obvious that you are using "party" designated talking points, if all of you did not use the SAME EXACT WORDS AND PHRASES in your arguments. You do not have the intelligence to put them in your own words. You can all state or post ONLY WHAT THE "PARTY" TELLS YOU TO SAY
But then...
NTMD8OR wrote:
...but it is only a matter of time until...Obama tries to take guns from all citizens...
Hilarious.
Nuh

South Pittsburg, TN

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#62364
Jan 14, 2013
 
Really Sassy wrote:
<quoted text>
I don't think you're right about what happened. I don't know how good or bad your memory is because you don't have a clue what happened. As I recall, nothing happened of any consequence because it didn't last long enough and Newt was taking so much heat because of it, he called it off and was as meek as a Lamb after that and the Republicans agreed to everything Clinton wanted! And Newt hasn't lived it down until this day!
You should. Clinton took credit for it.
Nuh

South Pittsburg, TN

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#62365
Jan 14, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Overtaxed wrote:
<quoted text> This is what happens when severe austerity measures are implimented during a deep recession. Curtailing government spending during recessionary periods always leads to a deeper recession. It is at times like these that the government becomes the only entity that can spur economic activity. The time to institute economic austerity for governments is when their economies are booming, not when they are contracting.
You posted a snapshot in time of what is happening in Europe that is factual. Then you suggest the United States follow Europe down the slope back into recession, and if austerity measures are severe enough....depression. That will really fill government coffers and balance the budget.
This reminds me of another poster who, after reading about a fellow Tennesseean who is in danger of death from the loss of Tenncare insurance, advised this person to support the repeal of Obamacare, a program which when it is fully enacted next January, has the potential to save this person's life.
No.

Here's basically what Keynesian adherents believe:

Problem: Excessive Debt
Cause: Spending too much money
Solution: Spend MORE money

Ludricous. The way to control debt is to quit spending.

Quit spending so much money! You simply cannot spend - or tax - yourself into prosperity.
Dunlapian

Dunlap, TN

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#62367
Jan 14, 2013
 

Judged:

2

2

2

NTMD8OR wrote:
<quoted text>SO you admit that you can lose your job if you do not do as the union says.. NO organization is going to tell me when I can or cannot work.
Hold on just one minute, I never ever said you could lose your job if you don't do what the Union wants.(Right to Work State)Unless you want me to take your statement literally, then I could say, you could lose your life if do not do as I say and don't jump off the mountain.
Please allow me to explain again;
If the Union calls a strike and I cross the picket line to keep working, while the Union and Company keep barginning, from that point on I will be known as a "Scab".
Now after the contract is signed and everybody goes back to work, I as a Scab will not belong to the Union that just got me my raise and other benefits. They still will have to honor any grievances I might have against the company.
It would be my co-workers that would not talk to me, or help me,ect. thus slowing down production. Management would not like this atmosphere, so more often than not they would promote and transfer me very far away and hope(or could care less) where I end up no one finds out that I scabbed. Because if craft finds out their boss scabbed then again production would go down........but this time I'm a manager(with no protection) they would fire me, I would have no where to turn.......but to hit the road.
The Union didn't get me fired, it was my own greedy action that got me fired. Any good Union has to follow the Labor laws. Any good Union has to have members that stick together and still follow the laws also. It's the greedy people(in this case) that get fired.
Dunlapian

Dunlap, TN

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#62368
Jan 14, 2013
 

Judged:

2

2

2

Dunlapian wrote:
<quoted text>Hold on just one minute, I never ever said you could lose your job if you don't do what the Union wants.(Right to Work State)Unless you want me to take your statement literally, then I could say, you could lose your life if do not do as I say and don't jump off the mountain.
Please allow me to explain again;
If the Union calls a strike and I cross the picket line to keep working, while the Union and Company keep barginning, from that point on I will be known as a "Scab".
Now after the contract is signed and everybody goes back to work, I as a Scab will not belong to the Union that just got me my raise and other benefits. They still will have to honor any grievances I might have against the company.
It would be my co-workers that would not talk to me, or help me,ect. thus slowing down production. Management would not like this atmosphere, so more often than not they would promote and transfer me very far away and hope(or could care less) where I end up no one finds out that I scabbed. Because if craft finds out their boss scabbed then again production would go down........but this time I'm a manager(with no protection) they would fire me, I would have no where to turn.......but to hit the road.
The Union didn't get me fired, it was my own greedy action that got me fired. Any good Union has to follow the Labor laws. Any good Union has to have members that stick together and still follow the laws also. It's the greedy people(in this case) that get fired.
Allow me to add(Right to Work State)you don't have to belong to a Union and still the Union members will work with you and still be your friend and you will still get all the benefits that they worked for and you as a non-member didn't lift a finger for. But when it comes time to strike, the Union members do expect you to strike also.........and all good management would rather you stay out until the contract is settled.
Truth Detector

Jamestown, TN

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#62369
Jan 14, 2013
 

Judged:

2

2

2

Overtaxed wrote:
<quoted text> This is what happens when severe austerity measures are implimented during a deep recession. Curtailing government spending during recessionary periods always leads to a deeper recession. It is at times like these that the government becomes the only entity that can spur economic activity. The time to institute economic austerity for governments is when their economies are booming, not when they are contracting.
Over the past 20 years, federal spending grew 71 percent faster than inflation.

Entitlement spending more than doubled over the past 20 years, growing by 110 percent. Discretionary spending grew by 60 percent.

Deficits have pushed up the debt each year since 2002 as federal spending exceeded revenue.

Fiscal year 2012 marked the fourth consecutive year of $1 trillion deficits.

Without pointing the fickle finger of blame, it is obvious that the government is spending like never before, yet we're still mired in a miserable economy, that has a very gloomy outlook.

Care to explain why, if government spending is the only way to spur economic activity, that it hasn't worked, and may indeed have made things worse?
CrashBurn

North Augusta, SC

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#62370
Jan 14, 2013
 

Judged:

3

3

3

Nuh wrote:
<quoted text>
No.
Here's basically what Keynesian adherents believe:
Problem: Excessive Debt
Cause: Spending too much money
Solution: Spend MORE money
Ludricous. The way to control debt is to quit spending.
Quit spending so much money! You simply cannot spend - or tax - yourself into prosperity.
Here is what idiots believe. Quit spending and everything will balance out. If that were even close to the truth, you could live an an especially extravagant lifestyle if you spent no money at all. But, some of us call people who live that way "homeless".
Truth Detector

Jamestown, TN

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#62371
Jan 14, 2013
 

Judged:

2

1

1

Barack Obama today: "You don't go out to dinner and leave after eating everything you want without paying the check. And if you do, you’re breaking the law."

Flashback: White House Forgets to Pay Father’s Day Lunch Tab

http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2012/06/...

"Amid the bustle of President Obama’s surprise stop for barbecue Wednesday the White House apparently overlooked one key detail: the bill."

Flashback: Obama refuses to pay Portsmouth $30K for campaign visit costs.

"PORTSMOUTH — A request by the city to be reimbursed $30,003 in costs associated with a Sept. 7 presidential campaign stop has been denied by the Obama for America office."

http://www.seacoastonline.com/articles/201212...

“IMNTBHO”

Since: Dec 10

On The Road Again

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#62372
Jan 14, 2013
 

Judged:

2

2

2

Dunlapian wrote:
<quoted text>Hold on just one minute, I never ever said you could lose your job if you don't do what the Union wants.(Right to Work State)Unless you want me to take your statement literally, then I could say, you could lose your life if do not do as I say and don't jump off the mountain.
Please allow me to explain again;
If the Union calls a strike and I cross the picket line to keep working, while the Union and Company keep barginning, from that point on I will be known as a "Scab".
Now after the contract is signed and everybody goes back to work, I as a Scab will not belong to the Union that just got me my raise and other benefits. They still will have to honor any grievances I might have against the company.
It would be my co-workers that would not talk to me, or help me,ect. thus slowing down production. Management would not like this atmosphere, so more often than not they would promote and transfer me very far away and hope(or could care less) where I end up no one finds out that I scabbed. Because if craft finds out their boss scabbed then again production would go down........but this time I'm a manager(with no protection) they would fire me, I would have no where to turn.......but to hit the road.
The Union didn't get me fired, it was my own greedy action that got me fired. Any good Union has to follow the Labor laws. Any good Union has to have members that stick together and still follow the laws also. It's the greedy people(in this case) that get fired.
It's the overpaid greedy union workers that start and cause the trouble in the first place. Now explain to me how a union can insure that I can work or actually have a job. The trucking industry has many cases where companies have closed their doors rather than give in to ridiculous union demands. The cost of labor is one of the biggest expenses any company has. When that gets too high, they have to raise the price of their products. Like the auto industry. Eventually that price is too high for the average person to buy. Sales go down. Then you have what you have now. A virtual ghost town where Detroit used to be. Empty plants. All because some people and their union decided to rip everyone else off. But you are retired. You got yours. What do you care that there are no jobs now to replace yours. Those jobs went overseas because it is cheaper to pay labor there and transport parts back here than it is to pay union scale for unskilled employees.
Truth Detector

Jamestown, TN

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#62373
Jan 14, 2013
 

Judged:

2

2

2

A Democrat shoot yourself in the foot story:

Obama’s push for fuel efficient cars has resulted in better mileage, and fewer stops at the pump. Fantastic success story, wouldn’t you say?

Well, according to a Government Accountability Office study, the government's highway fund is going broke, and needs a tax hike.

Whoa! We didn’t thinkathat!

So the push is on for a Per Mile Tax, rather than a Per Gallon tax.

Read and weap, rural AmeriKa:

http://www.gao.gov/assets/660/650863.pdf
Dunlapian

Dunlap, TN

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#62374
Jan 14, 2013
 

Judged:

3

3

3

NTMD8OR wrote:
<quoted text>It's the overpaid greedy union workers that start and cause the trouble in the first place. Now explain to me how a union can insure that I can work or actually have a job. The trucking industry has many cases where companies have closed their doors rather than give in to ridiculous union demands. The cost of labor is one of the biggest expenses any company has. When that gets too high, they have to raise the price of their products. Like the auto industry. Eventually that price is too high for the average person to buy. Sales go down. Then you have what you have now. A virtual ghost town where Detroit used to be. Empty plants. All because some people and their union decided to rip everyone else off. But you are retired. You got yours. What do you care that there are no jobs now to replace yours. Those jobs went overseas because it is cheaper to pay labor there and transport parts back here than it is to pay union scale for unskilled employees.
I really don't know that much about the trucking industry and their main Union "The Teamsters". But I am confused as to why they use to be so pro-Republican at the same time the Republicans are so anti-union.
I don't believe you can really blame the Unions for what is happening in Detroit. Not since first we let other countries like Japan, Korea, Germany(who have even more powerful unions) sell their products over here, with low if any tariffs. Then have these same companies come over here and build their auto's in states where unions are looked down on and the wages are very low and the states are letting them do it with very low taxes, cheap land even help them out with connecting infrastructure, at our expense. It's a win-win with foreign auto company's, while the average American worker is just keeping his head above water. So the average American worker spends less and the rest of the economy(small business) is just crawling along.
Now if the American worker is unionized he/she will have more money to spend at the small businesses and the economy will start moving.
When I retired, my job was filled right away with another skilled union member. I'm very proud of that, so I do care very much about what happened when I retired. I am worried about how long this can go on, I see so much greed on the big scale........and I'm talking about the Romney types, they are the one's that are strangling our economy and blaming it on the little union worker.
dislikeu

Kingsport, TN

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#62377
Jan 14, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

NTMD8OR wrote:
<quoted text>Since when is it my responsibility to help people that cry to the feds after a natural disaster? I did not ask the Government for help. Not even after the floods in Kansas and Tennessee and a hurricane in Virginia. I just buckled down and worked to replace my losses. Incidentally, I have said all along that we never should have gotten into foreign aid as a country. It is not my job to "save" all of them either. Charities helped people in other countries very well before our country got involved and started giving money to the leaders in those countries who lined their own pockets with it and it never made it to the people it was supposed to help. Of course, since the US decided to give this money away, they had to take more from the taxpayers, who, in turn, had less to give charities so they could help less people. In all, foreign aid is just a way for politicians to feel good about themselves while further stealing from the American people in order to try and buy the friendship of countries who do and forever will hate us.
This is the only time I have to say, I agree with you, 100%.

“IMNTBHO”

Since: Dec 10

On The Road Again

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#62378
Jan 14, 2013
 

Judged:

3

2

2

Dunlapian wrote:
<quoted text>I really don't know that much about the trucking industry and their main Union "The Teamsters". But I am confused as to why they use to be so pro-Republican at the same time the Republicans are so anti-union.
I don't believe you can really blame the Unions for what is happening in Detroit. Not since first we let other countries like Japan, Korea, Germany(who have even more powerful unions) sell their products over here, with low if any tariffs. Then have these same companies come over here and build their auto's in states where unions are looked down on and the wages are very low and the states are letting them do it with very low taxes, cheap land even help them out with connecting infrastructure, at our expense. It's a win-win with foreign auto company's, while the average American worker is just keeping his head above water. So the average American worker spends less and the rest of the economy(small business) is just crawling along.
Now if the American worker is unionized he/she will have more money to spend at the small businesses and the economy will start moving.
When I retired, my job was filled right away with another skilled union member. I'm very proud of that, so I do care very much about what happened when I retired. I am worried about how long this can go on, I see so much greed on the big scale........and I'm talking about the Romney types, they are the one's that are strangling our economy and blaming it on the little union worker.
In 1984 my wife were one of about 15 teams on a dedicated run that went from Port Huron, Mi. to Laredo Tx and back. I believe you said you worked for Chrysler. Then you should know about this. Our job was to pick up a load of engine blocks and heads fresh from the foundry. We transported these raw parts to Laredo where they were loaded on Mexican trucks and shipped to a town south of Mexico City(the name of the town escapes me) where the milling work was done on these heads and blocks. They were then brought back to Laredo and reloaded on to our trucks and we too them back to Port Huron. After arrival there these same parts were then reloaded onto Canadian trailers and transported to another small town in northern Ontario and there these engines were assembled then brought back to Port Huron where they were shipped to American plants to be installed in cars. This was cheaper than paying American Machinists and assemblers union wages to build these engines. This run went away when Chrysler started having the blocks forged in yet another country losing more American jobs. Now tell me how good the unions are for America. Union workers only care about how much they can get for themselves no matter what affect it will have on the overall economy. Union officials are do not care about the workers. They only want more members so they can get more dues to pay their 6 and 7 or more figure salaries.And if they cant get the money any other way they rob the pension fund.

“IMNTBHO”

Since: Dec 10

On The Road Again

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#62379
Jan 14, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

dislikeu wrote:
<quoted text> This is the only time I have to say, I agree with you, 100%.
Thanks

“IMNTBHO”

Since: Dec 10

On The Road Again

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#62380
Jan 14, 2013
 

Judged:

2

2

1

Not Willard wrote:
<quoted text>I get it...you would rather pay more for gas and get crappy mileage and reduce the use of fuel because of a few cents in tax ?? Are you really that nuts ??
Than pay yet another new tax? Are you really nuts enough to let this country start one more new form of taxation? Since you like paying taxes so much, why don't you send your entire paycheck to the government every week? It is only a matter of time until they think of enough ways to get it all anyway.
Overtaxed

Thorn Hill, TN

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#62384
Jan 14, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Nuh wrote:
<quoted text>
No.
Here's basically what Keynesian adherents believe:
Problem: Excessive Debt
Cause: Spending too much money
Solution: Spend MORE money
Ludricous. The way to control debt is to quit spending.
Quit spending so much money! You simply cannot spend - or tax - yourself into prosperity.

Here is what austerity advocates believe:
Problem: A world economy in deep recession.
Cause: A monetary crisis and a near collapse of the U.S. Banking system as a result of a housing bubble disaster.
Result: loss of demand for goods and services, the collapse of the value of real estate, high unemployment, falling consumer spending.
Solution: Take a trillion dollars a year out of the economy to balance the Federal Budget.
Ludicrious. The way to get out of a recession is to increase the monetary supply, not further constrain it.

We have a front row seat on austerity, as European countries spiral downward under a misguided effort to balance their budgets in a severe recession. It will take decades to undo what the E.U. has foisted on countries like Greece, Spain and Italy.
The time to address debt and deficits is when the business cycle is expanding, unemployment is low, wages are increasing,and consequently tax revenues are growing. That economy can stand cuts in government spending.

Unfortunately, when a robust economy returns if it ever does.....Republicans will want another tax cut instead of a balanced budget and paying off of the debt.

Tell me when this thread is updated: (Registration is not required)

Add to my Tracker Send me an email

Type in your comments below
Name
(appears on your post)
Comments
Characters left: 4000
Type the numbers you see in the image on the right:

Please note by clicking on "Post Comment" you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

99 Users are viewing the Greeneville Forum right now

Search the Greeneville Forum:
Title Updated Last By Comments
School Board Budget $46.8M! Will results reflec... 2 min house payment 395
PURGE THE JUDGES supreme court level 7 min well 10
If we had a real newspaper in this town 22 min failure to communicate 14
Thomas Johnson 33 min Candi 7
Greeneville: 4 main reasons that people refuse ... 43 min Benny Hill 53
Why do rich Republicans whine when we tax them 1 hr Dr Wu 11
MITTmormonRomney bigamy a way of life 1 hr Dr Wu 6
Lost respect for GPD 2 hr dingleberry 70
Eddie Overholt arrest question 3 hr Just one person 38
Summer Street 13 hr Gville Grad 35
•••
•••
•••
Greeneville Dating

more search filters

less search filters

•••

Greeneville Jobs

•••
Enter and win $5000
•••
•••

Greeneville People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

•••

Greeneville News, Events & Info

Click for news, events and info in Greeneville
•••

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]
•••