'Fox News Sunday' to Host Kentucky Senate Debate

[lol]

TakeAmericaback wrote:

<quoted text>
It didn’t make any sense to you did it? That’s because you are an illiterate inbred half-wit who thinks their smart when they ‘incorrectly correct spelling’ of others! HA HA HA HA.

lol

[AmericanMan]

Repubs and Dems can go at it until November about who's right who's wrong. Meanwhile in the real world we have the elected Republican leaders in DC doing shit like this ALL the time. Can any Republican explain why you would back a party that is intent on destroying the middle class of America? Read what they voted against.
.
07/19/12 02:39 PM ET
Senate Republicans on Thursday blocked an "insourcing" bill from Democrats that would have ended tax breaks for companies that move jobs overseas.
The Bring Jobs Home Act also would have given a tax incentives to companies that bring jobs back to the United States. The measure failed to advance on a 56-42 vote, with 60 votes needed to end debate on the bill.
Earlier in the week, Republicans also blocked the Disclose Act, which would have required the disclosure of campaign contributions of more than $10,000.

TUE SEP 28, 2010 AT 11:32 AM PDT
Senate Republicans on Tuesday blocked a Democratic plan to encourage companies to bring jobs back from overseas, as a united GOP caucus voted against a motion to debate the measure on the Senate floor.
The motion failed 53 to 45.
The legislation would have raised taxes on corporations that shift operations overseas, costing U.S. jobs. It also would have awarded companies that bring jobs back from abroad by offering a two-year hiatus from payroll taxes for those positions.

[We won]

frank wrote:

<quoted text>
Obama has no desire to be the president of earth or any other planet. He wants to clean up the Bush mess, wants to put people back to work and get the deficit in order -- little did he know did he?

Who said he wants to be president of earth?

[woc cares]

i dont care

[whocares]

thats right

[whocares]

rand paul

[Jay]

MY NAME IS AMERICA

Few emails deserve a "WOW" but this one sure does!!


If the Statue of Liberty could sing, this would be the song.
Posted by Major Gen Vernon Chong USAF ret.


Click on this utube video link and turn up your volume.


http://www.youtube.com/v/6TPgJSZf5Vw...

[Anon Einstein]

Jay wrote:

MY NAME IS AMERICA

Few emails deserve a "WOW" but this one sure does!!


If the Statue of Liberty could sing, this would be the song.
Posted by Major Gen Vernon Chong USAF ret.


Click on this utube video link and turn up your volume.


http://www.youtube.com/v/6TPgJSZf5Vw...

Love it!

[TakeAmericaback]

AmericanMan wrote:

Repubs and Dems can go at it until November about who's right who's wrong. Meanwhile in the real world we have the elected Republican leaders in DC doing shit like this ALL the time. Can any Republican explain why you would back a party that is intent on destroying the middle class of America? Read what they voted against.
.
07/19/12 02:39 PM ET
Senate Republicans on Thursday blocked an "insourcing" bill from Democrats that would have ended tax breaks for companies that move jobs overseas.
The Bring Jobs Home Act also would have given a tax incentives to companies that bring jobs back to the United States. The measure failed to advance on a 56-42 vote, with 60 votes needed to end debate on the bill.
Earlier in the week, Republicans also blocked the Disclose Act, which would have required the disclosure of campaign contributions of more than $10,000.
TUE SEP 28, 2010 AT 11:32 AM PDT
Senate Republicans on Tuesday blocked a Democratic plan to encourage companies to bring jobs back from overseas, as a united GOP caucus voted against a motion to debate the measure on the Senate floor.
The motion failed 53 to 45.
The legislation would have raised taxes on corporations that shift operations overseas, costing U.S. jobs. It also would have awarded companies that bring jobs back from abroad by offering a two-year hiatus from payroll taxes for those positions.

With all due respect, that is DC politics as usual; one party slamming what the other does. I would wager that with a bit of research I could find many acts of the Democrat party that look just as detrimental written down. Off the top of my head, 93, Clinton signs NAFTA, screws America! We need to rid America of all these power mongers on both sides, and install term limits. I will vote for Romney because anyone is better than that gentleman that currently occupies the White House! Hell he makes W look good! Herman Cain was my preference, but he couldn’t keep it in his pants just like Slick Willie, but he was judged much more harshly, wonder why? But I will vote as I please; and will be directed by no-one, I vote straight NOTHING! No ‘one party’ should ever control America and no politician should spend 30+ years in any office. Just my opinion.

[What]

TakeAmericaback wrote:

<quoted text>
With all due respect, that is DC politics as usual; one party slamming what the other does. I would wager that with a bit of research I could find many acts of the Democrat party that look just as detrimental written down. Off the top of my head, 93, Clinton signs NAFTA, screws America! We need to rid America of all these power mongers on both sides, and install term limits. I will vote for Romney because anyone is better than that gentleman that currently occupies the White House! Hell he makes W look good! Herman Cain was my preference, but he couldn’t keep it in his pants just like Slick Willie, but he was judged much more harshly, wonder why? But I will vote as I please; and will be directed by no-one, I vote straight NOTHING! No ‘one party’ should ever control America and no politician should spend 30+ years in any office. Just my opinion.

Herman Cain???

Lmfao

[TakeAmericaback]

What wrote:

<quoted text>Herman Cain???
Lmfao

Well well well, wtf is posting with a new name! lot of thought went into that didnt it, about as much as goes into your one-line dumb ass posts!

[BIG_STEVIE]

TakeAmericaback wrote:

<quoted text>
With all due respect, that is DC politics as usual; one party slamming what the other does. I would wager that with a bit of research I could find many acts of the Democrat party that look just as detrimental written down. Off the top of my head, 93, Clinton signs NAFTA, screws America! We need to rid America of all these power mongers on both sides, and install term limits. I will vote for Romney because anyone is better than that gentleman that currently occupies the White House! Hell he makes W look good! Herman Cain was my preference, but he couldn’t keep it in his pants just like Slick Willie, but he was judged much more harshly, wonder why? But I will vote as I please; and will be directed by no-one, I vote straight NOTHING! No ‘one party’ should ever control America and no politician should spend 30+ years in any office. Just my opinion.

Say, I like your opinion! It sounds a lot like mine! Have a great day, my friend!!

[TakeAmericaback]

BIG_STEVIE wrote:

<quoted text>
Say, I like your opinion! It sounds a lot like mine! Have a great day, my friend!!

Went around and checked out your posts Stevie, funny just like allways,

[Syl]

We won wrote:

Obama is perfect and should be made president of earth!

You kidder you! LOL!!! I like your sense of humor.

[it is what it is]

I find it interesting that the mainstream media has headlines and articles about "The Republicans go for Michelle Bachman's jugular" but not one word about Obama and his failed policies today. There are articles about Obama...the cam kiss and the dictator Chavez's support for Obama (big surprise there huh)
The left leaning news thinks Michelle Bachman, who is no longer in the presidential nomination race, deserves bigger and more headlines than Obama and unemployment or Obama and our horrible economy or even Obama and what his plans are concerning Iran's amped up threats.

Does everyone else find it so fascinating that republicans still call each other on wrong and bad shit? Obamorons follow and repeat and distort. I get that but is calling out a peer for what they said or did so foreign to the democrats that this becomes headline news over Obama's failures as president that affect each and every one of us? Crackerjack reporting at its best. lol

I did read a headline Obama story yesterday. The article told how Obama has so much more money stuffed away for the election than Romney does. What? How could that be? lol Obama has been constantly campaigning for several years now on the tax payers dime. He claims it is really town meetings he is having and of course don't forget it's Bush's fault no matter what the subject or the circumstances. Obama had the luxury of using tax payer dollars to campaign and hide away his campaign donations. The article never mentioned that part of the story.
The main stream media (aka Soros stories)has been very busy harping on Romney's tax returns. Presenting more tax returns or seeing more of Obama's tax returns means absolutely nothing. The rich (and Obama and Romney are both rich) pay their tax guys big bucks to make things look a certain way and to get the best deals and exemptions. So who cares what those tax returns read? Never seeing Obama's or Romney's tax returns do not play a role in the citizens pain of high unemployment, horrible economy, phasing out our Constitution, the huge it's not a tax but it's an Obama tax on the elderly and middle class, Progressives attempt to collapse our economy, citizens living below the poverty level during Obama's 4 years (step one of the total collapse), posters in Mexico that brag that food stamps are what makes America strong, drones to spy on us and on and on and on.

And people are supposed to be surprised when the main stream media releases all kinds of polls suggesting that Obama is in the lead and Obama is great and Romney is in a cult and Romney's church attire should matter to every American and blah, blah, blah.
Their headlines should read...we believe Americans are so dumb they will lap our shit up like a kid licking on an ice cream cone.
Boy have American citizens got news for you news people!

[lol]

rider wrote:

Revealed by US Congressman Charles A. Lindbergh, Sr. from Minnesota before the US Congress sometime during his term of office between the years of 1907 and 1917 to warn the citizens.
"We (the bankers) must proceed with caution and guard every move made, for the lower order of people are already showing signs of restless commotion. Prudence will therefore show a policy of apparently yielding to the popular will until our plans are so far consummated that we can declare our designs without fear of any organized resistance. The Farmers Alliance and Knights of Labor organizations in the United States should be carefully watched by our trusted men, and we must take immediate steps to control these organizations in our interest or disrupt them.
At the coming Omaha Convention to be held July 4th (1892), our men must attend and direct its movement, or else there will be set on foot such antagonism to our designs as may require force to overcome. This at the present time would be premature. We are not yet ready for such a crisis. Capital must protect itself in every possible manner through combination ( conspiracy) and legislation.
The courts must be called to our aid, debts must be collected, bonds and mortgages foreclosed as rapidly as possible.
When through the process of the law, the common people have lost their homes, they will be more tractable and easily governed through the influence of the strong arm of the government applied to a central power of imperial wealth under the control of the leading financiers. People without homes will not quarrel with their leaders.
History repeats itself in regular cycles. This truth is well known among our principal men who are engaged in forming an imperialism of the world. While they are doing this, the people must be kept in a state of political antagonism.
The question of tariff reform must be urged through the organization known as the Democratic Party, and the question of protection with the reciprocity must be forced to view through the Republican Party.
By thus dividing voters, we can get them to expand their energies in fighting over questions of no importance to us, except as teachers to the common herd. Thus, by discrete action, we can secure all that has been so generously planned and successfully accomplished."
Revealed by Congressman Charles A. Lindbergh, Sr. to the U.S. Congress sometime between 1907 and 1917.

Wow! A sign of things to come that are here and most people won't even notice. Thank you Rider.

[Jay]

Among Military Veterans: Romney 59% Obama 35%

Sunday, July 22, 2012

Most military veterans don’t like the job President Obama is doing and prefer Mitt Romney in November’s election.

New Rasmussen Reports polling finds that 59% of Likely U.S. Voters who have served in the military favor the Republican challenger, while 35% support the president. Five percent (5%) of these voters like some other candidate in the race, but only two percent (2%) are undecided.

The national telephone survey of 574 Voters who have served in the military was conducted by Rasmussen Reports from July 9-15, 2012.

The margin of sampling error for the survey is +/- 4 percentage points with a 95% level of confidence. Field work for all Rasmussen Reports surveys is conducted by Pulse Opinion Research, LLC

[pop]

Hi

[frank]

We won wrote:

<quoted text>
Who said he wants to be president of earth?

Oh just some lobotomized rightwingnuz ...

[pop]

Hi