Blaming Republicans

Posted in the Grand Rapids Forum

Comments (Page 22)

Showing posts 421 - 440 of484
|
Go to last page| Jump to page:
SeenItBefore

Jenison, MI

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#525
Mar 14, 2013
 
Batch 37 Pain Is Good wrote:
<quoted text>There is something wrong with you.;...... Make some money so the O can take it to give to non producers...
Something wrong with me? Seriously? When the concern you have over defense spending is when you might be missing the opportunity for a better toaster or different kitchen appliance?
Mark Luxford

Grand Rapids, MI

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#527
Mar 14, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Really wrote:
<quoted text>Another Ostrich Syndrome sufferer I see.
All right then, what was the evidence that Obama planned to use drones to attack American citizens on American soil? If you fail to produce the evidence I can only conclude that your fears of that happening are based in paranoia and not reality.
Really

Grand Rapids, MI

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#528
Mar 14, 2013
 
Mark Luxford wrote:
<quoted text>
All right then, what was the evidence that Obama planned to use drones to attack American citizens on American soil? If you fail to produce the evidence I can only conclude that your fears of that happening are based in paranoia and not reality.
The fact that Attorney General Holder told him in a memo that it is allowed. Where there is smoke there is fire.
pipedream

Grand Blanc, MI

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#530
Mar 14, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Really wrote:
<quoted text>The fact that Attorney General Holder told him in a memo that it is allowed. Where there is smoke there is fire.
Maybe you're still having a difficult time understanding. You refer to a memo from Holder stating its alright for Pres. Obama to order drone attacks on U.S. citizens. Produce a credible reference or citation to this memo.

If you can't do this, then you're blowing smoke and fear mongering. Did I make myself clear?

Since: Mar 09

Grandville, MI

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#532
Mar 14, 2013
 
Mark Luxford wrote:
<quoted text>
All right then, what was the evidence that Obama planned to use drones to attack American citizens on American soil? If you fail to produce the evidence I can only conclude that your fears of that happening are based in paranoia and not reality.
Google it!
No one say's he plans to, but he's saying it would be legal.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/03/05/us-d...
pipedream

Grand Blanc, MI

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#533
Mar 14, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Gville Jim wrote:
<quoted text>Google it!
No one say's he plans to, but he's saying it would be legal.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/03/05/us-d...
Hypothetically. Google it. When you master that, get back to me and explain the term, what it means and how it relates to this issue.
pipedream

Grand Blanc, MI

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#534
Mar 14, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Gville Jim wrote:
<quoted text>Google it!
No one say's he plans to, but he's saying it would be legal.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/03/05/us-d...
Wrong again JimBob. First there is all sorts of whackos and crackpots who say he, in fact, does plant to order drone attacks against Americans on U.S. soil. I would argue that you are one of those whackos or crackpots. Demonstrate you're not one of them.
SeenItBefore

Jenison, MI

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#535
Mar 14, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

pipedream wrote:
<quoted text>
Hypothetically. Google it. When you master that, get back to me and explain the term, what it means and how it relates to this issue.
It only goes to prove they can't even comprehend the sources they do use. And then intentionally corrupt it.

The despicable part is Ryan asked the Justice Department IF they believed Obama had the authority and after being told "in an "extraordinary circumstance" but has "no intention of doing so,"...The Obama administration, Holder said, rejected the use of military force where "well-established law enforcement authorities in this country provide the best means for incapacitating a terrorist threat." But in theory, it'd be legal for the president to order such an attack under certain circumstances, Holder said.
And, "The question you have posed is therefore entirely hypothetical, unlikely to occur, and one we hope no president will ever have to confront."
So then Ryan goes out and says Obama would. These people will stop at NOTHING to defame their President.

These people are certifiably sick.
pipedream

Grand Blanc, MI

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#536
Mar 14, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Hypothetical scenario: The govt. learns by way of credible and reliable sources that an attack by natural born or naturalized U.S. citizen(s) on U.S. soil is imminent or is underway. The President orders the threat neutralized or destroyed with a weaponized drone or by other means military or civilian, as appropriate.

What's amazing to me is the crackpots out there who believe this scenario would be unconstitutional or unlawful if ordered by the president or other high level officials.

Since: Mar 09

Grandville, MI

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#537
Mar 14, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

pipedream wrote:
<quoted text>
Wrong again JimBob. First there is all sorts of whackos and crackpots who say he, in fact, does plant to order drone attacks against Americans on U.S. soil. I would argue that you are one of those whackos or crackpots. Demonstrate you're not one of them.
I said nothing about "planting" anything!
The current subject at hand, is not about gardening.
Try to keep up.
But, hey, thanks for your insight.
pipedream

Grand Blanc, MI

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#538
Mar 14, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Gville Jim wrote:
<quoted text>I said nothing about "planting" anything!
The current subject at hand, is not about gardening.
Try to keep up.
But, hey, thanks for your insight.
Is that all you got JimBob? Plant v plan? Did you have a hard day today at Dollarville? Subway not sounding good tonight either?

Since: Mar 09

Grandville, MI

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#539
Mar 14, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

pipedream wrote:
<quoted text>
Is that all you got JimBob? Plant v plan? Did you have a hard day today at Dollarville? Subway not sounding good tonight either?
WOW,....that's what I enjoy about your in depth conversations!
:)
pipedream

Grand Blanc, MI

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#540
Mar 14, 2013
 

Judged:

2

2

2

Your superficiality Mr Gville is astonishing, especially a man of your stature and high number of Topix posts.
vox veritatis

Grand Rapids, MI

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#541
Mar 14, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

pipedream wrote:
What's amazing to me is the crackpots out there who believe this scenario would be unconstitutional or unlawful if ordered by the president or other high level officials.
What's amazing to me is crackpots like you who see no problem with this and think it would be lawful. Fortunately, you and others on Topix like you, represent a very small minority of Americans.
Your turn to provide credible citations that show it's lawful and constitutional for the POTUS or any 'high level official' to order the execution of a citizen without due process for any reason at all. McCarthy, anyone? You're good at demanding credible sources, cough some up yourself.
Oh...and as for your 'credible information', remember that we had 'credible information' that Iraq had WMD...credible enough that both sides of the aisle believed it. Just goes to show you, credible doesn't always equal infallible.
Really

Grand Rapids, MI

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#542
Mar 14, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

SeenItBefore wrote:
<quoted text>
It only goes to prove they can't even comprehend the sources they do use. And then intentionally corrupt it.
The despicable part is Ryan asked the Justice Department IF they believed Obama had the authority and after being told "in an "extraordinary circumstance" but has "no intention of doing so,"...The Obama administration, Holder said, rejected the use of military force where "well-established law enforcement authorities in this country provide the best means for incapacitating a terrorist threat." But in theory, it'd be legal for the president to order such an attack under certain circumstances, Holder said.
And, "The question you have posed is therefore entirely hypothetical, unlikely to occur, and one we hope no president will ever have to confront."
So then Ryan goes out and says Obama would. These people will stop at NOTHING to defame their President.
These people are certifiably sick.
Actually, the sick ones are you and your new BFF pipedream. But then, people who suffer from Ostrich syndrome are generally sick. You answered the issue...Holder told Obama it is legal to do so, but he "hopes no president will ever have to confront." Since you and your new BFF can't comprehend, perhaps you should try and figure out which President you would rather have using the drone on you.
Really

Grand Rapids, MI

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#543
Mar 14, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

pipedream wrote:
Your superficiality Mr Gville is astonishing, especially a man of your stature and high number of Topix posts.
You certainly are fixated on the number of posts. Why don't you grow a pair and register? Scared that your constant stalking and haranguing of people would warrant the same treatment? What a child you are.
pipedream

Grand Blanc, MI

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#544
Mar 14, 2013
 
Really wrote:
<quoted text>You certainly are fixated on the number of posts. Why don't you grow a pair and register? Scared that your constant stalking and haranguing of people would warrant the same treatment? What a child you are.
Stalking? Why don't you just provide sources and citations to support you claims.

I'm sick of your bull shit. How does that sound?

Since: Mar 09

Grandville, MI

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#545
Mar 14, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

pipedream wrote:
Your superficiality Mr Gville is astonishing, especially a man of your stature and high number of Topix posts.
LOL!
Youve made more posts in the last month.
Are you counting?
How many do you have under your registerd name?
Nice try though!
Epic Fail.
pipedream

Grand Blanc, MI

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#546
Mar 14, 2013
 
Or you can just go somewhere else and post your ridiculous crap. Its really quite that simple.
pipedream

Grand Blanc, MI

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#547
Mar 14, 2013
 
Really wrote:
<quoted text>Actually, the sick ones are you and your new BFF pipedream. But then, people who suffer from Ostrich syndrome are generally sick. You answered the issue...Holder told Obama it is legal to do so, but he "hopes no president will ever have to confront." Since you and your new BFF can't comprehend, perhaps you should try and figure out which President you would rather have using the drone on you.
Just read my rather straight forward Hypothetical scenario. Get a grasp of it. And then go look at yourself in the mirror, and ask if you could really be as stupid as you make yourself out to be.

Tell me when this thread is updated: (Registration is not required)

Add to my Tracker Send me an email

Showing posts 421 - 440 of484
|
Go to last page| Jump to page:
Type in your comments below
Name
(appears on your post)
Comments
Characters left: 4000
Type the numbers you see in the image on the right:

Please note by clicking on "Post Comment" you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

22 Users are viewing the Grand Rapids Forum right now

Search the Grand Rapids Forum:
Topic Updated Last By Comments
Juneteenth - " celebrating the end of slavery 18 min kookierecluse 404
Local News Women (Apr '09) 44 min I Think 2,286
social networking - your drug of choice 3 hr bobolinq 1
College football roundup: Ohio State starts the... (Sep '13) 4 hr Go Blue Forever 1,225
Obama Escaped D.C. To Shoot Pool And Drink Beer... 11 hr Dr X 8
Ex-New Orleans Mayor Ray Nagin sentenced to 10... Fri Heraldo 3
Obama gives ICE agents in Murrieta stand down o... Wed Dr X 3
•••
•••
•••
Grand Rapids Dating

more search filters

less search filters

•••

Grand Rapids Jobs

•••
Enter and win $5000
•••
•••

Grand Rapids People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

•••

Grand Rapids News, Events & Info

Click for news, events and info in Grand Rapids
•••

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]
•••