Bob

Big Rapids, MI

#22 Mar 21, 2013
Rob wrote:
<quoted text>
Why don't you tell us how many other countries believed the same thing from their own intelligence. Saddam went through great lengths to make everyone believe he still had WMDs. He only allowed the UN inspectorate to go were he allowed them to go. If he allowed them at all. Their has been many reports of the great possibility that he shipped WMDs to Syria. Regardless of were they went. It is a fact that he had them and used them in the past. They actually did find some there, it was just in small amounts. If you research any of this the information is there. Try getting your news from something other than your Obama loving propaganda sites.
You're the one making those claims so why don't you provide links to your argument. And make sure that your links prove that Iraq was a direct danger to our country.

Unless of course the warden doesn't allow you to post links that is!
Bill

Hudsonville, MI

#23 Mar 21, 2013
Bob wrote:
<quoted text>
You're the one making those claims so why don't you provide links to your argument. And make sure that your links prove that Iraq was a direct danger to our country.
Unless of course the warden doesn't allow you to post links that is!
Message from a living veteran: You suck!
Bob

Big Rapids, MI

#24 Mar 21, 2013
Bill wrote:
<quoted text>
Message from a living veteran: You suck!
The only possible way you would think that yor are a veteran would be because you served time in the same cell as your rump buddy with the "united states" isp.......

And I'll bet you did a lot more than suck!
pipedream

Grand Blanc, MI

#25 Mar 21, 2013
Bill wrote:
<quoted text>
Message from a living veteran: You suck!
Living veteran my ass. A lying pile of dung maybe, or a living douchebag.
Rob

United States

#26 Mar 21, 2013
pipedream wrote:
<quoted text>Living veteran my ass. A lying pile of dung maybe, or a living douchebag.
Although I don't agree with the letter there is no need for you to call him a lier or a douchebag. That veteran is entitle to his opinion. Now stop fantasizing about men in prisons engaging in sexual activities.
Bill

Hudsonville, MI

#27 Mar 21, 2013
Bob wrote:
<quoted text>
The only possible way you would think that yor are a veteran would be because you served time in the same cell as your rump buddy with the "united states" isp.......
And I'll bet you did a lot more than suck!
And you'd lose that bet but then, you're used to being a LOSER!
Really

Kalamazoo, MI

#28 Mar 21, 2013
pipedream wrote:
<quoted text>
Living veteran my ass. A lying pile of dung maybe, or a living douchebag.
Looking in the mirror again? I have a question for you: would you be courageous enough to say this to a veteran's face? I'm thinking not, but, if you are, I have a couple I can introduce you to.
Rob

United States

#29 Mar 21, 2013
Really wrote:
<quoted text>Looking in the mirror again? I have a question for you: would you be courageous enough to say this to a veteran's face? I'm thinking not, but, if you are, I have a couple I can introduce you to.
Jason only has keyboard courage! Besides, he's just a Nancy boy.
pipedream

Grand Blanc, MI

#30 Mar 21, 2013
Really wrote:
<quoted text>Looking in the mirror again? I have a question for you: would you be courageous enough to say this to a veteran's face? I'm thinking not, but, if you are, I have a couple I can introduce you to.
I have a feeling this punk 'Bill' is not a veteran. Bill is a pathetic little liar. A big talker. If 'Bill' wants us to believe he's a veteran, then 'Bill' is just going to have to prove it. Unless and until he does, then 'Bill' is just another loud mouth punk on here and doesn't rate my respect.

Rob

United States

#31 Mar 21, 2013
pipedream wrote:
<quoted text>I have a feeling this punk 'Bill' is not a veteran. Bill is a pathetic little liar. A big talker. If 'Bill' wants us to believe he's a veteran, then 'Bill' is just going to have to prove it. Unless and until he does, then 'Bill' is just another loud mouth punk on here and doesn't rate my respect.
Nobody cares about your respect Qboy. It does not matter if he is or not. Prove it to you! Lol! Jason please take your meds.
pipedream

Grand Blanc, MI

#32 Mar 21, 2013
The Bush/Cheney/Rumsfeld War. What it really cost.

The Bush Administration initially projected total costs would amount to $50-$60 Billion. They later said $100-200 billion.

How much did the it actually cost in dollars? We don't know the total amount yet. Total costs will certainly exceed $1.7 trillion. Some estimates say $7 trillion before its all said and done.

Drag the icons and add up the costs.

The Iraq War: How We Spent $800 Billion (and Counting)

http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/iraq-...
Happy

Jenison, MI

#33 Mar 21, 2013
pipedream wrote:
The Bush/Cheney/Rumsfeld War. What it really cost.
The Bush Administration initially projected total costs would amount to $50-$60 Billion. They later said $100-200 billion.
How much did the it actually cost in dollars? We don't know the total amount yet. Total costs will certainly exceed $1.7 trillion. Some estimates say $7 trillion before its all said and done.
Drag the icons and add up the costs.
The Iraq War: How We Spent $800 Billion (and Counting)
http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/iraq-...
Obama has spent much more on the war's during his term than Bush did during his, so, what is your point (if you have one)
Also, Obama has spent more than that on "stimulus" plans, than what Bush spent for those wars.
Do you even have a point? Or, any facts to back up your dribble?
Rob

United States

#34 Mar 21, 2013
pipedream wrote:
The Bush/Cheney/Rumsfeld War. What it really cost.

The Bush Administration initially projected total costs would amount to $50-$60 Billion. They later said $100-200 billion.

How much did the it actually cost in dollars? We don't know the total amount yet. Total costs will certainly exceed $1.7 trillion. Some estimates say $7 trillion before its all said and done.

Drag the icons and add up the costs.

The Iraq War: How We Spent $800 Billion (and Counting)

http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/iraq-...
"How much did the it actually cost in dollars?"
Some education Jason! Lol! "did the it"
Rob

United States

#35 Mar 21, 2013
Happy wrote:
<quoted text>Obama has spent much more on the war's during his term than Bush did during his, so, what is your point (if you have one)
Also, Obama has spent more than that on "stimulus" plans, than what Bush spent for those wars.
Do you even have a point? Or, any facts to back up your dribble?
He has always been pointless.
Really

Kalamazoo, MI

#36 Mar 21, 2013
pipedream wrote:
<quoted text>
I have a feeling this punk 'Bill' is not a veteran. Bill is a pathetic little liar. A big talker. If 'Bill' wants us to believe he's a veteran, then 'Bill' is just going to have to prove it. Unless and until he does, then 'Bill' is just another loud mouth punk on here and doesn't rate my respect.
"I have a feeling"??? Is that like your other "facts"?? Answer the question put to you? Or are you too cowardly to even answer the question?
Bill

Hudsonville, MI

#37 Mar 22, 2013
pipedream wrote:
<quoted text>
I have a feeling this punk 'Bill' is not a veteran. Bill is a pathetic little liar. A big talker. If 'Bill' wants us to believe he's a veteran, then 'Bill' is just going to have to prove it. Unless and until he does, then 'Bill' is just another loud mouth punk on here and doesn't rate my respect.
I really don't desire your respect Flint boy. Just how would you expect me to prove my veteran status to you?
St Stephen

Grand Rapids, MI

#38 Mar 22, 2013
For those that say the war was all of Washington's, they're either kidding themselves or very uneducated on the subject. Plans were in place to go after Iraq soon after Bush was elected and well before 9/11. This was Rumsfeld, Cheney and Bush's war. It was Cheney who went on national television and said we know for a fact that Saddam had WMD. It was that trio that used unreliable sources to gather evidence to justify their slaughter. It was that trio that lied over and over again to the American people and lawmakers while trying to build their case.

They had so many people fooled that those who voted against the war (Obama) were labeled as being un American! Those who spoke out against it (Michael Moore) were labeled as traitors.

Instead of listening to military leaders like their own Colin Powell (you break it you own it) they destroyed and deflected any dissent by bringing up 9/11 and then justifying their opportunity to profit off war by saying Saddam was just as much of a threat to us as bin Laden.

It's all been exposed, there are no more questions yet to be answered on this. There is going to be a special, warm place in hell reserved for these monsters. Aside from the financial costs involved the human cost and lives ruined (US soldiers, contractors and Iraqi civilians) can only be described as the biggest mass murder spree by American leaders since the American Indian Wars over 120 years ago.
Bill

Hudsonville, MI

#39 Mar 22, 2013
St Stephen wrote:
For those that say the war was all of Washington's, they're either kidding themselves or very uneducated on the subject. Plans were in place to go after Iraq soon after Bush was elected and well before 9/11. This was Rumsfeld, Cheney and Bush's war. It was Cheney who went on national television and said we know for a fact that Saddam had WMD. It was that trio that used unreliable sources to gather evidence to justify their slaughter. It was that trio that lied over and over again to the American people and lawmakers while trying to build their case.
They had so many people fooled that those who voted against the war (Obama) were labeled as being un American! Those who spoke out against it (Michael Moore) were labeled as traitors.
Instead of listening to military leaders like their own Colin Powell (you break it you own it) they destroyed and deflected any dissent by bringing up 9/11 and then justifying their opportunity to profit off war by saying Saddam was just as much of a threat to us as bin Laden.
It's all been exposed, there are no more questions yet to be answered on this. There is going to be a special, warm place in hell reserved for these monsters. Aside from the financial costs involved the human cost and lives ruined (US soldiers, contractors and Iraqi civilians) can only be described as the biggest mass murder spree by American leaders since the American Indian Wars over 120 years ago.
Peace out Steve. I didn't think you believed in hell!
phil

Oxford, MI

#40 Mar 22, 2013
St Stephen wrote:
For those that say the war was all of Washington's, they're either kidding themselves or very uneducated on the subject. Plans were in place to go after Iraq soon after Bush was elected and well before 9/11. This was Rumsfeld, Cheney and Bush's war. It was Cheney who went on national television and said we know for a fact that Saddam had WMD. It was that trio that used unreliable sources to gather evidence to justify their slaughter. It was that trio that lied over and over again to the American people and lawmakers while trying to build their case.

They had so many people fooled that those who voted against the war (Obama) were labeled as being un American! Those who spoke out against it (Michael Moore) were labeled as traitors.

Instead of listening to military leaders like their own Colin Powell (you break it you own it) they destroyed and deflected any dissent by bringing up 9/11 and then justifying their opportunity to profit off war by saying Saddam was just as much of a threat to us as bin Laden.

It's all been exposed, there are no more questions yet to be answered on this. There is going to be a special, warm place in hell reserved for these monsters. Aside from the financial costs involved the human cost and lives ruined (US soldiers, contractors and Iraqi civilians) can only be described as the biggest mass murder spree by American leaders since the American Indian Wars over 120 years ago.
God are you ever stupid. Guess what, we did go into Iraq before the terrorist attack. There was on going problems ever since. Saddam was breaking many of the resolutions made by the United Nations. He would not let the inspectors in to make sure Saddam had no WMDs. Maybe if you new history better you would not make so many stupid accusations Jason. Now why would anybody ever think he had weapons of mass destruction? Maybe now things make more sense to you but I doubt it. That's the problem dealing with the lowly educated such as yourself.
Bob

Big Rapids, MI

#41 Mar 22, 2013
St Stephen wrote:
For those that say the war was all of Washington's, they're either kidding themselves or very uneducated on the subject. Plans were in place to go after Iraq soon after Bush was elected and well before 9/11. This was Rumsfeld, Cheney and Bush's war. It was Cheney who went on national television and said we know for a fact that Saddam had WMD. It was that trio that used unreliable sources to gather evidence to justify their slaughter. It was that trio that lied over and over again to the American people and lawmakers while trying to build their case.
They had so many people fooled that those who voted against the war (Obama) were labeled as being un American! Those who spoke out against it (Michael Moore) were labeled as traitors.
Instead of listening to military leaders like their own Colin Powell (you break it you own it) they destroyed and deflected any dissent by bringing up 9/11 and then justifying their opportunity to profit off war by saying Saddam was just as much of a threat to us as bin Laden.
It's all been exposed, there are no more questions yet to be answered on this. There is going to be a special, warm place in hell reserved for these monsters. Aside from the financial costs involved the human cost and lives ruined (US soldiers, contractors and Iraqi civilians) can only be described as the biggest mass murder spree by American leaders since the American Indian Wars over 120 years ago.
The neo-cons and other assorted patriots are very adept at revisionist history. EVERYBODY knew that Saddam had WMD. So only one question remains......

What they'll come up with as an explainfor Valerie Plame, or Scooter Libby!

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Grand Rapids Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Old things and places we remember from the Gran... (Feb '09) 3 hr cnreadle 974
sony balony 17 hr kookierecluse 4
College football roundup: Ohio State starts the... (Sep '13) 18 hr Go Blue Forever 1,479
Experience a historical Christmas in downtown G... 21 hr DrX 54
Put Tolls on Our Interstate Highways Fri Really 18
3 reasons Grand Rapids-area Muslims want to ope... Thu tom_ 21
City of Pentecost Christmas program Thu COP OUTREACH 1
Grand Rapids Dating
Find my Match
More from around the web

Grand Rapids People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

Grand Rapids News, Events & Info

Click for news, events and info in Grand Rapids

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]

NFL Latest News

Updated 6:00 am PST

Bleacher Report 6:00AM
Fantasy Football Week 16: Updated Rankings for Sunday's Action
Bleacher Report 6:02 AM
The Coach That Could Turn Around Bears
Bleacher Report11:28 AM
Jay Cutler Rumors: Latest Details, Speculation on Bears QB's Future
NBC Sports12:33 PM
1 thing even Rahm can't fix: Da Bears - NBC Sports
NBC Sports 8:26 AM
Report: Executives suggest Bears could have to attach a draft pick to move Cutler