Liberty University Law School Dean: G...

Liberty University Law School Dean: Gay Marriage is 'Beginning...

There are 311 comments on the Cybercast News Service story from Aug 5, 2014, titled Liberty University Law School Dean: Gay Marriage is 'Beginning.... In it, Cybercast News Service reports that:

Mathew D. Staver, dean of the Liberty University School of Law, said that efforts to change the definition of marriage to include same-sex "marriage" would be like trying to re-define the law of gravity, adding that, if it were tried, it would mark "the beginning of the end of Western civilization."

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Cybercast News Service.

Since: Aug 11

Location hidden

#128 Aug 8, 2014
Really wrote:
<quoted text>No, the only wrong being committed is when people take things out of context to make their point. Even Satan knows the scriptures and uses them for his own purposes. Try looking up what happened to the Roman Empire and the Greeks when they allowed unbridled sexuality to rule the day AND allowed the minorities to rule the day.
Thanks for sharing your fantasies.

Got more funny stories?

Since: Aug 11

Location hidden

#129 Aug 8, 2014
Batch 37 Pain Is Good wrote:
<quoted text>You forgot the snap, we need the snap!
Since you like to stereotype.......
FLUSHED

NEXT
Batch 37 Pain Is Good

South Lyon, MI

#130 Aug 8, 2014
Shirvel s Shrivel wrote:
<quoted text>
Hey you stupid, lying bigot, then you christianist trash may have "civil unions" instead of marriage.
You won't qualify for any federal benefits of marriage, and you won't be "married" when you travel to other countries, but since you like to treat others as less than then following the golden rule you won't mind being treated as less than yourself.
Identify what would change Bigot...... Nothing....... Are you cheering ISIS in Iraq? They are beheading Christian men, women, and children you know........ Why? Because they are different....... We don't have that attitude here and in fact this country donates more than all other countries combined..... Why? Because of all the "Christianist trash" values. What have you done to at least make your city a better place? Probably nothing as it is a train wreck today...... The Dems you vote for saw to that...... All that mislaid hate from the biggest bigot is a waste of energy......
Shirvel s Shrivel

Philadelphia, PA

#131 Aug 8, 2014
Batch 37 Pain Is Good wrote:
<quoted text>You are such a bigot...... I didn't say that you should not have equal rights..... I merely had suggested a way for society to accept a secular solution without the drama you display now....
You have not corrected any of your lies, and you have persisted in two here.

1. Suggesting "civil unions" for some people rather than marriage is the definition of less than equal rights, you stupid trash.

If "civil unions" are "equal rights" as you lie, then you may start suggesting "civil unions" for fundamentalist christianists. No more marriage for them. Since "civil unions" are the same, you say.(Only a completely ignorant person would still be saying that "civil unions" are the same legally or societally as marriage.)

2. I'll be the bigot when I take your and fundies' equal rights in marriage, adoption, military service, employment protections away. My calling lying, homophobic bigots out as the garbage they are is not bigotry, just as my calling the kkk out as racists is not bigotry. We know who the bigots are.

You freeeks are so incapable of rational thought or simple truth telling that it's terrifying. But that's what you get from christardates who "believe" the earth is under 10000 years old, you know, like the buybull seyz.
Batch 37 Pain Is Good

Highland, MI

#132 Aug 8, 2014
Shirvel s Shrivel wrote:
<quoted text>
You have not corrected any of your lies, and you have persisted in two here.
1. Suggesting "civil unions" for some people rather than marriage is the definition of less than equal rights, you stupid trash.
If "civil unions" are "equal rights" as you lie, then you may start suggesting "civil unions" for fundamentalist christianists. No more marriage for them. Since "civil unions" are the same, you say.(Only a completely ignorant person would still be saying that "civil unions" are the same legally or societally as marriage.)
2. I'll be the bigot when I take your and fundies' equal rights in marriage, adoption, military service, employment protections away. My calling lying, homophobic bigots out as the garbage they are is not bigotry, just as my calling the kkk out as racists is not bigotry. We know who the bigots are.
You freeeks are so incapable of rational thought or simple truth telling that it's terrifying. But that's what you get from christardates who "believe" the earth is under 10000 years old, you know, like the buybull seyz.
1. Civil Unions for every couple regardless.... It is a State contract (license) with all the normal benefits and drawbacks it comes with. If a Judeo-Christian couple wants to have an event at their place of worship then that is up to them...... In my case I got a State contract and one from my church..... The state did not care except that I had to get license from them for it to be LEGAL........ In this case you are a lying bigot and can't spell...... You ignore what I said on purpose... Bigot.

2. Wrong again you bigot.... I can believe both the Bible and Science........ Do you know why monkey boy? Because I am not big enough to guess what makes up a day for GOD..... You are so high and mighty in your opinions that your facts end up inaccurate..... In other words, you are usually WRONG in your assumptions.... Hateful Bigot.....
Shirvel s Shrivel

Philadelphia, PA

#133 Aug 8, 2014
Batch 37 Pain Is Good wrote:
<quoted text>1. Civil Unions for every couple regardless....
1. No one is saying that. You weren't saying that and you aren't now really saying that. You were clearly braying about "domestic remedies" as some sort of (in your archaic mind) political compromise, something to offer same sex couples. Your earlier posts show this. You have borne false witness again.

And again, moron, civil unions do not confer federal benefits. They do not mean anything when traveling to other countries. Marriage licenses do these things.

Your project is to deny "marriage" to same sex couples, not to deny "marriage" to everyone. You're a terrible liar.

2. Hating bigots is not bigotry. If I tried to similarly take the equal rights of unwell, uneducated buybull "University" graduates away then I would be a bigot.

No, we won't take equal rights away from talibangelical bigots. We will just shun them in educated society.
Batch 37 Pain Is Good

Highland, MI

#134 Aug 8, 2014
Shirvel s Shrivel wrote:
<quoted text>
1. No one is saying that. You weren't saying that and you aren't now really saying that. You were clearly braying about "domestic remedies" as some sort of (in your archaic mind) political compromise, something to offer same sex couples. Your earlier posts show this. You have borne false witness again.
And again, moron, civil unions do not confer federal benefits. They do not mean anything when traveling to other countries. Marriage licenses do these things.
Your project is to deny "marriage" to same sex couples, not to deny "marriage" to everyone. You're a terrible liar.
2. Hating bigots is not bigotry. If I tried to similarly take the equal rights of unwell, uneducated buybull "University" graduates away then I would be a bigot.
No, we won't take equal rights away from talibangelical bigots. We will just shun them in educated society.
Your reading comprehension skills blow...... I was saying that all along. You just choose to be an idiot..... Yes, Gays can be idiots too.... If our govt says it is, the other countries will honor the status.....That is why I pay taxes for a State Department..... You are that stupid....

You have already demonstrated your bigotry toward people who hold beliefs other than your own..... You are a "useful idiot" and drink too much during the course of the day.... Clean yourself up....... Low information people are the bulk of this Country and you are one of them...... You extremist hate filled bigot you........ You really need to get help coping with whatever happened to you growing up...... You really seem unbalanced.........
Shirvel s Shrivel

Philadelphia, PA

#135 Aug 8, 2014
Batch 37 Pain Is Good wrote:
...Is right about the definition of "marriage". Words mean things. That being said, a State contract to facilitate legal access to make decisions as a couple is up to the individual State. The US Constitution does not make such contracts part of the Federal govt........
This is not the argument of someone who wishes to eliminate "marriage" for everyone. This is the argument of a person who wishes to keep the word "marriage" for some persons - heterosexuals.

Except in most of the developed West already the word "marriage" includes same sex couples, so the bigoted effort is moot, anyway.

Civil unions do not offer the 1000+ federal benefits of marriage, nor do they remain in effect when traveling abroad. Marriage licenses do those things.

The religious matter of blessing a union does not and will not confer any legal status, because the US is not a theocracy, and because we don't want some freeeky, mormon alike sect marrying underage girls.

Also, marriage has not been left solely to the states. That is an incoherent claim. Polygamy was outlawed federally. Each state recognizing marriages done in other states is a federal matter. The decision to insist on the legality of interracial marriage was federal. When the right wing bigots passed DOMA in the Congress, they unwisely from their point of view, as it turned out, made marriage equality explicitly a federal matter.

You really should learn to stop lying about everything.
Batch 37 Pain Is Good

South Lyon, MI

#136 Aug 8, 2014
Shirvel s Shrivel wrote:
<quoted text>
This is not the argument of someone who wishes to eliminate "marriage" for everyone. This is the argument of a person who wishes to keep the word "marriage" for some persons - heterosexuals.
Except in most of the developed West already the word "marriage" includes same sex couples, so the bigoted effort is moot, anyway.
Civil unions do not offer the 1000+ federal benefits of marriage, nor do they remain in effect when traveling abroad. Marriage licenses do those things.
The religious matter of blessing a union does not and will not confer any legal status, because the US is not a theocracy, and because we don't want some freeeky, mormon alike sect marrying underage girls.
Also, marriage has not been left solely to the states. That is an incoherent claim. Polygamy was outlawed federally. Each state recognizing marriages done in other states is a federal matter. The decision to insist on the legality of interracial marriage was federal. When the right wing bigots passed DOMA in the Congress, they unwisely from their point of view, as it turned out, made marriage equality explicitly a federal matter.
You really should learn to stop lying about everything.
Now that sounds like a more reasonable response to the subject at hand...... Wonder how long before first cousins can get married or brother and sister or brothers or sisters....... No interest to the States, right? They have their rights too...... What about them...... And how about Transsexuals? There has to be some kind of way to classify for State purposes..... MAYBE they will put a new word in the license...... Naw, according to you that would be impossible to change the form......
Shirvel s Shrivel

Philadelphia, PA

#137 Aug 8, 2014
Batch 37 Pain Is Good wrote:
<quoted text>Identify what would change
Hey sick freeek, we know there are muslim, theocratic mullahs just like there are xstain, theocratic mullahs. Luckily we keep our mullahs mostly in check in the US, although it's a struggle.

You're off topic and unhinged.
Shirvel s Shrivel

Philadelphia, PA

#138 Aug 8, 2014
Batch 37 Pain Is Good wrote:
<quoted text>Now that sounds like a more reasonable response to the subject at hand...... Wonder how long before first cousins can get married or brother and sister or brothers or sisters....... No interest to the States, right?
Moron, you know perfectly well I was not saying the government has no role in marriage, because I was saying precisely that we should not leave marriage to "religious" freeeks such as yourself.

As you know perfectly well, the point was that marriage is not solely a state issue. It is obviously also a federal issue, for the well known and common sense reasons I posted.

I like trolls, though, they give me a good chance to spread my ideas about xstain mullahs.

“Common sense prevails.”

Since: Mar 14

3rd rock from the sun.

#139 Aug 8, 2014
Really wrote:
<quoted text>No, the only wrong being committed is when people take things out of context to make their point. Even Satan knows the scriptures and uses them for his own purposes. Try looking up what happened to the Roman Empire and the Greeks when they allowed unbridled sexuality to rule the day AND allowed the minorities to rule the day.
The Roman Empire gradually declined over sever centuries, the overextended their territory, didn't protect their borders and were attacked several times by "barbarians" who weakened them.

If you want to get into a history lesson at least start with some facts or read a history book.

What makes you sure there is a Satan anyway?
Shirvel s Shrivel

Philadelphia, PA

#140 Aug 8, 2014
DebraE wrote:
<quoted text>
What makes you sure there is a Satan anyway?
"Satan" is anyone who references facts or notices that the Gospels do not all agree with one another on the basic facts of jaysus' death.

And there are assuredly such persons.

Maybe they should say, "Satans."

Since: Mar 07

Location hidden

#141 Aug 8, 2014
Batch 37 Pain Is Good wrote:
<quoted text>Now that sounds like a more reasonable response to the subject at hand...... Wonder how long before first cousins can get married or brother and sister or brothers or sisters..........
So, your argument is that straight siblings/relatives will suddenly want to marry eachother if gay people can marry people they are NOT related to, just as most straight people already do?

Makes straight folks seem pretty darn silly. If I were straight, I would be insulted.

Since: Mar 07

Location hidden

#142 Aug 8, 2014
Batch 37 Pain Is Good wrote:
<quoted text>1. Civil Unions for every couple regardless.... It is a State contract (license) with all the normal benefits and drawbacks it comes with.........
Currently married folks aren't going to go along with that. They like the perks that they, and their their ancestors have been adding to that contract for last couple of centuries.
Seneca

Rockford, MI

#143 Aug 8, 2014
Marriage existed long before the christian religion was made up.
In America, marriage is defined by the state thanks to our secular laws.
The religious freaks can go live in the middle east where their religion came from if they don't like it.
Really

Wyoming, MI

#144 Aug 8, 2014
Shirvel s Shrivel wrote:
<quoted text>
You don't follow scripture. You pick and choose. You're not always crowing about how unrepentant coveters are bringing down empires. You don't want divorce outlawed. You (possibly) don't support slavery.
You don't know what causality means; you have no idea that "unbridled sexuality" is what cause various empires to recede.(And they all do.)
You aren't barring the equal civil rights of the "sexually unbridled," you are opposing the equal civil rights of lgbt people. Go and similarly rail against and take equal rights from heterosexual adulterers and then we'll know you don't just have a mental disorder of homophobic obsession.
Liar.
The only liar I see is you and your name is also appropriate for you little man. And since when is it a "civil right" to get married??? You are and the lgbt extremists are really busy crying "civil rights" when you are actually totally clueless about the actual struggle for civil rights. Nothing like stealing from the very people who fought so hard for the their own civil rights that had previously been granted to them. There is NO place in the Constitution that guarantees anyone, gay or straight, the right to marry. winguts!

Since: Aug 11

Location hidden

#145 Aug 8, 2014
Really wrote:
<quoted text>The only liar I see is you and your name is also appropriate for you little man. And since when is it a "civil right" to get married??? You are and the lgbt extremists are really busy crying "civil rights" when you are actually totally clueless about the actual struggle for civil rights. Nothing like stealing from the very people who fought so hard for the their own civil rights that had previously been granted to them. There is NO place in the Constitution that guarantees anyone, gay or straight, the right to marry. winguts!
Honorable judges disagree with you stupid moron.
Shirvel s Shrivel

Philadelphia, PA

#146 Aug 8, 2014
Really wrote:
<quoted text>The only liar I see is you and your name is also appropriate for you little man....There is NO place in the Constitution that guarantees anyone, gay or straight, the right to marry.
You have drawn my attention to a typo - the moniker should read "Shirvell."

Obviously you're insane, since the Supreme Court has ruled for at least decades that marriage is a right.

Here's a helpful hint for morons: There are and have been found to be many Constitutional rights for things which do not appear written using that word in the text. "Marriage" is just one example. You have a lunatic conception of how constitutional law works.
Shirvel s Shrivel

Philadelphia, PA

#147 Aug 8, 2014
Batch 37 Pain Is Good wrote:
<quoted text>Civil Unions for every couple regardless....I can believe both the Bible and Science....
First, anyone who suggested "civil unions" for everyone as a way to address the Supreme Court's Loving decision would be recognized by you and by everyone else as a bigot.

Second, you cannot believe in the buybull and in science according to fundies unless you have some warped notion of science - Cretinism [sic], earth under 10000 years old, no such thing as carbon dating, had to have been there in order "to know" the earth is billions of years old.

Oh wait, you used that argument in this thread - that no one can say how old the earth is for sure who wasn't there.

You believe in science like the kkk believes in equality. You're a serial liar.

Oh, and when I say people like you can't have equal rights in marriage, adoption, military service, employment protections _then_ I'll be the bigot. Or at least an equivalent bigot.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Grand Rapids Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News The Latest: Trump calls Election Day 'our Indep... 2 hr slick willie expl... 357
Truly Disturbing Racism and The Silence That Fo... 3 hr RushFan666 24
Old things and places we remember from the Gran... (Feb '09) 18 hr Wyoming Bob 1,144
News Universal Forest Products closes five plants, p... (Jan '08) Wed Madoff zionism 19
Local News Women (Apr '09) Jan 15 T-Man 2,823
News Donald Trump defends use of "sch****ed" against... (Dec '15) Jan 14 MrsMrs90 89
Does anyone know why the Chez Ami Bowling alley... (Sep '14) Jan 14 MrsMrs90 6

Grand Rapids Jobs

More from around the web

Personal Finance

Grand Rapids Mortgages