“Selected Marksman”

Since: Aug 08

Northern Virginia

#259 May 7, 2013
vox veritatis wrote:
<quoted text>
And yet you stated so confidently that the pot smokers in the study who were able to quit must not have been addicted since they were able to quit.
Looks like that logic failed.
They weren't classified as heavy users...
Go back and re-read your own article and try to understand what was being said.
I'm beginning to know now why you don't understand lots of things...you can't comprehend what you are reading.

“Selected Marksman”

Since: Aug 08

Northern Virginia

#260 May 7, 2013
vox veritatis wrote:
<quoted text>
And yet you stated so confidently that the pot smokers in the study who were able to quit must not have been addicted since they were able to quit.
Looks like that logic failed.
And to help you just a bit more...
Your case actually verifies what I said. Iknow you are going to hate admitting it but I clearly said that addiction is a moving target...
free thinker

Farmington, MI

#261 May 7, 2013
Sassy wrote:
I know many very highly educated and influential people that smoke MJ. Some of these anti's just refuse to accept it.
I know many highly educated and influential peeople who beat their wives and children, cheat on their spouses, drive under the influence, commit homicide, fail to pay their taxes, engage in pedophilia and child porn and commit white collar crimes. Based on your logic (they're highly educated and influential) this makes all of those things acceptable and good to do and we should all follow their example.
Lots of highly educated and influential people do very, very stupid things.
Damn...you dope smokers are so hooked on it, you'll use the dumbest rationales imaginable to justify getting high and you can't even see how stupid you come across.
free thinker

Farmington, MI

#262 May 7, 2013
Mr Wiggley wrote:
They weren't classified as heavy users...
So? In your own words,'addiciton is a moving target' so there's no way you can claim they weren't addicted based on their degree of usage.

“Selected Marksman”

Since: Aug 08

Northern Virginia

#263 May 7, 2013
free thinker wrote:
<quoted text>
So? In your own words,'addiciton is a moving target' so there's no way you can claim they weren't addicted based on their degree of usage.
Hey, you guys are catching on one post at a time!!!!
Very good...addiction is a moving target...degree of usage is not the only determining factor when determinig or defining addiction.

Thanks!!!!
vox veritatis

Grand Rapids, MI

#264 May 7, 2013
Mr Wiggley wrote:
..addiction is a moving target...degree of usage is not the only determining factor when determinig or defining addiction.
Thanks!!!!
So tell me again how you magically determined that the users in the study weren't addicted soley based on the degree of usage and that because they were able to quit, they weren't really addicted?
LMAO...total fail.

“Selected Marksman”

Since: Aug 08

Northern Virginia

#265 May 8, 2013
vox veritatis wrote:
<quoted text>
So tell me again how you magically determined that the users in the study weren't addicted soley based on the degree of usage and that because they were able to quit, they weren't really addicted?
LMAO...total fail.
Addiction has several determining factors.
You obviously don't know that but oh well...
Try educating yourself before you get in over your head.
You fail...again.
jpeg

United States

#266 May 8, 2013
Mr Wiggley wrote:
<quoted text>Addiction has several determining factors.
You obviously don't know that but oh well...
Try educating yourself before you get in over your head.
You fail...again.
Dude you are stupid! Everything he said was reasonable. Yet you declare some sort of victory by saying nothing accept he don't know what he is talking about. WTF?
free thinker

Farmington, MI

#267 May 8, 2013
jpeg wrote:
Dude you are stupid! Everything he said was reasonable. Yet you declare some sort of victory by saying nothing accept he don't know what he is talking about. WTF?
You have to understand Wiggley. He has a pathological need to declare himself the winner of every debate no matter how badly he's getting spanked. Probably goes back to being a loser in his childhood. I'd suggest therapy, but he's afraid of drugs, except MJ which will only make things worse, I'm afraid.
Oneal

Three Rivers, MI

#268 May 8, 2013
Mr Wiggley wrote:
<quoted text>
Addiction has several determining factors.
You obviously don't know that but oh well...
Try educating yourself before you get in over your head.
You fail...again.
That seems to be your standard retort to anyone who rightly claims pot is addicting. Yes, we all get there are determining factors to addiction, however I've provided a physician's article stating pot is addicting. No, it's not as dangerous as other drugs, but it is addicting. The proof is there for anyone to see.

The only one over his head around here seems to be you, for refusing to accept even the most basic proven negatives regarding pot usage. It makes you sound like an unreasonable old fool.
Rob

United States

#269 May 8, 2013
Oneal wrote:
<quoted text>That seems to be your standard retort to anyone who rightly claims pot is addicting. Yes, we all get there are determining factors to addiction, however I've provided a physician's article stating pot is addicting. No, it's not as dangerous as other drugs, but it is addicting. The proof is there for anyone to see.

The only one over his head around here seems to be you, for refusing to accept even the most basic proven negatives regarding pot usage. It makes you sound like an unreasonable old fool.
If it walks like a duck, and quacks like a duck......,,
Oneal

Three Rivers, MI

#270 May 8, 2013
Rob wrote:
<quoted text>
If it walks like a duck, and quacks like a duck......,,
Where's my shotgun?

“Selected Marksman”

Since: Aug 08

Northern Virginia

#271 May 8, 2013
Oneal wrote:
<quoted text>
That seems to be your standard retort to anyone who rightly claims pot is addicting. Yes, we all get there are determining factors to addiction, however I've provided a physician's article stating pot is addicting. No, it's not as dangerous as other drugs, but it is addicting. The proof is there for anyone to see.
The only one over his head around here seems to be you, for refusing to accept even the most basic proven negatives regarding pot usage. It makes you sound like an unreasonable old fool.
Please provide the post number in which I stated that cannibus is not addictive...thanks in advance.
It is however, lower on the list for addiction that nicotine and caffine.
That being said, why would you deprive a person the choice of trying cannibus for medicinal purposes either in conjunction with or in place of one of those highly addictive prescription drugs?
I've provided plenty of links that confirm that cannibus has benifits and can be helpful and potentially replace those nasty highly addictive drugs. Even the AMA agrees.
People like you that refuse to accept the obvious and apparently have been successfully brainwashed by the gov't and the big drug companies are the unreasonable ones...sheeeesh.

“Selected Marksman”

Since: Aug 08

Northern Virginia

#272 May 8, 2013
Oneal wrote:
<quoted text>
Where's my shotgun?
Now you need to threaten me??
Bring it on punk!!!!
pipedream

Grand Blanc, MI

#273 May 8, 2013
Wiggley. They always threaten and pout and deflect and Lie when they are losing. This applies especially to Onasty and his bastard child 'Rob' aka crackpipe.

“Selected Marksman”

Since: Aug 08

Northern Virginia

#274 May 8, 2013
pipedream wrote:
Wiggley. They always threaten and pout and deflect and Lie when they are losing. This applies especially to Onasty and his bastard child 'Rob' aka crackpipe.
I know...bringing folks into the 21st century is a one day at a time thing.
Some have been trained very well in the projection and strawman dilusions. The Western Michigan culture is a very conservative one that commonly uses their divided religion as their source of knowledge with total disregard to Logic.

I'm gonna duck now as the infuriated opposition starts slinging the false accusations...
Oneal

Three Rivers, MI

#275 May 8, 2013
Mr Wiggley wrote:
<quoted text>
Now you need to threaten me??
Bring it on punk!!!!
Oh brother, you two are seriously in need of some anger management.

Bring it on punk???? LOL What are you going to do, beat your monitor up?

You two fools are about the worst thing that could happen to the fight for legalization of pot. A couple of comically irate, and entirely ignorant buffoons representing the sad result of self-imposed brain cell destruction.

“Selected Marksman”

Since: Aug 08

Northern Virginia

#276 May 8, 2013
Oneal wrote:
<quoted text>
Oh brother, you two are seriously in need of some anger management.
Bring it on punk???? LOL What are you going to do, beat your monitor up?
You two fools are about the worst thing that could happen to the fight for legalization of pot. A couple of comically irate, and entirely ignorant buffoons representing the sad result of self-imposed brain cell destruction.
I didn't bring guns into the discussion, for any reason, like you did.
Run, deny, do whatever coverup you need to...
Or you could just do the right thing and admit it was not appropriate.
Your choice.

“Selected Marksman”

Since: Aug 08

Northern Virginia

#277 May 8, 2013
vox veritatis wrote:
<quoted text>
So tell me again how you magically determined that the users in the study weren't addicted soley based on the degree of usage and that because they were able to quit, they weren't really addicted?
LMAO...total fail.
The same way your buddies somehow determined "magically" that my encounter with cannibus 25+ years ago means I've been smoking it ever since then. Don't deny it...you've read the posts and false accusations and have not once declared that there's no evidence the accuser(s) have any proof and should rightly stop making such unwarrented accustaions.

Laugh all you want bucky...you fail on several fronts...
Rob

United States

#278 May 8, 2013
Mr Wiggley wrote:
<quoted text>I didn't bring guns into the discussion, for any reason, like you did.
Run, deny, do whatever coverup you need to...
Or you could just do the right thing and admit it was not appropriate.
Your choice.
The discussion is about pot heads like yourself with guns. You must of forgot. That is something that could happen from to much gay sex and excessive pot use.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Grand Rapids Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Local News Women (Apr '09) 2 hr Casual Observer 2,314
Back in Iraq. WMD's? oil? 12 hr No_More_Dems 106
WLLA channel 64 - off the air? (Feb '12) 14 hr glassy girl 8
Obama and cocaine addicts 21 hr Leroy 11
go blue goes black Tue Idea Maker 68
Crowd Walks Out On Obama Tue no_more_dems 6
Watch Racebaiter Oprah Wigout On Guest's Opinion Tue Eldasha 54
Grand Rapids Dating
Find my Match

Grand Rapids Jobs

Grand Rapids People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

Grand Rapids News, Events & Info

Click for news, events and info in Grand Rapids

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]