Ken Kolker Reporter

He started his work as a correspondent at The Grand Rapids Press in 1979 before moving to The Saginaw News in 1982. Full Story
First Prev
of 2
Next Last
Jacob McCandles

Chicago, IL

#1 Feb 17, 2009
Congratulations on snagging Mr. Kolker. Why the Press let him slip away is beyond me. Perhaps he and Henry Erb can team up and bring to Grand Rapids a new era of investigative reporting -- something a little deeper than front page news about Jessica Simpson having a bad night at a DeVos Place concert. Good luck, Mr. Kolker!

“O__o ?”

Since: May 08

Grandville

#2 Feb 17, 2009
Ken Kolker is one very good reporter! I'm glad here's here.

Yes, good luck Mr. Kolker!
GRR

United States

#3 Feb 18, 2009
Marti from Michigan wrote:
Ken Kolker is one very good reporter! I'm glad here's here.
Yes, good luck Mr. Kolker!
Maybe he is good in the paper, but the first report I saw him do for WOOD was awful. He acted like the last thing he wanted to do was report the news...I seriously thought he might have killed himself as soon as the camera turned off. His hair was all messed up, his tie loosened up and disheveled, his voice and mannerisms were indicitave of deep depression and suicidal ideation. I'll give him the benefit of the doubt based on his experience in newspaper, but he really needs to get his act together if he wants to make the transition from newspaper to on-air reporter.
micky

Northbrook, IL

#4 Feb 18, 2009
Too bad he didn't replace Suzanne Hew-Haw..anything would be better than her

“O__o ?”

Since: May 08

Grandville

#5 Feb 18, 2009
GRR wrote:
<quoted text>
Maybe he is good in the paper, but the first report I saw him do for WOOD was awful. He acted like the last thing he wanted to do was report the news...I seriously thought he might have killed himself as soon as the camera turned off. His hair was all messed up, his tie loosened up and disheveled, his voice and mannerisms were indicitave of deep depression and suicidal ideation. I'll give him the benefit of the doubt based on his experience in newspaper, but he really needs to get his act together if he wants to make the transition from newspaper to on-air reporter.
A lot of the WOOD reporters look like that, lol. I caught the early morning news this morning and Terry looked haggard, and Emily Linnert was doing a story out by The Eberhardt Center and she looked like she was dressed in fatigues.

“O__o ?”

Since: May 08

Grandville

#6 Feb 18, 2009
micky wrote:
Too bad he didn't replace Suzanne Hew-Haw..anything would be better than her
I don't know what everyone's problems are with Suzanne Geha. She is a very good reporter, a very nice woman and a fine person overall. She has a big heart and she is doing a great job. Leave her alone. If you can't say anything nice about someone, don't say anything at all.

Since: Dec 08

Wyoming, Mi

#7 Feb 18, 2009
This guy is terrible. His monotone voice and appearance are terrible. Some new reporters are definently needed at WOOD TV!
GRR

United States

#8 Feb 19, 2009
Marti from Michigan wrote:
<quoted text>
I don't know what everyone's problems are with Suzanne Geha. She is a very good reporter, a very nice woman and a fine person overall.
You are joking, right?
Sarah

United States

#9 Feb 27, 2009
Hey! This guy is new at this station and to TV reporting, don't be so cruel. From what I have seen and what I have heard he is doing a great job at Wood TV 8 and deserves a a lot more than what "GRR" and "Silly Monkey" are saying. I have followed his stories over the years at The Grand Rapids Press and now at Wood, his does remarkable work and really digs into the details. He is why people want the news.
Kasey

United States

#10 Feb 27, 2009
Sarah wrote:
Hey! This guy is new at this station and to TV reporting, don't be so cruel. From what I have seen and what I have heard he is doing a great job at Wood TV 8 and deserves a a lot more than what "GRR" and "Silly Monkey" are saying. I have followed his stories over the years at The Grand Rapids Press and now at Wood, his does remarkable work and really digs into the details. He is why people want the news.
I guess that is one of the great things about our country, everyone is entitled to his/her own opinion. Personally, I don't know what he wrote in The Press, as I seldom read it. I do agree that he has a monotone voice and not much charisma. Maybe he will improve, or maybe not.
Shelby

Grand Rapids, MI

#11 Feb 27, 2009
I agree with what Sarah says he has worked his butt off at both jobs. That was his first time on TV and my guess is that he was a little nervous. So i think all you critics out there should just give him a break and wait to see what great stories he will do next.
Just_My_Opinion

United States

#12 Feb 27, 2009
Shelby wrote:
I agree with what Sarah says he has worked his butt off at both jobs. That was his first time on TV and my guess is that he was a little nervous. So i think all you critics out there should just give him a break and wait to see what great stories he will do next.
His first time on TV? I have seen him half a dozen times on air and heard his voice, many times before he was on air. Time will tell. Look at Leon Hendrix, he's been on air there for a year and still stinks. When an on air personality is infront of the camera, they do the best they can, simply their best isn't so great.
Repeat

Grand Rapids, MI

#13 Feb 28, 2009
I know style is important, and I'm sure that will come with time. But the shallow viewers who think that's what it's all about are just that -- shallow viewers. Try considering substance, if you've got the intelligence. Or, you can watch Inside Edition and ET. They don't have much to say, but they're awful pretty and have great inflection.
TJR

United States

#14 Feb 28, 2009
To Repeat...I don't think they meant to be shallow. I think it's more that he did good investigative reporting in The Press, and that's where someone with a monotone voice should be, not in front of the camera. If people are looking for monotone, they read The Press or other publications. On the air, people are looking for appearance and pleasant to bring the news. So, I don't think that people are necessarily being mean or shallow, just honest.

Since: Jun 08

Location hidden

#15 Feb 28, 2009
Suzanne with her up and coming breaking news? Sorry she is a joke, and should have been canned years ago. I would take Larry back in a minute and not miss her at all. I'm back to watching Tom and Channel 3
Marti from Michigan wrote:
<quoted text>
I don't know what everyone's problems are with Suzanne Geha. She is a very good reporter, a very nice woman and a fine person overall. She has a big heart and she is doing a great job. Leave her alone. If you can't say anything nice about someone, don't say anything at all.
Just_My_Opinion

United States

#16 Mar 1, 2009
KCGR wrote:
Suzanne with her up and coming breaking news? Sorry she is a joke, and should have been canned years ago. I would take Larry back in a minute and not miss her at all. I'm back to watching Tom and Channel 3
<quoted text>
Just remember that the up and coming new, breaking news and that sort of stuff is not written by the anchors. The editors and producers put it on the teleprompter for them to read. It's not up to the anchors. I'm guessing that every morning and evening Jen and Suzanne are tired of saying, "Economic Emergency" it's just part of the job. I think some behind the scenes people need to be a bit more creative and original!
GRR

United States

#17 Mar 2, 2009
Sarah wrote:
Hey! This guy is new at this station and to TV reporting, don't be so cruel. From what I have seen and what I have heard he is doing a great job at Wood TV 8 and deserves a a lot more than what "GRR" and "Silly Monkey" are saying. I have followed his stories over the years at The Grand Rapids Press and now at Wood, his does remarkable work and really digs into the details. He is why people want the news.
Just to be clear, my OP stated that I will give him the benefit of the doubt based on his track record in the print media. However, the first time I saw him on TV he WAS terrible. I hope he can improve his on air skills so he can bring his investigative work to television. That being said, it's just a simple fact that some people don't have what it takes to be on camera.
Annonymous

Grand Blanc, MI

#18 Mar 5, 2009
He may not look the greatest on camera, but he's real and I like that. At least he doesn't cake on the makeup and look fake. He may need a bit of time to get used to reporting verbally instead of putting it in ink, but I think he's a great addition to Wood TV 8.

He and his wife worked at The GR Press for years and they are both great people. Both of them were wise to leave newspaper too because it's a dying media.
Somebody

Holland, MI

#19 Mar 6, 2009
I agree with Annonymous on this one
GRR

United States

#20 Mar 7, 2009
Ken's story on yesterday's 5 o'clock newscast was much better. It had a feeling of professional journalism to it, which is rare coming from Wood-TV. I'd say he is becoming more comfortable on camera.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker
First Prev
of 2
Next Last

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Grand Rapids Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
2014 wastebook 3 hr Phil 5
New chiropractic tool treats back pain without ... (Apr '08) 6 hr Chiropractor From... 231
upsy daisy Fri bobolinq 1
WLLA channel 64 - off the air? (Feb '12) Thu Sharon 9
Local News Women (Apr '09) Thu Casual Shoes 2,317
Back in Iraq. WMD's? oil? Oct 22 No_More_Dems 106
Obama and cocaine addicts Oct 22 Leroy 11
Grand Rapids Dating
Find my Match

Grand Rapids Jobs

Grand Rapids People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

Grand Rapids News, Events & Info

Click for news, events and info in Grand Rapids

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]