Well said, Vox.<quoted text>
How do you know when a liberal is losing an argument? They resort to profanity and vulgarities.
Posted in the Grand Rapids Forum
#121 Mar 26, 2013
#122 Mar 26, 2013
I'm going to keep on this for a bit longer, not because I particularly like wasting my time on some attention-seeker, but because this is shining a spotlight on exactly why I use the term Useful Idiot to describe you liberals - and why it is a factual description.
ANSWER THE QUESTIONS:
Who gave the order to stand down?
Who created the talking point that the Benghazi attack was spontaneous mob violence based on an anti-Muslim Youtube video?
Notice, Stevie, none of your usual suspect liberals are coming to your defense on this one. Nasty, adolescent language and your silly little cyber tough guy routine aren't going to get you out of this one. The longer you go on responding with anything but an admittance you were wrong, the more you prove my point that liberals lack morality and intelligence. They are simply mindless tools used by a political vote-harvesting machine.
You are indeed Useful Idiots. Here's your chance to prove me wrong. Answer the questions.
#123 Mar 26, 2013
You still taking UEC? With that mouth I can tell why you need it.... Union Rats.......
Since: Oct 12
#124 Mar 26, 2013
Still no proof, eh??? Why embarrass yourself further?
#125 Mar 26, 2013
If you are going to keep slobbering over this, then you should study how the entire watergate thing went down. First, you need a reliable news organization that does some actual investigative reporting that comes up with facts of something done wrong. Then you'll have to get Boehner off of his own golf course long enough to find a congressional investigator to make it official. So far, you haven't got anything but quasi conspiracy bullshit from un-quoted sources that even Faux News has gotten tired of talking to.
Here's a perfect example: "Americans died - including two navy Seals."
Let me correct this for you..... "Americans died - including two former Navy Seals currently working as CIA operatives."
#126 Mar 26, 2013
More scrambling. It was you liberal goofballs who labeled this a conspiracy theory. The rest of us just want answers. It has escaped no one's attention by the way that neither you nor Stevie have supplied those answers. Just furious spinning to try and avoid the obvious. Fact is, you can't answer those questions because the administration refuses to, which means a "thorough" investigation was not held - making Stevie a liar.
BTW: Current or former, a Navy Seal is a Navy Seal forever. Arguing over semantics does not answer the questions.
Not even a good try, Bob.
#127 Mar 26, 2013
and you know spec ops how????
#128 Mar 26, 2013
So bone head. They were working for your Administration.
#129 Mar 26, 2013
The proof has been posted ad nauseum. I'm not embarrassed at all. You on the other hand, are looking really, really foolish and grumpy with your insistence on the proof that was previously posted that you ignored. I know that is wasn't from the BBC so it probably doesn't count in your rose colored world.
#130 Mar 26, 2013
Former Navy Seals? Really! Did you ever hear the line "Once a Seal always a Seal".... Not Seals, their CIA agents? Let me borrow a line from Hilary... What difference dose it make! That is the best you got?
#131 Mar 26, 2013
His stage name is Chris Matthews......
#132 Mar 27, 2013
All you village idiots HAVE is semantics....
What you don't have is either a news media or a single congressman that gives a rat's ass about wasting time on this.
#133 Mar 27, 2013
Evidently all you have is denial and ignorance. Investigations are ongoing and questions are still being asked. FOX News has stayed on this story from the beginning, as has:
Accuracy in Media
The Conservative Voice
Cybercast News Service
Ether Zone etherzone
The Federal Observer
Human Events Online
Media Research Center
Move America Forward
National Review Online
The Northern Right northernright
The Patriotist patriotist
The Third Report
Wall Street Journal
and the BBC.
All have had articles or commentary on this subject recently.
The only sources that haven't been covering the Benghazi murders are the liberal lame stream media, Jim Carrey, Al Jazeera and the Grand Rapids Topix Window Licker Society, of which you are the founding member.
#134 Mar 27, 2013
Nice list! You are really making Jason squirm. Poor little boy. Lol!
#135 Mar 27, 2013
That's a partial list. I left off Sean Hannity, Rush, Glenn Beck, Quinn and Rose, and a few other XM talk shows that have been covering this horrible event, and this administration's subsequent reluctance to live up to their promise of transparency.
This will continued to be treated as a joke, or just ignored, by the handful of chuckle-happy liberals on this site. They've already proven to live in a moral abyss anyway. I can't imagine making a joke of the deaths of fellow Americans serving our country. It takes a special breed of turd to sink that low, but it seems to be where these despicable lowlifes prefer to reside.
#136 Mar 27, 2013
You are correct. Those Navy Seals did not just die though. They were left behind to be Slaughtered. While those two Navy SEALs where severely wounded and still fighting for 8 hours or so with their blood soaked guns they never would have guessed their country would leave them behind. I wonder how proud our military personal or their family are to serve now knowing that. I salute you for your effort.
#137 Mar 28, 2013
Thanks for list of fanatics that rational thinking people should avoid.
Now would you care to mention the name of the Congressman that is now in charge of the official investigation into the blood thirsty murder of the Navy SEALS...... The ones on the CIA's payroll?
#138 Mar 28, 2013
Once you're done giving Dingbat his reach around, why don't you give us the name of the Congressman who is charge of the official government investigation into this brutal crime.
It shouldn't be that hard to find the Republican that is going to stand up to the gawdless commie muslim. I can't believe that your entire party is so afraid of the President that not one of them can bring the survivors in from the cold, to protect them from the Muslim Brotherhood, and to get the truth out to the masses.
#139 Mar 28, 2013
I can't believe you are this stupid. Guess it shouldn't be a surprise though. Anyone who spends their time worrying about "reach arounds" and the like can't usually focus on important things.
#140 Mar 28, 2013
Another one who can't name the congressman in charge of the investigation, and resorts to deflection.....
What is wrong with the republican party when they can't find one person to stand up for the patriot cause?
Add your comments below
|Quote of the Day (Jun '08)||2 hr||SLY WEST||2,849|
|Old things and places we remember from the Gran... (Feb '09)||9 hr||a commenter||947|
|Obama's new approval rating at 38% (Mar '14)||9 hr||scirocco||88|
|Local News Women (Apr '09)||11 hr||Keely||2,307|
|Back in Iraq. WMD's? oil?||15 hr||Idea Maker||65|
|Bengazi is back||17 hr||pipedream||145|
|tex-mex visits white house . . . without invita...||Sat||bobolinq||1|
Find what you want!
Search Grand Rapids Forum Now