“Selected Marksman”

Since: Aug 08

Northern Virginia

#41 May 29, 2013
Sneaky Pete wrote:
<quoted text>
Repeating yourself over and over again doesn't make your point valid. If anything, it makes you look desperate and redundant.
You'll see the black thug for who he is next month when this all comes out in court. If the words "black thug" and "Mexican" lead you to believe I'm a "racist and bigot", that's your problem, not mine. I'm not a PC sissy liberal that plays your silly word games. If this case had been a Mexican thug shot by a black guy, I'd still be pulling for the shooter.
Had to change my post to make it look like I said something in a different way?
You have not changed...you are still a spineless coward...and a racist biggot.

Pulling for the shooter...apparently someone who is clearly being followed in the dark has no rights to stand their ground. Wait and see, they both had certain rights and the key is going to be when the stand your ground statute kicked in. I say you are wrong.

“Come and get it! ”

Since: Jan 09

Traverse City

#42 May 29, 2013
Mr Wiggley wrote:
Had to change my post to make it look like I said something in a different way.you are still a spineless coward...and a racist biggot.
Nope, didn't change anything you said, just condensed it to point out your redundancy. Your posts are so long and rambling, it's hard to decipher them without shortening them a bit.

When libs are losing an argument, they resort to name calling, the race card, and proclaiming their opponents are "liars". You've got two out of the three down. Better shoot for the ol trifecta next time. Ha!
LolaLewinski24

United States

#43 May 29, 2013
Regaurdless of what Zimmerman was armed ,the dispatcher said clearly not to follow Martin.
Shut your pie hole

Grand Rapids, MI

#44 May 29, 2013
Sneaky Pete wrote:
<quoted text>
Nope, didn't change anything you said, just condensed it to point out your redundancy. Your posts are so long and rambling, it's hard to decipher them without shortening them a bit.
When libs are losing an argument, they resort to name calling, the race card, and proclaiming their opponents are "liars". You've got two out of the three down. Better shoot for the ol trifecta next time. Ha!
Maybe they pull the race card because of your racist comments and attitudes. Just because you say you're not a racist doesn't make it true. You think an un armed black kid deserves to be followed, harassed and shot? You extreme right wingers are full of hate and anger. Luckily there are more of us than there are of you. Go ahead and root for the killer to go free and declare open season on the whole black race while you're at it. They're all thugs right? The president is turning the White House into a ghetto flat, correct? Just put the hood on and get it over with. Well, that'll never happen because you're all just a bunch of pussies. Better yet approach some black people and let them know how you feel about their race and how black kids don't belong in gated communities? Yeah, right. You'll just keep blabbing anonymously from the safety of your living room. Blabber yourself into obscurity if you want because what you think will never matter.

Since: Oct 12

Location hidden

#45 May 30, 2013
LolaLewinski24 wrote:
Regaurdless of what Zimmerman was armed ,the dispatcher said clearly not to follow Martin.
Wrong!....You reply baiter, you.....

“Selected Marksman”

Since: Aug 08

Northern Virginia

#46 May 30, 2013
Sneaky Pete wrote:
<quoted text>
Nope, didn't change anything you said, just condensed it to point out your redundancy. Your posts are so long and rambling, it's hard to decipher them without shortening them a bit.
When libs are losing an argument, they resort to name calling, the race card, and proclaiming their opponents are "liars". You've got two out of the three down. Better shoot for the ol trifecta next time. Ha!
In order to condense what I said you had to change the wording of what I said. Go back to school and try again.
My posts are sometimes long because it takes lots of explaining to get uneducated folks like you to understand. I'll try not to use too many big words for you in the future...you do know what "future" means I hope.
Debate and arguement are different...try looking it up.
I'd say it's quite typical of someone like you to label anyone who disagrees with you a "lib" when you have nothing to back up your misguided beliefs and have lost any hope of winning a debate or "arguement" as you need to call it.
I am not affiliated with your republicants or democraps or libs or the tea party...nothing. I am an equal opportunity major party basher and will remain so forever.
Total failure on your part...and I again submit you are a coward and a racist bigot.

“Selected Marksman”

Since: Aug 08

Northern Virginia

#47 May 30, 2013
Shut your pie hole wrote:
<quoted text>
Maybe they pull the race card because of your racist comments and attitudes. Just because you say you're not a racist doesn't make it true. You think an un armed black kid deserves to be followed, harassed and shot? You extreme right wingers are full of hate and anger. Luckily there are more of us than there are of you. Go ahead and root for the killer to go free and declare open season on the whole black race while you're at it. They're all thugs right? The president is turning the White House into a ghetto flat, correct? Just put the hood on and get it over with. Well, that'll never happen because you're all just a bunch of pussies. Better yet approach some black people and let them know how you feel about their race and how black kids don't belong in gated communities? Yeah, right. You'll just keep blabbing anonymously from the safety of your living room. Blabber yourself into obscurity if you want because what you think will never matter.
Labeling the kid a "thug" because he was walking home from a 7-11 eating skittles is rather a stretch of the imagination. Expect nothing less from a racist bigot.
pipedream

Grand Blanc, MI

#48 May 30, 2013
Poor lil Z-man's legal defense is fund almost broke. He owes his team $325 grand and has about $5 grand in his fund. His help is bailing.
LolaLewinski24

United States

#49 May 30, 2013
Go Blue Forever wrote:
<quoted text>Wrong!....You reply baiter, you.....
Right!!!May.the justice system fry Zimmermans ass& you too for that matter.Review the ORIGINAL. 911 tape before youre so quick to critique what I stated=Facts.What a dense moron you are.

“Come and get it! ”

Since: Jan 09

Traverse City

#50 May 30, 2013
Mr Wiggley wrote:
<quoted text>
Labeling the kid a "thug" because he was walking home from a 7-11 eating skittles is rather a stretch of the imagination. Expect nothing less from a racist bigot.
Ah yes, this coming from a liberal, a member of the biggest group of liars and racists there are. If there's a black thug or muslim terrorist out there that you people don't embrace, I have yet to see it. If you're an honest, white Christian on the other hand...Or I guess a Mexican in this case.

“Selected Marksman”

Since: Aug 08

Northern Virginia

#51 May 30, 2013
Sneaky Pete wrote:
<quoted text>
Ah yes, this coming from a liberal, a member of the biggest group of liars and racists there are. If there's a black thug or muslim terrorist out there that you people don't embrace, I have yet to see it. If you're an honest, white Christian on the other hand...Or I guess a Mexican in this case.
Ah yes, the brainwashed need to label someone...especially in your case...the "enemy" is/are the "liberals". The brainwashing has worked well on you...

As far as my background...you couldn't be more wrong...but that's what destroys your credibility...you have no idea what you are talking about...

Yet another total failure...and you are still a coward and a racist bigot.

Since: Oct 12

Location hidden

#52 May 30, 2013
LolaLewinski24 wrote:
Regaurdless of what Zimmerman was armed ,the dispatcher said clearly not to follow Martin.
...George was told, he did'nt need to follow....check the tape yourself...CLUELESS......
Rob

United States

#53 May 30, 2013
Go Blue Forever wrote:
<quoted text>...George was told, he did'nt need to follow....check the tape yourself...CLUELESS......
So... They said they did not need him to follow. That is true. That has nothing to do with the stand your ground law. It means nothing. Following somebody does not make you a murderer. Your point is irrelevant and useless. The druggy had a history of violence and drug use, he probably had it coming one way or another. Let that be a lesson to all you potheads

Since: Mar 09

Grandville, MI

#54 May 30, 2013
Rob wrote:
<quoted text>
So... They said they did not need him to follow. That is true. That has nothing to do with the stand your ground law. It means nothing. Following somebody does not make you a murderer. Your point is irrelevant and useless. The druggy had a history of violence and drug use, he probably had it coming one way or another. Let that be a lesson to all you potheads
I think that you might have missunderstood Blue.
He's been a supporter of Zimmerman all along.
It's one of the few things I agree with him on.
Shut your pie hole

Grand Rapids, MI

#55 May 30, 2013
Rob wrote:
<quoted text>
So... They said they did not need him to follow. That is true. That has nothing to do with the stand your ground law. It means nothing. Following somebody does not make you a murderer. Your point is irrelevant and useless. The druggy had a history of violence and drug use, he probably had it coming one way or another. Let that be a lesson to all you potheads
This isn't a stand your ground case so why are you bringing it up?
Rob

United States

#56 May 30, 2013
Shut your pie hole wrote:
<quoted text>This isn't a stand your ground case so why are you bringing it up?
I'm saying that part of the issue means nothing. It means no guilt or innocents. Actually, it is a stand your ground case. Nobody ran away! The question is who attacked who? And who was acting in self defense? Wether the police said he could follow or not means nothing. Only that he did not take the advice of a 911 operator. They are not exactly anyone of authority anyway.
Rob

United States

#57 May 30, 2013
Gville Jim wrote:
<quoted text>I think that you might have missunderstood Blue.
He's been a supporter of Zimmerman all along.
It's one of the few things I agree with him on.
You are correct. I did misunderstand him.
vox veritatis

Grand Rapids, MI

#58 May 30, 2013
Mr Wiggley wrote:
Labeling the kid a "thug" because he was walking home from a 7-11 eating skittles is rather a stretch of the imagination. Expect nothing less from a racist bigot.
Actually, I think it had more to do with the pot, and getting kicked out of school and flashing gang signs and his social media pages.
You've been smoking too much of that weed you're so fond of promoting.
Oneal

Grand Rapids, MI

#59 May 31, 2013
pipedream wrote:
Poor lil Z-man's legal defense is fund almost broke. He owes his team $325 grand and has about $5 grand in his fund. His help is bailing.
Typical radical progressive response. Cheer for the legal system not to be able to support the defense of an American citizen because you don't happen to think he's innocent based on what you've heard from the media.

Guilty until proven innocent when it fits your narrative. You morons belong back two centuries ago when public opinion could get people hanged or burned at the stake without a trial. One thing is made certain by your own stupid words; you belong as far away from America as you can get.
Shut your pie hole

Grand Rapids, MI

#60 May 31, 2013
Oneal wrote:
<quoted text>
Typical radical progressive response. Cheer for the legal system not to be able to support the defense of an American citizen because you don't happen to think he's innocent based on what you've heard from the media.
Guilty until proven innocent when it fits your narrative. You morons belong back two centuries ago when public opinion could get people hanged or burned at the stake without a trial. One thing is made certain by your own stupid words; you belong as far away from America as you can get.
Boo hoo, poor little Zimmerman decided Martin was guilty the minute he decided to follow and harass him.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Grand Rapids Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
hillary is a shoe-in for the top spot 20 min Batch 37 Pain Is ... 8
lucrecia clinton 10 hr Gville Jim 2
College football roundup: Ohio State starts the... (Sep '13) 21 hr Buffalo Bull 1,711
'Netflix for libraries' comes to Grand Rapids: ... 22 hr Who 1
cattle ranchers Wed SUSAN PAGE 1
Local News Women (Apr '09) Wed Casual Observer 2,343
A Modality for Pain Reduction Tue britt05 1
Grand Rapids Dating
Find my Match
More from around the web

Grand Rapids People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]

NFL Latest News

Updated 11:10 am PST

Bleacher Report11:10AM
Broncos' Brandon Marshall Poses as Bears WR Amid Trade Rumors
ESPN12:06 PM
Injured LB Tulloch: I'll be back with Lions
Bleacher Report12:51 PM
Report: 7-Time Pro Bowl LB Briggs Won't Return to Bears
NFL 5:29 PM
Chicago Bears must make Jay Cutler decision soon
NFL 6:30 PM
Report: Lance Briggs will not return to Chicago Bears