Global warming 'undeniable,' scientis...

Global warming 'undeniable,' scientists say

There are 37122 comments on the TwinCities.com story from Jul 29, 2010, titled Global warming 'undeniable,' scientists say. In it, TwinCities.com reports that:

Scientists from around the world are providing even more evidence of global warming, one day after President Barack Obama renewed his call for climate legislation.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at TwinCities.com.

PHD

Thornton, TX

#24931 Apr 2, 2013
litesong wrote:
<quoted text>
'fetid feces face flip flopper fiend' also proves it lacks the morality to be human matter.
More and more thatís all the "pinheadlitesout" have more and more diarrheas.

“CO2 is Gaseous Love”

Since: Dec 08

Home, sweet home.

#24932 Apr 2, 2013
Bushwhacker wrote:
I'd point out, you changed his words, but YOU proving you're dishonest... said it all... Not an honest quote or a "man", brain gone... Thanks !!! Maybe, you're simply a product of your partisan politics and the bushwhacker lying era....
If you think I "changed his words", look at the original post:

http://www.topix.com/forum/news/global-warmin...

Then you'll learn who's not telling the truth.
Bushwhacker

Seattle, WA

#24933 Apr 2, 2013
It would be you're for you are... As I said earlier..

You continue to prove, you lack the maturity and intelligence to matter.

What's sad is, YOU "thinking" putting the letters PHD as a moniker isn't insulting to all the hard working Americans...who EARNED THEM....
PHD

Thornton, TX

#24934 Apr 2, 2013
Bushwhacker wrote:
It would be you're for you are... As I said earlier..
You continue to prove, you lack the maturity and intelligence to matter.
What's sad is, YOU "thinking" putting the letters PHD as a moniker isn't insulting to all the hard working Americans...who EARNED THEM....
Thank you, if mindless people like you toss out the scientific science fiction useless babble then you could answer in some intelligent third grade level. Anything more would add to your confusion. Now your the kettle calling.
lolololololo

Springfield, MA

#24935 Apr 2, 2013
so make people broke and to think you might save the world maby 10 years lololololol and how long has the earth been around? how many changes has it gone through? suckers
SpaceBlues

Houston, TX

#24936 Apr 2, 2013
lolololololo wrote:
so make people broke and to think you might save the world maby 10 years lololololol and how long has the earth been around? how many changes has it gone through? suckers
Happy lolo?

The man-made threat facing us is no other than the eighth extinction event but the first man-made kind and the first for the modern human species..

Do you get it, lolo?

Since: Jan 13

Location hidden

#24937 Apr 2, 2013
Brian_G wrote:
<quoted text>You want me to prove the CO2 from combustion is safe? You're about a million years late to that argument.
More irrelevant nonsense, BG. The dinosaurs had WAY higher CO2 levels & temps, but they were adapted to those. High CO2 & temps were their Goldilocks zone. And sea level was ~70 meters higher, of course.

We're not dinosaurs. Our Goldilocks zone is different. Our civilization has developed with Holocene climate. Our agriculture developed for this climate, & our infrastructure is adapted to this sea level.

If temps & sea levels were higher (& they will be MUCH higher with higher CO2; it's simple physics, AND the sun is stronger now), we might be able to adapt, but in the meantime the collapse of agriculture due to drought would cause billions of deaths, & the sea would inundate trillions of dollars of infrastructure. That's not to mention the storms & floods.

Unmitigated AGW/CC will be very, very, VERY costly - all because you & your ilk want to save a few pennies at the pump.

“CO2 is Gaseous Love”

Since: Dec 08

Home, sweet home.

#24938 Apr 2, 2013
HomoSapiensLaptopicus has more fairy tales, tell us The Story of the Three Bears. Tell us about the ideal climate Eden before the discovery of peat moss, soft coal and fire...

It's not science, its myth disguised as science to fool the masses.

Since: Jan 13

Location hidden

#24939 Apr 2, 2013
Brian_G wrote:
HomoSapiensLaptopicus has more fairy tales, tell us The Story of the Three Bears. Tell us about the ideal climate Eden before the discovery of peat moss, soft coal and fire...
It's not science, its myth disguised as science to fool the masses.
No, B_Gone, your words are disguised as science to fool the masses. The richest industry in the world has profound financial interest in AGW/CC denial, & you have taken advantage of that.

After all,
"It is difficult to get a man to understand something, when his salary depends on his not understanding it!"
--Upton Sinclair
litesong

Lynnwood, WA

#24940 Apr 2, 2013
brian_g stumble butt dumpster diver wrote:
You're about a million years late to that argument.
Considering "brian_g stumble butt dumpster diver" has past errors of 1 million TIMES, 1000 TIMES, 3000 TIMES, & 73 million TIMES, it presently HASN'T decreased its error rate.
Bushwhacker

Seattle, WA

#24941 Apr 3, 2013
Brian_G wrote:
HomoSapiensLaptopicus has more fairy tales, tell us The Story of the Three Bears. Tell us about the ideal climate Eden before the discovery of peat moss, soft coal and fire...
It's not science, its myth disguised as science to fool the masses.
You're right, you don't talk about science and the 3 bears was your proof.

“CO2 is Gaseous Love”

Since: Dec 08

Home, sweet home.

#24942 Apr 3, 2013
HomoSapiensLaptopicus is the one citing weird "Goldilocks" pseudoscience. I didn't cite a fairy tale to justify my climate fears.
Bushwhacker

Seattle, WA

#24943 Apr 3, 2013
You're right, you don't talk about science and the 3 bears was your proof.

Since: Jan 13

Location hidden

#24944 Apr 3, 2013
Brian_G wrote:
HomoSapiensLaptopicus is the one citing weird "Goldilocks" pseudoscience. I didn't cite a fairy tale to justify my climate fears.
The "Goldilocks" reference means we need climatic conditions on earth to be "just right," dimwit. We & the dinosaurs both need/needed "just right" conditions, but "just right" for the dinosaurs was very, VERY different from "just right" for us.

The dinosaurs had much higher CO2 levels, temperatures & sea levels than we need. Our civilization is adapted to Holocene climate, & we are now changing the climate into something very, very different. We are doing so at our peril.

But you & your ilk want to go right on changing the atmosphere, & the climate, without regard for the rest of us.
Dont drink the koolaid

Eden Prairie, MN

#24945 Apr 4, 2013
Brian_G wrote:
The research results are in: zero peer reviewed experimental tests of climate change mitigation.
Dear Brian, may I respectfully disagree?
There have been thousands of climate mitigation tests/experiments involving CO2 in the air and the science is clear... 1100ppm is, in fact, a healthier invironment for plant life than the current level of 385ppm.

Sincerely,
koolaid
Bushwhacker

Seattle, WA

#24946 Apr 4, 2013
Same lying guy, who said the 787 would never fly again !!! Moron troll, according to himself.
Kyle

United States

#24947 Apr 4, 2013
Brian_G wrote:
I quoted him directly, that quote is unchanged.
Paleohumans invented our fire technology, they already had the argument and it comes down to, "Fire good!" What's next, trying to reinvent the wheel?
Which is it, dipsquat?:

Are you so terminally stupid that you cannot differentiate the magnitudes of millions of camp fires burning biomass and biilions of people burning tankloads of gasoline, burning coal by the ton, etc.?

Or are you that desperately dishonest in your denial efforts?

Not rhetorical questions. Which is it. To you really wish flake the argument foe equivalency? Are you the typical denier; perfectly willing to appear functionally retarded if it's necessary to avoid conceding the most trivial point?

Hmmm? Stop ignoring my posts.
Kyle

Ligonier, IN

#24948 Apr 4, 2013
Brian_G wrote:
<quoted text>This is untrue, natural carbon dioxide emission far outweigh's man's use of fossil fuel. Look at the yearly cycle in Keeling's atmospheric carbon dioxide graphs; it looks like Earth is breathing as she orbits the sun.
A LIE. You are being deliberately dishonest. You know damn well it is invalid to look at one half of an annual CYCLE and use it to dismiss the multi-year trend. What a scumbag. Here's the truth about Keeling's graph:

Charles David Keeling, of the Scripps Institution of Oceanography at UC San Diego, was the first person to make frequent regular measurements of the atmospheric carbon dioxide (CO2) concentration, taking readings at the South Pole and in Hawaii from 1958 onwards.[2]

Prior to Keeling, the concentration of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere was thought to be affected by constant variability. Keeling had perfected the measurement techniques and observed "strong diurnal behavior with steady values of about 310 ppm in the afternoon" at three locations:(Big Sur near Monterey, the rain forests of Olympic Peninsula and high mountain forests in Arizona).[3] By measuring the ratio of two isotopes of carbon, Keeling attributed the diurnal change to respiration from local plants and soils, with afternoon values representative of the "free atmosphere". By 1960, Keeling and his group had determined that the measurement records from California, Antarctica, and Hawaii were long enough to see not just the diurnal and seasonal variations, but also a year-on-year increase that roughly matched the amount of fossil fuels burned per year. In the article that made him famous, Keeling observed, "at the South Pole the observed rate of increase is nearly that to be expected from the combustion of fossil fuel". He also noted an apparent absence of any reduction due to absorption of CO2 by the oceans.[4]
Kyle

Ligonier, IN

#24949 Apr 4, 2013
Brian_G wrote:
<quoted text>We can't know what the rates of emission are, because nobody measures whether you store or use the gas, oil and coal you buy.
Hillariously desparate ploy, douchebag. Are you really suggesting that the science is uncertain because it's just possible that 99% of all fossil fuels produced are being horded and never used?! What a monumental efftard you are.
Kyle

Ligonier, IN

#24950 Apr 4, 2013
Brian_G wrote:
<quoted text> We can't measure Earth's geological CO2 emissions because more than three quarters of the Earth is under the oceans.
We can't know because we don't have the data; ..
A LIE. The FACT that the isotopic signatures are different has been presented to you repeatedly. Besides, are you seriously suggesting that not only may 99% of fossil fuel production be horded, but also that ocean floor volcanism/venting may well be 100X the best scientifically derived numbers?

This behavior of yours is called confirmation bias - or it would be if you really believed it. you;ve just made it crystal clear that you're a prevaricating bag of excrement. Which Koch-funded "think tank" pays you to post all day?

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Grand Portage Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Mohamed Noor, Somali American cop who allegedly... 1 hr Rattlesnake Pete 70
Liberals are trying to destroy america 3 hr LIbEralS 43
Trump Derangement Syndrome TDS 4 hr TAAM 29
Somali brutaliy beats Woman 7 hr Anonyme 74
Bye bye Betsy...Bye bye Betsy 20 hr Minneapolis KILLS 11
I love waking up to a Trump presidency Sun Defeat Elizabeth ... 20
Cops getting Ambushed like in NY this month Sat Minneapolis KILLS 3

Grand Portage Jobs

More from around the web

Personal Finance

Grand Portage Mortgages