A Farmer's Perspective on Guns and the Second Amendment

Posted in the Grand Portage Forum

Comments

Showing posts 1 - 14 of14
Consistent

Minneapolis, MN

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#1
Jan 18, 2013
 

Judged:

2

2

1

Now is the Time to Act

Yesterday, President Obama put forth a set of executive actions and legislative proposals aimed at halting a continuing wave of gun violence that has bloodied communities in nearly every section of the United States.

The president responded boldly and swiftly, just one month after the most shocking mass killing in recent times, of 20 children and six adults by a gunman at Connecticut's Sandy Hook Elementary. It was possibly his most Lincoln-like action to date, and it drew instant opposition from his critics and gun lobbyists.

President Obama announced plans drawn up on his orders by a team under Vice President Joe Biden's leadership. The proposal calls for congressional action on four key areas: law enforcement, availability of guns and ammo, school safety and mental health care.

"We can't put this off any longer," the president said as he signed an additional package of 23 executive orders to bolster the proposed legislation. He called on the American people to back him up by actively supporting his plans.

"We won't be able to stop every violent act, but if there is even one thing that we can do to prevent any of these events, we have a deep obligation, all of us to try," the president said.

Now is the time for everyday people to get behind him urgently, to get involved and let their voices be heard. For years the National Rifle Association (NRA) has dominated the issue of guns on Capitol Hill. The NRA has been bullying those members of Congress in red states to vote their way on just about any gun legislation that came to the floor -- using scare tactics like the recent ad that stooped so low as using the president's children to protest curbs on gun ownership and access. The NRA has clearly crossed the line.

What I have not seen on any of the 24-hour news is a farmer, rancher or landowner being interviewed. Farmers and ranchers have been noticeably scarce amid all the commentary and reaction I have heard as I closely followed the coverage of Sandy Hook and its aftermath.

So, I will offer this one farmer's perspective which I believe is shared by many of us whose voices deserve to be fully included.

As a small child I remember my grandfather had his rifle on a gun rack over his bed for protection, my father has a rifle in his home and today, being a farmer and living on a farm, I, too, own a 22-caliber rifle.

Most farmers are responsible and law-abiding, and they use their guns safely. Like most farmers I have a deep appreciation for the land and the animals who share the land. I respect the right to bear arms and support the Second Amendment.

But I question what the Sam Hill does a farmer or hunter need with an AR-15 or any assault weapon? What are you hunting that requires the need of a semi-automatic weapon -- an instrument used for military warfare? This defies common sense and it should be central during the gun debate.

This kind of extremism is part of the reason I do not have an NRA membership. I do not need one to exercise my constitutional rights under the Second Amendment.
Amused Slew

Seattle, WA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#4
Jan 18, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Drink DELICIOUS PhillipKs VodKa, be the "man" of your dreams or nightmare in con's "case" ! LMAOROTFU~!
digger

Minneapolis, MN

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#5
Jan 18, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Consistent wrote:
Now is the Time to Act
Yesterday, President Obama put forth a set of executive actions and legislative proposals aimed at halting a continuing wave of gun violence that has bloodied communities in nearly every section of the United States.
The president responded boldly and swiftly, just one month after the most shocking mass killing in recent times, of 20 children and six adults by a gunman at Connecticut's Sandy Hook Elementary. It was possibly his most Lincoln-like action to date, and it drew instant opposition from his critics and gun lobbyists.
President Obama announced plans drawn up on his orders by a team under Vice President Joe Biden's leadership. The proposal calls for congressional action on four key areas: law enforcement, availability of guns and ammo, school safety and mental health care.
"We can't put this off any longer," the president said as he signed an additional package of 23 executive orders to bolster the proposed legislation. He called on the American people to back him up by actively supporting his plans.
"We won't be able to stop every violent act, but if there is even one thing that we can do to prevent any of these events, we have a deep obligation, all of us to try," the president said.
Now is the time for everyday people to get behind him urgently, to get involved and let their voices be heard. For years the National Rifle Association (NRA) has dominated the issue of guns on Capitol Hill. The NRA has been bullying those members of Congress in red states to vote their way on just about any gun legislation that came to the floor -- using scare tactics like the recent ad that stooped so low as using the president's children to protest curbs on gun ownership and access. The NRA has clearly crossed the line.
What I have not seen on any of the 24-hour news is a farmer, rancher or landowner being interviewed. Farmers and ranchers have been noticeably scarce amid all the commentary and reaction I have heard as I closely followed the coverage of Sandy Hook and its aftermath.
So, I will offer this one farmer's perspective which I believe is shared by many of us whose voices deserve to be fully included.
As a small child I remember my grandfather had his rifle on a gun rack over his bed for protection, my father has a rifle in his home and today, being a farmer and living on a farm, I, too, own a 22-caliber rifle.
Most farmers are responsible and law-abiding, and they use their guns safely. Like most farmers I have a deep appreciation for the land and the animals who share the land. I respect the right to bear arms and support the Second Amendment.
But I question what the Sam Hill does a farmer or hunter need with an AR-15 or any assault weapon? What are you hunting that requires the need of a semi-automatic weapon -- an instrument used for military warfare? This defies common sense and it should be central during the gun debate.
This kind of extremism is part of the reason I do not have an NRA membership. I do not need one to exercise my constitutional rights under the Second Amendment.
Obviously, you have never owned, or operated an AR-15, or other similar weapons. If you HAD, you would never label owners of such weapons as "extremists".

You also ignore situations like the Rodney King riots (glad the LOSER is DEAD), where business owners used such weapons to keep the VIOLENT, DEADLY, and LAWLESS MOBS from LOOTING and BURNING their businesses to the ground.
Amused Slew

Seattle, WA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#6
Jan 18, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Lots of "Rodney King" riots in MN ??? Yeah, you've got a nice point there, try a comb over...
Slew Theme Song

Minneapolis, MN

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#7
Jan 18, 2013
 

Judged:

2

2

2

Amused Slew wrote:
Lots of "Rodney King" riots in MN ??? Yeah, you've got a nice point there, try a comb over...
Dumbass.

"A race riot breaks out in the North Side of Minneapolis on Plymouth Avenue during the Minneapolis Aquatennial Parade and business are vandalized and fires break out in the area, although the disturbance is quelled within hours. However, the next day a shooting sets off another incident in the same area that leads to 18 fires, 36 arrests, 3 shootings, 2 dozen people injured, and damages totaling 4.2 million. There will be two more such incidents in the following two weeks."
Amused Slew

Seattle, WA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#8
Jan 18, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

So, in 1967 you had a riot ?? COME ON LOSER !!! LMAOROTFU~!

Lots of "Rodney King" riots in MN ??? Yeah, you've got a nice point there, try a comb over...
Terry McCaleb

Saint Paul, MN

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#9
Jan 18, 2013
 

Judged:

1

"Most farmers are responsible and law-abiding..."

The same can be said for everyone else in this country, both those who own guns and those who do not.

Where is hunting mentioned in the constitution? Who is the secretary for the U.S. Department of Needs?
digger

Minneapolis, MN

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#10
Jan 18, 2013
 
Amused Slew wrote:
So, in 1967 you had a riot ?? COME ON LOSER !!! LMAOROTFU~!
Lots of "Rodney King" riots in MN ??? Yeah, you've got a nice point there, try a comb over...
It's only a matter of time before it happens again...

If it can happen more than once in LA, it can happen more than once in Mpls. Rybak is getting out NOW, before it happens on HIS watch.

He's no dummy.
Amused Slew

Seattle, WA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#11
Jan 18, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Sure, every 50 years you "might" have a once in a lifetime event, so you'd best be building an ARK and gathering some animals...PLEASE take con and her head fulla fools, you'll make a wonderful FAMILY !!
Capt Crunch

Phoenix, AZ

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#12
Jan 18, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Amused Slew wrote:
Sure, every 50 years you "might" have a once in a lifetime event, so you'd best be building an ARK and gathering some animals...PLEASE take con and her head fulla fools, you'll make a wonderful FAMILY !!
Forgot the space, drunken fool... LMAOROTFu~!
Amused Slew

Seattle, WA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#15
Jan 18, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Sure, every 50 years you "might" have a once in a lifetime event, so you'd best be building an ARK and gathering some animals...

PLEASE take con and her head fulla fools, you'll make a wonderful FAMILY !!
Consistent

Minneapolis, MN

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#16
Jan 20, 2013
 
Best comment on Topix today:

But I question what the Sam Hill does a farmer or hunter need with an AR-15 or any assault weapon? What are you hunting that requires the need of a semi-automatic weapon -- an instrument used for military warfare? This defies common sense and it should be central during the gun debate.
John McBurney

Saint Paul, MN

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#17
Jan 20, 2013
 
Consistent wrote:
Best comment on Topix today:
But I question what the Sam Hill does a farmer or hunter need with an AR-15 or any assault weapon? What are you hunting that requires the need of a semi-automatic weapon -- an instrument used for military warfare? This defies common sense and it should be central during the gun debate.
Name a single country that has a military that is equipped with AR-15 weapons.
Amused Slew

Seattle, WA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#18
Jan 21, 2013
 
... with an AR-15 or any assault weapon.

Miss the point... MUCH ?

Tell me when this thread is updated: (Registration is not required)

Add to my Tracker Send me an email

Showing posts 1 - 14 of14
Type in your comments below
Name
(appears on your post)
Comments
Characters left: 4000
Type the numbers you see in the image on the right:

Please note by clicking on "Post Comment" you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

•••
•••
•••
•••

Grand Portage Jobs

•••
•••
•••

Grand Portage People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

•••

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]
•••