Your town. Your news. Your take.

Local News: Grafton, VT 

 | 

Sign Up

 | 

Sign In

 
Advertisment
Grafton, VT

Drill runs smoothly

Comments (Page 5)

Showing posts 81 - 88 of 88
« prev | next »
Go to last post | Jump to page:
Go forward not back
|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#83
Jul 2, 2008
 
JohnD wrote:
GFNB, I have to tell you I don't have much sympathy for your whining.
Nor I for yours, believe me
JohnD wrote:
Whatever company owns Vermont Yankee owns the responsiblity for taking care of the decommissioning. If a new company takes over VY then they take that responsibility from Entergy the same as Entergy took the responsibility from who ever it was they bought VY for.
True - in principle. If the spinoff is just for show, however, allowing profits to continue to go upwards to Entergy while allowing Entergy to separate itself from the front company when the decom bills come due, that's a form of fraud, legal or otherwise.
JohnD wrote:
If Entergy (or some other company) decoms the plant you're gonna pay for it through your energy bills. If the state does it, then you pay for it through your taxes. Either way, you let them build a nuclear power plant and you keep them in business by continuing to buy the electricity they produced so you're gonna pay for the cost of decomming it just like you paid for the cost of building it. Suck it up.
Duh! The deal is that we're paying for decommissioning now through our electricity bills. If ENVY takes that money and then disappears behind a shell company when it's time to clean up, that's a ripoff - legal or otherwise.
JohnD wrote:
As for your statement with regards to the drill, are you saying that the plant has NEVER sounded those sirens since they came online? Or is it that everytime the plant has sounded it's sirens in the last 30 years the entire town has gone into the chaotic panic you predict?
Where do you live? They sound every month at a given hour. If they sounded at some other time (and people paid attention), that's when you'd expect the confusion.
Koz
|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#84
Jul 2, 2008
 
Go forward not back wrote:
The UCS's credibility is impeccable.
Only to the ignorant, such as you.
Elmer Fudd
|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#85
Jul 5, 2008
 
Go forward not back wrote:
<quoted text>
Nor I for yours, believe me
<quoted text>
True - in principle. If the spinoff is just for show, however, allowing profits to continue to go upwards to Entergy while allowing Entergy to separate itself from the front company when the decom bills come due, that's a form of fraud, legal or otherwise.
<quoted text>
Duh! The deal is that we're paying for decommissioning now through our electricity bills. If ENVY takes that money and then disappears behind a shell company when it's time to clean up, that's a ripoff - legal or otherwise.
<quoted text>
Where do you live? They sound every month at a given hour. If they sounded at some other time (and people paid attention), that's when you'd expect the confusion.
Yet another post you forgot to delete.
surplus
|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#86
Aug 2, 2008
 
it's always about profit
JohnD
|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#87
Aug 12, 2008
 
Go forward not back wrote:
True - in principle. If the spinoff is just for show, however, allowing profits to continue to go upwards to Entergy while allowing Entergy to separate itself from the front company when the decom bills come due, that's a form of fraud, legal or otherwise.
GFNB, that's just ignorant. You're essentially saying "If the spinoff company's a fraud then that's fraud." Yeah, duh. What evidence do you have the spinoff will be "just for show"? Or is this one of those guilty-until-proven-innocent-c ause-I-hate-nuclear things? <quoted text>Duh! The deal is that we're paying for decommissioning now through our electricity bills. If ENVY takes that money and then disappears behind a shell company when it's time to clean up, that's a ripoff - legal or otherwise.
<quoted text> Nobody is disagreeing with you on that? The disagreement is THAT'S NOT WHAT THEY ARE DOING. Let me put it to you this way, how many fake shell companies has Entergy put up as owners of nuclear plants so they can twinkle away with all the dough and stick the state with bill? Rough numbers will be fine.
Algernon Sidney
|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#88
Aug 23, 2008
 
surplus wrote:
it's always about profit
Good point, you never would have caught Stalin, Mao or Pol Pot being concerned about profit as they killed millions. Gorby wasn't concerned about profit when he blew up Chernobyl.
pro nuke
|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#89
Aug 23, 2008
 
"Public voices support for fourth nuke plant"

http://www.palltimes.com/homepage/x560276416

It is nice to see a community who realizes the importance of a nuclear plant. It is also nice to see an un-bias newspaper!!!
BDV
|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#90
Aug 23, 2008
 
surplus wrote:
it's always about profit
If you want to see "going all out for profits" google vorkuta gold at your leisure.
Showing posts 81 - 88 of 88
« prev | next »
Go to last post | Jump to page:
Type in your comments to post to the forum
Name
(appears on your post)
Comments
Type the numbers you see in the image on the right:

Please note by clicking on "Post Comment" you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Other Recent Grafton Discussions
Topic Updated Last By Comments
Family Court closed Friday mornings to reduce c... Oct 10 Dr Julian Bo... 1
Residents irked by dog law Oct 9 Right to Life 5
Group shelves plan for new YMCA Oct 7 Ca mu nit t ... 1
GMP going solar Oct 7 Random 9
5 arrested in break-in at Harlow's Oct 7 dave 21
Police log Oct 3 Anonymous 1
Judge dismisses roofer case mid-trial Oct 3 Alyssa Palmi... 6
Related Topix Forums: Nuclear Energy, Vermont