GO POUND SAND. You are and advocate for the criminal, not the victim. It's time that you admitted that.<quoted text>
He reported on the committee hearing. He doesn't need to be a law enforcement officer or a lawyer to write. That's the nice thing about the first amendment.
Join the discussion below, or Read more at TwinCities.com.
#29 Mar 25, 2011
#30 Mar 27, 2011
I am not an advocate for the criminal. The fact is that you hare Reuben Rosario and will misrepresent anything he writes. He put forth both sides of an interesting story and did not show preference. If you see preference, it is because of your personal bias and, most likely, intellectual shallowness.
#31 Mar 27, 2011
He repeated the testimony of legislators and experts? That makes him against it? They testified at a legislative hearing. That makes it news. If he hadn't covered their side it would have madea one-sided story. You are saying that any story that covers the side you don't like is biased. I think you need serious mental health intervention.
Add your comments below
|Sam & Abe's Childcare Review||Feb '16||jajohsonfamily||1|
|Truman ready to settle lawsuit (Mar '08)||Aug '15||Yess||2|
|Better off than five years ago? (Jul '15)||Jul '15||Ohio resident||2|
|Taylor corporation (Jul '15)||Jul '15||Ohio resident||1|
|Accused Elysian bank robber, 70, chooses jail o... (Dec '10)||Jun '15||Grams||9|
|Parents in W'bago mull future (Jun '15)||Jun '15||hope maybe||1|
|Sensient expanding in Amboy (Jun '15)||Jun '15||pic||1|
Find what you want!
Search Good Thunder Forum Now
Copyright © 2016 Topix LLC