Who do you support for U.S. Senate in...

“Arch Nemisis of Democrats”

Since: Jun 12

Location hidden

#33513 Jan 26, 2013
Mike Duquette wrote:
<quoted text>There are many possible answers to a question such as this. You evidently think only one conclusion is possible to a statistic. Black and white flawed philosophy.
Maybe the young people are just taking note of how moronic the repugblican party is today.
College is not public education moron.
What do you call state funded universities homo? Public education.

Institutions of higher learning are a privledge, not a right.

“Arch Nemisis of Democrats”

Since: Jun 12

Location hidden

#33514 Jan 26, 2013
Arnold-Ziffel wrote:
<quoted text>You just may want to familiarize youself with the Supreme Court ruling of Texas vs. White to see if a state can "peacefully seceed" from the Union. But, I know you won't, and will just continue to post ignorantly.
Then I guess that means Texas has to go back to Mexico, Alaska has to go back to the rusky's, Hawaii is on its own. Puerto Rico can't be granted statehood. California goes back to Mexico. Louisiana purchase goes back to France.

“Breaking the spell ”

Since: Dec 10

of the puppet master

#33515 Jan 26, 2013
Makin bacon wrote:
<quoted text>
TSF, I think there's something you're failing to grasp. I'm John Q Public, I don't know anyone that has the money to run for president nor will I ever and I'd venture to say 99% of most people voting don't have the financial capability to run for POTUS. So, you're saying me, a Republican, personally picked Mitt Romney as the Republican candidate and everyone that voted for him? By your own admission you gave pause to not vote for Obama for whatever reason, and I still don't know if you did or didn't; however, why are Republicans like me guilty of being the presenter of an idiot for a candidate? You, Mr. Independent, have a bad habit of lumping everyone into one stereotypical category based off of their affiliation to a political party. Everyone in the Republican party in your eyes are rich, greedy, Bible thumpers, against science and math (it's not I'm against math, I just suck at it), education in general, racists and rednecks. I don't know you, but we both have college degrees, my kid attended private school, yours' didn't but I believe from previous posts by you, your children as mine have done just fine, I'm a christian, I'm not greedy and I'm damn sure I pay my fair share of taxes and probably then some, I'm called a racist because I don't believe anyone of any race should get a perpetual free ride off the back of hard working citizens and the word "illegal immigrant" "undocumented worker" i.e. illegal means they're ILLEGAL, just like murder, driving drunk, speeding etc. The word "illegal" means it's against the law. I didn't make up the meaning, it's right there in the dictionary. The opposite of "legal" is "illegal", get it? Therefore, I think they should enter the country legally and if it takes a while, that's not my problem to pony up and pay benefits for them until it's LEGAL. I might be a redneck, but rest assured I'm not a skank redneck.
Can I buy a paragraph?

“Breaking the spell ”

Since: Dec 10

of the puppet master

#33516 Jan 26, 2013
Arnold-Ziffel wrote:
<quoted text>
We have a system in this country known as "Primaries". The candidate comes from this system to be the nominee who carries the most support. Maybe your favorite candidate didn't win the Republican primary, but you certainly voted for Romney. Now, you are saying you are not responsible for Romney?
The sad part is,Mitt was one of the more moderate ones in the bunch.

“Breaking the spell ”

Since: Dec 10

of the puppet master

#33517 Jan 26, 2013
Makin bacon wrote:
<quoted text>
Thank you Arnold for making me aware of what a "primary election" is. What I do without your not so subtle sarcastic wisdom? If my favorite candidate didn't win in the primary and it wasn't Romney would that make me responsible for him being the Republican nominee? I did vote Romney in the general election, so does that make me responsible for him being the Republican nominee? That is the point I was making to TSF. I would have voted for anyone but Obama.
I see you failed to admit who you voted for in the primaries. Grow some balls(metaphor).

Since: Dec 11

Location hidden

#33518 Jan 26, 2013
Arnold-Ziffel wrote:
<quoted text>
I don't believe for one minute that if your business was forced to hire illegals or go under that you would choose to go under. Not in your nature. You would bend the rules to survive. So are the growers.
Arnold, pardon my language but you don't know $hit about how we run our business and what we'd do. When my husband first started out, he worked by himself with the help of a sub contractor when needed. It paid the bills and we survived. We're not into prison time or legal fines. All you're going off of is your opinion and frankly I don't give a damn what you think you know is in my nature. It's a$$holes you like that run around thinking they know everything about everyone when you don't and then you want to label them based off your skewed misconceptions. "I bet it was in your nature to take a job based off affirmative action. Would I be correct in assuming that you couldn't get a job based off your ability but based off your race?" Now how does it feel to have someone accuse you of something they know nothing about? That is an example of how you operate. Own it Arnold.

Since: Dec 11

Location hidden

#33519 Jan 26, 2013
Mike Duquette wrote:
<quoted text>Do we have one party rule today? No, so get off the communism thing Joe.
But your communism rhetoric does help our party win, as so many see it as McCarthyism. McCarthy was a nut, Taxpayer is a nut, and now you are showing the same nuttyness.
Keep up the good work showing everyone what a real republican thinks.
Read the post you responded to idiot. I said "do you believe in a one party rule." There's no hope for your stupidity. Done with you.

“Breaking the spell ”

Since: Dec 10

of the puppet master

#33520 Jan 26, 2013
Silvercoastcorks wrote:
<quoted text>
What do you call state funded universities homo? Public education.
Institutions of higher learning are a privledge, not a right.
And you wonder why our country is losing the battle in education to the countries who have free higher education for all.
Who gives a shit if it a "right" or not? While you sit around bitching about it not being a "right" the countries who do the right thing are making us look stupid.

Since: Dec 11

Location hidden

#33521 Jan 26, 2013
Mike Duquette wrote:
<quoted text>I see you failed to admit who you voted for in the primaries. Grow some balls(metaphor).
Again idiot, you can't vote for someone who is not legally on the ticket. Gingrich had stopped his campaign a couple days before the N.C. Primary, so I didn't vote for anyone. Is there something you don't understand? You grow some balls (not a metaphor).

“Breaking the spell ”

Since: Dec 10

of the puppet master

#33522 Jan 26, 2013
Makin bacon wrote:
<quoted text>
Old heavens, Jimmy Carter is still stinking up planet Earth. Yes, I voted from him too and I'm so ashamed. I still have the Jimmy Carter voting stench in my nose all these years later. Tell you what, you don't come back from mistakes like that!!! Scarred me for life, nose and all!!
Carter is a god compared to Bush. At least Carter did not march our boys off to die for nothing in Iraq.

“Breaking the spell ”

Since: Dec 10

of the puppet master

#33523 Jan 26, 2013
Makin bacon wrote:
<quoted text>
Read the post you responded to idiot. I said "do you believe in a one party rule." There's no hope for your stupidity. Done with you.
"Mike would be happy with a one party, Democrat rule. "

Bacon, read your own words. You seem to forget what you say often.

“Breaking the spell ”

Since: Dec 10

of the puppet master

#33524 Jan 26, 2013
Makin bacon wrote:
<quoted text>
Again idiot, you can't vote for someone who is not legally on the ticket. Gingrich had stopped his campaign a couple days before the N.C. Primary, so I didn't vote for anyone. Is there something you don't understand? You grow some balls (not a metaphor).
So when someone says, grow some balls, they mean it literally? Who knew?

Since: Dec 11

Location hidden

#33525 Jan 26, 2013
Silvercoastcorks wrote:
<quoted text>
Then I guess that means Texas has to go back to Mexico, Alaska has to go back to the rusky's, Hawaii is on its own. Puerto Rico can't be granted statehood. California goes back to Mexico. Louisiana purchase goes back to France.
Why would they have to go back to origin when they were legally annexed into the US by purchase, results of treaty after the Mexican War, and by legal inclusion in statehood?(Puerto Rico is a US territory that has not applied for statehood.) Your argument is reactionary with no basis of fact. History and Civics are not your strong points, are they? They don't have history courses at NC State? What does this have to do with secession anyway?

“Breaking the spell ”

Since: Dec 10

of the puppet master

#33526 Jan 26, 2013
Makin bacon wrote:
<quoted text>
Again idiot, you can't vote for someone who is not legally on the ticket. Gingrich had stopped his campaign a couple days before the N.C. Primary, so I didn't vote for anyone. Is there something you don't understand? You grow some balls (not a metaphor).
Did you tell us your man was Newt? No, so do not expect us to read your mind.
Mr Anderson

Los Angeles, CA

#33527 Jan 26, 2013
Mike Duquette wrote:
<quoted text>And you wonder why our country is losing the battle in education to the countries who have free higher education for all.
Who gives a shit if it a "right" or not? While you sit around bitching about it not being a "right" the countries who do the right thing are making us look stupid.
Mentally Disturbed Homocrat

“Breaking the spell ”

Since: Dec 10

of the puppet master

#33528 Jan 26, 2013
Makin bacon wrote:
To our Topix "Judge it" person, I deserve a "brilliant on the stinky Jimmy Carter post. Come on, throw me a few crumbs!!:)
Look at the nut trying beg for a pat on the back.
I am sure Waco will be around soon enough.

Since: Dec 11

Location hidden

#33529 Jan 26, 2013
Makin bacon wrote:
<quoted text>
Again idiot, you can't vote for someone who is not legally on the ticket. Gingrich had stopped his campaign a couple days before the N.C. Primary, so I didn't vote for anyone. Is there something you don't understand? You grow some balls (not a metaphor).
So, you could not write in Gingrich on the ballot, both in the Primary and Presidential elections? I was mistaken. I thought I could even write in Taxpayer on the ballot if I wanted to. Anyone can be written in. "You can't vote for someone who is not legally on the ticket" is absolutely not true at all. Write in's have always existed in America.

Since: Dec 11

Location hidden

#33530 Jan 26, 2013
Arnold-Ziffel wrote:
<quoted text>
I ask you those questions to make you think for a moment about the party you are blindly supporting. If you have no defense, I will tell you why the Republicans did not outlaw all abortions when they had the opportunity. Here is the answer. The party elite don't really want abortions to end. Why? Because if outlawed, every Republican candidate on every level of government could not use the Pro life mantra in all their campagin literature and all the dumbasses that believe this bs would not vote for them. That is the exact reason why. All the backwoods Baptist that vote Republican would be lost for something to vote Republican for. By the way, Republicans use this same political tactic for guns and gays. It keeps the ignorant motivated.
So you know what's wrong with the Republican Patty but you can't see what's wrong with your own party.

Since: Dec 11

Location hidden

#33531 Jan 26, 2013
Arnold-Ziffel wrote:
<quoted text>
Didn't I tell you, Bacon, that Republicans can seldom submit a post without using the fear of Communism as a background argumemt?
See why my statement to you..."The ghost of Joseph McCarty will never die as long as there is one Republican left on the earth" Here is more proof.
Straw man

Since: Dec 11

Location hidden

#33532 Jan 26, 2013
Mike Duquette wrote:
<quoted text>"Mike would be happy with a one party, Democrat rule. "
Bacon, read your own words. You seem to forget what you say often.
Again, I didn't say we had a one party rule. I said you would be happy with a one party rule. No, I don't seem to forget, you can't comprehend. From another post, I'm not the only one that believes you're a bit extreme.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Goldsboro Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Vote for Donald J Trump Oct '16 MAGA 1
Should I move to Goldsboro? Is it a safe place ... (Dec '09) Sep '16 Skip 127
News Man Jailed On Charges Of Sex Crimes Against Child (Oct '11) Jun '16 Little g 2
interricial dating (Dec '12) Mar '16 TheReal 4
Why Preachers Push Cruz NOT Trump (Mar '16) Mar '16 Vote For Trump 1
R.I.P. Tammy Lynn Sullivan (Dec '08) Feb '16 Josh Blanchard 9
New to goldsboro (Oct '15) Oct '15 Aprilwine 1

Goldsboro Jobs

More from around the web

Personal Finance

Goldsboro Mortgages