Who do you support for U.S. Senate in...

“Arch Nemisis of Democrats”

Since: Jun 12

Location hidden

#28828 Nov 19, 2012
Mike Duquette wrote:
<quoted text>So you wish for the president to go unprotected? I am sure you would love this.
Air force one is a mobile command unit. It is a must.
You do not understand how compromise works. Your requests are not reasonable.
Now who is being unreasonable? The planes of the 89th Airlift Wing are hardly a must. They might help the president do his job better but hardly a must.

You guys said the republican saber rattling was all for not prior to your president being re-elected. I will ask, if that truly is the case, what does your president have to fear other than fear itself?

“Arch Nemisis of Democrats”

Since: Jun 12

Location hidden

#28829 Nov 19, 2012
WACO 1909 wrote:
<quoted text>y'all are right.The president should hitchhike if he has to go anywhere and he should carry a .357 and a30.06 to protect himself.This would undoubtedly encourage only true patriots to run for the office. ;)
Hitchhiking are your words, not mine. I merely suggested giving up all the perks in our time of fiscal uncertainty.
WACO 1909

Houston, TX

#28830 Nov 19, 2012
Silvercoastcorks wrote:
<quoted text>
Hitchhiking are your words, not mine. I merely suggested giving up all the perks in our time of fiscal uncertainty.
When Carter gave up some White House perks during the"gas crisis"critics said he was demeaning the office of president.
WACO 1909

Houston, TX

#28831 Nov 19, 2012
Silvercoastcorks wrote:
<quoted text>
Now who is being unreasonable? The planes of the 89th Airlift Wing are hardly a must. They might help the president do his job better but hardly a must.
You guys said the republican saber rattling was all for not prior to your president being re-elected. I will ask, if that truly is the case, what does your president have to fear other than fear itself?
You.
WACO 1909

Houston, TX

#28832 Nov 19, 2012
Actually Silvercoast I said that in a humorous fashion..I know you aren't a danger to the president except politically.

“Arch Nemisis of Democrats”

Since: Jun 12

Location hidden

#28833 Nov 19, 2012
WACO 1909 wrote:
<quoted text>When Carter gave up some White House perks during the"gas crisis"critics said he was demeaning the office of president.
True, times are different.

“Arch Nemisis of Democrats”

Since: Jun 12

Location hidden

#28834 Nov 19, 2012
WACO 1909 wrote:
Actually Silvercoast I said that in a humorous fashion..I know you aren't a danger to the president except politically.
I know man, just being chatty this morning. It is not raining and in a good mood.
WACO 1909

Houston, TX

#28835 Nov 19, 2012
Silvercoastcorks wrote:
<quoted text>
I know man, just being chatty this morning. It is not raining and in a good mood.
Its clear and blue skies here gonna go up to 72 degrees.Naturally...I feel great!

Since: Dec 11

Location hidden

#28836 Nov 19, 2012
Silvercoastcorks wrote:
<quoted text>
I will ask, if that truly is the case, what does your president have to fear other than fear itself?
If you are going to use a quote, how about not using one by FDR. Remember, he was a socialist.
Welt Geliebt

UK

#28837 Nov 19, 2012
WACO 1909 wrote:
<quoted text> Its clear and blue skies here gonna go up to 72 degrees.Naturally...I feel great!
Halt die Fressie Schlappschwanz hurensohn Schwuler! Versager.

“Seek Light”

Since: May 12

Location hidden

#28838 Nov 19, 2012
Welt Geliebt wrote:
<quoted text>Halt die Fressie Schlappschwanz hurensohn Schwuler! Versager.
Back at you! LOL!

“Arch Nemisis of Democrats”

Since: Jun 12

Location hidden

#28839 Nov 19, 2012
Arnold-Ziffel wrote:
<quoted text>If you are going to use a quote, how about not using one by FDR. Remember, he was a socialist.
Hahahahaha
Welt Geliebt

UK

#28840 Nov 19, 2012
waco1909 wrote:
<quoted text> Back at you! LOL!
Mach es dir selber Schwuchtl! Du verdammter Arschficker scheisskopf. Dumme Schlampe du bist ein volltrottel!:):):):):

“Seek Light”

Since: May 12

Location hidden

#28841 Nov 19, 2012
Welt Geliebt wrote:
<quoted text>Halt die Fressie Schlappschwanz hurensohn Schwuler! Versager.
Bessame coulo cabron!

“Seek Light”

Since: May 12

Location hidden

#28842 Nov 19, 2012
Welt Geliebt wrote:
<quoted text>Mach es dir selber Schwuchtl! Du verdammter Arschficker scheisskopf. Dumme Schlampe du bist ein volltrottel!:):):):):
ha ha ha ha! I think anybody can figure that crap out! Remember....large parts of Texas were settled by Germans! I'm flattered you'd go to all this trouble for me! Can you do some RUSSIAN as well?:)

“Seek Light”

Since: May 12

Location hidden

#28843 Nov 19, 2012
I love attention!!:)

“Arch Nemisis of Democrats”

Since: Jun 12

Location hidden

#28844 Nov 19, 2012
http://politix.topix.com/homepage/3473-ron-pa...

You have some time left AZ, but don't dilly dally.

Since: Dec 11

Location hidden

#28845 Nov 19, 2012
Silvercoastcorks wrote:
http://politix.topix.com/homep age/3473-ron-paul-secession-a- worthwhile-question
You have some time left AZ, but don't dilly dally.
Back in the height of the Viet Nam war, the 'patriotic' right wing pro war supporters coined the statement..."Love it, or leave it" to question who was really with America in her stuggles and who really was not. We finally see which route you 'patriotic' right wingers have decided to go. So, all I can say in response is, "Get the hell out".

“Arch Nemisis of Democrats”

Since: Jun 12

Location hidden

#28846 Nov 19, 2012
Arnold-Ziffel wrote:
<quoted text>
Back in the height of the Viet Nam war, the 'patriotic' right wing pro war supporters coined the statement..."Love it, or leave it" to question who was really with America in her stuggles and who really was not. We finally see which route you 'patriotic' right wingers have decided to go. So, all I can say in response is, "Get the hell out".
Once again, it has been confirmed, democrats know precisely dick about anything. Not against the law or subject to penalty to openly discuss secession. It wasn't even against the law in 1861 till shots were fired on Fort Sumter. And, as I have said before, there will not be a second surrender signing at the Appomattox Courthouse next time.

You still have time AZ. Perhaps you can convince your constiutents to assist you in packing.

"Section 3: TreasonSection 3 defines treason and its punishment.

"Treason against the United States, shall consist only in levying War against them, or in adhering to their Enemies, giving them Aid and Comfort. No Person shall be convicted of Treason unless on the Testimony of two Witnesses to the same overt Act, or on Confession in open Court. The Congress shall have Power to declare the Punishment of Treason, but no Attainder of Treason shall work Corruption of Blood, or Forfeiture except during the Life of the Person attainted."

The Constitution defines treason as specific acts, namely "levying War against [the United States], or in adhering to their Enemies, giving them Aid and Comfort." A contrast is therefore maintained with the English law, whereby a variety of crimes, including conspiring to kill the King or "violating" the Queen, were punishable as treason. In Ex Parte Bollman, 8 U.S. 75 (1807), the Supreme Court ruled that "there must be an actual assembling of men, for the treasonable purpose, to constitute a levying of war.""

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Article_Three_of...

Since: Dec 11

Location hidden

#28847 Nov 19, 2012
Silvercoastcorks wrote:
<quoted text>
Once again, it has been confirmed, democrats know precisely dick about anything. Not against the law or subject to penalty to openly discuss secession. It wasn't even against the law in 1861 till shots were fired on Fort Sumter. And, as I have said before, there will not be a second surrender signing at the Appomattox Courthouse next time.
You still have time AZ. Perhaps you can convince your constiutents to assist you in packing.
"Section 3: TreasonSection 3 defines treason and its punishment.
"Treason against the United States, shall consist only in levying War against them, or in adhering to their Enemies, giving them Aid and Comfort. No Person shall be convicted of Treason unless on the Testimony of two Witnesses to the same overt Act, or on Confession in open Court. The Congress shall have Power to declare the Punishment of Treason, but no Attainder of Treason shall work Corruption of Blood, or Forfeiture except during the Life of the Person attainted."
The Constitution defines treason as specific acts, namely "levying War against [the United States], or in adhering to their Enemies, giving them Aid and Comfort." A contrast is therefore maintained with the English law, whereby a variety of crimes, including conspiring to kill the King or "violating" the Queen, were punishable as treason. In Ex Parte Bollman, 8 U.S. 75 (1807), the Supreme Court ruled that "there must be an actual assembling of men, for the treasonable purpose, to constitute a levying of war.""
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Article_Three_of...
If it can to a state wide referendum, do you seriously think this state would vote to seceed from the US? You don't even realize the seriousness of the act, let alone do it in reality.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Goldsboro Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Should I move to Goldsboro? Is it a safe place ... (Dec '09) May '15 gilsburough 112
A Hate Crime On Goldsboro Community Campus ?? ... Apr '15 American_Sons 2
Our Society is Headed to Lockdown in The War on... Apr '15 Culture Auditor 1
Goldsboro Mar '15 ECU15 1
Likes/ dislikes of goldsboro Mar '15 Stubbs89 1
Review: Old School Auto Feb '15 Anonymous 1
Do anybody remember a guy they Called E Feb '15 Little E 1
More from around the web

Goldsboro People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

Personal Finance

Goldsboro Mortgages