Judged:
5
4
3
Full story: Las Cruces Sun-News![]()
Comments
|
Judged:
5
4
3 |
||||
|
Judged:
7
6
6 That, along with the state park admission fees, should be more than enough to keep the parks open. Regardless, the state parks belong to the people, not the government. They do not have the legal right to "close" our lands, even if they think they do. |
||||
|
Judged:
2
1
1 |
||||
|
Judged:
4
2
2 |
||||
|
Judged:
4
3
3 Raising taxes is never the answer. Cost cutting is. However, there are a lot of things that can be cut from the state budget long before getting to the state parks. Let's start with Richardson's pet "Rail Runner" project, which will likely never pay for itself, let alone make a profit, and only serves folks in Santa Fe and Albuquerque. |
||||
|
Judged:
3
3
3 serves no one except the cement contractor. Not even built yet. Railrunner is useful now and will be even more in the future. |
||||
|
Judged:
5
5
3 |
||||
|
Judged:
5
5
4 |
||||
| ||||
|
Judged:
5
5
4 Agreed. Unfortunately, the ACLU and other anti-American coalitions have successfully sued in court over and over concerning the "rights" of convicted criminals, and they have won more often than not. Most of the cushy benefits convicts enjoy are now guaranteed by legal precedent. 100 years ago, prison directors would have scoffed at the idea of courts telling jailers how to humanely treat prisoners. The courts used to be there to judge and sentence criminals. But today officials actually take stock in the nonsense coming from courts, even though there is no Constitutional authority for the court's rulings. To take it even further, courts now issue rulings based on precedent that was unconstitutional in the first place, thus we get precedent law that is ever more radically leftist, with absolutely no legal basis whatsoever, Constitutionally speaking. |
||||
|
Judged:
2
2
1 toon |
||||
|
Judged:
3
3
3 |
||||
|
Judged:
3
2
2 Fine! All in agreement, say I! |
||||
|
Judged:
2
2
1 Would these harsh prison measures include future inmates who are serving time for lackikng health insurance ..... as is a provision in our newly House-approved health care bill? These vicious no-insurance criminals need to think over what they've done. |
||||
|
Judged:
2
2
2 It costs something like $40,000/inmate/year. It costs on the order of $8,000-$10,000/student/year. This is a national average, but I think it's much lower. I had read a number like $1,500/student/yr. You all have any problems with this thinking? |
||||
|
Judged:
3
2
2 In my opinion, we should have Sheriff Joe Arpaio, of Maricopa County Arizona, running the prison system. Surplus food, tent camps, chain gains are the rule. "Don't do the crime, if you can't do the time." Prison should be a work camp, not rest and relaxation. |
||||
|
Judged:
2
1
1 On Nov. 9, Richardson used his line-item veto power for the state budget to ensure that $800,000 targeted for transfer to the state general fund remained in the trail safety fund. He noted the program "is funded by fees and designed to protect the safety of outdoorsmen and other New Mexicans who use off-highway vehicles." Let's see......College Educations on the chopping block. But to "protect outdoorsmen". Agh..Does anyone besides me think this is just WRONG? I am serious, how do we get rid of this drain on our future? |
||||
|
Judged:
3
2
2 Richardson ruined our economy, a productive O&G producing state, and now intends to produce a generation of uneducated, government dependent paupers. Am I wrong? |
||||
|
Judged:
3
3
1 you are. |
||||
|
Judged:
3
2
2 There needs to be a new sheriff in town. Look at Maricopa County Arizona. Sherrif Joe is saving tax dollars. New Mexico needs to stop electing people just because they are Democrat, elect people who have a resume of knowledge and wisdom. Bill Richardson and his cronies have taken us to poverty to elevate Bills political future. We are at the bottom of every category from education to income. Our government doesnt know how to manage money, our money. |
||||
Since that $800,000 was paid in fees by sportsmen expressly for the purpose indicated, it's not a "drain". The money wouldn't be there if sportsmen, off-roaders, ATV users, etc. didn't pay it. I'm no fan of Richardson, but his decision regarding the fees was the correct one. Sportsmen pay the fees believing they will be used for trail upkeep. Raiding that fund and using the money for something else would have been wrong, causing outrage among sportsmen who would likely not pay the fees in the future. Taxpayers are upset enough as it is. Taking what amount to a "tax" on the use of land that already belongs to us and using it for purposes it wasn't intended for would only aggravate an already pissed-off electorate. |
||||
|
||||
Please note by clicking on "Post Comment" you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.
| Topic | Updated | Last By | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gov. Richardson asks New Mexicans to shop locally | 4 min | Because | 14 |
| NFL Football Lucky Week 13 - Who Will Win? | 9 hr | George Pomonis | 84 |
| State seeks owners of unclaimed property | 12 hr | Al Bundy | 37 |
| Farmington's business license revocation propos... | 16 hr | hilllbilly | 19 |
| New Mexico revenues projected to drop $53M | 23 hr | Skuttlebutt | 1 |
| N.M. revenues projected to drop $53M | Sun | Old Timer | 11 |
| Beaver Toyota relocation plan hits annex snag (Nov '08) | Sun | ToyotaBuyer_x4 | 40 |