Lot 4 fate to be decided the people

The Estes Park Town Board did the right thing last Monday night when it approved an ordinance containing the contract for the sale of Lot 4 of the Stanley Historic District. Full Story
Jake

Ault, CO

#1 Jan 10, 2014
Please Please Please tell us exactly what the 50-60 well paying job positions are that you so highly advocate and their commensurate salary's. You surely must have this well figured out by now. As for increasing tourism, please also tell us how it will increase tourism. I can see it now---"Hey honey, let's go to Estes Park and see all the new buildings on Lot 4".
Tom H

Denver, CO

#2 Jan 10, 2014
Agreed
And why the need to increase tourism when they want to reconfigure downtown roads to ease existing traffic? And add parking structures to handle existing visiting cars. When is enough,enough?
Estes is visited because it is a quaint little town with charm, visitor words not mine,and bordered by RMNP.Lets keep this lot 4 debate out in the open, where we can size it up for what it is and go from there.
NLC

Estes Park, CO

#3 Jan 11, 2014
It seems to me that this would ruin the ambiance of The Stanley. There has to be a better place - please find it!
freddie

Estes Park, CO

#4 Jan 28, 2014
NLC wrote:
It seems to me that this would ruin the ambiance of The Stanley. There has to be a better place - please find it!
you wouldn't even notice it behind the safeway and the other stores ...

that ugly slide next to the donuthause is a bigger eyesore (to name one thing)
Concerned resident

Aurora, CO

#5 Feb 8, 2014
My first concern relates to the municipal election. It should be EASY for all eligible voters to cast their ballot. The choice to hold a required poll election on this issue is clearly designed to suppress votes. It is specifically directed toward the elderly population that will be prone to vote against the sale of Lot 4. The extra time and effort to complete and submit an absentee ballot application, wait to receive the absentee ballot, then complete and submit it - it NOT an easy process. And there are many elderly voters who will not be physically capable of making the trip to Town Hall to cast their vote in person. This strategy planned by the Town Board, Town Clerk and EP "elites" in favor of the sale is very troubling and should be brought to the attention of the Colorado Attorney General. This is just not right.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Glen Haven Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Debate: Gay Marriage - Berthoud, CO (Jan '12) Sep 18 Red 22
Learn to be a ham radio operator (Nov '13) Sep 17 HAM 12345 2
Review: T V Service Center Sep 12 bill Brennan 3
Review: Affordable Dentures - Walter E Schneide... (Feb '11) Sep 11 Complete Dentures 23
CO Colorado Primary Election August 10: Will you v... (Aug '10) Sep 10 We hate fort coll... 32
Jared Polis sues to stop fracking next to his W... (Jul '13) Sep 3 Jim 4
LP + Mesa = Skybeam, broadband alternative (Dec '08) Aug 30 Terry 83
•••
•••
•••

Glen Haven Jobs

•••
•••
•••

Glen Haven People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

•••

Glen Haven News, Events & Info

Click for news, events and info in Glen Haven
•••

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]
•••