No more Public Assitant checks for sm...

No more Public Assitant checks for smokers.

Posted in the Glasgow Forum

Concerned

Glasgow, KY

#1 Feb 11, 2013
Yeah a law that finally makes sense. If you smoke and draw welfare you get no more money. I am so glad. I am getting tired of taking care of people that use my hard earned money to pay for their house,eletric,health care and food. Only to stand around and smoke cigarettes. This law will go into effect in July and if you are caught smoking and getting govt help your done. No more money from us.
Please

Cave City, KY

#2 Feb 11, 2013
Is it OK to do drugs and boze?
LOL

Glasgow, KY

#3 Feb 11, 2013
awsomeness where can i read the article don't watch a lot of tv
Liar

Glasgow, KY

#4 Feb 11, 2013
Concerned wrote:
Yeah a law that finally makes sense. If you smoke and draw welfare you get no more money. I am so glad. I am getting tired of taking care of people that use my hard earned money to pay for their house,eletric,health care and food. Only to stand around and smoke cigarettes. This law will go into effect in July and if you are caught smoking and getting govt help your done. No more money from us.
you are full of s..t what you telling is false. Is your name Walton Shirley.
wtf

Edmonton, KY

#5 Feb 11, 2013
Concerned wrote:
Yeah a law that finally makes sense. If you smoke and draw welfare you get no more money. I am so glad. I am getting tired of taking care of people that use my hard earned money to pay for their house,eletric,health care and food. Only to stand around and smoke cigarettes. This law will go into effect in July and if you are caught smoking and getting govt help your done. No more money from us.
Does that mean the Obama must give up his annual salary as president? He still sneaks and smokes and you are aware of who pays Obama's salary, right?
Herb

Glasgow, KY

#6 Feb 11, 2013
It would be a step in the right direction- but really, if it were true, just how would they know who was smoking and who wasn't? How many degenerates would admit that they were smoking, if it meant losing their "benefits"?
huh

Glasgow, KY

#7 Feb 11, 2013
wtf wrote:
<quoted text>
Does that mean the Obama must give up his annual salary as president? He still sneaks and smokes and you are aware of who pays Obama's salary, right?
You've seen him yourself, I take it?
atf

Glasgow, KY

#8 Feb 11, 2013
Always picking on the smoker. Why not the drunks sure are plenty of them.
Yes

Glasgow, KY

#10 Feb 13, 2013
What about medical
Herb

Glasgow, KY

#11 Feb 13, 2013
atf wrote:
Always picking on the smoker. Why not the drunks sure are plenty of them.
How about people who aren't capable of/refuse to support themselves, yet think that they are entitled to a family and kids?
Are you crazy

Glasgow, KY

#12 Feb 18, 2013
When you start that you get no drinkers, no one that uses makeup, let them spend money on food instead of that. No perfume wearers, only get a hair cut twice a year to expensive Oh and you cant own a car just use public transit. Hey how bout no sick people either. think before you write. Land of the free Ha Ha. Want you just enforce the need it law a little better

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Glasgow Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Bible study rules for public schools proposed (Feb '10) 3 min Pres Donald J Tru... 164,730
What's happened to mighty dollar? 49 min Zou 20
Best mechanic for transmissions? 1 hr HelpPlease 1
All non-whites should be kicked out of America ... 1 hr Zoom 31
Brandon Buckley (Oct '10) 6 hr Reunite The Veterens 6
Tim Chapman of cave city 6 hr Acs2018 11
Skater Kid 6 hr ayewhatitdo 1

Glasgow Jobs

More from around the web

Personal Finance

Glasgow Mortgages