Ill. House Approves Legalizing Same-Sex Civil Unions

Nov 30, 2010 | Posted by: roboblogger | Full story: CBS2

The Illinois House has approved a measure to legalize civil unions for same-sex couples.

Comments
35,561 - 35,580 of 49,006 Comments Last updated 13 min ago

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#41504
Aug 3, 2013
 
LGBT wrote:
Amazing that something good finally came out of Illinois!
No, Illinois keeps making dumber and dumber mistakes.

“Busting Kimare's”

Since: Feb 13

Clitty

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#41505
Aug 3, 2013
 
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
But clearly not real marriage as my point definitively shows.
You have yet to definitely state your case. You've merely expressed your opinion.
Until you're judgments have any legal bearing on the validity of my marriage you have nothing more than a personal opinion.
I woke up this morning still legally married, just like you.

Troll on, Hunty

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#41506
Aug 3, 2013
 
Dusty Mangina wrote:
<quoted text>
You have yet to definitely state your case. You've merely expressed your opinion.
Until you're judgments have any legal bearing on the validity of my marriage you have nothing more than a personal opinion.
I woke up this morning still legally married, just like you.
Troll on, Hunty
You woke up with a bogus piece of paper and pointlessly duplicate penis's.

I woke up in a natural union of gender, naturally united in body, mind and spirit.

There is nothing close to that in your relationship.

“Busting Kimare's”

Since: Feb 13

Clitty

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#41510
Aug 3, 2013
 
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>

I woke up in a natural union of gender, naturally united in body, mind and spirit.
There is nothing close to that in your relationship.
What part of the above invalidates the legal validity of my marriage?

Troll on, Hunty.

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#41511
Aug 3, 2013
 
Dusty Mangina wrote:
<quoted text>
What part of the above invalidates the legal validity of my marriage?
Troll on, Hunty.
Physically they are distinct.

Gender wise they are distinct.

Relationally they are distinct.

Historically they are distinct.

Consequentially they are distinct.

You have a relational contract falsely titled marriage. That's it.
Angus

Wilmington, IL

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#41514
Aug 3, 2013
 

Judged:

1

Anal sex is wrong
beers

Oswego, IL

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#41517
Aug 4, 2013
 
Why can't it be called a union? Why do they so vehemently scream it must be marriage? I'm all for the same rights under the law, but why do they have to take something so sacred to Christians? I'm thinking they hate Christians.

Since: Jun 11

AOL

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#41518
Aug 4, 2013
 
beers wrote:
Why can't it be called a union? Why do they so vehemently scream it must be marriage? I'm all for the same rights under the law, but why do they have to take something so sacred to Christians? I'm thinking they hate Christians.
Illogical. Many are Christians. Many Christian congregations celebrate same sex marriage.

Are you forgetting that many of other faiths get married too? Marriage does not belong to any one religion. Each religion may have their own additional requirements and rituals, but marriage is a fundamental right of all persons.

Why do those like you so vehemently scream it must not be marriage?

You are free to determine what your marriage means to you. You are not free to impose your personal beliefs on everyone else. Marriage is a fundamental right, and each couple is free to determine what it means to them.

Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pennsylvania v. Casey, 505 U.S. 833, 851 (1992):“These matters, involving the most intimate and personal choices a person may make in a lifetime, choices central to personal dignity and autonomy, are central to the liberty protected by the Fourteenth Amendment. At the heart of liberty is the right to define one’s own concept of existence, of meaning, of the universe, and of the mystery of human life.”
Wondering

Tyngsboro, MA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#41519
Aug 4, 2013
 
Not Yet Equal wrote:
At the heart of liberty is the right to define one’s own concept of existence, of meaning, of the universe, and of the mystery of human life.”
That's why we have an overcrowded prison system. Too many people defining their own concept of existence.
disabled in mapleton

Mapleton, IL

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#41520
Aug 4, 2013
 
sad part is what makes u think it will be any better if u get same sex marriage? Hell as it is the courts ruled against me a disabled man when I was wrongfully arrested in 2009 and I even did jail time for it when there was three different judges who dealt with my case. Here i sit some 4 years later and one more wrongful arrest and they still won't just do their jobs because a grown man and his adult daughter threatened my 12 yr old and they do nothing...except send the exact same cop who first arrested and tased me after illegally entering my property

“Busting Kimare's”

Since: Feb 13

Clitty

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#41521
Aug 4, 2013
 
beers wrote:
Why can't it be called a union? Why do they so vehemently scream it must be marriage? I'm all for the same rights under the law, but why do they have to take something so sacred to Christians? I'm thinking they hate Christians.
A Church sponsored wedding is known as Holy Matrimony.

Marriage, which can include the above, also includes civil unions. Millions of couples have simply gone to a courthouse to get married.

Further, your comment is insulting people whose faith practice is not Christianity.

Finally, separate, but equal, has never been equal.

“Busting Kimare's”

Since: Feb 13

Clitty

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#41523
Aug 4, 2013
 
The Regnerus Hoax has become a tool for the international scapegoating of LGBT people world wide, including in Russia where it is being heavily used.

http://www.topix.com/news/gay/2013/08/the-reg...

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#41526
Aug 4, 2013
 
Not Yet Equal wrote:
<quoted text>
Illogical. Many are Christians. Many Christian congregations celebrate same sex marriage.
Are you forgetting that many of other faiths get married too? Marriage does not belong to any one religion. Each religion may have their own additional requirements and rituals, but marriage is a fundamental right of all persons.
Why do those like you so vehemently scream it must not be marriage?
You are free to determine what your marriage means to you. You are not free to impose your personal beliefs on everyone else. Marriage is a fundamental right, and each couple is free to determine what it means to them.
Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pennsylvania v. Casey, 505 U.S. 833, 851 (1992):“These matters, involving the most intimate and personal choices a person may make in a lifetime, choices central to personal dignity and autonomy, are central to the liberty protected by the Fourteenth Amendment. At the heart of liberty is the right to define one’s own concept of existence, of meaning, of the universe, and of the mystery of human life.”
Those churches are apostate.

However, based on science, ss marriage is an oxymoron.

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#41527
Aug 4, 2013
 
Dusty Mangina wrote:
The Regnerus Hoax has become a tool for the international scapegoating of LGBT people world wide, including in Russia where it is being heavily used.
http://www.topix.com/news/gay/2013/08/the-reg...
The Regenerus study is the latest, largest and most scientific study to date. It was exonerated of all gay charges by peers.

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#41528
Aug 4, 2013
 
Dusty Mangina wrote:
<quoted text>
A Church sponsored wedding is known as Holy Matrimony.
Marriage, which can include the above, also includes civil unions. Millions of couples have simply gone to a courthouse to get married.
Further, your comment is insulting people whose faith practice is not Christianity.
Finally, separate, but equal, has never been equal.
Marriage is a distinct human relationship.

ss couples are clearly not equal from the get-go.

“Busting Kimare's”

Since: Feb 13

Clitty

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#41529
Aug 4, 2013
 
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
Marriage is a distinct human relationship.
ss couples are clearly not equal from the get-go.
Thanks, yet again, for sharing your personal opinion. Sad, that's all you have left.

Still married, in every sense of the word, just like you. Not partnered, not coupled, not "united, but married.

Troll on, Hunty.

Since: Jun 11

AOL

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#41530
Aug 4, 2013
 
Wondering wrote:
<quoted text>
That's why we have an overcrowded prison system. Too many people defining their own concept of existence.
Our prison population is a result of people failing to follow the golden rule.

The prison problem is not self actualization, but unwanted interference in the lives of others.

Since: Jun 11

AOL

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#41531
Aug 4, 2013
 
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
The Regenerus study is the latest, largest and most scientific study to date. It was exonerated of all gay charges by peers.
Bull.

The American Sociological Association's SCOTUS brief destroys claims made that same-sex households are inferior when it comes to raising children, which is a major argument for those pushing Prop 8 and DOMA. "The ASA especially calls out the Mark Regnerus study, which is the recent controversial study claiming children raised in same-sex households suffer adverse efffects. Supporters of Prop 8 made this study a huge part of their arguments in spite of fact that it has been discredited."

Since: Jun 11

AOL

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#41532
Aug 4, 2013
 
ASA said the following about the Regnerus study in its brief (pgs. 26-29):

"First, the Regnerus study does not specifically examine children born or adopted into same-sex parent families, but instead examines children who, from the time they were born until they were 18 or moved out, had a parent who at any time had “a same-sex romantic relationship.”. As Regnerus noted, the majority of the individuals characterized by him as children of “lesbian mothers” and “gay fathers” were the offspring of failed opposite- sex unions whose parent subsequently had a same-sex relationship. In other words, Regnerus did not study or analyze the children of two same-sex parents.

Second, when the Regnerus study compared the children of parents who at one point had a “same-sex romantic relationship,” most of whom had experienced a family dissolution or single motherhood, to children raised by two biological, married opposite-sex parents, the study stripped away all divorced, single, and stepparent families from the opposite-sex group, leaving only stable, married, opposite-sex families as the comparison... Thus, it was hardly surprising that the opposite-sex group had better outcomes given that stability is a key predictor of positive child wellbeing. By so doing, the Regnerus study makes inappropriate apples-to-oranges comparisons.

Third, Regnerus’s first published analysis of his research data failed to consider whether the children lived with, or were raised by, the parent who was, at some point, apparently involved in “a romantic relationship with someone of the same sex” and that same-sex partner. Instead, Regnerus categorized children as raised by a parent in a same-sex romantic relationship regardless of whether they were in fact raised by the parent and the parent’s same-sex romantic partner and regardless of the amount of time that they spent under the parent’s care. As a result, so long as an adult child believed that he or she had had a parent who had a relationship with someone of the same sex, then he or she was counted by Regnerus as having been “raised by” a parent in a same-sex relationship.

Fourth, in contrast to every other study on same-sex parenting, Regnerus identified parents who had purportedly engaged in a same-sex romantic relationship based solely on the child’s own retrospective report of the parent’s romantic relationships, made once the child was an adult. This unusual measurement strategy ignored the fact that the child may have limited and inaccurate recollections of the parents’ distant romantic past.

Finally, the study fails to account for the fact that the negative outcomes may have been caused by other childhood events or events later in the individual’s adult life, particularly given that the vast majority (thirty-seven of forty) of the outcomes measured were adult and not childhood outcomes. Factors other than same-sex parenting are likely to explain these negative outcomes in the Regnerus study. Regnerus himself concludes that “I am thus not suggesting that growing up with a lesbian mother or gay father causes suboptimal outcomes because of the sexual orientation or sexual behavior of the parent.”

In sum, by conflating (1) children raised by same-sex parents with (2) individuals who reportedly had a parent who had “a romantic relationship with someone of the same sex,” and referring to such individuals as children of “lesbian mothers” or “gay fathers,” the Regnerus study obscures the fact that it did not specifically examine children raised by two same-sex parents. Accordingly, it cannot speak to the impact of same-sex parenting on child outcomes."

American Sociological Association

Since: Jun 11

AOL

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#41533
Aug 4, 2013
 
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
Those churches are apostate.
However, based on science, ss marriage is an oxymoron.
Your personal prejudice. Not a statement of fact.

Tell me when this thread is updated: (Registration is not required)

Add to my Tracker Send me an email

Type in your comments below
Name
(appears on your post)
Comments
Characters left: 4000
Type the numbers you see in the image on the right:

Please note by clicking on "Post Comment" you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Other Recent Glasford Discussions

Search the Glasford Forum:
Title Updated Last By Comments
IL Who do you support for Governor in Illinois in ... (Oct '10) 1 hr nono 3,849
IL Illinois Governor Recall Amendment (Oct '10) 12 hr newpoly 1,867
IL Who do you support for Secretary of State in Il... (Oct '10) Jul 27 Chicagobunny 526
IL Who do you support for Attorney General in Illi... (Oct '10) Jul 16 rdarbin 641
Lisa Conn Murder (Feb '13) Jul 12 Jay 8
Greenwood Cemetery map is offered to help locat... (May '06) Jul 7 Jessica from Norwich 10
IL Who do you support for U.S. Senate in Illinois ... (Oct '10) Jul 6 george 6,590
•••
•••
•••
Glasford Dating

more search filters

less search filters

•••

Glasford Jobs

•••
Enter and win $5000
•••
•••

Glasford People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

•••

Glasford News, Events & Info

Click for news, events and info in Glasford
•••

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]
•••