Oh, now I see. What you're saying is that if Democrat voters had something to do with this, they would have chosen a more conservative candidate instead of the more liberal candidate. You know..... because conservative candidates are immediate losers?<quoted text>
No. Christ. I said if Democrats would have tainted out your primaries the nominee would have been Rick Perry, someone much easier for Obama to beat. Democrats wouldn't help the most viable candidate get the nomination. Democrats would have helped the biggest bozo win. Get it?
I guess the Republican party is becoming liberal now....... huh? Republicans couldn't have possibly chosen a conservative candidate, especially with the emerging Tea Party crowd and the fact moderates have no chance at winning.
I disagree. I mean, if our voters were going to jump party lines, I think we would do so to nominate the most conservative Democrat. I mean, after all, in the event we lose, we sure as hell wouldn't want to deal with a Commie left-winger. We would rather tolerate a moderate Democrat instead.
Your theory defies logic.