Assemblyman Jim Nielsen files restrai...

Assemblyman Jim Nielsen files restraining order against activist

There are 1 comment on the Red Bluff Daily News story from Sep 1, 2011, titled Assemblyman Jim Nielsen files restraining order against activist. In it, Red Bluff Daily News reports that:

Assemblyman Jim Nielsen, R-Gerber, has filed a temporary restraining order against Don Bird, a Tehama County political activist.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Red Bluff Daily News.

Pat Massie Johnston

Stockton, CA

#1 Sep 15, 2011
Hey I didn't know we could still comment on Topix on stories from the Daily News. I miss Topix and so do a lot of other people. Facebook sucks for political blogging. I miss Topix. Can anyone explain to mewhy this is? Does Topix still cover Daily News?
Last February, Tehama County Grand Jury Foreman Robert Wilkerson commits suicide. Robert shared concerns about Nielson’s fraudulent election and cover-up. Finally someone would do a real investigation. Then, he had an DUI, Hit and run accident and took his life.
Judge Garaventa overseeing the Grand Jury, whom mishandled Don Bird’s legal case against Nielson, appointed Richard Sol to be the new foremen. Sol lives next door to Nielson’s alleged domicile, a low rent mobile in Gerber.
In the Sacramento Valley Mirror article “Is Governor Brown complicit in Nielson campaign crimes?”, Sol made many disturbing statements. As Nielson’s Gerber neighbor, he “has only seen Nielson a few times…his wife once and the lights are never on.”
As foreman, he made more “…after the discovery of the suicide of the former grand jury foreman, it was discovered that all the letters and other documents that had come to the grand jury, prior to his death were kept in a box in his home.” How does Sol know this if…he was not sure what letters if any had been answered” but “assumed that all letters had been answered?” The former foreman kept secret county documents at his house, and the new foreman didn’t read any of them to know what our concerns were. Everyone I know, who filed complaints, including myself, have received no correspondence from the grand jury. Nor have they or any law enforcement agencies supposedly investigating this serious crime have contacted ANY reporters or people who have proof, diaries and other relevant information.
Sol “surmised County Council Will Murphy reviewed the letters” and “decided if the matters were acceptable for the Grand Jury to investigate”. Murphy has no legal authority to do that. He is there for legal advice! Murphy “told the grand jury“…“in regard to Nielson’s residency…“If he says he lives there than he does”.
Sol continued,“if we had been given the green light to investigate Nielson then they would have pursued it”.“ Garaventa told them “they could not investigate a state employee”. He has no authority to stop any Grand Jury investigation, only direct and give LEGAL council.
In spite of Sol’s remarks about there being no investigation into Nielson’s domicile, an “investigation” shows up in the final Grand Jury report. Apparently most of the local media didn’t really bother to read or analyze the “investigation”. Nor did they report the numerous contradictions in it or interview anyone who filed .complaints.
They wrote California Election law indicates (a)“Residence for voting purposes means a person’s domicile”.(b)“At a given time a person may have more than one residence”.©“The domicile of a person is that place in which the person’s habitation is fixed, wherein the person has the intention of remaining and to which, whenever he or she is absent, the person has the intention of returning. At a given time, a person may have only one domicile”.
Sol said if the Judge and the County Council would have “given us a green light, than we would have investigated it“. Then, why is there residency investigation in the Grand Jury report, if they were not given the green light?
They turn the law upside down by saying in their approach “A residence is a domicile and a domicile is a residence.” No it’s not! Sounds, like something County Council Will Murphy and Judge Garaventa might say. Obviously, neither can be trusted, should be disbarred, removed from their position, along with criminal charges for abusing their power.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Gerber Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
National Archives to Release JFK Assassination ... 12 min As the Noose Tigh... 2
The Democrat-Russia Connection Uncovered 19 min Solutions A S1u t 41
Proof Putin Loves Trump! 1 hr Its Crazy Grandpa... 3
Where Is The Outrage? 11 hr Both Sides Now 12
I am smarter than anyone out here 13 hr Godfrey 1
Putin's Stooge!!! 14 hr Its Crazy Grandpa... 5
democrat Crime Syndiate Supports North Korea an... 15 hr Grandpa Luvs News... 1

Gerber Jobs

More from around the web

Personal Finance

Gerber Mortgages