Who do you support for Governor in Ne...
Loser

Rocklin, CA

#6049 Jan 18, 2013
If you would like to see the police report I can show you. Yes I did turn in a claim. I had $4000 worth of guns stolen and the insurance company gave me a whopping $750. Boy did I make out. Who said anything about what kind of crook they were, all I know is they got stolen out of a locked safe. Yes the guns did exist and the serial numbers are out there. You are the moron that thinks gun control will solve the problem, hopefully you don't own a gun.

Since: Dec 12

Location hidden

#6050 Jan 18, 2013
Teddy R wrote:
<quoted text>
http://www.masslive.com/news/index.ssf/2012/1...
You're an abject idiot who's completely FOS.
You have no credibility on this issue. A troll.
GTFO. Grownups are trying to have an adult conversation here.
The guy is full of sh*t, and you know it. First, we have to assume that this person or person was a professional, right? Ameteurs don't crack safes. Now, in order to break into the safe, the perps had to know it was there, because they had to bring specialized tools to get into it. No professional breaks into a house on the off chance that there's a safe...to much risk.

So, we can assume one of the following:

1. No guns ever existed, so there was no safe broken into

2. Guns were stolen, but it was a setup: the safe was left open for the "theives"...they get the guns, and the owner puts in a big claim with the insurance company.

3. Small-time crooks breaking into a private residence just happened to have the tools and knowledge necessary to break into a locked gun-safe and get away without making enough noise to alert the neighbors.

You decide...bu11shit or not!

Since: Dec 12

Location hidden

#6051 Jan 18, 2013
Also... what kind of safe was this?

I think that we would all like to know.

Since: Dec 12

Location hidden

#6052 Jan 18, 2013
I'm guessing that it was a unicorn safe...the kind that don't exists, but it's fun to pretend like they do.
Teddy R

San Francisco, CA

#6053 Jan 18, 2013
De Opresssor Liber wrote:
<quoted text>
The guy is full of sh*t, and you know it. First, we have to assume that this person or person was a professional, right? Ameteurs don't crack safes. Now, in order to break into the safe, the perps had to know it was there, because they had to bring specialized tools to get into it. No professional breaks into a house on the off chance that there's a safe...to much risk.
So, we can assume one of the following:
1. No guns ever existed, so there was no safe broken into
2. Guns were stolen, but it was a setup: the safe was left open for the "theives"...they get the guns, and the owner puts in a big claim with the insurance company.
3. Small-time crooks breaking into a private residence just happened to have the tools and knowledge necessary to break into a locked gun-safe and get away without making enough noise to alert the neighbors.
You decide...bu11shit or not!
Nothing in your post here causes me to revise my previous assessment of your posts as rubbish.

Your post attempting Alinskyite ridicule of the obviously factual truth that thieves routinely defeat all levels of security to steal firearms, just like jewelry, in residential burglaries was immediately shown to be rank horsedung. A Google search on "guns stolen in burglary" returns 300,000 additional hits - you would do well to peruse them before posting again on this matter.

That you persist in even trying to ridicule this indisputable fact simply adds to the weight of proof showing you to be a mindless partisan stooge, an anti-gun extremist idealogue that has no credibility whatsoever on this issue.

You're posting rubbish, best ignored.

Selah.
Loser

Rocklin, CA

#6054 Jan 18, 2013
Most of you are morons. It was a stackable safe. They used crow bars to break in. Everything I said existed. Why should I do a google search when I know what was stolen, what they were and that they are registered. Maybe I should put a post up and ask for them back, or maybe I'll wait till the thieves register them, then I'll go and claim. Thats what I'll do. Yeh unicorn safe just like your unicorn brain, it doesn't exist.
Loser

Rocklin, CA

#6055 Jan 18, 2013
Yes they broke in, but there are no close neighbors. Oh yeh I made tons of money on those guns from the insurance, why don't read what I got paid vs what they were worth. You don't need much knowledge to break into some of these safes, even a moron like yourself could do it, but wait you said it doesn't exist you you would be walking around with head where the sun doesn't shine.
Bla Blah

Corinth, NY

#6056 Jan 18, 2013
Teddy R wrote:
<quoted text>
Nothing in your post here causes me to revise my previous assessment of your posts as rubbish.
Your post attempting Alinskyite ridicule of the obviously factual truth that thieves routinely defeat all levels of security to steal firearms, just like jewelry, in residential burglaries was immediately shown to be rank horsedung. A Google search on "guns stolen in burglary" returns 300,000 additional hits - you would do well to peruse them before posting again on this matter.
That you persist in even trying to ridicule this indisputable fact simply adds to the weight of proof showing you to be a mindless partisan stooge, an anti-gun extremist idealogue that has no credibility whatsoever on this issue.
You're posting rubbish, best ignored.
Selah.
Bla Bla Blah ?

BLAH !

Blah Bla Bla Bla BLAH
TrollBot

San Francisco, CA

#6057 Jan 18, 2013
Troll with a Speech Impediment wrote:
<quoted text>
(Juvenile and inane troll snipped)
Troll. Ignore.

"Helping ignore trolls until Topix lets you killfile the scum."
Very Impressive

Corinth, NY

#6058 Jan 18, 2013
TrollBot wrote:
<quoted text>
Troll. Ignore.
"Helping ignore trolls until Topix lets you killfile the scum."
Did I tell you how impressed we all are ?

Don't hold your breath, Jethro !

ROFLMSLAO !
TrollBot

San Francisco, CA

#6059 Jan 18, 2013
Very UNimpressive wrote:
<quoted text>
(Another juvenile and inane troll snipped)
Troll. Ignore.

"Helping ignore trolls until Topix lets you killfile the scum."
Interesting guy

Newark, NJ

#6062 Jan 18, 2013
Gov. Cumo, do not be concerned over the recent complaining of north country politicians. They mean well but are not skilled in understanding how to manage a whole state. Send them free gift certificates and pretend you care. Not all north country residents disapprove of your leadership and politics.
Interesting guy

Newark, NJ

#6066 Jan 18, 2013
Goober of Gloversville wrote:
In 1929, the Soviet Union established gun control. From 1929 to 1953,
about 20 million dissidents, unable to defend themselves, were rounded
up and exterminated.
----------
In 1911, Turkey established gun control. From 1915 to 1917, 1.5 million
Armenians, unable to defend themselves, were rounded up and
exterminated.
----------
Germany established gun control in 1938 and from 1939 to 1945, a total
of 13 million Jews and others who were unable to defend themselves were
rounded up and exterminated.
----------
China established gun control in 1935. From 1948 to 1952, 20 million
political dissidents, unable to defend themselves, were rounded up and
exterminated.
----------
Guatemala established gun control in 1964. From 1964 to 1981, 100,000
Mayan Indians, unable to defend themselves, were rounded up and
exterminated.
----------
Uganda established gun control in 1970. From 1971 to 1979, 300,000
Christians, unable to defend themselves, were rounded up and
exterminated.
----------
Cambodia established gun control in 1956. From 1975 to 1977, one million
educated people, unable to defend themselves, were rounded up and
exterminated.
----------
Defenseless people rounded up and exterminated in the 20th Century
because of gun control: 56 million.
----------
You won't see this data on the US evening news, or hear politicians
disseminating this information.
Guns in the hands of honest citizens save lives and property and, yes,
gun-control laws adversely affect only the law-abiding citizens.
Take note my fellow Americans, before it's too late!
The next time someone talks in favor of gun control, please remind them
of this history lesson.
With guns, we are 'citizens'. Without them, we are 'subjects'.
During WW II the Japanese decided not to invade America because they
knew most Americans were ARMED!
.
The purpose of fighting is to win.
There is no possible victory in defense.
The sword is more important than the shield, and skill is more important
than either.
The final weapon is the brain.
All else is supplemental.
SWITZERLAND ISSUES EVERY HOUSEHOLD A GUN!
SWITZERLAND 'S GOVERNMENT TRAINS EVERY ADULT THEY ISSUE A RIFLE.
SWITZERLAND HAS THE LOWEST GUN RELATED CRIME RATE OF ANY CIVILIZED
COUNTRY IN THE WORLD!!!
I'm sure Hitler used the same "psychology". Go on with your fancy paragraphs little Hitler. I'm sure brad Larock and his flock would love to listen to you explain why it's good to kill using brain-washing or just being a psychopath with a message.
Teddy R

San Francisco, CA

#6068 Jan 18, 2013
Interesting guy wrote:
Gov. Cumo, do not be concerned over the recent complaining of north country politicians. They mean well but are not skilled in understanding how to manage a whole state. Send them free gift certificates and pretend you care. Not all north country residents disapprove of your leadership and politics.
... quoth the downstate Shelly Silver toolbag.

We are vastly amused.

Since: Dec 12

Location hidden

#6070 Jan 18, 2013
The mugger who is arrested is back on the street before the police officer, but the person mugged may not be back on the street for a long time, if ever.
Mario Cuomo

Since: Dec 12

Location hidden

#6071 Jan 18, 2013
I said I didn't want to run for president. I didn't ask you to believe me.
Mario Cuomo

Since: Dec 12

Location hidden

#6072 Jan 18, 2013
You want calamities? What about the Ice Age?
Mario Cuomo

Since: Dec 12

Location hidden

#6073 Jan 18, 2013
I have no plans, and no plans to plan.
Mario Cuomo

The apple does not fall far from the tree.
obama vomit
Obskeptic

United States

#6074 Jan 19, 2013
Teddy R wrote:
<quoted text>
Nothing in your post here causes me to revise my previous assessment of your posts as rubbish.
Your post attempting Alinskyite ridicule of the obviously factual truth that thieves routinely defeat all levels of security to steal firearms, just like jewelry, in residential burglaries was immediately shown to be rank horsedung. A Google search on "guns stolen in burglary" returns 300,000 additional hits - you would do well to peruse them before posting again on this matter.
That you persist in even trying to ridicule this indisputable fact simply adds to the weight of proof showing you to be a mindless partisan stooge, an anti-gun extremist idealogue that has no credibility whatsoever on this issue.
You're posting rubbish, best ignored.
Selah.
I watched a outfit that went into jails to interview convicts that commit burglary. They were asked where they obtained possession of the weapon they had if they had one. They also talked to burglars that did not use weapons and asked if they would break into a home they new had the potential of an armed home owner. NONE of them would have knowingly robbed an armed home owner. They determined that roughly 40% of the guns criminals had and used or were caught with were bought on the street and were stolen, 40% were taken from a family member that legally owned guns, with or without their knowledge, roughly 10% were purchased from a Pawn Shop, and less then 1% were purchased at a gun show. The facts are very clear about who the criminal wants to confront, and its not a gun owner. I recommend that those who believe all guns should be taken from us should put a sign in the front yard of their residence declaring "THIS IS A GUN FREE ZONE" with pride. Oh, and Cuomo is an idiot!
Chuck

Brooklyn, NY

#6076 Jan 19, 2013
Obskeptic wrote:
<quoted text>
I watched a outfit that went into jails to interview convicts that commit burglary. They were asked where they obtained possession of the weapon they had if they had one. They also talked to burglars that did not use weapons and asked if they would break into a home they new had the potential of an armed home owner. NONE of them would have knowingly robbed an armed home owner. They determined that roughly 40% of the guns criminals had and used or were caught with were bought on the street and were stolen, 40% were taken from a family member that legally owned guns, with or without their knowledge, roughly 10% were purchased from a Pawn Shop, and less then 1% were purchased at a gun show. The facts are very clear about who the criminal wants to confront, and its not a gun owner. I recommend that those who believe all guns should be taken from us should put a sign in the front yard of their residence declaring "THIS IS A GUN FREE ZONE" with pride. Oh, and Cuomo is an idiot!
I can't believe your still around. I thought for sure sombody would have offed you by now.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Gasport Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Lockport, NY. A good place to live? (Sep '07) Jun 19 Gwbush43 15
News Young mother, seeking a new life, wants happy h... (Dec '11) Jun 13 Kinky Fiebelkorn 94
News Latest News: Flood recovery for Lake Ontario, M... May '17 lookin 4 JustUs 1
Not again Joel May '17 Albiononlooker 4
News Potsdam woman charged with heroin possession (Jul '16) Apr '17 Itsasmallworld 4
Emily Rupert Apr '17 Lkpt is gross 1
Tony Ray Townsend died (Nov '10) Apr '17 Southernman 9

Gasport Jobs

More from around the web

Personal Finance

Gasport Mortgages