I didn't think you were capable of doing it, Pops. I will do it for you. Fred was blaming Australia's lack of similar mass assaults with firearms on what he called Australia's homogeneous society. When others pointed out to him that he was wrong, he changed his definition to say that it was because Australia didn't have the same number of "poor, uneducated,third worlders" as the US has. Based on that, I suggested to him he check to see how many "poor, uneducated, third worlders" had recently shot up a mall or a school. You then, until that time not a part of the dialogue, come with this,<quoted text>I try to NOT be colorful in my posts so in that theme please allow me to get away with, "YOU are one convaluted, weak thinking, narrow minded, non-comprehensive individual. YOU read what has been posted & rethink it.
This is another example of you liberal thinking,(if thinking is applicable) manure talking, superficial, weak minded people that are passing the blame/responsibility boneheads. Don't put this on me because your comprehension is in negative numbers. YOU are the PUTZ.
I won't go on the defensive because you don't understand.
In fact, YOU are proving my point with this post. PUTZ.
which is totally non-responsive to the discussion about the comparison of mass violence with guns between Australia and the US. If you think that your post somehow does further that conversation, I welcome your explanation. Frankly, I think you wrote it in your neverending quest to somehow get the better of me and didn't understand a word of the ongoing conversation.<quoted text>Can't answer that.'3rd worlders' are largely illiterate & largely have censorship. But many '3rd worlders' do have easy access to all kinds of weapons.
So there is your explanation. Now call me a bunch of names and do exactly what you accuse me of doing. Classic wingnut.