Colo. immigrants face uncertainty after floods

Sep 27, 2013 Full story: SFGate 32

In this Sept. 24, 2013 photo, immigrant Rosi Derma views the flood damage inside her home, which was declared uninhabitable due to permanent damage, at a trailer park in Evans, Colo.

Read more
First Prev
of 2
Next Last
Brenda besson

United States

#2 Sep 27, 2013
b4its2late wrote:
Oh??? And all citizens face certainty???
.
What a dumb fking statement...I mean, gee lets worry about whether the illegals are OK.
.
Poor Rosi :(
im gonna tell her to get the fack out.
Quirky

Denver, CO

#4 Sep 28, 2013
F--K Em, They need to go back home.
ima-Ilis Myka Ashanti

El Paso, TX

#8 Sep 28, 2013
zanoni wrote:
And despite all this immigrant bashing, look at some interesting statistics:
Total welfare recipients is 12,800,000
Of that this is the racial break down:
White 38.8%= 4,966,400
Black 39.8%= 5,094,400
Latino 15.7%= 2,009,600
Total US population is 313,914,000
This is the racial make up of the population:
White 63%= 197,765,820
Black 13.1%= 41,122,734
Latino 16.9%= 53,051,466
With the figures above you calculate the percentage, of each race, that's on Welfare, here are the percentages:
Whites 2.51%
Blacks 12.39%
Latinos 3.79%
Here are the Section 8 numbers for California, the state I live in.
Total recipients 179,856
White 26%= 46,763
Black 36%= 64,748
Latino 26%= 46,763
Asian 11%= 19,784
California population is 14,988,323
White 39.4%= 14,988,323
Black 6.6%= 2,510,734
Latino 38.2%= 14,531,826
Asian 13.92%= 5,287,758
This means that
0.31% of Whites are on Sec 8
2.58% of Blacks are on Sec 8
0.32% of Latinos are on Sec 8
0.37% of Asians are on Sec 8
This shows that more Blacks are on Welfare and Section 8.
Considering that most Whites have been in this country for many generations, speak English as a native language, and get the perks for being White, they should be doing much better than that.
It turns out that the Latinos are doing very, Very, VERY WELL considering our disadvantages, you know, many are recent immigrants, many don't speak English, and the ones raised or born here speak English as a second language. And we don't get the perks of being White, such as better positions and higher salaries. We're doing very GOOD!!!!
Yeah, if they had been Black or White and spoken English they would have gotten all types of aid a-la-freebies.
sin huevos, aka rico, frito, mexican pride,juan-Lodi CA.aka all the others....do you really think people read ALL YOUR JUNK you post? for one it's way too LENGTHY and BORING! Your hard work advocating for your counterparts isn't working, and neither is your hate inducing methods. Good day to you, I'm going shopping at the new Fountains of Farah mall and I'm walking to enjoy and breath in the first cool fall breeze, should be absolutely breath taking and fun.
Brenda besson

United States

#9 Sep 28, 2013
ima-Ilis Myka Ashanti wrote:
<quoted text> sin huevos, aka rico, frito, mexican pride,juan-Lodi CA.aka all the others....do you really think people read ALL YOUR JUNK you post? for one it's way too LENGTHY and BORING! Your hard work advocating for your counterparts isn't working, and neither is your hate inducing methods. Good day to you, I'm going shopping at the new Fountains of Farah mall and I'm walking to enjoy and breath in the first cool fall breeze, should be absolutely breath taking and fun.
I read it sometimes,its funny.it is always too long.poor putz no friends.thats why all the aka.still illegal.no amnesty will pass.have fun shopping.
Brenda besson

United States

#10 Sep 28, 2013
zanoni wrote:
And despite all this immigrant bashing, look at some interesting statistics:
Total welfare recipients is 12,800,000
Of that this is the racial break down:
White 38.8%= 4,966,400
Black 39.8%= 5,094,400
Latino 15.7%= 2,009,600
Total US population is 313,914,000
This is the racial make up of the population:
White 63%= 197,765,820
Black 13.1%= 41,122,734
Latino 16.9%= 53,051,466
With the figures above you calculate the percentage, of each race, that's on Welfare, here are the percentages:
Whites 2.51%
Blacks 12.39%
Latinos 3.79%
Here are the Section 8 numbers for California, the state I live in.
Total recipients 179,856
White 26%= 46,763
Black 36%= 64,748
Latino 26%= 46,763
Asian 11%= 19,784
California population is 14,988,323
White 39.4%= 14,988,323
Black 6.6%= 2,510,734
Latino 38.2%= 14,531,826
Asian 13.92%= 5,287,758
This means that
0.31% of Whites are on Sec 8
2.58% of Blacks are on Sec 8
0.32% of Latinos are on Sec 8
0.37% of Asians are on Sec 8
This shows that more Blacks are on Welfare and Section 8.
Considering that most Whites have been in this country for many generations, speak English as a native language, and get the perks for being White, they should be doing much better than that.
It turns out that the Latinos are doing very, Very, VERY WELL considering our disadvantages, you know, many are recent immigrants, many don't speak English, and the ones raised or born here speak English as a second language. And we don't get the perks of being White, such as better positions and higher salaries. We're doing very GOOD!!!!
Yeah, if they had been Black or White and spoken English they would have gotten all types of aid a-la-freebies.
changes nothing,illegals have to go,those blacks and whites are american.get it.
ima-Ilis Myka Ashanti

El Paso, TX

#11 Sep 28, 2013
Brenda besson wrote:
<quoted text> I read it sometimes,its funny.it is always too long.poor putz no friends.thats why all the aka.still illegal.no amnesty will pass.have fun shopping.
Thanks, Brenda! have a great day yourself!
Brenda besson

United States

#13 Sep 28, 2013
zanoni wrote:
<quoted text>
You and your kind don't read them because you know where it's going. Others do read them.
going nowhere,party for you and your kind over.no amnesty,not even for the dreamers.
Brenda besson

United States

#14 Sep 28, 2013
ima-Ilis Myka Ashanti wrote:
<quoted text> Thanks, Brenda! have a great day yourself!
thanks ima.
ima-Ilis Myka Ashanti

El Paso, TX

#15 Sep 28, 2013
zanoni wrote:
<quoted text>
You and your kind don't read them because you know where it's going. Others do read them.
Yeah....you bet we know where it's going NO WHERE! LOL! LOL!

Since: Oct 10

Location hidden

#16 Sep 28, 2013
zanoni wrote:
And despite all this immigrant bashing, look at some interesting statistics:
Total welfare recipients is 12,800,000
Of that this is the racial break down:
White 38.8%= 4,966,400
Black 39.8%= 5,094,400
Latino 15.7%= 2,009,600
Total US population is 313,914,000
This is the racial make up of the population:
White 63%= 197,765,820
Black 13.1%= 41,122,734
Latino 16.9%= 53,051,466
With the figures above you calculate the percentage, of each race, that's on Welfare, here are the percentages:
Whites 2.51%
Blacks 12.39%
Latinos 3.79%
Here are the Section 8 numbers for California, the state I live in.
Total recipients 179,856
White 26%= 46,763
Black 36%= 64,748
Latino 26%= 46,763
Asian 11%= 19,784
California population is 14,988,323
White 39.4%= 14,988,323
Black 6.6%= 2,510,734
Latino 38.2%= 14,531,826
Asian 13.92%= 5,287,758
This means that
0.31% of Whites are on Sec 8
2.58% of Blacks are on Sec 8
0.32% of Latinos are on Sec 8
0.37% of Asians are on Sec 8
This shows that more Blacks are on Welfare and Section 8.
Considering that most Whites have been in this country for many generations, speak English as a native language, and get the perks for being White, they should be doing much better than that.
It turns out that the Latinos are doing very, Very, VERY WELL considering our disadvantages, you know, many are recent immigrants, many don't speak English, and the ones raised or born here speak English as a second language. And we don't get the perks of being White, such as better positions and higher salaries. We're doing very GOOD!!!!
Yeah, if they had been Black or White and spoken English they would have gotten all types of aid a-la-freebies.
Interesting stats, however, you fail to mention that there are more 'whites' in the US than "latinos" although most would beg to differ and say that are white.

Statistics are easily manipulated by whomever decides to use them to further their own cause. Let's just say that the economy stinks, and more people are unemployed or working part-time jobs just to get by. Welfare (whatever the 'race' of the recipient isn't meant to be a permanent solution, but temporary help.

You must be a Democrat though, the party that lives off other people's dime, whose motto is "you fund it, we use it".
ima-Ilis Myka Ashanti

El Paso, TX

#20 Sep 29, 2013
OneRepublic wrote:
<quoted text>
Interesting stats, however, you fail to mention that there are more 'whites' in the US than "latinos" although most would beg to differ and say that are white.
Statistics are easily manipulated by whomever decides to use them to further their own cause. Let's just say that the economy stinks, and more people are unemployed or working part-time jobs just to get by. Welfare (whatever the 'race' of the recipient isn't meant to be a permanent solution, but temporary help.
You must be a Democrat though, the party that lives off other people's dime, whose motto is "you fund it, we use it".
you go that right, OneRep! LOL!
ima-Ilis Myka Ashanti

El Paso, TX

#21 Sep 29, 2013
zanoni wrote:
<quoted text>
I'm not replying to your posts anymore. You have nothing worthy to say.
No stats, no figures, no facts, no intelligence, absolutely nothing!!!!
Good deal, BUT I was aimiing to get ON YOUR NERVES like you claim that's all you're here for. Ta Ta! Good day to you, sin huevos, you're as bad as cluless-turner which you no doubt are.
ima-Ilis Myka Ashanti

El Paso, TX

#22 Sep 29, 2013
zanoni wrote:
<quoted text>
You're in denial now bitch! I'm aware statistics can be fudged. So if you have better number, post them, or shut up!!!!!
And I want to know your sources.
Otherwise mine are correct.
you mess with the numbers, LOL! to fit your own agenda.

Since: Oct 10

Location hidden

#23 Sep 29, 2013
zanoni wrote:
<quoted text>
Well then you post the numbers!
I don't need to post numbers to prove my point.'Tis easily done by just discounting yours.

Since: Oct 10

Location hidden

#24 Sep 29, 2013
zanoni wrote:
And despite all this immigrant bashing, look at some interesting statistics:
Total welfare recipients is 12,800,000
Of that this is the racial break down:
White 38.8%= 4,966,400
Black 39.8%= 5,094,400
Latino 15.7%= 2,009,600
Total US population is 313,914,000
This is the racial make up of the population:
White 63%= 197,765,820
Black 13.1%= 41,122,734
Latino 16.9%= 53,051,466
With the figures above you calculate the percentage, of each race, that's on Welfare, here are the percentages:
Whites 2.51%
Blacks 12.39%
Latinos 3.79%
Here are the Section 8 numbers for California, the state I live in.
Total recipients 179,856
White 26%= 46,763
Black 36%= 64,748
Latino 26%= 46,763
Asian 11%= 19,784
California population is 14,988,323
White 39.4%= 14,988,323
Black 6.6%= 2,510,734
Latino 38.2%= 14,531,826
Asian 13.92%= 5,287,758
This means that
0.31% of Whites are on Sec 8
2.58% of Blacks are on Sec 8
0.32% of Latinos are on Sec 8
0.37% of Asians are on Sec 8
This shows that more Blacks are on Welfare and Section 8.
Considering that most Whites have been in this country for many generations, speak English as a native language, and get the perks for being White, they should be doing much better than that.
It turns out that the Latinos are doing very, Very, VERY WELL considering our disadvantages, you know, many are recent immigrants, many don't speak English, and the ones raised or born here speak English as a second language. And we don't get the perks of being White, such as better positions and higher salaries. We're doing very GOOD!!!!
Yeah, if they had been Black or White and spoken English they would have gotten all types of aid a-la-freebies.
What immigrant bashing? There's a difference between legal immigrants and illegal aliens. You can be accused of attempting to start a race war, but for the life of me, can't figure out where in the world you got the idea that Latinos are a separate race.

Since: Oct 10

Location hidden

#25 Sep 29, 2013
zanoni wrote:
<quoted text>
You're in denial now bitch! I'm aware statistics can be fudged. So if you have better number, post them, or shut up!!!!!
And I want to know your sources.
Otherwise mine are correct.
Too funny! You are clearly frustrated, and have resorted to name calling to make your point. Although the only point you've got is at the top of your dunce cap. Now, go stand in the corner like a good little student, and wait for the short bus with the La Raza sign on it, should be here shortly.
Rose is a Fucktard

Dublin, Ireland

#28 Sep 29, 2013
She deals in slinging stench!

Since: Oct 10

Location hidden

#29 Sep 30, 2013
zanoni wrote:
<quoted text>
That's called denial. Really, don't provide an facts and figures to the contrary, just look the other way and deny everything.
That's exactly what criminals do. Deny everything, even when all evidence presented shows you're guilty, just deny everything.
I'm sorry, where should I dig up the numbers from?

Wikepedia, Univision, etc??? I lead a very busy life, and don't feel the need to justify my comments with stats. Suffice it to say that your numbers are manipulated. You must spend literally hours on the computer, posting opinion as fact.

Since: Oct 10

Location hidden

#32 Oct 1, 2013
zanoni wrote:
@One_Republic, just an FYI. All said and done, I spent no more than one hour gathering the info I needed to crunch those numbers. I know how to research. I did it all as I answered posts on this forum. And the info came from the Census Bureau, Housing and Community Development, and StatisticBrain.com .
When you said you don't have the time because you're too busy, what you really meant to say is that you're not smart enough to conduct that depth of research in a short period of time. It takes up too much of your time, your feeble brain can't process that much info in a short period of time. You need a lot of time to do that depth of research, and you just don't have the time, you're too busy.
It's all in the wording, I can read between the lines, you're too stupid!!!!
Once again, I did it within an hour as I answered other posts.
You feeble minded shit-hole!
Oh yeah, but you know how to run your mouth don't you?
I call you out on your BS. You're full of hot air, face it, Mr."I conduct research therefore I'm validated", no matter how much 'research' you conduct and present on this forum, my opinion matters more than that. You can regurgitate numbers, but are you a critical thinker? I think not.
ima-Ilis Myka Ashanti

El Paso, TX

#35 Oct 2, 2013
zanoni wrote:
I won!!!! Again!!!!!!!!!!
Hahahahahaha!!!!!!!!
Another one way trip to your old mejico? STAY THERE!

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker
First Prev
of 2
Next Last

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Garden City Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Why Raise Gas Prices? Mar 2 SCGreeley 1
News Northern Colorado Continues to Grow; But What B... Feb '15 Jim Moz 2
Local Politics Do you approve of John Vazquez as Mayor? Feb '15 Jim Moz 3
Shawn Read Feb '15 SerenaDallas 1
Rachel Hinker possibly? We're you in Louisvil... Feb '15 Brian Louisville 1
Looking for Rachel. Met her on flight from Loui... Feb '15 Brian Louisville 2
jbs usa Jan '15 LocalYokel903 1
Garden City Dating
Find my Match
More from around the web

Garden City People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]