Looked on by who as science sites. The only ones who seem to are like yourself who are in need of something you can offer as proof. the fact that they have as much fiction as fact would indicate that they are anything but a science site. It could be said that they are nothing more than left wing ideology sites. The fact that you have to call what I provide right wing means that there has to be a left wing version. It also points out that the discussion is about politics and not science. Science has no right wing or left wing. The speed of light does not change because the person measuring it has political leaning to the right or left. The mass of the earth does not change based on if the person measuring it is liberal or libertarian.<quoted text>
They're looked upon as science.
You post purely from right wing ideology sites.
You admitted you don't think NASA's official climatology is a science site.
Is that also an admission you were lying when you said you could find me an official NASA website that was opposed to global warming?
NAH, you aren't that honest.
Let's see: You insisted all the scientists were saying global warming was a hoax.
I showed all the world renown, top science agencies (not based on petroleum) had statements strongly in support of global warming; same as all the mainstream science media and world renown journals.
I gave you an official NASA citation. What else do you call it when you insisted there were "other" official NASA websites that were calling global warming a hoax. Except, OOPS you couldn;t produce them. Nor will you admit it, even now.
A higher truth -- you know "above" the real truth. HA HA HA
I've switched to voting you a peanut, down from clueless.
You wanted a site with an offical NASA logo and I found one. One that did not back your misguided beliefs. And as for your world renown agencies, have you ever taken a look at what some of them are renown for? A few are world renown for the serious mistakes they have made. NASA has lost satellites, the IPCC had so many mistakes that they were considering asking for the head of the IPCC to step down. AAAS is a lobbing group and it wasn't the only one on the list. In fact the only thing required to make this list was to say the man was the cause of climate change. As for your mainstream media and science journals, the main stream media has dropped the subject since it isn't selling like it once was and many of your journals are actually magazines trying to sell subscriptions.