Who do you support for Lieutenant Governor in Pennsylvania in 2010?

[Anteater]

Don't waste your time on the Lieutenant Gov. It is a silly position. Watch out for smoke and mirrors.

[Nerd Rage]

Dan the Man wrote:

<quoted text>
Ummm, THIS is the rightwing attack I was referring to:
<quoted text>
Or are you a "liberal journalist?" LOL!

That is not an attack in anyway.

[Nerd Rage]

Dave Rogers wrote:

<quoted text>
So, Social Security has not added one dime to the deficit and should not be part of the discussion.

It should be part of the discussion. The article was about how Obama's base was furious that he put it on the table when he said that he wouldn't harm senior or the middle-class during the elections and now he seems to have either told a big lie to his constituents’.

[Dan the Man]

Nerd Rage wrote:

<quoted text>
That is not an attack in anyway.

LOL! Of course not.

Since you don't seem interested in using the established dictionary definition of words, maybe you should define your terms for us.

You accused me of calling you names when I didn't. Could you please define 'name-calling' for me?

And you attacked the President while denying you did it. Could you please define 'political attack' for me?

Thank you.

[Nerd Rage]

Dan the Man wrote:

<quoted text>
LOL! Of course not.
Since you don't seem interested in using the established dictionary definition of words, maybe you should define your terms for us.
You accused me of calling you names when I didn't. Could you please define 'name-calling' for me?
And you attacked the President while denying you did it. Could you please define 'political attack' for me?
Thank you.

Nerd Rage wrote:
<quoted text>
Ummmm...It's the Left who is attacking him, NOT the right! Also this is from a liberal journalist. The right had nothing to do with this so at least be honest in what the story is.
Ummm, THIS is the rightwing attack I was referring to:
Nerd Rage wrote:
Wow...I love how he just betrayed all the seniors and middle class that voted for him.
Or are you a "liberal journalist?" LOL!
This was not an attack. It was a statement directed at the President’s actions that those on the “Left” were expressing toward him. It also was not directed any you or anyone on this forum. Also FYI…Every time someone has a different opinion or view towards an issue does not make it an attack. You’re trying to make something out of nothing. The issue is that the president is putting cuts on the table for SS and taxing the middle-class which is the complete opposite of what he campaigned on. So his BASE is viewing that as a betrayal, not me.

[Nerd Rage]

Obama’s base pushes back on plan to cut Social Security

http://tv.msnbc.com/2012/12/18/progressives-p...

Maybe it'll help if you read the article yourself. It's getting into the weeds to play the "he said, she said" game. Lets stay on topic. I wasn't making an political attack on the President but if I were then I am certainly free to express my opinions on any subject but in this case I wasn't, so if you took it that way then you have 2 choices you can either accept that I wasn't or not. Either way it doesn't matter to me but I wasn't making a negative comment on you or anyone on Topix. I hope that clears that up.

[Dan the Man]

Nerd Rage wrote:

<quoted text>
Nerd Rage wrote:
<quoted text>
Ummmm...It's the Left who is attacking him, NOT the right! Also this is from a liberal journalist. The right had nothing to do with this so at least be honest in what the story is.
Ummm, THIS is the rightwing attack I was referring to:
Nerd Rage wrote:
Wow...I love how he just betrayed all the seniors and middle class that voted for him.
Or are you a "liberal journalist?" LOL!
This was not an attack. It was a statement directed at the President’s actions that those on the “Left” were expressing toward him. It also was not directed any you or anyone on this forum. Also FYI…Every time someone has a different opinion or view towards an issue does not make it an attack. You’re trying to make something out of nothing. The issue is that the president is putting cuts on the table for SS and taxing the middle-class which is the complete opposite of what he campaigned on. So his BASE is viewing that as a betrayal, not me.

You're accusing the President of betraying seniors and middle class voters. That is YOUR accusation.

And it is a dishonest accusation because that's not what he's doing. You're distorting the facts to make a dishonest attack.

But please - define 'political attack' for me. Tell me how what you dishonestly accuse the President of is NOT one.

[Nerd Rage]

Dan the Man wrote:

<quoted text>
You're accusing the President of betraying seniors and middle class voters. That is YOUR accusation.
And it is a dishonest accusation because that's not what he's doing. You're distorting the facts to make a dishonest attack.
But please - define 'political attack' for me. Tell me how what you dishonestly accuse the President of is NOT one.

Again read the artical...

“MoveOn members overwhelmingly oppose cuts to Social Security, Medicare, and Medicaid benefits,” the group said in a statement.“And they’ve made clear that they would see any fiscal agreement that cuts such benefits as a BETRAYAL that sells out working and middle class families.

Is this a political attack from "MoveOn" or from me? Because I didn't write the article (as you stated)nor did I distort any facts. It was taken from the article.

It seems as if you're upset because he's back tracking on his campaign promises. Maybe you should write him a letter.
Now

[Dan the Man]

Nerd Rage wrote:

<quoted text>
Again read the artical...
“MoveOn members overwhelmingly oppose cuts to Social Security, Medicare, and Medicaid benefits,” the group said in a statement.“And they’ve made clear that they would see any fiscal agreement that cuts such benefits as a BETRAYAL that sells out working and middle class families.
Is this a political attack from "MoveOn" or from me? Because I didn't write the article (as you stated)nor did I distort any facts. It was taken from the article.
It seems as if you're upset because he's back tracking on his campaign promises. Maybe you should write him a letter.
Now

Again, I wasn't commenting on the article. I was commenting on YOUR attack.

Not much of a critical thinker, are you Nerd? LOL!

[Nerd Rage]

Dan the Man wrote:

<quoted text>
Again, I wasn't commenting on the article. I was commenting on YOUR attack.
Not much of a critical thinker, are you Nerd? LOL!

It's typical. You lose another debat topic with facts and you resort to personal attacks. It's the playbook of the left.

[Dan the Man]

Nerd Rage wrote:

<quoted text>
It's typical. You lose another debat topic with facts and you resort to personal attacks. It's the playbook of the left.

LOL! Proving my point, huh?

I haven't lost this debate.

And you haven't refuted the facts I presented.

If Obama does nothing on Social Security, the right attacks him for not being serious.

If Obama proposes increasing the funding for Social Security, the right attacks him for raising taxes.

If Obama proposes a step to reduce the future growth of Social Security, the right attacks him for betraying seniors and middle class.

Just goes to show you - if Obama proposes it, the right will attack him for it.

[Nerd Rage]

Dan the Man wrote:

<quoted text>
LOL! Proving my point, huh?
I haven't lost this debate.
And you haven't refuted the facts I presented.
If Obama does nothing on Social Security, the right attacks him for not being serious.
If Obama proposes increasing the funding for Social Security, the right attacks him for raising taxes.
If Obama proposes a step to reduce the future growth of Social Security, the right attacks him for betraying seniors and middle class.
Just goes to show you - if Obama proposes it, the right will attack him for it.

And AGAIN...No one on the right attacked him. The article was written by a left journalist. MoveOn.ORG were the ones who didn't like it. You keep trying to interject the right in this story that had nothing to do with it. I guess in your world it's the RIGHT who is the blame for everything. I pointed out an article that his base was clearly at odds with and you turn this into a "It's the rights fault".

[Dan the Man]

Nerd Rage wrote:

<quoted text>
And AGAIN...No one on the right attacked him. The article was written by a left journalist. MoveOn.ORG were the ones who didn't like it. You keep trying to interject the right in this story that had nothing to do with it. I guess in your world it's the RIGHT who is the blame for everything. I pointed out an article that his base was clearly at odds with and you turn this into a "It's the rights fault".

You're unbelievable.

Did you or did you not say this?

Nerd Rage wrote:

Wow...I love how he just betrayed all the seniors and middle class that voted for him.

Are these your words or not?

[Dan the Man]

Dan the Man wrote:

<quoted text>
You're unbelievable.

Did you or did you not say this?

Nerd Rage wrote:
Wow...I love how he just betrayed all the seniors and middle class that voted for him.

Are these your words or not?

No response?

Imagine my surprise.

LOL!

[facts do not lie dtm does]

Nerd Rage wrote:

<quoted text>
And AGAIN...No one on the right attacked him. The article was written by a left journalist. MoveOn.ORG were the ones who didn't like it. You keep trying to interject the right in this story that had nothing to do with it. I guess in your world it's the RIGHT who is the blame for everything. I pointed out an article that his base was clearly at odds with and you turn this into a "It's the rights fault".

Dan the Man thinks he is right and when proven wrong he refuses to accept it. So he rants and tries to turn it on the person that proved him wrong. The guy is a nut job loser. I wouldn't waste too much time on him.

[Dan the Man]

facts do not lie dtm does wrote:

<quoted text>Dan the Man thinks he is right and when proven wrong he refuses to accept it. So he rants and tries to turn it on the person that proved him wrong. The guy is a nut job loser. I wouldn't waste too much time on him.

Use whatever name you like, it doesn't change the fact that you can't answer a simple question.

Wait, let me fix that...

Use whatever name you like, it doesn't change the fact that you are afraid to answer a simple question.

Yeah, that's better. LOL!

[facts do not lie dtm does]

Dan the Man wrote:

<quoted text>
You're unbelievable.
Did you or did you not say this?
<quoted text>
Are these your words or not?

So what if he did! Has nothing to do with the fact that it is the left attacking Obama.....NOT THE RIGHT!! You will do anything to try and change the subject. Grow up and be the man you call yourself!

[Dan Da Man]

TaxNoMore wrote:

.
.
.
dannyboy!
.
.
Cash your check and give me half.
(protection tax)
.
.
Let's see if it depresses your growth or stimulates your growth.
.
.
.
But wait there's MORE!!!!
I want to pass your money out to every fricking useless bum I see camping out on the streets and sidewalks of Carlisle, PA.
.
.
It's only fair dannyboy.
"It's the right thing to do"
.
.
It's called "Redistribution"
1. The act or process of redistributing.
2. An economic theory or policy that advocates reducing inequalities in the distribution of wealth.
.
dannyboy..........My GOD you're an idiot!

You can't take DTM's check. He doesn't work! He's one of the many with their hands out. Why do you think he supports liberalism and Obama so much? The handouts will keep on a coming!

[Dan Da Man]

Mitt vs Mitt wrote:

Ur all f'd up get over it he won the lection nothing more you can do!

Here's another one that has his hand out for all the freebies. Too lazy to work, so let the taxpayers support you.

[Marisa]

Dan Da Man wrote:

<quoted text>Here's another one that has his hand out for all the freebies. Too lazy to work, so let the taxpayers support you.

Yawn!!!!!!!!