City considers smoke laws
Join the discussion below, or Read more at San Mateo Daily Journal.
#1 Apr 13, 2010
Non Smoking establishments are very nice, However San Bruno needs to weigh both the financial cost to the city to enforce the laws, as well as possible loss of tax revenue as a result of laws
#2 Apr 14, 2010
Non-Smoking may be nice however there should be choices !! Smoking OR Non-Smoking.
#3 Apr 15, 2010
If it shortens my life, i ban it. if it makes my life harder, then pass taxes on it.
#4 Apr 16, 2010
Boo to smoking laws
Add your comments below
|My Teen Verbally Abuses Me (Feb '09)||Jan 14||momfor36years||132|
|Man in car exposes himself to woman in Palo Alto||Jan 8||coon dogs||3|
|Why does topix let their moderators harass post...||Dec '16||Yeah yeah||1|
|Palo Alto schools, council take steps to protec...||Dec '16||spytheweb||4|
|One way or another, Bay Area sheriffs hold them... (May '08)||Dec '16||ZodiacHoax||4|
|Review: Senior Helpers (Mar '16)||Sep '16||John A||3|
|Baby falls from open 3rd-story window in Foster...||Aug '16||Lavanya||1|
Find what you want!
Search Foster City Forum Now
Copyright © 2017 Topix LLC