Nebraska woman, 41, accused of having...

Nebraska woman, 41, accused of having nightly sex with son when he was in 7th and 8th grades

There are 19 comments on the CW33 Dallas KDAF-TV story from Jan 28, 2010, titled Nebraska woman, 41, accused of having nightly sex with son when he was in 7th and 8th grades. In it, CW33 Dallas KDAF-TV reports that:

A 41-year-old Nebraska woman is accused of having sex nightly with her teenage son when he was in seventh and eighth grades, officials said Wednesday.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at CW33 Dallas KDAF-TV.

“Ya'll be killin me.”

Since: Jan 10

Location hidden

#2 Jan 28, 2010
Nasty. nasty nasty.
pluto

Wichita, KS

#3 Jan 28, 2010
ONE YEAR PROBATION, Amazing what if the dad, with a daughter, they would trow away the key.. Neb, court system maybe.........

“Uzi Does It”

Since: Nov 08

UZILAND

#4 Jan 28, 2010
Kilum wrote:
Nasty. nasty nasty.
Did you ever notice that when the N in "nasty" is replaced with a T, it's pronounced TASTY.

“Hello”

Since: Jun 08

Location hidden

#6 Jan 28, 2010
This is absolutely disgusting.Why didn't the boy say something earlier?Hopefully this child will placed in a more normal home enviroment now.
FBen

Sacramento, CA

#7 Jan 28, 2010
Is the kid retarded? Most normal boys would have knocked her so hard in the face and left the house, plus he had another home to run to. Both are sick.

“Uzi Does It”

Since: Nov 08

UZILAND

#10 Jan 28, 2010
Louis wrote:
<quoted text>Is that the best a dotard like yourself can come up with?
No, but I can put on a pasty, if that is your sort of thing.

“Uzi Does It”

Since: Nov 08

UZILAND

#11 Jan 28, 2010
sandy63 wrote:
This is absolutely disgusting.Why didn't the boy say something earlier?
He was "mr. plow" up in that booty, don't ruin it for him.



Besides, the best society can hope for him is to not make the poor kid feel any worse than he already will.
Second Thoughts

Apple Valley, CA

#12 Jan 28, 2010
Get ready for the call to allow marriage in this perversion, too.
FBen

Sacramento, CA

#13 Jan 28, 2010
How true, with a bad economy millions going to war, obama should addrss this issue and make it legal to be with your son, don't look, don't ask. Maybe they can both join the Marines.

“Ya'll be killin me.”

Since: Jan 10

Location hidden

#14 Jan 29, 2010
Gross how doped up on Ambien must you be to screw your son. Your son. FRUCKIN nasty. I don't get how the dad didn't notice he must have worked nights.

“Hello”

Since: Jun 08

Location hidden

#16 Jan 29, 2010
I agree nastyyyy.Screw your own mom,i guess she must've been desperate.The 64,000 question everyone needs to ask is<why did the kid do this for!!Yuck.
pluto

Wichita, KS

#18 Jan 29, 2010
THE marines wouldent take either in sure>>>>

SEMPER FI
Second Thoughts

Apple Valley, CA

#19 Jan 30, 2010
Kilum wrote:
Gross how doped up on Ambien must you be to screw your son. Your son. FRUCKIN nasty. I don't get how the dad didn't notice he must have worked nights.
That's what they, as a society, used to say about homosexuality. That was until we became desensitized to it. We're one step closer to legalizing this, too.

“Uzi Does It”

Since: Nov 08

UZILAND

#20 Jan 30, 2010
Second Thoughts wrote:
<quoted text>That's what they, as a society, used to say about homosexuality. That was until we became desensitized to it. We're one step closer to legalizing this, too.
which legal concept are you talking about?

1) sex between a parent and their legal aged child,

or,

2) sexual assault of a child.

In my state, two 15 year olds that have willing sex with each other are BOTH gulty of 948.02(2), a class C felony, never mind an adult having sex with a 15 year old.

Here's the exact statutes:

948.02(1)(e)

(e) Whoever has sexual contact with a person who has not attained the age of 13 years is guilty of a Class B felony.

948.02(2)

(2) Second degree sexual assault. Whoever has sexual contact or sexual intercourse with a person who has not attained the age of 16 years is guilty of a Class C felony.

948.02(3)

(3) Failure to act. A person responsible for the welfare of a child who has not attained the age of 16 years is guilty of a Class F felony if that person has knowledge that another person intends to have, is having or has had sexual intercourse or sexual contact with the child, is physically and emotionally capable of taking action which will prevent the intercourse or contact from taking place or being repeated, fails to take that action and the failure to act exposes the child to an unreasonable risk that intercourse or contact may occur between the child and the other person or facilitates the intercourse or contact that does occur between the child and the other person.

“Uzi Does It”

Since: Nov 08

UZILAND

#21 Jan 31, 2010
Kilum wrote:
Gross how doped up on Ambien must you be to screw your son. Your son. FRUCKIN nasty.
Did you ever notice that when the N in "nasty" is replaced with a T, it's pronounced TASTY.
Second Thoughts

Apple Valley, CA

#22 Jan 31, 2010
Richard_ wrote:
<quoted text>which legal concept are you talking about?
1) sex between a parent and their legal aged child,
or,
2) sexual assault of a child.
In my state, two 15 year olds that have willing sex with each other are BOTH gulty of 948.02(2), a class C felony, never mind an adult having sex with a 15 year old.
Here's the exact statutes:
948.02(1)(e)
(e) Whoever has sexual contact with a person who has not attained the age of 13 years is guilty of a Class B felony.
948.02(2)
(2) Second degree sexual assault. Whoever has sexual contact or sexual intercourse with a person who has not attained the age of 16 years is guilty of a Class C felony.
948.02(3)
(3) Failure to act. A person responsible for the welfare of a child who has not attained the age of 16 years is guilty of a Class F felony if that person has knowledge that another person intends to have, is having or has had sexual intercourse or sexual contact with the child, is physically and emotionally capable of taking action which will prevent the intercourse or contact from taking place or being repeated, fails to take that action and the failure to act exposes the child to an unreasonable risk that intercourse or contact may occur between the child and the other person or facilitates the intercourse or contact that does occur between the child and the other person.
So? And this means what in the grand scheme of things?

As I said, we are one step closer to it's legalization.

“Uzi Does It”

Since: Nov 08

UZILAND

#23 Jan 31, 2010
Second Thoughts wrote:
<quoted text>So? And this means what in the grand scheme of things?
As I said, we are one step closer to it's legalization.
First of all, "it's" is contraction for "it is", which means that your sentence reads, "...we are one step closer to it is legislation".

Secondly, I'll repeat my question real slow, as I know you cannot or can't read so fast;

Which legal concept are you talking about?

1) sex between a parent and their legal aged child,

or,

2) sexual assault of a child.

“Uzi Does It”

Since: Nov 08

UZILAND

#24 Jan 31, 2010
Second Thoughts wrote:
<quoted text>So? And this means what in the grand scheme of things?
As I said, we are one step closer to it's legalization.
the reason why i have to ask the question in the two parts that I do, is that as far as I know, there's no law that says a mom or dad can't have sex with their legal aged progeny, do you know of such a law? If so, post the statute.

Otherwise, as far as I know, the law in my state says that anyone who has sexual contact with a 15 year old is going to prison for a felony.

Let me know if your tardishness prevented you from grasping the concepts and I'll be glad to repeat it again, just slower next time.
Second Thoughts

Apple Valley, CA

#25 Jan 31, 2010
Richard_ wrote:
<quoted text>
First of all, "it's" is contraction for "it is", which means that your sentence reads, "...we are one step closer to it is legislation".
Secondly, I'll repeat my question real slow, as I know you cannot or can't read so fast;
Which legal concept are you talking about?
1) sex between a parent and their legal aged child,
or,
2) sexual assault of a child.
Forgive me for the misuse if this contraction, but if that's the only thing that you can find wrong with my statement written ar 12:30 am, then I guess that I'm doing pretty well.

I see, now, that you're resorting to insults as a method of presenting an argument.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Fort Calhoun Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Choosing Israel, Trump Mirrors Reagan May 22 Zionist 2
News On Your Side - Pot Pie Recall (Oct '07) May 16 PRIME RIB 50
News Iowa, Nebraska senators re-introduce immigratio... May 8 Defeat Elizabeth ... 4
where r some gay or bi men that I can meet in o... (Oct '12) May 7 Closerbi 2
Last Post Wins! (Jan '11) May 7 Princess Hey 61
How to Order Prescription Drugs Safely Online May 2 freely 6
Al Sal Apr '17 Kirby 1

Fort Calhoun Jobs

More from around the web

Personal Finance

Fort Calhoun Mortgages