Gun Control or Obamacare which is worse
First Prev
of 2
Next Last

“Armadillo Stew,”

Since: Jan 13

Location hidden

#22 Jan 21, 2013
Yep socialism!
guest

Jonesboro, AR

#23 Jan 22, 2013
Guest wrote:
Neither they are equally important and sorely needed right now. We need less talk and more action.
Commie
Ya gotta be

Ash Flat, AR

#24 Jan 22, 2013
Winter wrote:
<quoted text>
We need Obamacare to pay for preventative care and other medical needs and we need gun control so we don't spend money on stupid people shooting each other over who can get the wing or drumstick. YES WE SHOULD!
West Memphis Moron , those Black brothers of yours are the ones committing the majority of gun violence and they generally are killing each others unless some non black strays into the hood.
Gun control no you can't!
guest

United States

#25 Jan 22, 2013
Banned wrote:
What he did would not have passed through Congress and wasn't the right thing to do. Banning assault weapons and high-cap magazines will do nothing to prevent gun violence. It's nothing more than a stepping stone to infringe on the 2nd Amendment. Some of you might want to inform yourself on this issue before you speak on it publicly. Almost every semi-auto handgun sold since the Brady Bill expired came with one or more high-cap magazines. You can't get them back. There are millions of them on the streets in this country so banning them is pointless. Do you know what the difference is between a high-cap magazines and a magazine that will still be legal after this legislation is made into law? Six bullets.

The shooting in CT did not involve an assault rifle but that kid did have high-cap mags in both pistols. Would the country have been less outraged if he would have only killed 18 kids because he had 12 less bullets? Of course not. What if he had brought an extra magazine for each pistol? He could have killed 10 or 15 more kids with weapons that will still be legal after Obama's restrictions are in place.

School shootings can be stopped completely in this country but not by placing restrictions on the guns used in these killings. Why is it that no one ever walks into a Federal Building and kills 15 people? Because you have to go through metal detectors with armed guards before you get inside a Federal Building, that's why? Why do Federal Employees deserve to be protected while they are at work but your children don't deserve that same protection while they are at school? How many more school shootings have to take place before liberals recognize the need to take real action to stop this from happening again. Federal Buildings, prisons, and other facilities are secure from anyone trying to gain access with a weapon. Why not schools?

Please pull your heads out of your asses and see this problem for what it is so that you can recognize the difference between a real solution and the smoke screen that liberals are using to attempt to infringe on rights that the founding father's of our country viewed important enough to include them in our nation's Constitution.
Well said!

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker
First Prev
of 2
Next Last

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Forrest City Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
First National Bank of Eastern Arkansas 2 hr Truth 7
How stupid is the PD 8 hr Makeyougohmm 4
First Judicial Drug Taskforce 8 hr Curios 30
News Fired Arkansas Cop Sues City for $2.5M (Jan '16) Mon Chat 7
Fire Sub Station Sun Da truth 4
Review: Beauty Gallery (Apr '13) Jul 22 Browneyes 6
screen Jul 21 Need Help! 1

Forrest City Jobs

More from around the web

Personal Finance

Forrest City Mortgages