Be a juror. David Camm Innocent or Guilty?

[I think]

guilty. What does it say about a man whose only living child has nothing to do with him and believes he is guilty? Don't suggest that her mother turned her against him either because she's an adult and old enough to make her own decisions.

[IXSatanXI]

geebee2 wrote:

I have been looking at the case in detail, I'm recording everything at
http://david-camm.wikispaces.com/home
Based on everything I have found so far, I think he is very probably innocent.

You have a right to be wrong.

[Aaron Hollander]

Beyond innocent, if there is such a thing.

I have followed this case from the very beginning.

If you look at only the facts....you will see...period.

http://investigatinginnocence.org/OurFeatured...

[Aaron Hollander]

I think wrote:

guilty. What does it say about a man whose only living child has nothing to do with him and believes he is guilty? Don't suggest that her mother turned her against him either because she's an adult and old enough to make her own decisions.

She is as misinformed as you are...that's all.

Mark Twain - "If you don't read the newspaper, you're uninformed. If you read the newspaper, you're mis-informed."

Same with Kim's parents. Plus, they have the added pressure to believe that David is guilty because until Boney was uncovered, which if David knew about him don't you think he would have ratted him out prior to being sentenced to THREE LIFE SENTENCES!!! But I digress, before they new about Boney they HAD to convince themselves that David was a monster and could do this...once they believed that, nothing will change their minds.

[Aaron Hollander]

The juries found him guilty based on lies...and the convictions were overturned...how can you not see this.

Lou Simms wrote:

<quoted text>I cast the second vote as Guilty. It would be nice indeed if those 24 previous people had of been able to cast stones--maybe we wouldn't be having this Third Trial since one of them might have had a good throwing arm. Didn't those Judges meet on October 4th to discuss his case and whether Henderson would stay or not? It is getting close to November 4th so maybe we will get an answer this week. If Henderson doesn't get to stay, then all this will be even longer and get the witnesses, Jury, ready-they may take a long time debating on where the Jury comes from. Why did the defense submit 8 counties and the Prosecutor only got to submit 5? If I was Henderson, I'd have a long discussion with the Judge about that providing he doesn't care for who they picked. You know, their counties will be all around northern IN or else Indianapolis where his new attorney is from, which would NOT be a neutral site.

[Aaron Hollander]

Most of what you right here is untrue :(

jimmy wrote:

<quoted text> Did not call 911? had blood splater? set out of the game? had GSR,on him? brass? did not get on stand? called about Ins less than 24 hrs after killing? had 380,amo? did not have a good statment of what he did? at the time? A daughter who had what looked like being molested? and a lot of things that look down right bad?

[IXSatanXI]

Aaron Hollander wrote:

Most of what you right here is untrue :(
<quoted text>

You mean most of what they "write" is untrue professor.