Charges filed in copper wire death

Charges filed in copper wire death

There are 43 comments on the The Indianapolis Star story from Jun 27, 2007, titled Charges filed in copper wire death. In it, The Indianapolis Star reports that:

A man faces charges in the death of an accomplice who police say was fatally shocked while the two were trying to steal copper wire.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at The Indianapolis Star.

First Prev
of 3
Next Last
sizzling

Chicago, IL

#1 Jun 27, 2007
I am jolted with the news!(bet you thought that I would write that I was shocked? Such a statement would be sooooo juvenile)
The air is filled with electricity as we await the pleadings of the perp in the courtroom. Innocent or guilty? We can almost feel the undercurrents.

However, first we must ask the important question of the day:
Where were the parents?
Darwin

Heltonville, IN

#2 Jun 27, 2007
I was right!
Opinion

Indianapolis, IN

#3 Jun 27, 2007
What kind of charges? Leaving the scene of fatal stupidity?(Barbequeing
without a permit?)
dumb hoosier

AOL

#4 Jun 27, 2007
Did not know that copper wire had a living life. What a headline. Wonder what 3rd grader wrote it. Anything to save Gannett a couple bucks
2 cents

Carmel, IN

#5 Jun 27, 2007
So Darwin missed one but the cops caught him anyway.
Electrcian

AOL

#6 Jun 27, 2007
Thou shall not steal
Electrcian

AOL

#7 Jun 27, 2007
Thou shal not steal
liDs

United States

#8 Jun 27, 2007
im confused. why is the OLDS being charged with manslaughter? did he kill him, or did the electrical wire kill him bc he was being stupid and tryin to steal something? i dont know...
Slow day

Indianapolis, IN

#9 Jun 27, 2007
Maybe I missed something, but the man who actually touched the copper wires (essential committing suicide) is somehow not responsible for his own death? Did the survivor make him touch the wires? If not, how can he be charged with murder? He's apparently a criminal but shouldn't the crime fit the bill? Or is charging him with a greater crime and locking him behind bars for many years just another tactic to justify the raising of our income taxes?
Amber

Indianapolis, IN

#10 Jun 27, 2007
This is so confusing to me. Why is he being being charged with manslaughter?
unplugged

Chicago, IL

#11 Jun 27, 2007
There was a typo on the list of charges.
Not Manslaughter but
man's laughter
They were having too much fun.
Indy Lawyer

Indianapolis, IN

#12 Jun 27, 2007
Slow day wrote:
Maybe I missed something, but the man who actually touched the copper wires (essential committing suicide) is somehow not responsible for his own death? Did the survivor make him touch the wires? If not, how can he be charged with murder? He's apparently a criminal but shouldn't the crime fit the bill? Or is charging him with a greater crime and locking him behind bars for many years just another tactic to justify the raising of our income taxes?
My guess it they are charging him under some felony murder charge. Essentiall, if someone dies while you are committing a felony, even if you didn't "technically" kill them, you can be charged with their death. The classic example is someone robs a convenience store. A patron is so scared by the robber that he has a heart attack and dies. The robber is charged with robbery of the store and with murder of the patron.

Here's more info: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Felony_murder
Mauri Rahn

United States

#13 Jun 27, 2007
What a couple of losers, well, one loser and one guy who took the dirt nap. To bad there are not more deaths of criminals while they are breaking the law. What did the older one do, tell the other dude "Hey, it is ok to stand in that bucket of water while you steal this copper".

Since: Jun 07

Edinburgh

#14 Jun 27, 2007
FYI - Just in case anyone cares - THERE IS NO COPPER IN ELECTRICAL LINES. Hopefully, that prevents another one.

“We're all Bozos on this bus”

Since: Jan 07

Indianapolis, IN

#15 Jun 27, 2007
What the font? These guys were truly a couple of Dingbats that got Zapf'ed .

Oh, Adobe accusing ME of not giving a Helvetica about THEIR Bold Eras. I don't Courier what you think. I'm not that typeface of a person, you WingDings.
TRAGIC

Chicago, IL

#16 Jun 27, 2007
So how violent was the death? I sure hope the wire didn't suffer much.

I just hate it when copper wire or pipe has to be needlessly killed just so some greedy sumb*tch can recover and melt it down.

Hopefully the other guy gets to fry
Lene

Jeffersonville, IN

#17 Jun 27, 2007
Our judicial system is getting worse and worse, I agree with "slow day". The man didn't kill him, they were stealing together. Some of the laws on the book need to be reviewed because this is rediculous. They are going to accuse a theif of manslaughter. Utterly rediculous. I hope his family gets a great attorney.
Slow day

Indianapolis, IN

#18 Jun 27, 2007
Indy Lawyer wrote:
<quoted text>
My guess it they are charging him under some felony murder charge. Essentiall, if someone dies while you are committing a felony, even if you didn't "technically" kill them, you can be charged with their death. The classic example is someone robs a convenience store. A patron is so scared by the robber that he has a heart attack and dies. The robber is charged with robbery of the store and with murder of the patron.
Here's more info: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Felony_murder
Oh, okay. That's very interesting. I would still argue that these two guys were both committing a crime and one happened to get killed while in the act. As an example, if two people were robbing a store and one held the gun during the crime accidently shot and killed himself, his accomplice would be charged with murder? I could see if there was something the survivor did to aid in his accomplice's death but they were both willing participants in the crime and, therefore, should be held accountable for their own actions. It's unfortunate that this time it was death.
Slow day

Indianapolis, IN

#19 Jun 27, 2007
Indy Lawyer wrote:
<quoted text>
My guess it they are charging him under some felony murder charge. Essentiall, if someone dies while you are committing a felony, even if you didn't "technically" kill them, you can be charged with their death. The classic example is someone robs a convenience store. A patron is so scared by the robber that he has a heart attack and dies. The robber is charged with robbery of the store and with murder of the patron.
Here's more info: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Felony_murder
Hey, I checked out the web site and it seemed that in every case described, an innocent person was killed and not the criminal. This one may be a stretch for the prosecutor.
TRAGIC

Chicago, IL

#20 Jun 27, 2007
Electrcian wrote:
Thou shall not steal
Thou shalt not Copper, either!!!

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker
First Prev
of 3
Next Last

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Flat Rock Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Sub convincing CD let down 6 hr Maddie 1
Moustache 12 hr Daddy 3
Church of Cannabis II 13 hr Pastor Peyote 1
VIDEO of City of Greensburg IN Public meetings (Dec '11) Wed Jean Johannigman 243
News Officers, firefighters still looking for missin... (Aug '14) Aug '14 unowho 2
Election Who do you support for U.S. House in Indiana (D... (Oct '10) Jul '14 Hoosier Hillbilly 92
john gore (Oct '12) Oct '12 Matt Sheckles 3
More from around the web

Flat Rock People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]