To easy

Leominster, MA

#101 Sep 26, 2013
Post #94 is funny. Do you always talk to yourself? Who usually wins the arguement, you or you? Seek some help.
Civil Servant Supporter

Winchendon, MA

#102 Sep 26, 2013
Stamos wrote:
<quoted text>You were given the link and refuse to accept it out of fear of facing reality. Something you're whole existence revolves around, fear of reality and the fact that you've been indoctrinated into a cult of lies. Face your fears and the TRUTH will set you free. Here, maybe if it's presented in a HTML format you'll be able to understand it. I doubt it, but give it a try anyway.
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j....
The two of you dumbazzes continue to stick your big fat conservative heads out your windows and tell the weather from your penthouse views. Shit's happening-in our world, maybe not yours, but you two don't give a fook about the environment anyway. Let's start from here: How do you two dumbazzes enjoy the natural environment? Most likely from an exploitation POV... of course.

You two will dance and dodge around that question just like any question about religion any day.

By the way, I'm Wiccan.

Too funny

Fitchburg, MA

#103 Sep 26, 2013
Civil Servant Supporter wrote:
<quoted text>
The two of you dumbazzes continue to stick your big fat conservative heads out your windows and tell the weather from your penthouse views. Shit's happening-in our world, maybe not yours, but you two don't give a fook about the environment anyway. Let's start from here: How do you two dumbazzes enjoy the natural environment? Most likely from an exploitation POV... of course.
You two will dance and dodge around that question just like any question about religion any day.
By the way, I'm Wiccan
You're a phony army man. And you're not Wiccan, we know who and what you are.
Just Facts

United States

#104 Sep 27, 2013
Ahhhhhhhhhh, Fake Army Man came out to play. Always the same nonsense from you....never anything from you but conservative bashing.

Georges was open last night...you should just go get yourself a nice hotdog, maybe a beer, and chill. The adults are discussing something now, go out in the yard with your green army men and play little boy.
OK will do

Gardner, MA

#105 Sep 27, 2013
Just Facts wrote:
Ahhhhhhhhhh, Fake Army Man came out to play. Always the same nonsense from you....never anything from you but conservative bashing.
Georges was open last night...you should just go get yourself a nice hotdog, maybe a beer, and chill. The adults are discussing something now, go out in the yard with your green army men and play little boy.
Lame! oh look, let's talk about George's hot dogs so I can distract from my failure of integrity where I simply cannot post the study supporting the arguments I made yesterday!

You're a cheapshot low IQ poseur Factless, proven once again that you have no interest in reality, integrity, or as you so often whine cry and moan about, rational discourse.

For YOUR information, the study is just being released as of last night bonehead, so, your fabricated right wing story summizing incorrectly the findings is now proven just that, another attempt by the noise machine to skew the reality with BS!!!

"IPCC report: global warming is 'unequivocal'"

The operable word is UNEQUIVOCAL and just like I said, you're a sucker once again!

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/earth/environment/...

"Drafts of this dense, complex document seen by the BBC indicate that scientists are more convinced than ever that the planet is warming and that humans are responsible for the majority of it, especially over the past 50 years."

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment...

"IPCC report: Scientists are 95% certain humans are responsible for climate change"

https://www.google.com/#q=ipcc+report+today

Sucker, poseur, liar, typical Republican fool!!!!
Droopyballs

Gardner, MA

#106 Sep 27, 2013
Too funny wrote:
<quoted text>
You're a phony army man. And you're not Wiccan, we know who and what you are.
Civil Servant Supporter use to be funny and was my mentor as a Lynch fighter. I don't what happened because all of a sudden Civil is very serious now.

Civil are you okay? You use to be one of us, all against Lynch and now you have changed?
OK will do

Gardner, MA

#107 Sep 27, 2013
From the Faux Snews lying article you posted first post!, I keep telling you, you refuse to understand, THEY LIE TO YOU AND YOU SUCK IT UP EVERY TIME!!!!! SUCKER!!!

" according to a leaked copy of the foremost climate report in the world."

Get it, form a leaked report, they skew the findings and argue the reverse of what it actually say's!!

This is how the noise machine works, you're one of the biggest TOOLS in their pocket and why I call you FACTLESS!!!!!!!!
Lynch

Gardner, MA

#108 Sep 27, 2013
Civil Servant is now part of my team. He saw the corruption first hand.

Everyone else will also join my team as their time will come and they will feel the effects of the corruption in the city.

Thanks Civil for supporting me.
Just Facts

United States

#110 Sep 27, 2013
OK will do wrote:
From the Faux Snews lying article you posted first post!, I keep telling you, you refuse to understand, THEY LIE TO YOU AND YOU SUCK IT UP EVERY TIME!!!!! SUCKER!!!
" according to a leaked copy of the foremost climate report in the world."
Get it, form a leaked report, they skew the findings and argue the reverse of what it actually say's!!
This is how the noise machine works, you're one of the biggest TOOLS in their pocket and why I call you FACTLESS!!!!!!!!
Right on you moron! Your source, The Telegraph in the UK is a better source...you're not even worth poking fun at anymore you moron...bye bye
OK will do

Gardner, MA

#111 Sep 27, 2013
Just Facts wrote:
<quoted text>
Right on you moron! Your source, The Telegraph in the UK is a better source...you're not even worth poking fun at anymore you moron...bye bye
What a poor poor sad loser you are. Forcing ignorant rabbit hole justifications for your BS sucker tool existance.

YOUR source manipulated the truth to suit the opposite conclusions and get their tools (YOU) out there pushing the lie, the Telegraph reported the actual facts.

Since you're FACTLESS, this eludes your thought process.

Nothing to say about how exaclty WRONG you were and how exaclty RIGHT I Was in every post on the subject?

Of course not, unlike every other tactic of yours, acountability is not an option for your lying sucker ass!

I suggest introspection.
OK will do

Gardner, MA

#112 Sep 27, 2013
"Something you're whole existence revolves around, fear of reality and the fact that you've been indoctrinated into a cult of lies. Face your fears and the TRUTH will set you free."

From one of your best friends!!!!! Sucker!
Just Facts

United States

#113 Sep 27, 2013
lets put this together in little pieces so even someone dumb like OKIE DOKIE can understand, although I hold out little hope for it...

The urgent issue in climate science today is not whether man-made global warming is real but whether the climate models that scientists use to predict it are realistic enough to assess future climate change and inform public policy. The real, observable evidence increasingly shows that the models, which are no more than computer simulations based on the data and assumptions that scientists currently think are relevant, are way out of line with the changes that scientists are able to measure. And the gap is widening.

So the computer models that the climatologists are using do not agree with the findings.....hmmm
Just Facts

United States

#114 Sep 27, 2013
Consider some recent science on these matters.

John Christy, a distinguished climate scientist and director of the Earth System Science Center at the University of Alabama in Huntsville (UAH) found that all 73 computer model runs performed by the IPCC as of June 1, 2013 overshoot the observed warming of the tropical atmosphere during the previous 34 years.
And despite the fact that global carbon dioxide emissions are increasing more rapidly than most models assumed (due largely to industrial growth in India and China), the temperatures recorded by the NASA-supported Remote Sensing Systems shows no warming in the earth’s middle atmosphere, or troposphere, over the past 16-plus years.
Just Facts

United States

#115 Sep 27, 2013
So the main increases are where? Oh, in India and China...so that begs the question.....wait for it....

How does penalizing our companies and industries here do anything to change what they are doing in India and China?

Answer...it doesn't, it only makes our companies less competitive!

Lets continue, shall we?
Just Facts

United States

#116 Sep 27, 2013
German climatologist Hans von Storch has found that IPCC climate models project warming trends as low as actual recorded observations only 2% of the time.

So the climate models are only 2% accurate? Wow, that sure is a good reason to regulate our industries into oblivion...

The monthly journal Nature Climate Change reports that over 20 years (1993-2012), the warming trend computed from 117 climate model simulations (0.3°C per decade) is more than twice the observed trend (0.14°C/decade). Over the most recent 15 years (1998-2012), the computer-simulated trend (0.21°C/decade) is more than four times the observed trend (0.05°C/decade)—a trend that is pretty close to a flat line.

These are huge inconsistencies, and they matter because less warming means smaller climate impacts, and less ostensible need for radical changes in the way we live to deal with them.

Lets read that again...THESE ARE HUGE INCONSISTENCIES, AND THEY MATTER BECAUSE LESS WARMING MEANS SMALLER CLIMATE IMPACTS, AND LESS OSTENSIBLE NEED FOR RADICAL CHANGES IN THE WAY WE LIVE TO DEAL WITH THEM.

Also keep in mind that changes we make here have NO IMPACT on what China, India, and other countries do about their contribution to this supposed problem.

lets look further...
Just Facts

United States

#117 Sep 27, 2013
The NAS researchers briefly note the discrepancy between warming projections and observations but then ignore its implications.
Rather than confront the failure of increasingly overstretched climate models, the NAS study emphasizes the agreement between satellite observations and the model-projected combination of warming in the troposphere and cooling in the atmospheric layer above it, the lower stratosphere.

Hmmmm, so they know about the discrepancy but choose to ignore it.
Just Facts

United States

#118 Sep 27, 2013
It’s the match between the computer-projected “fingerprint” and the observed “thermal structure” that supposedly demonstrates a “discernible human influence” on global climate.

But there’s less to this finding than meets the eye, because according to the study, the “human influence” cooling the lower stratosphere is predominantly the presence of man-made ozone depleting substances, not greenhouse gases.

So the reduction in "green house" gases shouldn't even be the goal? Well, I'll be damned.(much sarcasm)

Obama sure has the right idea...regulations to reduce something that isn't even the main contributor to a problem that isn't even being caused by us, and kill our industries in the process...awesome idea!!(much more sarcasm)
Just Facts

United States

#119 Sep 27, 2013
In fact, a study cited by the NAS researchers, found that the “influence of greenhouse gases” on stratospheric temperatures “is not yet clearly identifiable.” Contrary to appearances, they have not really found the smoking gun of man-made global warming.

AND LASTLY...

After all, few prominent skeptics of the sky-is-falling school of global warming actually deny that man-made climate change is real.

What they doubt is that climate change is a “planetary emergency” brought on by rapidly rising projected temperatures, that reducing carbon dioxide emissions would detectably benefit public health and welfare, and that mankind has nothing to fear from carbon taxes, cap-and-trade, renewable energy mandates, and other forms of centralized energy planning.

Those radical forms of social engineering, it turns out, are the real short-term threat of climate change. And the science-policy community that is pushing them is substituting heated rhetoric for real data that doesn’t support their agenda.

Lets say that again!!!

Those radical forms of social engineering, it turns out, are the real short-term threat of climate change. And the science-policy community that is pushing them is substituting heated rhetoric for real data that doesn’t support their agenda.
Just Facts

United States

#120 Sep 27, 2013
SO TO SUMMARIZE...

I completely believe that we each have a moral obligation to minimize our fingerprint and use our resources wisely, but I also temper that with common sense and look at the whole picture, not just what an obviously tainted report from people with an obvious agenda puts forth as being gospel.

I will stand by my statement that global warming has yet to be undeniably proven to be "man-made" and not a normal cyclical event that happens on our planet anyway. Even if it were proven, Americans can do our part, but we should not destroy our country in an effort at fixing a potential problem that should involve the entire world.

OKIE DOKIE should spend his/her time arguing with the Chinese or people in India and see how far he/she will get.

I'm sure they would have some interesting responses.
OK will do

Gardner, MA

#121 Sep 27, 2013
You regurgitating the same spin arguments all over again, REALLY? Pathetic really.

You posted an article that lied, spoke of a study released and argued the oppoisite of what it adtually says.

Now you think I'm going down the rabbit hole of self delusion you live in, PAHLEASE.

You're a lying sack of garbage, never know enought o cut your losses and suffer from Fauz Snews derangement syndrome, sucker.

Best of luck, this thread ended when I slapped the crap out of you in post 105!!!!!

Go ahead, try and steal the higher ground and proclaim victory, you've already lost meathead.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Fitchburg Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Snow 10 hr The Insider 3
Lets pave downtown today! 10 hr The Insider 9
8 charged after shots fired in Fitchburg 11 hr BillyBob 1
Massachusetts town drops plan for ban on tobacc... 13 hr Jtn 6
Upcoming Lynch Committment (Jan '14) 16 hr Tim 95
lynch for mayor 2014 (Apr '12) 23 hr Lynch for Councillor 312
Dan Kirouac live in Fitchburg Nov 24 BillyBob 6

Fitchburg News Video

Fitchburg Dating
Find my Match

Fitchburg People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

Fitchburg News, Events & Info

Click for news, events and info in Fitchburg

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]

NFL Latest News

Updated 4:16 am PST