Who is the stalker ROLLSTONE?

Posted in the Fitchburg Forum

Comments (Page 4)

Showing posts 61 - 80 of80
|
next page >
Go to last page| Jump to page:

Since: Feb 10

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#66
Jul 13, 2013
 

Judged:

2

1

1

Lynch, you are assuming again! You know what assuming does Lynch? Let me break it down for you, assuming makes an a.s.s out of you. LMAO
Lynch for city council

Fitchburg, MA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#68
Jul 30, 2013
 

Judged:

3

3

2

Lynch wrote:
Here is your little BS tyrade! "1. My problem is you, Lynch. You are a serial liar with a proven violent past and you slander people.
4. The incident where you were brutally attacked? oh, do you mean the one where you attacked a cop and a fireman? The one where you stood in the middle of the street screaming "You cops are all done! I'm going to get you all!"? The one where you got probation for 2.5 years? That one? You're funny.
5. The ethics investigation? Of course you've lied about this. You sent them a letter. The ethics commission will give a case number to any complaint they receive, even if it's from a crazy man alleging that the Blue Light making your molars vibrate. Then it goes straight to the crazy file.
6. The names of people being investigated? You make all of this stuff up. Or maybe you're so crazy that you actually believe it. You've posted that you have sent names of your "suspects" to the Chief of Police, the DA and the FBI. Lists that you probably send them once a week. Those don't count.
7. Who am I? What is my involvement with "all of this"? I'm someone who cares about this city. Someone who doesn't want to see you lie about people without being challenged. Someone who thinks that a felon shouldn't be able to slander others whilst ignoring his own history of violence and pretending that all of his troubles are the work of others who are engaged in a huge conspiracy against him. I have no "connection" to anyone. Except for college and the military, I've lived here all of my life. This city has many challenges, but you're not the guy to meet them. You only have one focus, and that is to destroy the cops, the fire department, municipal government and the university. The only saving grace is that any of the voters who don't know you will be able to recognize how crazy you are as soon as they meet you. And they will laugh and vote accordingly.
Your campaign will be a disaster as you won't take it beyond this forum. But, on the positive side, all of your crazy posts are here and will return to haunt you. I'm not going away. "
You seem to have a big mouth but you back up NOTHING with it!!!!! All you do is STALK and HARASS!
We are going to go through it all piece by piece! I will copy all documents onto my facebook! OK , CUPCAKE??
You are harassing me. You are intelligent!

You state LIES! The list of individuals, including the City of Fitchburg, the FFD, The FPD and many others were put on a list of people I had agree not to sue. You are smarter than you put on.

You want to act highly intelligent and them dumb as a stump when common sense thinking is applied!

This deal was a strong arming straight out of the GOOD OLE BOY HANDBOOK! Look at the list of names and entities! Why put together such a list????? Why?

Because they did me wrong and people were going to be held accountable for it!

THEY POINTED TO 1992 AS THE ONLY REASON FOR THIS ENTIRE SITUATION!!

THE RMV POINTED TO 1992 AND THE PHONY FITCHBURG CASE AS REASONS FOR TAKING MY RIGHT TO DRIVE TAKEN AWAY!

Maybe someday you will have the courage that I have had to stand to such POWER!!!But until that day you will remain an anonymous COWARD!
NancyB

United States

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#69
Jul 30, 2013
 

Judged:

3

3

2

Lynch for city council wrote:
<quoted text>
You are harassing me. You are intelligent!
You state LIES! The list of individuals, including the City of Fitchburg, the FFD, The FPD and many others were put on a list of people I had agree not to sue. You are smarter than you put on.
You want to act highly intelligent and them dumb as a stump when common sense thinking is applied!
This deal was a strong arming straight out of the GOOD OLE BOY HANDBOOK! Look at the list of names and entities! Why put together such a list????? Why?
Because they did me wrong and people were going to be held accountable for it!
THEY POINTED TO 1992 AS THE ONLY REASON FOR THIS ENTIRE SITUATION!!
THE RMV POINTED TO 1992 AND THE PHONY FITCHBURG CASE AS REASONS FOR TAKING MY RIGHT TO DRIVE TAKEN AWAY!
Maybe someday you will have the courage that I have had to stand to such POWER!!!But until that day you will remain an anonymous COWARD!
You're pretty funny. But they still took your license, didn't they? So they were right and you are wrong.

Since: Apr 13

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#70
Jul 30, 2013
 

Judged:

2

Driving is not a right, it is a privelege.
Lynch for city councilor

Fitchburg, MA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#71
Jul 30, 2013
 

Judged:

3

3

2

NancyB wrote:
<quoted text>
You're pretty funny. But they still took your license, didn't they? So they were right and you are wrong.
They took my license? How cute!!! What is your standing? Do you believe in the Constitution?

Keep protecting the corrupt! Just because you know them?

How do you feel about an officer filing a false report? Can you answer with honesty??

Come on Nancy, answer truthfully or can you?

It all depends on if the person is an undesirearable???

This is a good thing in society ,huh??

Our lt governor drives at 108 miles an hr on an icy rd flipping his car and he is driving today,huh??

These are the likes whom you protect!
Lynch for city councilor

Fitchburg, MA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#72
Jul 30, 2013
 

Judged:

3

2

2

NancyB wrote:
<quoted text>
You're pretty funny. But they still took your license, didn't they? So they were right and you are wrong.
Your type has succeeded on one thing, fucking the entire system up through your improper labeling of everyone else besides who you know??

Do you know who Sandusky is? He raped young boys and people like you protected him from being caught while putting other helpless boys in harms way!!!

Feel proud , Nancy!! Corruption along the lines of NAZI Germany ruled the day and took my license. Feel good!

Say Heil Hitler Nancy because that is who you support! You have to answer to God for your nastiness as well. Maybe God is "colored"???
Lynch for city councilor

Fitchburg, MA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#73
Jul 30, 2013
 

Judged:

2

2

2

FLRetiree wrote:
Driving is not a right, it is a privilege.
Driving is a privilege. Yes folks, we have privileges in a free society!

This is 100% wrong! A driving license is a right once you pass the safety course. But the corrupt government enjoys not having to follow the Constitution by labeling it a "privilege"!

This is why everything attacks the citizens driving license now because they have the protection to be able to violate and not even have to abide by Constitutional protections.

But don't be too happy donkey as they are about to take your license, LMAO!

You are so comfortable with other citizens having their rights violated?

Even though the license is a privilege it STILL MUST ABIDE BY THE FAIRNESS DOCTRINE!!!!

Do you know the ONLY other privilege quoted in law is a PAROLE HEARING??

So, do you believe that the drivers license should be ruled on along with parole hearings????

Stand up for once!!! Stop standing up for corruption! Or are you involved in it? Did you take undocumented comp time?? Crook!!!

As I thought! It is Okay for you to steal tax money but dam those welfare recipients,huh?? Thought so!!!

Since: Apr 13

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#74
Jul 30, 2013
 

Judged:

4

4

4

Please cite the law that was violated when your license was revoked. Since you've been spouting off about this for so long you must have it handy, chapter and verse. Post it for all to see.
Pietro Rotolo

Buzzards Bay, MA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#75
Jul 30, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Lynch for city councilor wrote:
<quoted text>
Driving is a privilege. Yes folks, we have privileges in a free society!
This is 100% wrong! A driving license is a right once you pass the safety course. But the corrupt government enjoys not having to follow the Constitution by labeling it a "privilege"!
This is why everything attacks the citizens driving license now because they have the protection to be able to violate and not even have to abide by Constitutional protections.
But don't be too happy donkey as they are about to take your license, LMAO!
You are so comfortable with other citizens having their rights violated?
Even though the license is a privilege it STILL MUST ABIDE BY THE FAIRNESS DOCTRINE!!!!
Do you know the ONLY other privilege quoted in law is a PAROLE HEARING??
So, do you believe that the drivers license should be ruled on along with parole hearings????
Stand up for once!!! Stop standing up for corruption! Or are you involved in it? Did you take undocumented comp time?? Crook!!!
As I thought! It is Okay for you to steal tax money but dam those welfare recipients,huh?? Thought so!!!
Explain to us how the RMV did not follow the Constitution during your hearing. And kindly tell us the reason that your license was yanked to begin with. And is this permanent? No nonsense about the GOBN, please. Just the facts, as Jack Webb used to say.

So you went through this process. And I would assume you appealed. Now you assert that the RMV are fascists who don't follow the constitution. Am I correct so far? But the big problem with this, as with most of your nonsense, is that you are the only one that sees it this way. No one else in government, apparently, has agreed with your assessment. Just as you label people "corrupt" without pointing out any statutes that the police, mayor, or FSU president have violated, you can't point to a part of the constitution either.

None of this plays well with voters, by the way.
Hmmmm

Leominster, MA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#76
Jul 30, 2013
 

Judged:

3

3

3

WTF is your fairness doctrine Mr. Lynch? You yourself have admitted that you are not healthy enough to work. In terms that means you are not fit to drive. If you are fit to drive then you can be a pizza delivery boy. That's fair. I think you call it level playing ground.
Hmmmm

Leominster, MA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#77
Jul 30, 2013
 

Judged:

2

2

You claim you walk around knocking on doors all the time so there you go! It's a win win for you. You could knock on a door and say "Hi I'm running for President, Mayor, councilor, chief of police, and President of the glee club did you order a large mushroom pizza?". You earn some $$ and get to talk to potential voters.
Pietro Rotolo

Buzzards Bay, MA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#78
Jul 30, 2013
 
Lynch for city council wrote:
<quoted text>
You state LIES! The list of individuals, including the City of Fitchburg, the FFD, The FPD and many others were put on a list of people I had agree not to sue. You are smarter than you put on.
You want to act highly intelligent and them dumb as a stump when common sense thinking is applied!
This deal was a strong arming straight out of the GOOD OLE BOY HANDBOOK! Look at the list of names and entities! Why put together such a list????? Why?
"Lynch, 42, of 48 Cedar St.,#2, is ordered to not commit any misdemeanor or felony crimes, to abide by any existing harassment orders, and to not publicly comment in writing about the officer, or the officer's family, in relation to the case. Lynch is also barred from pursuing civil action related to the incident against the Fitchburg police, JR's Pub or any of their employees."

This is from the Sentinel story. Notice that it says "Lynch is barred from pursuing civil action." No mention of you agreeing to refrain from suing anyone, as you have asserted. So if this was wrong, if the court did not specifically prohibit you from doing this, where is the clarification or correction? So the only conclusion that we are to draw is that you are not telling the truth. Again (And no mention of the FFD, by the way). And how about abiding by any existing harassment orders? Did the GOBN orchestrate this as well?
Hmmmm

Leominster, MA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#79
Jul 30, 2013
 

Judged:

3

3

2

So Lynch you hate everyone and you're going to press charges because Nazis are following you? Sounds perfectly sane to me.
Lynch for city council

Fitchburg, MA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#80
Jul 30, 2013
 

Judged:

3

3

3

FLRetiree wrote:
Please cite the law that was violated when your license was revoked..
Ok, the Assistant Attorney General investigated and stated that my rights were violated. The hearing officer after hearing my side and reading all the reports stated, "I feel that the other driver should be in front of me today and not you and it seems like this officer has a personal issue". So he told me once the case was dropped in court then he would reissue my license at no cost.

The case was dismissed. The other driver stated, "I do not want to go any further with this situation but the state police will not let it go as they want these guys".

So, I went back to the RMV and the guy was removed from his position there and they will not tell me where he works of if he is still with the RMV.

So, I had another hearing but this time the hearing officer stated I am ruling solely from the State police report. She refused me to be able to testify. So, I appealed and went to the three person panel. At the beginning they stated that 99.9% of those in court were leaving there without a license. So I was called up. They stated the 1992 case and the current case in Fitchburg as reasons why my license should be taking and nothing about the incidence.

I attempted to testify and they stated that I was not able to and that only the other side could testify. They also added that I received a $100 ticket in 1985.

One member was from the AGs office, I stated to her that it seemed like she was versed on the case before the hearing. I explained that the AG was investigating and that it was conflict of interests for her to be there. I also explained that the FBI was investigating the Fitchburg incident.

So, they took it under advisement, they agreed with the second hearing officers' decision. They wanted me to go to a two day class and pay $500 for reinstatement costs. I appealed.

I paid $300 again to appeal to the court. The court was heldin Worcester. I put in a motion to strike the booklet that the AGs attorney filed. It was filled with double and triple copies. I had another persons driving record included and there were 30 blank pages. I also requested for the AGs attorney to be taken off the case due to conflict of interests. The judge stated that I could not argue the facts of the incident at all but only procedure.

The judge accepted my position and disallowed the AG to speak but he never made a ruling on the packet that they filed.

I explained in writing as well as in my testimony that the law was not being applied correctly as the reasons that I was there does not fall under the statute at hand. I also stated that I was not afforded to defend myself at any point in the process besides the initial hearing which was ruled in my favor.

So now you will state that I am stubborn. You will state why not just pay the $500 and the $200 for the class as I already paid $400 plus to appeal.

You know, when we lay down to such Nazi ways then we make a path for further injustices. The law to revoke my license without being afforded a hearing is against our Constitution.

What happened here is I appealed and was making progress as the AG was in my corner. And that AGs name was Allen. I spelled his name wrong and he chastised me for it, he was so straight laced. He was extremely professional as well. I have since been told that he is no longer in the civil rights division but they will not divulge where he is at.

I would need roughly $10,000 to hire an attorney who would be able to first overturn this law. This I am in the process of doing. I am also talking with State reps in an effort to be able to speak at the state house in opposition of this law.

I have been to Governor Devals office twice over this issue. I thought they he would be a champion of civil rights but have found out that he is just an opportunist. I campaigned for him and people would tell me as much then.

So, I have been without my license for roughly 4 years now.
Lynch for city council

Fitchburg, MA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#81
Jul 30, 2013
 

Judged:

3

3

2

Pietro Rotolo wrote:
<quoted text>
"Lynch, 42, of 48 Cedar St.,#2, is ordered to not commit any misdemeanor or felony crimes, to abide by any existing harassment orders, and to not publicly comment in writing about the officer, or the officer's family, in relation to the case. Lynch is also barred from pursuing civil action related to the incident against the Fitchburg police, JR's Pub or any of their employees."
This is from the Sentinel story. Notice that it says "Lynch is barred from pursuing civil action." No mention of you agreeing to refrain from suing anyone, as you have asserted. So if this was wrong, if the court did not specifically prohibit you from doing this, where is the clarification or correction? So the only conclusion that we are to draw is that you are not telling the truth. Again (And no mention of the FFD, by the way). And how about abiding by any existing harassment orders? Did the GOBN orchestrate this as well?
That's it, I have to ask you. Are you stoned? You are like stuck on dumb. There are no existing harassment orders as the judge denied them to continue. They were total nonsense anyway.

Just to state, this is a wider issue at hand here as the citizens in general are denied proper access to fairness and the government does not abide by the Constitution. It is all a sham and this is why the citizens do not trust government.

Look at the "leaker" American stuck in Russia as the US wants to prosecute him for whistle blowing on them. This is the same sort of BS but on a much bigger scale. That guy blew the whistle on Big Brother violating every Americans rights. In other cases the government protects the whistle blower calling them courageous heroes.

My main problem is that I believe in the Constitution as if it were bible. Americans died for this Constitution. And people are taking it as a slight when the government violates the peoples rights.

They want you to just follow and not speak out against injustice.
Hmmmm

Leominster, MA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#82
Jul 30, 2013
 

Judged:

2

2

2

Lets see if I have this correct. You have been banned from parts of the city including FSU and banned from using any road in the state or the country and it's all because cowards, pedophiles and nazis are out to get you? Ok that sure makes sense to me.
Lynch for city council

Fitchburg, MA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#83
Jul 30, 2013
 

Judged:

3

2

2

Hmmmm wrote:
Lets see if I have this correct. You have been banned from parts of the city including FSU and banned from using any road in the state or the country and it's all because cowards, pedophiles and nazis are out to get you? Ok that sure makes sense to me.
Let me tell you, you are going to remember my name. I will make differences for all Americans.

Your compliance with such a corrupt government is a direct insult to all Americans who died for our Constitution. You minimalize their ultimate sacrifice for freedom and equality.

Under your view they have all laid their lives down for not. Respect the Constitution as if it was Bible!!!!!

Are you an American of a Nazi contributor?
Kamien Rolka

Buzzards Bay, MA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#84
Jul 31, 2013
 
Lynch for city council wrote:
<quoted text>
That's it, I have to ask you. Are you stoned? You are like stuck on dumb. There are no existing harassment orders as the judge denied them to continue. They were total nonsense anyway.
Of course you feel that they were nonsense. Of course you will say that the judge "denied them to continue." But the paper said otherwise. Which hasn't been challenged by anyone except you. So how many were there, anyway?
Kamien Rolka

Buzzards Bay, MA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#85
Jul 31, 2013
 
Lynch for city council wrote:
<quoted text>
Ok, the Assistant Attorney General investigated and stated that my rights were violated. The hearing officer after hearing my side and reading all the reports stated, "I feel that the other driver should be in front of me today and not you and it seems like this officer has a personal issue". So he told me once the case was dropped in court then he would reissue my license at no cost.
The case was dismissed. The other driver stated, "I do not want to go any further with this situation but the state police will not let it go as they want these guys".
So, I went back to the RMV and the guy was removed from his position there and they will not tell me where he works of if he is still with the RMV.
So, I had another hearing but this time the hearing officer stated I am ruling solely from the State police report. She refused me to be able to testify. So, I appealed and went to the three person panel. At the beginning they stated that 99.9% of those in court were leaving there without a license. So I was called up. They stated the 1992 case and the current case in Fitchburg as reasons why my license should be taking and nothing about the incidence.
I attempted to testify and they stated that I was not able to and that only the other side could testify. They also added that I received a $100 ticket in 1985.
One member was from the AGs office, I stated to her that it seemed like she was versed on the case before the hearing. I explained that the AG was investigating and that it was conflict of interests for her to be there. I also explained that the FBI was investigating the Fitchburg incident.
I also requested for the AGs attorney to be taken off the case due to conflict of interests. The judge stated that I could not argue the facts of the incident at all but only procedure.
The judge accepted my position and disallowed the AG to speak but he never made a ruling on the packet that they filed.
I explained in writing as well as in my testimony that the law was not being applied correctly as the reasons that I was there does not fall under the statute at hand. I also stated that I was not afforded to defend myself at any point in the process besides the initial hearing which was ruled in my favor.
So now you will state that I am stubborn. You will state why not just pay the $500 and the $200 for the class as I already paid $400 plus to appeal.
You know, when we lay down to such Nazi ways then we make a path for further injustices. The law to revoke my license without being afforded a hearing is against our Constitution.
What happened here is I appealed and was making progress as the AG was in my corner. And that AGs name was Allen. I spelled his name wrong and he chastised me for it, he was so straight laced. He was extremely professional as well. I have since been told that he is no longer in the civil rights division but they will not divulge where he is at.

I have been to Governor Devals office twice over this issue. I thought they he would be a champion of civil rights but have found out that he is just an opportunist. I campaigned for him and people would tell me as much then.
So, I have been without my license for roughly 4 years now.
OK. So you went through the whole process. And the RMV won't tell you where the hearing officer works, which should tell you that they don't want you harassing anyone. And you still don't have your license. Which means that the only person who feels that an injustice was done is you. Not surprising. But what was the incident that triggered this to begin with? What did the officer pull you over for?
Kamien Rolka

Buzzards Bay, MA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#86
Jul 31, 2013
 
Lynch for city council wrote:
<quoted text>
That's it, I have to ask you. Are you stoned? You are like stuck on dumb. There are no existing harassment orders as the judge denied them to continue. They were total nonsense anyway.
So, Lynch, in light of your statement above, let's compare it with one of your other posts:
Lynch for city council wrote:
<quoted text>
In Fitchburg two officers put in restraining/harassment stay away orders. That is it in Fitchburg. And for the record, I NEVER had a restraining order placed on me until this fake incident in 2011.
So, fake (in your eyes only I would assume) or not, there were two restraining orders against you. And how many afterward? And, here's the key thing, the voters will only conclude that you are lying. About something. Won't they?

Tell me when this thread is updated: (Registration is not required)

Add to my Tracker Send me an email

Showing posts 61 - 80 of80
|
next page >
Go to last page| Jump to page:
Type in your comments below
Name
(appears on your post)
Comments
Characters left: 4000
Type the numbers you see in the image on the right:

Please note by clicking on "Post Comment" you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

9 Users are viewing the Fitchburg Forum right now

Search the Fitchburg Forum:
Topic Updated Last By Comments
boycotting new market basket prices 8 hr tim 13
MA Who do you support for U.S. Senate in Massachus... (Oct '10) 15 hr John 4,692
Manager: 'It could be empty tomorrow' Mon Pajama People 1
Fitchburg officer charged with drunken driving ... (Nov '10) Mon Pajama People 50
Fitchburg mural honors environmentalist Marion ... Sun Pajama People 6
FSU calling for community input on Landry Sun joan 6
Dogs from closed Fitchburg shelter are alive an... Jul 19 Pajama People 3
•••
•••

Fitchburg News Video

•••
•••

Fitchburg Jobs

•••
Enter and win $5000
•••
•••

Fitchburg People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

•••

Fitchburg News, Events & Info

Click for news, events and info in Fitchburg
•••

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]
•••