Who do you support for Governor in Oh...
UdintEarnThat

Canton, OH

#20112 Aug 23, 2013
UdintBuildThat wrote:
<quoted text>
Enough to make any democrat politician proud.
Yah, too bad the story wasn't about a creepy old Christian racist who likes groping the little kiddies. Then it would make any republican politician proud.

Since: Aug 12

Atlanta, GA

#20113 Aug 23, 2013
What amazes me is that you could take a group of people who are hard workers and convince them that they should support social programs that were the exact opposite of their own personal convictions. Put a little fear here and there and you can get people to vote any way you want. The democrat voter is basically dumb and lazy.
.
No truer words ever typed.
OMG

Columbus, OH

#20114 Aug 23, 2013
Can you guys start a new thread instead of continually adding to one from 2010? You would think you would have found time to do this a long time ago with all the talk on here which has nothing to do with "Who do you support for governor in Ohio in 2010".
UDintEarnThat

Canton, OH

#20115 Aug 23, 2013
UdintBuildThat wrote:
What amazes me is that you could take a group of people who are hard workers and convince them that they should support social programs that were the exact opposite of their own personal convictions. Put a little fear here and there and you can get people to vote any way you want. The democrat voter is basically dumb and lazy.
.
No truer words ever typed.
Republicans are greedy, racist, kiddie gropers and Bible voting tin foil hat, corporate fetch boy sheep. No truer words need to be spoken because the vast majority of hard working Americans already know it.(Also see last two elections)

Unlike you, I back up my statements with documented facts.

http://armchairsubversive.blogspot.com/

There's what you stand for.

Besides, what does a mom and dad trust fund, hand me down success story like you have when it comes to teaching ANY American about hard work? You didn't earn that, boy. Your pappy did.
UDintEarnThat

Canton, OH

#20116 Aug 23, 2013
http://armchairsubversive.blogspot.com/

Your turn, mouth boy. Show us that long list of Democrats that have been documented molesting children. I would much rather be called "dumb and lazy" than a toddler groper. Wonder what makes you guys feel so strongly about supporting a group of hasbeen child molesters? I didn't know you were that religious.
UDintEarnThat

Canton, OH

#20117 Aug 23, 2013
The GOP loves them some toddlers. No truer words have been spoken on this forum.
KeepItAwayFromTh eKids

Canton, OH

#20118 Aug 23, 2013
So let's see. The agenda we follow makes us "commie" "Liberal" "socialist" "tree huggers".

What does the agenda you follow make you?

http://armchairsubversive.blogspot.com/
xxxrayted

Brook Park, OH

#20119 Aug 23, 2013
OMG wrote:
Can you guys start a new thread instead of continually adding to one from 2010? You would think you would have found time to do this a long time ago with all the talk on here which has nothing to do with "Who do you support for governor in Ohio in 2010".
Do you think you can find something better to do than bother people that are enjoying political discussion and not bothering you one bit?

Maybe you should find a shrink while you're at it too. Tell him your life is so pathetic that something like an active blog is making your life hell. You just can't help yourself.
xxxrayted

Brook Park, OH

#20120 Aug 23, 2013
SmackedDown wrote:
More on Peter Schorsch, the source of your "facts".
University of South Florida political science professor Susan MacManus told SSN, "Peter was one of the brightest students I've ever had, and it was disappointing to watch his deterioration."
Oh no. That's not the only source. It's all over really:

http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/wonkblog/...
xxxretarded

Canton, OH

#20121 Aug 23, 2013
xxxrayted wrote:
<quoted text>
Oh no. That's not the only source. It's all over really:
http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/wonkblog/...
All over it like a Tea Bagger on a toddler?
Old Guy

New Carlisle, OH

#20122 Aug 23, 2013
xxxrayted wrote:
<quoted text>
Oh no. That's not the only source. It's all over really:
http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/wonkblog/...
Thanks for proving my point that the Republicans are using delaying tactics to gum up government ever since Obama took office:

"There’s an interesting question around exactly when this change in norms happened. If you look at the graph, you have three major moments of discontinuity. One, around 1972, that appears to provoke reform of the filibuster rules so cloture is easier to achieve. Another, in the early 1990s, that seems covers the latter half of George H.W. Bush’s administration and the beginning of Bill Clinton’s presidency. And then the practice absolutely skyrockets when Barack Obama takes office."

http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/wonkblog/...

Since: Aug 12

Atlanta, GA

#20123 Aug 23, 2013
UDintEarnThat wrote:
<quoted text>
Besides, what does a mom and dad trust fund, hand me down success story like you have when it comes to teaching ANY American about hard work? You didn't earn that, boy. Your pappy did.
Awwwwwwww you didn't get a mom and pop trust fund? That's too darn bad. Suck it up buttercup. Youll be getting all them there feeebies that you voted for your whole life soon enough... just keep hoping for hope and change.....and click yer heals together.... ROFLMAO
.
And you keep bragging about high moral standards??? You're like a hemophiliac that wants to take up fencing.
xxxrayted

Brook Park, OH

#20124 Aug 23, 2013
Old Guy wrote:
<quoted text>
Thanks for proving my point that the Republicans are using delaying tactics to gum up government ever since Obama took office:
"There’s an interesting question around exactly when this change in norms happened. If you look at the graph, you have three major moments of discontinuity. One, around 1972, that appears to provoke reform of the filibuster rules so cloture is easier to achieve. Another, in the early 1990s, that seems covers the latter half of George H.W. Bush’s administration and the beginning of Bill Clinton’s presidency. And then the practice absolutely skyrockets when Barack Obama takes office."
http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/wonkblog/...
The graph details what you are talking about and the change of rules. But I don't know if you understand the chart.

The chart displays clotures which is a method used by the majority to stop the minority filibuster.

So in this chart (and the other chart I provided) red clotures means that the blue was the party that initiated the filibuster during those years, and of course, the opposite with red party.

I don't want to calculate who filibustered most, when and where. The point of this chart is to display that filibusters have been used by both parties somewhat equally. It's not a tactic that's been abused by one party or the other.
Old Guy

New Carlisle, OH

#20125 Aug 24, 2013
xxxrayted wrote:
<quoted text>
But I don't know if you understand the chart.
What part of the author's conclusion "And then the practice absolutely skyrockets when Barack Obama takes office" don't you understand? Or do you think the person that made the chart and wrote the article is also confused?

http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/wonkblog/...
run41

South Point, OH

#20126 Aug 24, 2013
Yea
Pops

Fort Thomas, KY

#20127 Aug 24, 2013
on this topic/post There are more & more posters that can NOT agree to simply disagree & consequently call other posters diaper wearers,'tea baggers' racists etc with NO basis what so ever other than they are close minded so I will post much less if at all.
Have a good time folks
EatThoseFacts

Canton, OH

#20128 Aug 26, 2013
Waaaaah. I called the Republicans racists. Here's what you call a "baseless" claim...

http://republicansareracists.com/
EatThoseFacts

Canton, OH

#20129 Aug 26, 2013
I also claimed that the GOP like little kids...a whole lot. Baseless? Let's see...

http://armchairsubversive.blogspot.com/
EatThoseFacts

Canton, OH

#20130 Aug 26, 2013
Texas Rep. Ron Paul (R-TX), a libertarian hero, last year said that allowing Social Security to exist is akin to permitting slavery. But during an appearance on MSNBC’s Morning Joe today, Paul admitted to the Huffington Post’s Sam Stein that he collects Social Security checks anyway.
Pops

Fort Thomas, KY

#20131 Aug 26, 2013
EatThoseFacts wrote:
Texas Rep. Ron Paul (R-TX), a libertarian hero, last year said that allowing Social Security to exist is akin to permitting slavery. But during an appearance on MSNBC’s Morning Joe today, Paul admitted to the Huffington Post’s Sam Stein that he collects Social Security checks anyway.
He's been paying in like countless others, why not get some back?
Are you saying that you would decline collecting SS?

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Findlay Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News UF discussion on Islam to address election rhet... Oct '16 Thinking 4
Vote for Donald J Trump Oct '16 pawpaw 2
Tom Scarberry Oct '16 pawpaw 1
Joella Hamlin - anyone know her? Sep '16 Findlay Gurl 1
Looking for Tom Hall any one? Sep '16 serching 1
Weekly rate motels Sep '16 Just wondering 1
Review: Bubbles Pet Salon (Jun '15) Aug '16 Candy Desgrange 2

Findlay Jobs

More from around the web

Personal Finance

Findlay Mortgages