Old Guy

Cincinnati, OH

#26093 Feb 26, 2014
mutt wrote:
<quoted text>
What is evolution based on?(Don't say "science", because scientifically-speaking, it's impossible for life to create itself.) Evolution is based on the fanatical desire to prove that there's no higher power than man. It's the religion of the left.
The fossil record is the most powerful verification of the theory of evolution.

"One of the most famous fossils of all time is Archaeopteryx, which combines feathers and skeletal structures peculiar to birds with features of dinosaurs. A flock's worth of other feathered fossil species, some more avian and some less, has also been found. A sequence of fossils spans the evolution of modern horses from the tiny Eohippus. Whales had four-legged ancestors that walked on land, and creatures known as Ambulocetus and Rodhocetus helped to make that transition [see "The Mammals That Conquered the Seas," by Kate Wong; Scientific American, May]. Fossil seashells trace the evolution of various mollusks through millions of years. Perhaps 20 or more hominids (not all of them our ancestors) fill the gap between Lucy the australopithecine and modern humans."

http://www.scientificamerican.com/article/15-...
Old Guy

Cincinnati, OH

#26094 Feb 26, 2014
mutt wrote:
<quoted text>
Anyone every find out where Obama was during all those hours that the Benghazi embassy was being attacked?
"The claim that Obama was missing during the Benghazi attack has been long debunked. During a February 7 congressional hearing, former Defense Secretary Leon Panetta attested to the fact that the White House was in contact with military officials and was "well-informed" during the attack, as reported by the Associated Press:

Sen. Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., questioned whether Panetta spoke again to Obama after that first meeting. The Pentagon chief said no but that the White House was in touch with military officials and aware of what was happening.

"During the eight-hour period, did he show any curiosity?" Graham asked.

Panetta said there was no question the president was concerned about American lives. Exasperated with Graham's interruptions, Panetta said forcefully, "The president is well-informed about what is going on; make no mistake about it."

General Martin E. Dempsey, the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, also testified that Obama's staff "was engaged with the national military command center pretty constantly" throughout the attack.

The AP also reported that Panetta and Dempsey were meeting with Obama when they learned of the attack and that Obama responded immediately, telling them to "deploy forces as quickly as possible."

http://mediamatters.org/blog/2013/05/08/foxs-...
Canton

Chillicothe, OH

#26095 Feb 26, 2014
Old Guy wrote:
The fossil record is the most powerful verification of the theory of evolution.
Two scientists looking at the same fossil can come up with two different theories about it, and neither one can be proven. The fossil record means absolutely nothing, other than to verify that something lived on the earth at one time.

You still have never explained how your law-defying theory is valid.
woo-boy

Waverly, OH

#26096 Feb 26, 2014
Canton wrote:
<quoted text>
Two scientists looking at the same fossil can come up with two different theories about it, and neither one can be proven. The fossil record means absolutely nothing, other than to verify that something lived on the earth at one time.
You still have never explained how your law-defying theory is valid.
Ahhh- poochie forgot to change back to mutt after using Canton to spill his lies on his Chill-town forum hero Rushie-poo thread. Slippin' a little there from all that constant lying.
woo-boy

Waverly, OH

#26097 Feb 26, 2014
Canton wrote:
<quoted text>
Two scientists looking at the same fossil can come up with two different theories about it, and neither one can be proven. The fossil record means absolutely nothing, other than to verify that something lived on the earth at one time.
You still have never explained how your law-defying theory is valid.
There's that word VERIFY- scientists can....you can't. They may disagree, but they have VERIFIABLE proof.
Republican 101

Van Wert, OH

#26098 Feb 26, 2014
woo-boy wrote:
<quoted text>There's that word VERIFY- scientists can....you can't. They may disagree, but they have VERIFIABLE proof.
And nobody gets tortured and burned at the stake for disagreeing with a scientist.
Too bad Dahmer's morally superior lapdog can't say the same about his religious fanaticism, err, creation science...
Republican 101

Van Wert, OH

#26099 Feb 26, 2014
woo-boy wrote:
<quoted text>Ahhh- poochie forgot to change back to mutt after using Canton to spill his lies on his Chill-town forum hero Rushie-poo thread. Slippin' a little there from all that constant lying.
Could we PLEASE have a link to the lapdog's Rush thread?
It seems like an entertaining read, and as I've said before, I just love watching a rightwing tool completely lose his sh!t online...
Canton

Chillicothe, OH

#26100 Feb 26, 2014
Republican 101 wrote:
And nobody gets tortured and burned at the stake for disagreeing with a scientist.
Disagreeing with an atheist is a different matter, though.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/State_atheism

Sometime you should watch Ben Stein's "Expelled: No Intelligence Allowed", and listen to scientists (including the famous evolutionist, Richard Dawkins) try to explain the theory of evolution in their own words. It's ridiculous. One guy finally goes off on Stein for just asking a couple of basic questions.
Canton

Chillicothe, OH

#26101 Feb 26, 2014
Republican 101 wrote:
Could we PLEASE have a link to the lapdog's Rush thread?
It seems like an entertaining read, and as I've said before, I just love watching a rightwing tool completely lose his sh!t online...
http://www.topix.com/forum/city/chillicothe-o...

Rush is the defacto leader of the conservative movement ... a decent guy who loves America and has dedicated his life to saving it from you liberal commies.
Republican 101

Van Wert, OH

#26102 Feb 26, 2014
Canton wrote:
<quoted text>
Rush is the defacto leader of the conservative movement ... a decent guy who loves America and has dedicated his life to saving it from you liberal commies.
Says every lowlife, tax dodging "patriot" in the country.
But hey, if you "morally superior" brainwashed cannibals want a drug addicted, washed up blimp to be the face of conservative Murrika, that's just fine with me. LOL!
mutt

Van Wert, OH

#26105 Feb 26, 2014
xxxrayted wrote:
<quoted text>
Getting pregnant does not happen to people that watch too much television. It's not just dumb luck. I never said somebody else getting an abortion is my business. What I am saying is that because we do have legal abortions, people are more careless because there is always an easy out.
If we ever want to really cut unwanted pregnancies, then they need to come out with a male birth control pill.
Since you presumably don't have a vagina, and you'll never have to worry about getting pregnant, your opinion about abortion doesn't matter, and you shouldn't be allowed to vote. You don't have any skin in the game. See how that works, lil fascist trucker buddy?
Oh, and you can't have male birth control because it goes against God's will...
Canton

Chillicothe, OH

#26106 Feb 26, 2014
mutt wrote:
Since you presumably don't have a vagina, and you'll never have to worry about getting pregnant, your opinion about abortion doesn't matter, and you shouldn't be allowed to vote. You don't have any skin in the game. See how that works, lil fascist trucker buddy?
Oh, and you can't have male birth control because it goes against God's will...
Republican 101, I hate to be the one to inform you that his opinion does matter. His taxes pay for some of those abortions.
Pops

Cincinnati, OH

#26107 Feb 26, 2014
mutt wrote:
<quoted text>Since you presumably don't have a vagina, and you'll never have to worry about getting pregnant, your opinion about abortion doesn't matter, and you shouldn't be allowed to vote. You don't have any skin in the game. See how that works, lil fascist trucker buddy?
Oh, and you can't have male birth control because it goes against God's will...
Pops is back & you are nuts. I was a single custodial MALE parent in the 80's & 90's when the courts & society leaned strongly for the 'mom's' & it was a legal struggle to do what was right but since you are are so knowing explain why the fathers do not matter. It took TWO to make that child, NOT just the mother. I was the 1st non-medical person to hold each child, I changed more diapers than their 'mom', I feed MORE bottles of milk including breast milk (which their mother pumped), took EVERY so called 2am feeding until there were no more 2am feedings & kept more doctor appointments than the 'mom' & did indeed deliver the 3rd child.
Other than the fact that the mother physically carries a fetus thru gestation, make an effort to convince me that the father has NO . factor in PRO-creation. Has no more or less say in which pregnancy should be terminated or not.
Convince me that the father wishes/opinions do NOT factor in.
Since I have lived the situation you can NOT convince me.
Little Facist dumb a$$.
Pops

Cincinnati, OH

#26108 Feb 26, 2014
mutt wrote:
<quoted text>Since you presumably don't have a vagina, and you'll never have to worry about getting pregnant, your opinion about abortion doesn't matter, and you shouldn't be allowed to vote. You don't have any skin in the game. See how that works, lil fascist trucker buddy?
Oh, and you can't have male birth control because it goes against God's will...
I might add that YOU are a vagina & that fathering a child does in fact create SKIN IN THE GAME of BOTH parents.
Where do you think that the SKIN of the offspring comes from? But from BOTH of the parents.

mutt

Van Wert, OH

#26109 Feb 26, 2014
Pops wrote:
<quoted text>I might add that YOU are a vagina & that fathering a child does in fact create SKIN IN THE GAME of BOTH parents.
Where do you think that the SKIN of the offspring comes from? But from BOTH of the parents.
Well, XXX is admittedly single, sex outside of marriage goes against God's will, and every fetus has a right to be born, then quickly brainwashed into believing "creation science" in public schools.
It's really simple, actually. If you hadn't lived a life of sin, maybe your senile oldass would understand.
You should listen to Rush Limbaugh sometime. He never lies, unlike our Muslim communist president...
Canton

Chillicothe, OH

#26110 Feb 26, 2014
mutt wrote:
You should listen to Rush Limbaugh sometime. He never lies, unlike our Muslim communist president...
That's the first smart thing you've said on here, 101.
mutt

Van Wert, OH

#26111 Feb 26, 2014
Canton wrote:
<quoted text>
That's the first smart thing you've said on here, 101.
Right. If you're a batsh!t crazy cannibal, that is...

Since: Jan 13

Nicholasville, KY

#26112 Feb 26, 2014
Whatever happened to just being responsible for your actions. It takes two to make a child responsibility should be shared equally. Dudes wear a condom, girls get on some form of birth control. People are keeping Maury in TV shows with all this baby daddy bullshit. Be responsible for your choices in life.

Since: Aug 11

Location hidden

#26113 Feb 26, 2014
Old Guy wrote:
It's pretty easy to lose the thread of the conversation here on Topix, especially when conversations sometimes span several days. Here's a brief summary of a recent exchange:
<quoted text>
<quoted text>
<quoted text>
I was responding to your assertion "there is no way Southern Democrats changed their affiliation to Republican", with a concrete example (Strom Thurmond changing from Democrat to Republican) and another link that discussed the transformation of the South in general from Democrat to Republican. Your one sentence reply leads me to believe that you did not read the articles at all, and still don't understand this basic bit of our recent history.
"Though the "Solid South" had been a longtime Democratic Party stronghold due to the Democratic Party's defense of slavery before the American Civil War and segregation for a century thereafter, many white Southern Democrats stopped supporting the party following the civil rights plank of the Democratic campaign in 1948 (triggering the Dixiecrats), the African-American Civil Rights Movement, the passage of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and Voting Rights Act of 1965, and desegregation.
The strategy was first adopted under future Republican President Richard Nixon and Republican Senator Barry Goldwater in the late 1960s. The strategy was successful in winning 5 formerly Confederate states in both the 1964 and 1968 presidential elections. It contributed to the electoral realignment of some Southern states to the Republican Party, but at the expense of losing more than 90 percent of black voters to the Democratic Party. As the twentieth century came to a close, the Republican Party began attempting to appeal to black voters again, though with little success."
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Southern_strateg...
Democrats in the South didn't change to Republican is the point and the Southern Democrats in the 1960's still shared the same views as Democrats like FDR who had no use for Blacks and FDR himself didn't even want to think of having Father Devine living across from him in HydePark, NY when Father Devine made the attempt to purchase a property in HydePark, NY and FDR had it stopped.

October 15, 2012

The Democratic Party's Long History of Racism

Ethel C. Fenig

It was Bull Connor, a member of the Democrat National Committee, who turned the hoses on the marchers in Birmingham, and it was the Republicans who made up the majority that passed the 1964 Civil Rights Act, over the filibuster of such Democrat paragons as William Fulbright and Al Gore Sr.- and Grand Kleagle Byrd.

http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2012/10/t...
mutt

Chillicothe, OH

#26114 Feb 27, 2014
woo-boy wrote:
There's that word VERIFY- scientists can....you can't. They may disagree, but they have VERIFIABLE proof.
If they had verifiable proof, there wouldn't much of a disagreement.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Findlay Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Debate: Marijuana - Findlay, OH (Jul '11) May 5 Joe shmoe 8
David Young Apr 30 Curious 3
News UF students to host African Night Apr '15 zebra 1
Zebadiah Taylor from Kenton Ohio Apr '15 haha 6
News Johnson Rubber says it won't close (Feb '08) Apr '15 Wentworth 26
Review: Time Cutters Lawn & Landscape LLC Mar '15 pam7731 1
Cheri Lynn Brooks (Feb '12) Mar '15 Dodacall 7
More from around the web

Findlay People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]