Canton

Canton, OH

#25401 Feb 13, 2014
mutt wrote:
<quoted text>
Your lack of knowledge and understanding of history is expected.
Tell me about paranoia, Canton ... how many people am I on this forum now?
How's about lil' poochie tells us about how low and insecure a person would have to be to agree with their own posts. Quick, pretend you didn't do it while Jesus isn't watching. Aaaah ha ha ha ha! VOID Smacked that lil' trooper off his high horse...again.(Also see last two presidential elections)
Canton

Canton, OH

#25402 Feb 13, 2014
mutt wrote:
<quoted text>
I doubt that. In order to successfully homeschool, you'd have to want to be with your kids, instead of letting strangers raise them for you.
Or to hide them away from society, because you don't want them to repeat something vile in front of the other kids, like the Bible story of Lot getting drunk and banging his own daughters in a cave...because it was "the end of the world".(Also see majority of Conservative Christians' current view of the world) Ahhhh ha ha ha ha ha! So very VOID, you, and yours.

Since: Jan 13

Lexington, KY

#25403 Feb 13, 2014
xxxrayted wrote:
<quoted text>
What rights do you speak of here? When was marriage ever a right--particularly in the US Constitution? The Constitution doesn't even address marriage.
If your marriage has no barring on anybody else's life, then what harm would it do to you if I wanted to marry my cousin? My dog? My mother or father? My sister has much better healthcare than I do, maybe I could marry her so I have better coverage. And if I do, how would that effect you?
The SSM issue is not how it affects other people, it's about a social standard--one that we've had for hundreds of years not to mention tradition.
Social standard that's funny, look at all the single moms, people on welfare, fathers who don't pay child support and the divorce rate and you say social standard, yeah with this kind of social standard I think same sex marriage probably wont hurt that.
Old Guy

Cincinnati, OH

#25404 Feb 13, 2014
Old Guy wrote:
<quoted text>
Your anger only hurts you, not them.
Proverbs 11:17
"When you’re kind to others, you help yourself;
when you’re cruel to others, you hurt yourself."
http://www.biblegateway.com/passage/...
Reality Speaks wrote:
<quoted text>
then introduce pot to kettle.
Your reply is a bit cryptic, but if you are asking why I don't give this same message to xxxrayted or Canton, it's because they seem to be enjoying this war of words. I don't think you do.

Since: Jan 13

Lexington, KY

#25406 Feb 13, 2014
xxxrayted wrote:
<quoted text>
The "social standards" you posted are not the social standards of the majority of people. They are the social standards of the left. The right has promoted family values, personal responsibilities and a reduction of government dependents.
During the Bush administration, SSM was voted on in over a dozen states. All voted to reject recognition of SSM. Doesn't their vote count? And if there is some sort of Constitutional violation, then what is it and how would it apply to gays and not everybody?
Those are the standards that seem to be the prevailing force and I seriously doubt its all the lefts fault. The vote was made on personal feelings not based on any sense of fairness the government shouldn't be involved in marriage anyway and I think the gist of it is the legal benefits that comes with marriage. Why shouldn't I be entitled to those as well?, after all I work 40hrs and more a week, pay my taxes and my bills and am a productive member of society. The social standards have deteriorated not because gays want to get married but because heterosexuals take the sanctity of marriage for granted.

“Tenured Marxist Radical”

Since: Jan 13

Ivy League-ISIS

#25407 Feb 13, 2014
joanna50 wrote:
<quoted text>Those are the standards that seem to be the prevailing force and I seriously doubt its all the lefts fault. The vote was made on personal feelings not based on any sense of fairness the government shouldn't be involved in marriage anyway and I think the gist of it is the legal benefits that comes with marriage. Why shouldn't I be entitled to those as well?, after all I work 40hrs and more a week, pay my taxes and my bills and am a productive member of society. The social standards have deteriorated not because gays want to get married but because heterosexuals take the sanctity of marriage for granted.
The better way of describing it would be that SSM is seen as morally acceptable because marriage is devalued thanks to no-fault divorce, feminism, social climbing, etc.

As a civil contract, "marriage" is a bad joke. Modern Western society has rejected the values that made it, gay marriage is just a symptom not a cause.
Class

United States

#25408 Feb 13, 2014
I know a couple on N. London St. that cannott stand each other but stay married anyway. So the meaning of marriage is different to some. My husband loves me and we Cherish our Marriage. I think he is also the Greatest. When he goes on plane to visit his parents....( I do not tell people I hope his plane .....well better kept unsaid)... but many have heard what she has said. That is not a Healthy marriage. As far a Gay couples wanting equal rights....well ...let God see that through...because the ones on London St...have said they do not believe in God....How sad....!!!
Class

United States

#25409 Feb 13, 2014
I am a Proud Republican !!!¡
Agree

United States

#25410 Feb 13, 2014
we agree, butch momma runs that house
mutt

Chillicothe, OH

#25411 Feb 13, 2014
Canton wrote:
Yet, strangely, you skipped over the first 20 websites on Google to reach your "common" definition of the term, as was clearly pointed out to you by Old Guy.
If I remember right, Old Guy's links were basically about the Tea Party. I posted links about the actual origins of the word, and what it meant prior to 2009.
Crazzzie is

United States

#25412 Feb 13, 2014
Crazy is not believing your baby dolls are Real and take pictures of them like they are real. You are F........Nuts lady !!! Crazy is writing prison inmates and hoping one day they will be released and be your "True Love".....
Bible

United States

#25413 Feb 13, 2014
Read it, it will give you the answers about gays.

Since: Jan 13

Nicholasville, KY

#25414 Feb 13, 2014
-The-Artist- wrote:
<quoted text>
The better way of describing it would be that SSM is seen as morally acceptable because marriage is devalued thanks to no-fault divorce, feminism, social climbing, etc.
As a civil contract, "marriage" is a bad joke. Modern Western society has rejected the values that made it, gay marriage is just a symptom not a cause.
You raise some good points but as a female I don't think feminism plays a part simply for the fact of economics. The way things are today it takes both the parents working in order to maintain a standard of living that doesn't require government help. Marriage is an institution and depending how one was raised either cherished or taken for granted. I don't think gay marriage is a symptom because gays cant legally marry so therefore haven't taken that right/privilege for granted. Marriage is devalued for the simple fact of its easy to do.
Bible

United States

#25415 Feb 13, 2014
Goodnight and God Bless

Since: Jan 13

Nicholasville, KY

#25416 Feb 13, 2014
Bible wrote:
Read it, it will give you the answers about gays.
I don't need a book written by man to know what's acceptable behavior or not, my conscious has that under control. But thanks you keep believing the lie if it makes you sleep better at night.
mutt

Chillicothe, OH

#25417 Feb 13, 2014
Canton wrote:
Or to hide them away from society, because you don't want them to repeat something vile in front of the other kids, like the Bible story of Lot getting drunk and banging his own daughters in a cave...because it was "the end of the world"....
I wouldn't be bragging about your 12 years of intense theological studies, if I were you. It doesn't say much for your intelligence that you can't remember how a simple story goes, after doing all that studying.
Old Guy

Cincinnati, OH

#25418 Feb 14, 2014
mutt wrote:
<quoted text>
I wouldn't be bragging about your 12 years of intense theological studies, if I were you. It doesn't say much for your intelligence that you can't remember how a simple story goes, after doing all that studying.
He got the essence of the story correct:

"Genesis 19:32-36

King James Version (KJV)

32 Come, let us make our father drink wine, and we will lie with him, that we may preserve seed of our father.

33 And they made their father drink wine that night: and the firstborn went in, and lay with her father; and he perceived not when she lay down, nor when she arose.

34 And it came to pass on the morrow, that the firstborn said unto the younger, Behold, I lay yesternight with my father: let us make him drink wine this night also; and go thou in, and lie with him, that we may preserve seed of our father.

35 And they made their father drink wine that night also: and the younger arose, and lay with him; and he perceived not when she lay down, nor when she arose.

36 Thus were both the daughters of Lot with child by their father."

http://www.biblegateway.com/passage/...
Reality Speaks

Columbus, OH

#25419 Feb 14, 2014
Canton wrote:
<quoted text>
How's about lil' poochie tells us about how low and insecure a person would have to be to agree with their own posts. Quick, pretend you didn't do it while Jesus isn't watching. Aaaah ha ha ha ha! VOID Smacked that lil' trooper off his high horse...again.(Also see last two presidential elections)
last 2 presidential elections have been a disgrace to anyone who died for this country, and anyone who has served.

The last 2 presidential elections also point out America has equal number of freeloaders as those working.

The house of cards is a bon fire.
kuda

Cincinnati, OH

#25420 Feb 14, 2014
mutt wrote:
<quoted text>
I'm not aware of any conservative politician (or republican, for that matter) that would advocate that. However, I found out yesterday that Obama has created his own law that makes it illegal for a business to lay off workers in order to avoid the ObamaCare mandate. Any business that lays off employees, and, as a result, escapes the mandates, has to sign a statement, under penalty of perjury, that they didn't do it because of ObamaCare.
http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2014/feb/...
So, that's illegal on several levels. First, you have Obama making laws. The president isn't the legislative branch -- he's the executive branch. Then, you have the govt threatening to punish a business for making a financial decision it was forced to make because of heavy mandates imposed on it by said govt. Then, the govt bullies the business into silence by threatening legal action, if the business tells the truth about its motives for the lay offs. You don't see these as totalitarian actions?
Are you so hung up on whatever prejudices you have against God and/or republicans, that you're missing what's going on right under your nose?
Roger Ailes creates and writes the “news” at Fox for all of its “personalities” to repeat pretty much verbatim, which is why the words of the scripts become standards. Consider, for example,“train wreck” to describe Obamacare,“Mainstream media,” abbreviated “MSM” to disparage legitimate news media, and “imperial presidency” and “totalitarian” to characterize President Obama as a dictator for exercising executive privilege. Fox feeds a steady diet of its “news” to its faithful who feel especially well informed by access to manufactured information that’s not available through the “MSM,” generally recognized as the respectable and fact-based new sources.

Most of your post is devoted to repeating the “totalitarian President Obama” script, which specifically excludes any hint of mention that he has exercised executive privilege considerably less frequently than any other recent president. It was quite an inclusive, faithfully rendered speech, that illustrates my point.

You then ask, as if rhetorically, if I’m “so hung up on whatever prejudices you have against God and/or republicans, that you're missing what's going on right under your nose?” Despite your implication, I have nothing against any gods or republicans, nor do I believe them to enjoy any special or privileged relationship, and I certainly don’t need to believe Fox’s “news” stories to understand “what’s going on.” Reality's good enough for me and I highly recommend it.
Canton

Canton, OH

#25421 Feb 14, 2014
mutt wrote:
<quoted text>
I wouldn't be bragging about your 12 years of intense theological studies, if I were you. It doesn't say much for your intelligence that you can't remember how a simple story goes, after doing all that studying.
Still playing the word twisty games I see. Let us know when you have graduated beyond agreeing with your own posts under another name. Until then...you know what's coming. Say it with me lil' poochie....VOID

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Findlay Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Review: Time Cutters Lawn & Landscape LLC 15 hr pam7731 1
Zebadiah Taylor from Kenton Ohio Tue just sayin 4
Cheri Lynn Brooks (Feb '12) Mar 26 Dodacall 7
News Cooper worker cited for menacing temp (Jan '12) Mar 9 insider 44
David Young Mar 3 big g 2
pain n other medications Feb '15 findlay 1
Findlay Snitches Feb '15 ThatOneGuy 1
Findlay Dating
Find my Match
More from around the web

Findlay People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]