Reality Speaks

Columbus, OH

#25355 Feb 13, 2014
Canton wrote:
Everyone should have a "Patriot Mark" that states their criminal record, their current health status, and their financial standing. Nothing could be bought or sold without the "Patriot Mark". Only a terrorist would decline the "Patriot Mark". Presto-Proof the Bible was right all along. What a perfect rightwing Christian Conservative agenda.
mark of the beast is not Christian.

Do you ever tire from being wrong 100% of the time?

and I thought animals were dumb until you came along.

Declining your patriot mark is exactly what a Christian would do.
mutt

Chillicothe, OH

#25356 Feb 13, 2014
joanna50 wrote:
There are more than 2% who are gay. Perhaps at the beginning of the outbreak it was considered a gay disease but that is no longer the truth.
Specifically, MSM represent 2% of the population, according to the CDC website that I had linked to and posted a quote from. It explains the AIDS statistics there.
kuda

Cincinnati, OH

#25357 Feb 13, 2014
Reality Speaks wrote:
<quoted text>
mark of the beast is not Christian.
Do you ever tire from being wrong 100% of the time?
and I thought animals were dumb until you came along.
Declining your patriot mark is exactly what a Christian would do.
Yes, Christians would not wear the "mark of the beast" but there's an infinite number of possible marks other than 666. But then, that's not really the point here. It's parody in the spirit of fun in the service of the ongoing battle of reasonably progressive versus right wing extremist political views. Enjoy.
Canton

Canton, OH

#25358 Feb 13, 2014
Reality Speaks wrote:
<quoted text>
mark of the beast is not Christian.
Do you ever tire from being wrong 100% of the time?
and I thought animals were dumb until you came along.
Declining your patriot mark is exactly what a Christian would do.
If the "Mark of the beast" is not Christian, then tell us where it is mentioned, other than the Holy Bible. Also, how completely hilarious that you are trying to tell someone else they are always wrong. We have all seen your batting average. Only a terrorist would decline the "Patriot Mark". Ahh ha ha ha ha!
Reality Speaks

Columbus, OH

#25359 Feb 13, 2014
kuda wrote:
<quoted text>
Yes, Christians would not wear the "mark of the beast" but there's an infinite number of possible marks other than 666. But then, that's not really the point here. It's parody in the spirit of fun in the service of the ongoing battle of reasonably progressive versus right wing extremist political views. Enjoy.
I am not so sure the mark of the beast is going to be a 666 tattoo.

right wing extremist definition being pro life......how extreme. My my the radicals are running wild now.

reasonably progressive meaning not wanting to be held responsible for your own actions?

I see no fun in my being forced by law to pay for your mistakes. You should not pay for mine either.

safety blankets promote bad behavior.
Hey Stupid

Columbus, OH

#25360 Feb 13, 2014
Canton wrote:
<quoted text>
If the "Mark of the beast" is not Christian, then tell us where it is mentioned, other than the Holy Bible. Also, how completely hilarious that you are trying to tell someone else they are always wrong. We have all seen your batting average. Only a terrorist would decline the "Patriot Mark". Ahh ha ha ha ha!
the mark of the beast is that of the devil. Lucifer.

Not Christ.

and yes you are dumber than a rock.
Canton

Canton, OH

#25361 Feb 13, 2014
Securing our borders? Solved by the Patriot Mark. Identity theft? Solved by the Patriot Mark. Illegal immigrants? Solved by the Patriot Mark. Keeping people infected with AIDS away from our Jesus loving children? Solved by the Patriot Mark. Stopping terrorists from roaming around our country? Solved by the Patriot Mark. Proof that the Bible was right all along? Solved by the Patriot Mark. Now ask yourself, whose agenda would a "Patriot Mark" really serve? Now let's think long and hard about how it mentions in the Bible that people will be deceived into following this person who can spout Bible verses at will. I wonder what kind of people could trick this mostly Christian nation, when they are all poised to refuse the "mark of the beast".

Hey, wanna see a video of Sarah Palin telling her church congregation that building a pipeline is "God's will"?

Since: Jan 13

Lexington, KY

#25362 Feb 13, 2014
mutt wrote:
<quoted text>
Specifically, MSM represent 2% of the population, according to the CDC website that I had linked to and posted a quote from. It explains the AIDS statistics there.
Perhaps in 09 that was true but I doubt it was. This 2014 im sure a lot has changed.
Canton

Canton, OH

#25363 Feb 13, 2014
Hey Stupid wrote:
<quoted text>
the mark of the beast is that of the devil. Lucifer.
Not Christ.
and yes you are dumber than a rock.
Oh Reality Speaks. Perhaps my 12 solid years of theological studies is what makes me so dumb on these matters. VOID
Canton

Canton, OH

#25364 Feb 13, 2014
Reality Speaks wrote:
<quoted text>
I am not so sure the mark of the beast is going to be a 666 tattoo.
right wing extremist definition being pro life......how extreme. My my the radicals are running wild now.
reasonably progressive meaning not wanting to be held responsible for your own actions?
I see no fun in my being forced by law to pay for your mistakes. You should not pay for mine either.
safety blankets promote bad behavior.
Not being held responsible for my own actions? You mean blaming the devil for my bad deeds, and pretending a water walking zombie makes all of my ill deeds magically vanish is taking responsibility for my own actions? VOID
Hey Stupid

Columbus, OH

#25365 Feb 13, 2014
Canton wrote:
Securing our borders? Solved by the Patriot Mark. Identity theft? Solved by the Patriot Mark. Illegal immigrants? Solved by the Patriot Mark. Keeping people infected with AIDS away from our Jesus loving children? Solved by the Patriot Mark. Stopping terrorists from roaming around our country? Solved by the Patriot Mark. Proof that the Bible was right all along? Solved by the Patriot Mark. Now ask yourself, whose agenda would a "Patriot Mark" really serve? Now let's think long and hard about how it mentions in the Bible that people will be deceived into following this person who can spout Bible verses at will. I wonder what kind of people could trick this mostly Christian nation, when they are all poised to refuse the "mark of the beast".
Hey, wanna see a video of Sarah Palin telling her church congregation that building a pipeline is "God's will"?
Bring your ID to vote.
Canton

Canton, OH

#25366 Feb 13, 2014
Hey Stupid wrote:
<quoted text>
the mark of the beast is that of the devil. Lucifer.
Not Christ.
and yes you are dumber than a rock.
That's funny, because in the Bible, it says it is a "human number". Guess you know better than the Bible. VOID
Reality Speaks

Columbus, OH

#25367 Feb 13, 2014
Canton wrote:
<quoted text>
Oh Reality Speaks. Perhaps my 12 solid years of theological studies is what makes me so dumb on these matters. VOID
Theological studies?

you mean elementary school.
middle school
and high school.

did you skip kindergarden or the 12th grade?

Are you now Bishop of the church in Canton too?

Who did you sleep with to get that job?
Canton

Canton, OH

#25368 Feb 13, 2014
My parking lot fisherman friend can't even keep his own fairytales straight. Good thing your parents didn't read you the Wizard of Oz when you were a child or you would be preaching to us the evils of flying monkeys in between your death threats.
kuda

Cincinnati, OH

#25369 Feb 13, 2014
Reality Speaks wrote:
<quoted text>
I am not so sure the mark of the beast is going to be a 666 tattoo.
right wing extremist definition being pro life......how extreme. My my the radicals are running wild now.
reasonably progressive meaning not wanting to be held responsible for your own actions?
I see no fun in my being forced by law to pay for your mistakes. You should not pay for mine either.
safety blankets promote bad behavior.
I was not thinking tattoo necessarily. What do you imagine the "mark of the beast" might be?

Not wanting to be held responsible for one's own actions is not a progressive value. It's an absurd misconception based on the faulty premise that helping others relieves them of their personal responsibilities. Good Samaritanism is one of those Christian values shared by many religious traditions. Only the likes of Rand Paul argue that Good Samaritans damage those they assist. Only extremists whine that they're communists. It's only political hyperbole to stir the least insightful among us to fervor sufficient to get them to vote against their own best interest and that of society in general. The faulty thinking behind the extremist rhetoric is that we all have complete control of our lives, so that there's no such thing as bad luck. Whenever misfortune strikes, it's our own fault and we deserve no mercy from others who have no obligation to help their fellow man and that doing so only encourages others to screw up their lives and become deadbeat takers on the public dole. Well, we all know the script and its key words. Basically, what's mine is mine (all mine, mwah-haa-haa) and what's your'n is....

Of course, by writing "reasonably progressive," I was definitely intending to be provocative.
Reality Speaks

Columbus, OH

#25370 Feb 13, 2014
Canton wrote:
My parking lot fisherman friend can't even keep his own fairytales straight. Good thing your parents didn't read you the Wizard of Oz when you were a child or you would be preaching to us the evils of flying monkeys in between your death threats.
so that is how you answer succinct questions regarding your extensive Christian studies you claim you possess?

see your post 2 above this one.

or was it my question of when you dropped out of educating yourself further?

my reply to your post 2 above this one.

I see you choose to spin as always.
Reality Speaks

Columbus, OH

#25371 Feb 13, 2014
kuda wrote:
<quoted text>
I was not thinking tattoo necessarily. What do you imagine the "mark of the beast" might be?
Not wanting to be held responsible for one's own actions is not a progressive value. It's an absurd misconception based on the faulty premise that helping others relieves them of their personal responsibilities. Good Samaritanism is one of those Christian values shared by many religious traditions. Only the likes of Rand Paul argue that Good Samaritans damage those they assist. Only extremists whine that they're communists. It's only political hyperbole to stir the least insightful among us to fervor sufficient to get them to vote against their own best interest and that of society in general. The faulty thinking behind the extremist rhetoric is that we all have complete control of our lives, so that there's no such thing as bad luck. Whenever misfortune strikes, it's our own fault and we deserve no mercy from others who have no obligation to help their fellow man and that doing so only encourages others to screw up their lives and become deadbeat takers on the public dole. Well, we all know the script and its key words. Basically, what's mine is mine (all mine, mwah-haa-haa) and what's your'n is....
Of course, by writing "reasonably progressive," I was definitely intending to be provocative.
provocative stirs debate, and purpose of this site.

old sayings..........

if you don't teach your children to work, then you are teaching them to steal.

if I give you a fish you are dependent on me, but if I teach you to fish you can always feed yourself.

self satisfaction comes from within

man who go to bed with itchy butt wake up with stinky fingers

Debate........

Luck.....I believe in luck, and I am the best weapon to improve my odds in finding luck.

Lucky is walking into a customer, and he is furious with my competition :)

Lucky is finding a $100 bill in your yard after the snow melted reveling it.:)

Lucky not to get hit in car accidents.

getting lucky on valentines day.

above is luck I have been working on recently.
Reality Speaks

Columbus, OH

#25372 Feb 13, 2014
Canton wrote:
<quoted text>
That's funny, because in the Bible, it says it is a "human number". Guess you know better than the Bible. VOID
Lucifer is marked 666.

I give him credit for being more imaginative than tattooing 666 on his mis-guided followers.

And the Bible speaks about the anti Christ's deception skill.

Void is Lucifer's followers..........my opinion due to what I was taught.
Canton

Canton, OH

#25373 Feb 13, 2014
Reality Speaks wrote:
<quoted text>
so that is how you answer succinct questions regarding your extensive Christian studies you claim you possess?
see your post 2 above this one.
or was it my question of when you dropped out of educating yourself further?
my reply to your post 2 above this one.
I see you choose to spin as always.
You got me. My great conspiracy is the fact that I attended a Christian school for 12 years, with extensive theological studies. Boy, you caught me there. I almost got away with my statements being...absolutely...correct? Like I said, you really showed me.
Funny though how you seem to look down on the Christian schooling I was raised with. I couldn't agree with you more.
Canton

Canton, OH

#25374 Feb 13, 2014
Reality Speaks wrote:
<quoted text>
Lucifer is marked 666.
I give him credit for being more imaginative than tattooing 666 on his mis-guided followers.
And the Bible speaks about the anti Christ's deception skill.
Void is Lucifer's followers..........my opinion due to what I was taught.
You are one kookie little fellow. Hey, while we are speaking gibberish about 3000 year old lice infested shepherds, care to show us the verse in the Bible where it states that the number of the beast is Lucifer's number? Bet you can't. That means you are personally making up sub stories to something that is already obviously the fables of old Jewish belief. Nothing unhinged about that...right? Hey, let's teach your personal version to the kids in public school science classes. Then they can all go on a parking lot field trip to fish for Marlin.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Findlay Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
benjamin davis Jan 26 Dawn 2
megan davidson-hunter Jan 25 busy 1
looking Jan 22 looking 1
Kirsten Kelly (Jul '14) Dec '14 usedtobeawaitress 2
Cassity Green (Aug '11) Nov '14 FcukABitchDotNet 3
Review: Vapor Emporia Nov '14 dustin boes 1
adult breast feeding Oct '14 bighoss 1

Winter Storm Warning for Hancock County was issued at February 01 at 4:12AM EST

Findlay Dating
Find my Match
More from around the web

Findlay People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]

NFL Latest News

Updated 8:43 am PST

NFL 8:43AM
Jimmy Haslam: Browns have to get a QB in 2015
Bleacher Report 9:17 AM
Jimmy Haslam Speaks on Browns' 2015 QB Situation
Bleacher Report12:23 PM
Manziel's Teammates Discuss QB's Rookie Season
Yahoo! Sports12:24 PM
Report: Cleveland Browns 'wrecked' by Johnny Manziel's rookie season
NBC Sports12:46 PM
Teammate: Manziel was a "100 percent joke" as a rookie