Limbaugh lashes out at ouster from Rams bidding group

Awww.....

Is it because he's a former drug addict? Or simply because he spews hours of hateful BS all week long?

Not sure.

http://news.yahoo.com/s/afp/20091015/sp_afp/a...

Ian

HATE narrow cold hard garbage in garbage out truth rush nfl mad black bad racist dots shoes filled.

karma?

disco stu

Plainwell, MI

I will admit this is really not fair, but with the baggage that Limbaugh chooses to carry around - how could he NOT expect it?

He got dumped because he was queering the deal for the rest of the investors.

Mongoose

Grand Rapids, MI

You know that singer Fergie that is with the Black Eyed Peas? You know the one that uses the N word, the B word, Ho, and the F word in her songs?
She has been approved as a part owner of the Miami Dolphins. It seems that being accused of racism is only mentioned if you are a conservative commentator.
I was watching ESPN at 2 AM several years ago and I heard Charles Barkley say he hated all white people. I wrote to ESPN about the racist remark and they replied; "that's just Charles, it's no big deal". I have searched for that clip and it is nowhere to be found.
I am so sick of the racism double standard, I could just puke.
Anyone should be able to do whatever they want to do, as long as no laws are being broken. If Fergie wants to own the Dolphins........do it. If Rush wants to own part of the Rams...... do it. What difference does it make?
All the self-righteous liberals want the masses to think they are compassionate and caring, when in fact they are only compassionate to those of their own ilk.

bonds77

Are you saying Fergie is as influential as Rush? Have you EVER listened to one of her songs? I've listened to Rush. I don't care for Fergie, but as I can tell, she's not exactly a hate mongerer. Bad comparison.

Rush is entitled to free speech. That right should be defended to the end.

What he's not entitled to is ownership in a private club. See Jim Balsille and the drama w/ the Phoenix Coyotes. It's not OK for Charles Barkley- who said it was?

Broad brush you're painting with there, my friend.

Ian

"the self-righteous liberals...." were NOT the ones that nixed this deal for Rush. Who has the power to say yes or no to this deal? Is it the Congressional Committee on Fairness in Pro Sports?(isn't Barney on that committee too?). Who is in control of who buys in to what teams where...the "liberals"?

Who DID NOT have the balls (but surely has the power) to allow this deal to go through? It was not the "liberals" Mongoose. Look elsewhere my friend. I'm sure the truth is out there if you care to see it.

SilentRunner

It was the liberal press' repetition of fabricated racial quotations attributed to Limbaugh that has caused the problem. Now legal experts are saying Limbaugh should sue and probably would win. I hope he does sue.

I'd like to see Chris Matthews' thrill run up his leg again on national TV. What an asshole.

Ian

So the liberal press controls who buys what in this country? Your delusional old man.

Let me ask you this...
When/if Rush sues (and wins...and he should win) who will he have sued? The liberal press or those that are RESPONSIBLE for him being cut from the deal?

Here is my guess...
If he wins the case he will have gone after the responsible parties in this deal...it will NOT be the liberal press he sues.

IF he sues the liberal press for nixing this deal...he will NOT win. It will be thrown out. They are NOT responsible. Even a dummy knows this...right bdwg?

Wanna place some bets?

bdwg

he will sue the people who attributed quotes to him (that they can't source - you know how that works don't you Ian?) and that would be the liberal media. hmmmmmmm.... you make the call, FOOL. even an Ian would know that....

he told the main person in the group that he would have to be tossed out of the group - because Rush wouldn't back out - they tossed him.

i am glad you keep up on the facts...

Ian

"he may sue the people who attributed quotes to him" for slander, defamation and slander etc.
He wont sues them for nixing the deal...because they didn't nix the deal...duh.
Next Idiot...your turn.

Any takers on the bet?
$5?

Disco stu

"It was the liberal press' repetition of fabricated racial quotations attributed to Limbaugh that has caused the problem." ~ Silent Runner

Yes. Rush is an angel.
An overweight, doctor shoppin, prescription pill-poppin, thrice married, angel.

Limbaugh will sue the investment group that dropped him (and that's his prerogative)- Not the news agencies that quoted his OWN SHOW.

This is just a case of his words coming back to haunt him. Next time, maybe he should keep his head down until AFTER the deal goes through?

SilentRunner

See, bdwg, they read the news, they understand the news, but they feel compelled to twist it and the result is they look like ignoramuses.

Hey, dimwits: the NFL does NOT have to sell anything to Limbaugh and the group that wants to buy the St. Louis Rams does NOT have to include Limbaugh. Limbaugh knows that, every dipwad knows that. No suit there, fools.

But when someone (the liberal press) libels you and causes you financial loss, YOU HAVE A GODDAMNED SUIT THAT YOU CAN WIN.

Look again, fools: LIBELS you and CAUSES YOU FINANCIAL LOSS. Limbaugh has a suit he may win.

SilentRunner

By the way, the libel that the liberal press is committing is attributing to Limbaugh racist quotations that he did not say and that the liberal press cannot back up with evidence.

Ian

Rush sues "liberal press"...may win a settlement (chances slim)...wont get a dime over "nixed deal" (wrong party sued)...nice try Rush.

bet...takers...any?

btw...
I have not read a word of this news...seriously. I think I saw about 3 minutes worth on The View (you know stay at home Mom and all) maybe a very slight spot on ABC Nightly News on Tues. or Wed Other then that I guessed the rest...so far pretty good guesses huh? You'd have to have been in a cave for the last 15 years to not know/guess this stuff.

Side bet...
Rush wont sue the press for JACK.
He has no case...It's not liable if it's true.
takers?

I'll say it again...
Rush was screwed...by his investment "pals"
They have no balls...or they have some brains...or both...you choose.

SilentRunner

"The View" is a news program!!?? LOL.

It's a cacophony of shrill female voices babbling liberal nonsense most of the time.

That probably accounts, Ian, for your ignorance on most issues.

Mongoose

Again Bonds, I have listened to the Black Eyed Peas and once was enough. I do know this, the liberals will not use the same tape to measure identical gaffs.

You might be interested to know that Juan Williams, a well known liberal commentator agrees with me. He mentions the fact that no matter what people say, it should not impair the ability to buy and sell as the individual sees fit. In fact it may be unconstitutional.

We will wait and see. Also, will someone tell me this: when a Hollywood star/starlet has a drug problem and shops physicians it is a terrible addiction and is emotionally supported by liberals everywhere, but when a conservative has the same addiction he is a criminal? Aren't they both criminals?

SilentRunner

Ian, I've read where most teeny-boppers and young adults watch Jon Stewart of The Daily Show to get their "news"! How pathetic.

Ian

'Goose...I didn't say nary a word about Rush's personal life...and I wont. Drugs? I don't care (some do). What he has said on air and in the press for years...I don't care (but some sure do).

I'll say it again...Rush got screwed.

bdwg

my point being, dimbulb, that he wouldn't sue over him getting booted out of the group, but they he COULD sue (and win) for people saying he said stuff that he didn't say - especially the racist stuff.

none of the people that are "quoting" him can source the quotes. NO ONE. you know how that sourcing thing works, right? that's right - you use other peoples words WITHOUT sourcing them. it's not that you can't - you're too damn lazy to do so. my bad.

ya gonna hit vedwards church for some grub sunday, ian? enjoy it ya hypocrite.

and yes he did get screwed and by the liberal media. i've heard he won't sue. but i have heard he's digging as much dirt up on the ones that "quoted" him, and is reading the info over the radio (with his sources). kinda funny actually. anything he uses is right out of the news/internet/public domain. something else that is perfectly legal, right Ian?

Disco stu