Former Bountiful teacher in court for evidentiary hearing
#1 Apr 7, 2010
I think it is a joke that when men have sex with underage kids, everyone wants them to pay to the max for what they did. me included. so why is there a difference between men and women. She had sex with a minor, she should be held just as accountable as men do!!!
Saint Paul, MN
#2 Apr 8, 2010
you mean we give sex affenders deals now what about all the guys that are charged with rape and ect, i never see them getting deals and the boy should be held responsible, its getting pretty redicolious that all these litte kids do this at the age of 12 and up sying they dont no better hell they are probly having sex earlier then that and are probly looking for benifits of gettin gmoney or somthing make the kids go through counciling till they turn 18 and have the person they were involved with pay for it somthing needs to be done to these kids they have nothing to loose, and why not give there name out it will let others no about what they are about they do to the adult if your old enough to have sex they should be old enough to suffer also and get the counciling instead of moving to the next adult
#3 Apr 8, 2010
I would agree. You know times have changed and kids are surrounded by sex with the internet and all so they are just as to blame as the other person.
#4 Apr 8, 2010
You know, this is rediculous. Yes, I agree these adult women deserve prison time, don't get me wrong. You can put a dress on it, but a pediphile is still a pediphile. However, this kid has had two "conquests" with teachers. Anyone consider looking at this kid's intensions??? For instance, did he target these teachers as a vendetta? He should be evaluated and serve time as well; granted, not as much as the adult teachers, however, he needs to spend some time behind bars.
#5 Apr 10, 2010
This women was a teacher,,,she is not the type to be influenced by a child. If she is she shouldn't be a teacher of children. And she is forty years old, about time she got some sense.
The reason she is not going to trial is because the prosecutor doesn't want the boy to testify in open court. His testimony says he started the sexual encounters and she just went along with him. Still doesn't make it right.
My point is (if I have one) She had sex with a minor not once but several times.
Add your comments below
|why does Ogden 13 gang call Sur 13 scraps? (Feb '12)||Apr 8||Fencer||45|
|Can you be non-LDS in Ogden? (Sep '10)||Apr 7||rob||49|
|North Ogden to make city Nativity display 'more...||Mar 30||straitblow||2|
|Saints (Nov '13)||Mar '15||gab||40|
|The whale in the fields of Farmington is it real?||Dec '14||Fish12||2|
|Utah nude sunbather to fight lewdness charges (Aug '14)||Aug '14||Jay Hova||4|
|Review: Acuknee (Oct '13)||Oct '13||Greg||1|
Find what you want!
Search Farmington Forum Now
Copyright © 2015 Topix LLC